Skip to main content
Topic: Goaltracker 2018 (Read 31644 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #90
So if i'm reading between the lines, we are 0.05% above where we were when Mick got sacked?

Pretty depressing given that all we have to hold on to is the hope that we are on the right path.

Nicely read ;)

Look, it's a goal for the second half of the year that we at least make this percentage a little more respectable. A small goal but sometimes the "baby steps" are the best. ;)

We finished the year on 64.8% in 2015...if we can't beat that we really are in strife.

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #91
After Round 10

2016

Goals 105 Behinds 100- (points for 730 - against 901)
Percentage 81 %

2017
Goals 107 Behinds 86- (points for 728 against 923)
Percentage 78.9 %

2018
(2017 Target 232 Goals- 202 behinds-1594)

Goals-93  Behinds - 94
Percentage  63.2 % (For- 652, Against- 1032)


Goalkickers
(2017 Target Casboult  34)

2017

Casboult 17
Wright 13
Silvagni 8
Gibbs 8

2018

Curnow 14
McKay 12
Casboult 11
Wright 11
Fisher- 7

Despite an improved performance we still dropped 0.1% on percentage this week from what was an already very low base.
That was compounded by our low score and late goals to Geelong.

Goalkicking remains an issue and we're starting to slip off the pace in our chase after last year's total.
Defence has now conceded 100 points more than this stage last year.

On the positive side we did have plenty of shots...just the wrong side of the post.


Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #92
Looks like we're creating more opportunity to score but not as efficient as we were.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #93
Looks like we're creating more opportunity to score but not as efficient as we were.

We used to be a lot more patient when making our inside 50 entries in the past. Painstakingly so in some cases.
We can still see a little bit of that now, but there is more hit and hope now, or trying to force a kick that isn't quite there. We are not skilled enough to do this.

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #94
We used to be a lot more patient when making our inside 50 entries in the past. Painstakingly so in some cases.
We can still see a little bit of that now, but there is more hit and hope now, or trying to force a kick that isn't quite there. We are not skilled enough to do this.

It's not all to do with us, the umpiring has changed again, they are giving the ball carrier less and less time be it from a loose possession or from a mark.

I heard some commentary allegedly from Hocking that they want to be even tighter again. Pretty soon they'll be calling players to play on or for holding the ball before they actually get it!
The Force Awakens!

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #95
After Round 11

2016

Goals 121 Behinds 106-(For 832 - against 965)
Percentage 86.2 %

2017
Goals 117 Behinds 97-(For 799 - against 993)
Percentage 80.5 %

2018
(2017 Target 232 Goals- 202 behinds-1594)

Goals-102  Behinds - 101
Percentage  63.5 % (For- 713, Against- 1123)


Goalkickers
(2017 Target Casboult  34)

2017

Casboult 18
Wright 15
Silvagni 9
Gibbs 9

2018

Curnow 16
M Wright 12
McKay 12
Casboult 11
Fisher- 7

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #96
After 12 games

2016

Goals 133 Behinds 112-(For 910 against 1075)
Percentage 84.7 %

2017
Goals 129 Behinds 108-(For 882 against 1066)
Percentage 82.7 %

2018
(2017 Target 232 Goals- 202 behinds-1594)

Goals-108  Behinds - 111
Percentage  61.9 % (For- 759, Against- 1226)


Goalkickers

(2017 Target Casboult  34)

2017

Casboult 18
Wright 16
Silvagni 11
Gibbs 11

2018


Curnow 16
M Wright 14
McKay 12
Casboult 12

 :(

 

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #97
Casboult better get a move on for that 50 goals he was easily going to kick.

Ironically if we played Harry McKay every game he would go close.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #98
Casboult better get a move on for that 50 goals he was easily going to kick.

Ironically if we played Harry McKay every game he would go close.

Bit hard for forwards to kick goals when your midfield goes AWOL.

Let alone when you're coming off a 5-6 week layoff post injury....shouldn't have been picked in the 1s.
Finals, then 4 in a row!

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #99
Bit hard for forwards to kick goals when your midfield goes AWOL.

Let alone when you're coming off a 5-6 week layoff post injury....shouldn't have been picked in the 1s.

I'm not sure if it was you who made the comment MBB was referring too...

BUT....you have to factor in the fact that we have a very average size when making any such predictions. You can't use our midfield going AWOL as an excuse, as when we have a young inexperienced midfield, it will go AWOL regularly.

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #100
After 13 games

2016

Goals 142 Behinds 123-(For 975 against 1202)
Percentage 81.1 %

2017(Target 224-224-1568)

Goals 137 Behinds 118-(For 940 against 1150 )
Percentage 81.7 %


2018
(2017 Target 232 Goals- 202 behinds-1594)

Goals-117  Behinds - 116
Percentage  62.7 % (For- 818, Against- 1305)


Goalkickers
(2017 Target Casboult  34)

2017


Casboult 20
Wright 17
Silvagni 11
Gibbs 11

2018


Curnow 19
M Wright 14
McKay 12
Casboult 12

Despite the loss we managed to improve our percentage (slightly) this week.

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #101
Thanks for your work on this Lods. Much appreciated.

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #102
Thanks for your work on this Lods. Much appreciated.

Thanks Paul :)
It's actually not a lot of trouble...the 2016 and 2017 are just a copy and paste.
The 2018 is just adding the score from the weekend.
And the Goalkickers are just a copy /paste from Footwire
It takes about five minutes.

Just a shame the figures aren't trending upwards....hopefully we can make a dent in the remaining games.

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #103
Curnow 19
M Wright 14
McKay 12
Casboult 12

Some positives:

We have covered Gibbs’ contribution from 2017.

Two of our top four goalkickers weren’t in the top four last season.

One of our top four goalkickers can’t get a game!

Very much a work in progress but there are some promising signs  :)
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball

Re: Goaltracker 2018

Reply #104
Some positives:

We have covered Gibbs’ contribution from 2017.

Two of our top four goalkickers weren’t in the top four last season.

One of our top four goalkickers can’t get a game!

Very much a work in progress but there are some promising signs  :)

Thats a false positive (the bold one).

He's top 4 for goal kicking because we are so poor at kicking goals as a team and it can be argued that Mckay wouldnt be in anyone elses top 4 goal kickers at another club.

If he was sitting top 4 for goals kicked, and the top two had kicked 100 between them, then this might be a positive.

"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson