Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Poll

Pick your best 22 players (22 votes allowed!)

1 - Walker
[ 22 ] (4.4%)
2 - Menzel
[ 18 ] (3.6%)
3 - Murphy
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
4 - Gibbs
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
5 - Judd
[ 5 ] (1%)
6 - Simpson
[ 22 ] (4.4%)
7 - Buckley
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
8 - Kreuzer
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
9 - Cripps
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
10 - Watson
[ 0 ] (0%)
11 - Warnock
[ 0 ] (0%)
12 - Boekhorst
[ 16 ] (3.2%)
13 - Yarran
[ 6 ] (1.2%)
14 - Jones
[ 0 ] (0%)
15 - Docherty
[ 22 ] (4.4%)
16 - Viojo-Rainbow
[ 0 ] (0%)
17 - Rowe
[ 15 ] (3%)
18 - Jaksch
[ 15 ] (3%)
19 - Giles
[ 0 ] (0%)
20 - Holman
[ 7 ] (1.4%)
21 - Sheehan
[ 4 ] (0.8%)
22 - Tutt
[ 1 ] (0.2%)
23 - Henderson
[ 3 ] (0.6%)
24 - Whiley
[ 3 ] (0.6%)
25 - Smith
[ 0 ] (0%)
26 - Foster
[ 0 ] (0%)
27 - Armfield
[ 19 ] (3.8%)
28 - Bell
[ 16 ] (3.2%)
29 - Gowers
[ 0 ] (0%)
30 - Johnson
[ 0 ] (0%)
31 - Dick
[ 1 ] (0.2%)
32 - Graham
[ 20 ] (4%)
33 - Everitt
[ 22 ] (4.4%)
34 - Walsh
[ 1 ] (0.2%)
35 - Curnow
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
36 - Wood
[ 12 ] (2.4%)
37 - Fields
[ 0 ] (0%)
38 - Byrne
[ 7 ] (1.4%)
39 - Thomas
[ 19 ] (3.8%)
40 - Jamison
[ 22 ] (4.4%)
41 - Casboult
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
42 - Tuohy
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
43 - White
[ 14 ] (2.8%)
44 - Carrazzo
[ 6 ] (1.2%)
46 - Ellard
[ 0 ] (0%)
47 - Russell
[ 0 ] (0%)

Total Members Voted: 22

Topic: Pick your best 22 players - Part 8 (Season over - wooden spooners) (Read 118131 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #285 –
Quote from: kruddler on
I was also hoping to highlight during our worst periods that our best 22 was far from easy to select.

That's a fair point....
When a team is performing poorly there are always folk calling for heads to roll or for fringe players to be given a chance.
At such a time you would get a large selection of players suggested as being in the top 22 and a big difference between poster's choices.

Contrast that with our improved form over the last month and the numbers contract to a core group... with not a lot of difference in people's choices.

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #286 –
I have recently left Thomas out because of injury and suspect it will take him a while to come good again. It isn't as easy as I thought earlier when we had more passengers in the squad. Number one spot should go to Barker, but his name isn't on the list. ;D
This digital world is too much for us insects to understand.

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #287 –
I had trouble finding 22 to pick.
DrE is no more... you ok with that harmonica man?

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #288 –
Good to see Juddy's name is still on the pick list.  Even on 1 leg, and formally retired, I still have him ahead of Boekhurst.  I think they had the same number of kicks on Saturday

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #289 –
Quote from: Milhanna13 on
Good to see Juddy's name is still on the pick list.  Even on 1 leg, and formally retired, I still have him ahead of Boekhurst.  I think they had the same number of kicks on Saturday

I tossed up whether i should take it off or not, or if i should make a comment about him at all.

I figured someone would pick him and suggest what you have above, that even on 1 leg he is better than.....

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #290 –
Quote from: kruddler on
I figured someone would pick him and suggest what you have above, that even on 1 leg he is better than.....

Perhaps you could run a poll to see who we think he is still better than  ;)
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #291 –
Quote from: kruddler on
I figured someone would pick him and suggest what you have above, that even on 1 leg he is better than.....

Tie him to Watson. ;D
Firstly we'll have a player with two legs..... ;)

...and a good midfielder who will work hard and can kick the ball a mile :))

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 6 (Back-to-back thumpings 3-14)

Reply #292 –
OK, time to check where we are at with our players after back to back thumpings under the watch of our second coach for the year.

Here are the results for the latest poll....

Starters
3 - Murphy - 29 (4.6%)
4 - Gibbs - 29 (4.6%)
6 - Simpson - 29 (4.6%)
8 - Kreuzer - 29 (4.6%)
9 - Cripps - 29 (4.6%)
15 - Docherty - 29 (4.6%)
17 - Rowe - 29 (4.6%)
28 - Bell - 29 (4.6%)
42 - Tuohy - 29 (4.6%)
42 - Tuohy - 29 (4.6%)
13 - Yarran - 28 (4.4%)
23 - Henderson - 28 (4.4%)
33 - Everitt - 28 (4.4%)
41 - Casboult - 28 (4.4%)

Probables
2 - Menzel - 27 (4.3%)
7 - Buckley - 26 (4.1%)
40 - Jamison - 26 (4.1%)
27 - Armfield - 25 (3.9%)
35 - Curnow - 25 (3.9%)
32 - Graham - 24 (3.8%)
43 - White - 22 (3.5%)
44 - Carrazzo - 21 (3.3%)

Possibles
36 - Wood - 19 (3%)
39 - Thomas - 16 (2.5%)
1 - Walker - 8 (1.3%)

Probably Not
38 - Byrne - 4 (0.6%)
18 - Jaksch - 4 (0.6%)
20 - Holman - 4 (0.6%)
21 - Sheehan - 3 (0.5%)
5 - Judd - 1 (0.2%)
14 - Jones - 1 (0.2%)
22 - Tutt - 1 (0.2%)
34 - Walsh - 1 (0.2%)
46 - Ellard - 1 (0.2%)
47 - Russell - 1 (0.2%)

Unlikely
10 - Watson - 0 (0%)
11 - Warnock - 0 (0%)
12 - Boekhorst - 0 (0%)
16 - Viojo-Rainbow - 0 (0%)
19 - Giles - 0 (0%)
24 - Whiley - 0 (0%)
25 - Smith - 0 (0%)
26 - Foster - 0 (0%)
29 - Gowers - 0 (0%)
30 - Johnson - 0 (0%)
31 - Dick - 0 (0%)
37 - Fields - 0 (0%)


As always, try using this...
http://users.tpg.com.au/jrhass/teamboard.swf

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 6 (Back-to-back thumpings 3-14)

Reply #293 –
Daisy...750k a year for a possible.... :(

Reckon Boekhorst is in the probable category, with Holman...

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 6 (Back-to-back thumpings 3-14)

Reply #294 –
Please correct me if I am wrong, but it seems that there are no new players that have come to the club in the last 2 years that are rated higher than "propably not" ? Not a positive position for us

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 6 (Back-to-back thumpings 3-14)

Reply #295 –
Quote from: Robblues on
Please correct me if I am wrong, but it seems that there are no new players that have come to the club in the last 2 years that are rated higher than "propably not" ? Not a positive position for us

Technically Cripps, Everitt and Docherty have come to the club in the past 2 seasons and have made an impact.
IN WADA WE TRUST

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 6 (Back-to-back thumpings 3-14)

Reply #296 –
Quote from: Robblues on
Please correct me if I am wrong, but it seems that there are no new players that have come to the club in the last 2 years that are rated higher than "propably not" ? Not a positive position for us

Traditionally kids are simply not ready to come into the best 22 in their first 2 years.

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 6 (Back-to-back thumpings 3-14)

Reply #297 –
Walker isn't best 22 based on his past 2 seasons, neither is Thomas.  Menzel barely scrapes in.
DrE is no more... you ok with that harmonica man?

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 6 (Back-to-back thumpings 3-14)

Reply #298 –
Results are in....not many people voted during this time, but voters have remained relatively consistent.

Starters
3 - Murphy -    13 (4.5%)
4 - Gibbs -    13 (4.5%)
4 - Gibbs -    13 (4.5%)
6 - Simpson -    13 (4.5%)
8 - Kreuzer -    13 (4.5%)
9 - Cripps -    13 (4.5%)
15 - Docherty -    13 (4.5%)
33 - Everitt -    13 (4.5%)
40 - Jamison -    13 (4.5%)
41 - Casboult -    13 (4.5%)
42 - Tuohy -    13 (4.5%)
7 - Buckley -    12 (4.2%)
28 - Bell -    12 (4.2%)
32 - Graham -    12 (4.2%)

Probables
2 - Menzel -    11 (3.8%)
23 - Henderson -    11 (3.8%)
27 - Armfield -    11 (3.8%)
13 - Yarran -    10 (3.5%)
39 - Thomas -    10 (3.5%)

Possibles
35 - Curnow -    9 (3.1%)
43 - White -    9 (3.1%)
17 - Rowe -    8 (2.8%)
44 - Carrazzo -    7 (2.4%)
1 - Walker -    6 (2.1%)
36 - Wood -    6 (2.1%)

Probably not
12 - Boekhorst -    4 (1.4%)
20 - Holman -    4 (1.4%)
21 - Sheehan -    4 (1.4%)
38 - Byrne -    4 (1.4%)
25 - Smith -    2 (0.7%)
11 - Warnock -    1 (0.3%)
18 - Jaksch -    1 (0.3%)
31 - Dick -    1 (0.3%)
34 - Walsh -    1 (0.3%)

Unlikely
5 - Judd -    0 (0%)
10 - Watson -    0 (0%)
14 - Jones -    0 (0%)
16 - Viojo-Rainbow -    0 (0%)
19 - Giles -    0 (0%)
22 - Tutt -    0 (0%)
24 - Whiley -    0 (0%)
26 - Foster -    0 (0%)
29 - Gowers -    0 (0%)
30 - Johnson -    0 (0%)
37 - Fields -    0 (0%)
46 - Ellard -    0 (0%)
47 - Russell -    0 (0%)


Time for a revote courtesy of our new found cellar dweller status.
http://users.tpg.com.au/jrhass/teamboard.swf

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 7 (Tanking? - Dead last with 3 to play)

Reply #299 –
Lets try and get some more votes in here