Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #15 – June 17, 2021, 10:57:38 am Carlton vs Sydney in SydneyThis could well be the performance we liked least for this season. It scared the voters off more than any performance of recent times. That includes when we were being thrashed a year or tow back.Trends:[1] As noted earlier, this game really scared the voters away. Only 9 people voted, compared to 16 for the same round last year and 12 to a ‘normal’ loss. More people were voting when we were being thrashed every second week![2] The rating, at 7.26 (D+) was nowhere near the worst for the year. But the voters were tired of our capitulating in the last quarter. The Obvious question is: are we as fit as we are supposed to be? The answer appears to be a ‘no’.[3] 13 players managed a mention, but there were 3 performances that stood out. 13 players is not bad, but …[4] 4 players managed 100 or more votes, which would have been good if others had been good. However, these 4 guys managed to get almost all of the votes.[5] 3 players managed votes from all of the voters. [6] Cripps managed his first BOG performance of the year. Walsh was 2nd. Walsh has been in our top 2 for 9 games so far.Votes:Cripps, Patrick 315Walsh, Sam 230McKay, Harrison 177Weitering, Jacob 101 William, Zac 69Curnow, Edward 48Silvagni, Jack 40Jones, Liam 36Betts, Eddie 32 Newman, Nicholas 12Stocker, Liam 8Docherty, Sam 4Pittonet, MarcProgressive Voting:3150 - Walsh, Sam (0)1345 - Weitering, Jacob (0)1227 - McKay, Harrison (0)1223 - Curnow, Edward (0)1034 - Cripps, Patrick (0)969 - Saad, Adam (0)769 - Jones, Liam (0)739 - Docherty, Sam (0)442 - Betts, Eddie (0)290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)176 - William, Zac (0)157 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)156 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)151 - Silvagni, Jack (0)144 - Pittonet, Marc (0)114 - Cuningham, David (0)104 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)100 - Murphy, Marc (0)78 - Newnes, Jack (0)74 - Casboult, Levi (0)69 - Martin, Jack (0)54 - Owies, Matthew (0)46 - Stocker, Liam (0)35 - Newman, Nicholas (0)26 - Fisher, Zac (0)8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)6 - Setterfield, Will (0)
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #16 – June 17, 2021, 11:58:21 am Carlton vs West CoastAnother disappointment. This year is littered with them.However, the Weagles did beat Richmond the next round, so maybe it wasn't quite as bad as we thought. However, the loss did cause a Review into the entire Football Department.Trends:[1] There were 12 voters this round, an improvement over the last round, but not the sign of success. There were 16 votes for this round last year.[2] The rating was a very topsy-turvy thing, but the disappointment was definite across the board. The overall rating was 6.36, which represents an E+! This is the 2nd lowest of the year.[3] 15 players managed to get a mention, which would normally be an excellent sign. But not this week. It shows that a lot of players did something, but not enough played out the 4 quarters.[4] 4 players managed 100 votes or more this week. This was actually pretty good.[5] Walsh and Weitering were the top 2 again this week. If only a few more players would join them at the top.[6] Walsh and Weitering were also the only 2 players to get votes from all of the voters this week.Votes:Walsh, Sam 257Weitering, Jacob 183Jones, Liam 135Saad, Adam 101 William, Zac 53Cripps, Patrick 48Betts, Eddie 32Silvagni, Jack 29 Fisher, Zac 27Newman, Nicholas 21de Koning, Tom 21Dow, Patrick 19Owies, Matthew 13Setterfield, Will 13Murphy, Marc 03Progressive Voting:1528 - Weitering, Jacob (0)1227 - McKay, Harrison (0)1223 - Curnow, Edward (0)1082 - Cripps, Patrick (0)1070 - Saad, Adam (0)905 - Jones, Liam (0)739 - Docherty, Sam (0)474 - Betts, Eddie (0)290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)229 - William, Zac (0)186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)180 - Silvagni, Jack (0)157 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)156 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)144 - Pittonet, Marc (0)114 - Cuningham, David (0)104 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)103 - Murphy, Marc (0)78 - Newnes, Jack (0)74 - Casboult, Levi (0)69 - Martin, Jack (0)67 - Owies, Matthew (0)56 - Newman, Nicholas (0)53 - Fisher, Zac (0)46 - Stocker, Liam (0)22 - de Koning, Tom (0)20 - Setterfield, Will (0)19 - Dow, Patrick (0)8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #17 – June 19, 2021, 01:14:04 pm I notice Walsh's progressive total is not on this week. Does this mean that we are so certain Walsh will win it this year that we have lost interest and we are now only interested in whether Weitering will be second or not. It is notable that Weitering and Walsh are going to quinella this award two years in a row.
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #18 – June 19, 2021, 02:21:51 pm Quote from: Blue Moon on June 19, 2021, 01:14:04 pmI notice Walsh's progressive total is not on this week. Does this mean that we are so certain Walsh will win it this year that we have lost interest and we are now only interested in whether Weitering will be second or not. It is notable that Weitering and Walsh are going to quinella this award two years in a row. Sorry. My error. I'll fix that. But Walsh is so far in front it isn't funny.
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #19 – June 19, 2021, 02:24:39 pm 3407 - Walsh, Sam (0)1528 - Weitering, Jacob (0)1227 - McKay, Harrison (0)1223 - Curnow, Edward (0)1082 - Cripps, Patrick (0)1070 - Saad, Adam (0)905 - Jones, Liam (0)739 - Docherty, Sam (0)474 - Betts, Eddie (0)290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)229 - William, Zac (0)186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)180 - Silvagni, Jack (0)157 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)156 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)144 - Pittonet, Marc (0)114 - Cuningham, David (0)104 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)103 - Murphy, Marc (0)78 - Newnes, Jack (0)74 - Casboult, Levi (0)69 - Martin, Jack (0)67 - Owies, Matthew (0)56 - Newman, Nicholas (0)53 - Fisher, Zac (0)46 - Stocker, Liam (0)22 - de Koning, Tom (0)20 - Setterfield, Will (0)19 - Dow, Patrick (0)8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)Walsh is almost 2000 ahead.
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #20 – June 19, 2021, 04:09:51 pm What is the world record for this award? Will Walsh break it?
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #21 – June 19, 2021, 07:33:02 pm Quote from: Blue Moon on June 19, 2021, 04:09:51 pmWhat is the world record for this award? Will Walsh break it? Good question. I can look through the ones I have recorded, but I can't do much about the previous ones. I'd say he is going to give top spot in my time one hell of a shake.
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #22 – June 19, 2021, 08:02:14 pm Quote from: crashlander on June 19, 2021, 07:33:02 pm Good question. I can look through the ones I have recorded, but I can't do much about the previous ones. I'd say he is going to give top spot in my time one hell of a shake.Cripps' 2019 season might be worth a look. He dominated everything.
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #23 – July 02, 2021, 11:46:33 am Carlton vs GWSAnother huge disappointment where our players didn’t turn up. We had some good patches, but we just didn’t have the desire on the day.Trends:[1] With another poor effect, the voters were pushed away. Only 10 people voted. This is a very low number.[2] The rating was 5.67, the lowest score for the year. We’ve got used to us being competitive, so this effort was poorly received. 5.67 represents an E-.[3] Thirteen players managed to get a mention, which is reasonable, but the spread of relatives low scores represents the fact that we didn’t have a lot of winners on the day.[4] Only 2 players managed more than 100 votes. They were Matthew Kennedy and Patrick Cripps.[5] This was Sam Walsh’s worst game of the season, with 10th being his lowest finish and 20 being his lowest number of votes. On the other hand, it was Kennedy’s best effort by some margin and his 1st BOG.[6] Only one player, Kennedy, managed to get votes from every voter. That says a hell of a lot. Cripps and Jones attract most voters.Votes:Kennedy, Matthew 249Cripps, Patrick 127Jones, Liam 87McKay, Harrison 72Stocker, Liam 61Pittonet, Marc 55Saad, Adam 52Weitering, Jacob 49Owies, Matthew 46Walsh, Sam 20Dow, Patrick 19Fisher, Zac 12Docherty, Sam 3Progressive Votes:3427 - Walsh, Sam (0)1577 - Weitering, Jacob (0)1299 - McKay, Harrison (0)1223 - Curnow, Edward (0)1209 - Cripps, Patrick (0)1122 - Saad, Adam (0)991 - Jones, Liam (0)742 - Docherty, Sam (0)474 - Betts, Eddie (0)290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)249 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)229 - William, Zac (0)199 - Pittonet, Marc (0)186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)180 - Silvagni, Jack (0)157 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)156 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)114 - Cuningham, David (0)114 - Owies, Matthew (0)106 - Stocker, Liam (0)104 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)103 - Murphy, Marc (0)78 - Newnes, Jack (0)74 - Casboult, Levi (0)69 - Martin, Jack (0)64 - Fisher, Zac (0)56 - Newman, Nicholas (0)36 - Dow, Patrick (0)22 - de Koning, Tom (0)20 - Setterfield, Will (0)8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)Walsh retains his lead of close to 2000 votes. Weitering has solidified 2nd spot, but after that things are relatively close between 3 players.
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #24 – July 05, 2021, 02:55:47 pm It is just so much no9cer doing this after a win!Carlton vs Adelaide at MarvelAfter three ordinary performances in a row, it was very nice to see the Blues get over the line.Trends:[1] We had only 12 people voting for this game, which is hugely down for what is normal for a win. Usually when we win, we get between 17 – 19 voters. 12 voters is a number more common when we lose.Hopefully, we can reverse that process next week.[2] At 8.92, this win was rated among the best we have for the season. A huge increase after last week, where we as bad as we have been this season. Considering the GWS just beat Melbourne, that loss may not have been quite as bad as we first considered. A score of 8.92 is almost a B.[3] 16 players managed a mention this week, which is a significant improvement over last week. [4] 4 players managed more than 100 votes this week, double what we got last week. Not only that, but Sam Walsh again had a standout game that scored very highly.[5] For the 8th time this season Sam Walsh was BOG. That is an outstanding effort. He not been outside the top 10 vote getters in any game this season.[6] Liam Jones deserves a mention for three straight top 3 performances. He is having a fine season.[7] 3 players got votes from every voter, Walsh, Jones and Weitering. Three others got close.[8] Zac Williams continues his improved performances since being moved back into defence. Not yet what we were hoping for, but he is, at least, earning some of his money. Adam Saad, however, is still looking to be our best pick-up at this point. His is attracting votes and is averaging more possessions this year than in any previous one.[9] Paddy Dow continues his resurrection, getting votes for the 3rd time in a row. This was his best effort for the year to date.Votes:Walsh, Sam 334Jones, Liam 227Weitering, Jacob 157Saad, Adam 111William, Zac 85Dow, Patrick 82Stocker, Liam 71Betts, Eddie 63Kennedy, Matthew 63Cripps, Patrick 37de Koning, Tom 37Curnow, Edward 19Newman, Nicholas 19Plowman, Lachlan 11Petrevski - Seton, Sam 7Owies, Matthew 4Progressive Voting:3762 - Walsh, Sam (0)1744 - Weitering, Jacob (0)1299 - McKay, Harrison (0)1246 - Cripps, Patrick (0)1242 - Curnow, Edward (0)1234 - Saad, Adam (0)1218 - Jones, Liam (0)742 - Docherty, Sam (0)537 - Betts, Eddie (0)315 - William, Zac (0)312 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)199 - Pittonet, Marc (0)186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)180 - Silvagni, Jack (0)177 - Stocker, Liam (0)167 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)164 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)118 - Dow, Patrick (0)117 - Owies, Matthew (0)114 - Cuningham, David (0)104 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)103 - Murphy, Marc (0)78 - Newnes, Jack (0)74 - Newman, Nicholas (0)74 - Casboult, Levi (0)69 - Martin, Jack (0)64 - Fisher, Zac (0)59 - de Koning, Tom (0)20 - Setterfield, Will (0)8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #25 – July 17, 2021, 02:41:31 pm Carlton vs Fremantle at the MCGAnother solid effort against a team that had pretentions of finals action. It would have been nice if we could have managed a 4 quarter effort, but we can't have everything.Trends:[1] There were 16 voters this week, which 4 better than last round and 1 less than for the same round last year. Not yet back to our best, but nice to see the numbers on the up.[2] The rating this week was 8.90, which represents a B. This is the 4th best for the season. Does this say something about our season? I think so.[3] For the second week in a row 16 players deserved a mention. This is impressive in anyone’s language. I guess it shows that when we win, it tends to be a real team effort.[4] 4 players managed 100 or more votes this week, also for the second week in a row.[5] It was another Weitering-Walsh Quinella, with those players being in 1st and second spots for the 4th time this season. [6] Four players managed to get votes from every voter, including Paddy Dow for the first time.[7] Jack Martin continues to disappoint. Whether he is fully fit is an issue, as he hasn’t made an impact for more than a quarter. Saad, on the other hand, continues to be more than serviceable. He has been a good pick-up.Votes:Weitering, Jacob 257Walsh, Sam 245Dow, Patrick 170Silvagni, Jack 153Cripps, Patrick 89 Newman, Nicholas 89Jones, Liam 86Kennedy, Matthew 78Stocker, Liam 50Betts, Eddie 42Saad, Adam 28Curnow, Edward 11McKay, Harrison 6Plowman, Lachlan 6de Koning, Tom 6Owies, Matthew 4Progressive Voting:4006 - Walsh, Sam (0)2019 - Weitering, Jacob (0)1335 - Cripps, Patrick (0)1305 - McKay, Harrison (0)1304 - Jones, Liam (0)1261 - Saad, Adam (0)1253 - Curnow, Edward (0)742 - Docherty, Sam (0)579 - Betts, Eddie (0)390 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)333 - Silvagni, Jack (0)315 - William, Zac (0)290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)288 - Dow, Patrick (0)227 - Stocker, Liam (0)199 - Pittonet, Marc (0)186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)172 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)164 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)163 - Newman, Nicholas (0)120 - Owies, Matthew (0)114 - Cuningham, David (0)104 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)103 - Murphy, Marc (0)78 - Newnes, Jack (0)74 - Casboult, Levi (0)69 - Martin, Jack (0)64 - de Koning, Tom (0)64 - Fisher, Zac (0)20 - Setterfield, Will (0)8 - McDonald, Oscar (0) Last Edit: July 17, 2021, 02:43:26 pm by crashlander
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #26 – July 23, 2021, 06:01:57 pm Carlton vs Geelong:One that got away. Not our worst game, but our worst kicking.Trends:[1] There were 12 voters this week, which is pretty average for a loss. Last week we managed 16, but that was a win. We had 13 voters for this round last year.[2] The rating this week was 7.72, which represents a C-. Disappointing, as we had a lot going for us. But our disposal was so ordinary.[3] There were 11 players who managed a mention this week, which is somewhat down from last week. [4] We had 4 players who managed 100 votes or more. Normally, this is a good sign. But this week it isn’t: it meant that we had only a couple of 4 quarter winners.[5] It was another Weitering/Walsh quinella, where both players managed excellent scores. [6] Only two players managed votes from every voter.Votes:Walsh, Sam 364Weitering, Jacob 364Saad, Adam 145Plowman, Lachlan 125Silvagni, Jack 64Newnes, Jack 32de Koning, Tom 29Stocker, Liam 13Curnow, Edward 10Newman, Nicholas 10Williamson, Tom 3Progressive Voting:4370 - Walsh, Sam (0)2383 - Weitering, Jacob (0)1406 - Saad, Adam (0)1335 - Cripps, Patrick (0)1305 - McKay, Harrison (0)1304 - Jones, Liam (0)1262 - Curnow, Edward (0)742 - Docherty, Sam (0)579 - Betts, Eddie (0)397 - Silvagni, Jack (0)390 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)315 - William, Zac (0)298 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)288 - Dow, Patrick (0)240 - Stocker, Liam (0)199 - Pittonet, Marc (0)186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)173 - Newman, Nicholas (0)164 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)120 - Owies, Matthew (0)114 - Cuningham, David (0)110 - Newnes, Jack (0)104 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)103 - Murphy, Marc (0)93 - de Koning, Tom (0)74 - Casboult, Levi (0)69 - Martin, Jack (0)64 - Fisher, Zac (0)20 - Setterfield, Will (0)8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)4 - Williamson, Tom (0)
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #27 – July 29, 2021, 07:30:25 pm Carlton vs. Collingwood! A win for the ages! If we played with the same heart each week, we would never lose!Trends:[1] Only 13 people voted this round! I found it amazing, as we beat our oldest foe, but nobody was interested in voting.Serious, wins usually have between 17 to 19 votes. 13 is only one more than our usual for a loss![2] The rating, 9.36, was the highest we’ve managed this year! That represents a B+. In that, it is unusual. We usually have a couple of games each year which score an overall A. Not his time, but there are 4 rounds left.[3] Sam Walsh was BOG again. This is the 10th time this season he’s been our BOG. Those numbers are Judd-like![4] There were 15 players who got a mention this week, a very solid number. A lot of players did their bit.[5] 4 players managed 100 votes or better this week. That has been typical of our wins this year.[6] There were 1404 votes in total this week, which is the highest for the year. This is something special, considering that only 13 people voted.[7] Only Sam Walsh got votes from everyone this week. The other three top votes getters missed out by at least one voter.[8] Jacob Weitering continues to have a strong season. He has only missed top 10 status for 2 games so far. Liam Stocker can celebrate five games in a row in the top 10, the only five of his career to date. Jack Silvagni has also been significant in voting of late.Votes:Walsh, Sam 464Kennedy, Matthew 281Weitering, Jacob 223Silvagni, Jack 151McKay, Harrison 65Stocker, Liam 58Martin, Jack 50Dow, Patrick 29Curnow, Edward 22de Koning, Tom 22Betts, Eddie 14Fisher, Zac 11Jones, Liam 7Saad, Adam 4Cottrell, Matthew 4Progressive Votes:4834 - Walsh, Sam (0)2606 - Weitering, Jacob (0)1410 - Saad, Adam (0)1369 - McKay, Harrison (0)1335 - Cripps, Patrick (0)1311 - Jones, Liam (0)1284 - Curnow, Edward (0)742 - Docherty, Sam (0)671 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)593 - Betts, Eddie (0)548 - Silvagni, Jack (0)317 - Dow, Patrick (0)315 - William, Zac (0)298 - Stocker, Liam (0)298 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)199 - Pittonet, Marc (0)186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)173 - Newman, Nicholas (0)164 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)120 - Owies, Matthew (0)119 - Martin, Jack (0)115 - de Koning, Tom (0)114 - Cuningham, David (0)110 - Newnes, Jack (0)107 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)103 - Murphy, Marc (0)75 - Fisher, Zac (0)74 - Casboult, Levi (0)20 - Setterfield, Will (0)8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)4 - Williamson, Tom (0)
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #28 – August 05, 2021, 09:47:00 pm Carlton vs North MelbourneIf last round was a win for the ages, this was probably the worst loss of the year. North were on the bottom. However, with the injuries we have, the result was not that ridiculous: it just hurt!Trends:{1] Only 7 people bothered to vote this round, but far the lowest I can ever recall. We usually get about 12 voters when we lose, but this was something else. This round last year we had 18 voters.[2] That said, it was not the lowest rating of the year. 5.93 might not be a great rating, but it is higher than higher than it was in two earlier games. And it was not the lowest number of votes. The rating represents an E.[3] Four players managed 100 + votes, but none of the scores was particularly high. When we win, someone usually get 300+. Top votes this round was just 153.[4] Congratulations to Jack Silvagni for his first BOG. His recent form has been nothing short of excellent.[5] 12 players managed a mention this round, which is not that bad. Unfortunately, many didn’t get many votes. SPS was dropped after garnering 13 votes.[6] Two players, Cripps and Silvagni got votes from every voter. Walsh missed one.[7] Sam Walsh continued his run of top 2 finishes.Votes:Silvagni, Jack 153Walsh, Sam 145Cripps, Patrick 145Newman, Nicholas 111Saad, Adam 77Newnes, Jack 68Curnow, Edward 60 de Koning, Tom 51 Dow, Patrick 43Martin, Jack 17Jones, Liam 13Petrevski - Seton, Sam 13Progressive Votes:4979 - Walsh, Sam (0)2606 - Weitering, Jacob (0)1486 - Saad, Adam (0)1480 - Cripps, Patrick (0)1369 - McKay, Harrison (0)1343 - Curnow, Edward (0)1324 - Jones, Liam (0)742 - Docherty, Sam (0)701 - Silvagni, Jack (0)671 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)593 - Betts, Eddie (0)359 - Dow, Patrick (0)315 - William, Zac (0)298 - Stocker, Liam (0)298 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)283 - Newman, Nicholas (0)199 - Pittonet, Marc (0)186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)178 - Newnes, Jack (0)177 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)166 - de Koning, Tom (0)136 - Martin, Jack (0)120 - Owies, Matthew (0)114 - Cuningham, David (0)107 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)103 - Murphy, Marc (0)75 - Fisher, Zac (0)74 - Casboult, Levi (0)20 - Setterfield, Will (0)8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)4 - Williamson, Tom (0)
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 Reply #29 – August 12, 2021, 08:18:12 pm Carlton vs St. KildaOne of our better wins for the season, considering what we had available. Pity we couldn't play out the four quarters.Trends:[1] There were 14 voters for this game, only 2 above the lowest number we’ve had for a win. With no crowd, and our poor recent form, we probably won’t get better until next year.[2] The rating, 9.83, was the best of the year. This represents an A-. Fair enough too, consider the players we have available. [3] We had 5 players get 100+ votes, the best of the year. That was a real positive in an ordinary season.[4] Very close at the top this week between Walsh and Silvagni. Brilliant efforts from both of them.[5] 16 players had a mention this week, which is also the best we’ve managed since I was doing this job. That was truly magnificent. Pity we can’t manage it each week. It would do much for our mental health. Especially mine.[6] Only [color=limegreen]one[/color] player, Jack Silvagni, got votes from everyone. Two others got votes from all but one.[7] Sam Walsh continues to have top 2 finishes. Brilliant effort from a brilliant player.Votes:Silvagni, Jack 323Walsh, Sam 316Kennedy, Matthew 186McKay, Harrison 169Cripps, Patrick 123Dow, Patrick 70Weitering, Jacob 53Jones, Liam 49O'Brien, Lochie 46Honey, Joshua 39Curnow, Edward 32Williamson, Tom 32Saad, Adam 18Newman, Nicholas 11Fisher, Zac 7Newnes, Jack 4Progressive Voting:5295 - Walsh, Sam (0)2659 - Weitering, Jacob (0)1603 - Cripps, Patrick (0)1538 - McKay, Harrison (0)1504 - Saad, Adam (0)1375 - Curnow, Edward (0)1373 - Jones, Liam (0)1024 - Silvagni, Jack (0)857 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)742 - Docherty, Sam (0)593 - Betts, Eddie (0)429 - Dow, Patrick (0)315 - William, Zac (0)298 - Stocker, Liam (0)298 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)294 - Newman, Nicholas (0)290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)199 - Pittonet, Marc (0)186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)182 - Newnes, Jack (0)177 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)166 - de Koning, Tom (0)136 - Martin, Jack (0)120 - Owies, Matthew (0)114 - Cuningham, David (0)107 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)103 - Murphy, Marc (0)82 - Fisher, Zac (0)74 - Casboult, Levi (0)46 - O'Brien, Lochie (0)39 - Honey, Joshua (0)35 - Williamson, Tom (0)20 - Setterfield, Will (0)8 - McDonald, Oscar (0) Last Edit: August 12, 2021, 08:19:50 pm by crashlander
Topic: Jim Park Analysis 2021 (Read 3644 times)
previous topic - next topic
Topic: Jim Park Analysis 2021 (Read 3644 times)
previous topic - next topic