Re: Pandemic Management bill. Health and well-being Act 2021.
Reply #172 –
Thank you DJC for some of the almost condescending comments. Appreciate them all. It is all opinion and good feedback. Won’t respond in a way to engage an argument. You have your opinion. I just ask why things can’t be different. Nothing wrong with this in my opinion. Just because the state and county is full of corrupt politicians doesn’t make it right. The world is full of murderers, thieves and rapists. That doesn’t go to say it is correct.
My stepfather lives 1 km from the office in Noble Park of Dan Andrews. He is interested in the bill and some issues regarding award/minimum wage, pensions and a few others questions. Let’s just see what minimum to no response he gets. He is too busy running the state as you said. Maybe running it into the ground? My bad, sorry. Sarcasm from me on that one. Not directed to you. Running a state to me was about serving your constituents. The people that voted your party into power. If you can’t hear them because your own agenda is above all priorities of the people it could be what gets you out of a job eventually. Just saying a possibility.
Your sales pitch has put my opinion in concrete. Thank you. I now understand how it works. He which is too busy to see what goes on around him and hear what people say, is either being ignorant or has a self benefiting agenda. He will never get a vote, nor will his party from me, ever again in history. I will seek a better option. Bad or worse leaves me win choice of bad.
Just to let you know, I didn’t address any mail with “how dare you steal our freedoms “. Seriously DJC. I am not a complete f@ckwit. I was taught by my mother that complements to any individual as a first point of communication engages conversation. They lower a persons guard and get them to listen once you need to hit them with some hard concerns. Then be receptive and accept their views but ask, “why do you feel this is the solution and what other options did you have”? If they repeat a pre-rehearsed response you have heard over and over again, you are going to argue with someone who will never hear your view. They know better than you do. Go ask someone else for another opinion, just to establish an opinion isn’t contradicting facts and that goes the other way around. Then choose what you get out of the conversation.
She said wrong is wrong. Just because it is a fact of live indicates wrong is still wrong. Red tape is a fact of life but could be wrong. Systems and processes might be wrong. Life is all about wrong. Ask the questions why and don’t be afraid to do so. Don’t expect change, but accept positive changes as they do happen on a rare occasion. Be honest. Be brave to ask questions, why, where, who what and when. Don’t believe everything you read. You learn more from talking to someone than reading what they wrote. Hence scripted text, interviews and carefully constructed facts mean little to me many times. If that makes me stupid, then stupid is where I sit with pride and happy to be honest. Bill looks better than it originally was, but as dangerous as the leader that can abuse it at their will. Wait and see what happens next year. I don’t have any answers there. Suspicion of things that could be an issue. My opinion again.
I'm not sure what post you're referring to. I suspect that you're confusing me with another poster.
The fact of the matter is that, while Governments of any persuasion are interested in the opinions of electors, they're not obliged or able to agree with the vast range of opinions that are provided by folk who feel strongly enough to write or send an email. For every elector who proposes a course of action similar to yours, there are 7 or 8 who propose an opposite course of action. That's democracy and it will play out at the next State election.