Carlton Supporters Club

@Baggers‍
https://youtu.be/SxBkN5UsPz0?t=3

Binchicken is a snake and has gotten lucky too many times (Ruby princess, etc) and hopefully this is it.

she is doing a good job of saying it's the FEd's fault now and even the language of Chant 'National emergency' - ah ha - so you were both sniping Vic from the sidelines our long lockdown last year and Binchicken even had the audacity to be smug about Vic's success last week or the week before, and now oh it's a national emergency? not your incompetency? nor your no guts to actually do what needed to be done to reign it in before numbers exploded?

HOpefully the good of this will see her and scumo fighting, pair of dirty rats. 

How is anyone still saying Scumo is doing a good job, it is bewildering.  he and binchicken have both ridden a wave of luck and i cant believe people aren't seeing thru their bullcrap.

The problem I have with this #3 perspective is that it is basically stated in ignorance of the flip side of the actions of any vaccine, that is keeping hospitalisation numbers low by reducing / preventing severe disease.

It's a weird sort of an argument, like claiming you can use a gun to stop the enemy killing you, like the cause and event is unidirectional.

It's an argument that you virtually contradict in point #4, but that also is asymmetrical because #4 without explicitly stating it implies the risk from the vaccine and Sars-CoV-2 is equal or proportional, but it isn't.

I think as Mav, Baggers or DJC pointed out before, the correct way to look at this what would be the outcome of 6 Million COVID cases versus 6 Million vaccinations. It's a fair question and a very fair comparison to make, because without vaccination we will eventually get to 6 Million COVID cases based on current Sars-CoV-2 virality, it would only be a matter of time. Should we do that math based on global averages?

Actually, I've heard the #3 argument before, .............. it's a dressed up something like the NRA claiming more guns will mean less crime, where they completely ignore the criminal effects of having more guns available?

25 million double vaccinated people will yield x amount of deaths (currently .009 of 6 million).

Sell your shares, if you're an investor it's yet another failed bet.

Bad luck for those selling boot loads of the fake stuff from gymnasium carparks, getting some comeuppance like the bog roll hoarders!

Biggest beat up ever.

The study was withdrawn before the author was given the opportunity to address/respond to the alleged deficiencies.

And even if dodgy stuff was going on with that study, it doesn't effect the veracity of every other study.

The stuff works but actions like this are uber convenient for big pharma and governments.

https://c19ivermectin.com/

Are there any vaccine related deaths from the second dose?

No idea but the data doesn't lie.  If we continue eliminating covid before we let it rip then the numbers will initially show that the vaccine is as dangerous as the disease and that will absolutely without a shadow of a doubt change once we let it rip (which is a fair accompli).

I don't think that the data will ever show that, it can't ever be as deadly as the virus, it is already an impossibility!

Based on our current level of cases, death and transmission if we wait until everyone is vaccinated to let it rip, that's actually a plausible.  We've had more deaths in our state from the vaccination in 2021 than we have from covid as an example.

What a distorted, egotistical view Gladys presents of NSW's position amongst the states by calling it "a national emergency".