- At least 3 players
- No more than 10 votes to any one player
- Votes have to add up to 15
- Remember to include a team rating
Team C
5 Scotland
4 Watson
3 Simpson
2 Tuohy
1 Henderson
d
6.Simpson
5.Scotland
2.Tuohy
1.McLean
1.Judd
Team: C
3: Tuohy
3: Scotland
3: Henderson
2: Simpson
2: Watson
1: McLean
1: Armfield
C
5 Simpson
5 Scotland
5 Tuohy
Team c
Touhy 5
Simmo 5
Kruezer 3
Judd 2
Team C
Simpson 6
Scotland 5
Tuohy 4
6 Scotland
5 Simpson
4 Tuohy
Team C
Simpson - 5
2E - 5
Scotland - 3
Watson - 2
Team . C
5 . Simpson
4 . Touhy
2 . Scotland
2 . Judd
1 . Kreuser
1 . Watson
Team C
Simpson - 5
2E - 5
Scotland - 3
Watson - 2
Nailed it. Ditto.
Team: D
I was going to give the effort an 'E', but, but in the end, I relented. We weren't TOO bad for 3 quarters, but our last quarter was faecal in the extreme.
Unfortunately it looked like we weren't going to have a good day from very early in the game, but that is another issue altogether. That Freo, the most defensive team in the comp, kicked a lot of goals to beat us was very damning.
Votes:
[3] Judd
2.5] Tuohy
[2.5] Scotland
[2.5] Simpson
[2] Robinson
[1] Henderson
[0.5] Armfield
[0.5] Gibbs
[0.5] Watson
Explanations:
I found this game very difficult to assign votes in. Basically, we didn't 'win' a single position, and although we had a few players who did well (Tuohy, Scotland, Simpson, Armfield, to mention most) and got a lot of the ball, they were also the guys (if you include Walker) who haemorrhaged goals. The small forwards for Freo kicked the goals and did a lot of damage. (Walters 4, Ballantyne 3, Hill 2, Neale 2, Suban 2)
Malthouse mentioned that at least 10 players had shockers: unfortunately he isn't far off the mark.
[3] Judd: Was one of our closest to winning his spot. Everything he did was class. 6 tackles and a some tough inside work shows just how important the guy still is to us.
[2.5] Tuohy: His 3 goals were rippers and the work he did in defence was great.
[2.5] Scotland: Probably his best game for the year, with 12 marks and a lot of effort.
[2.5] Simpson: Played well and gave some run from defence.
[2] Robinson: tried his guts out in the clinches and managed to get some good clearances. 7 tackles.
[1] Henderson: Had his man beaten if the ball got down there 1 on 1. Since that didn't happen....
[0.5] Armfield: Tried hard and gave some run.
[0.5] Gibbs: A fair bit of the ball, but he didn't have the touch today. Too many errors and was beaten when he shouldn't have been.
[0.5] Watson: Did better than most and lead much better than I've seen him do since the U18's.
Honourable Mentions:
Kreuzer: tried hard, but he couldn't handle Sandilands at all and struggled to take a mark.
Garlett: 2 good goals and some run, but not enough.
Walker: 26 possessions, but got too carried away by Ballantyne and haemorrhaged goals.
Cachia: 9 tackles
Team = C
6 Simpson
5 Scotland
4 Tuohy
Team E
7: Simpson
5: Scotland
3: Touhy
Team D-
6 - Simpson
5 - Touhy
2 - Scotland
1 - Armfield
1 - Watson
Team C+
Touhy - 4
Simpson - 3
Scotland - 3
Watson - 2
Walker - 1
Gartlett - 1
Kreuzer - 1
Team: D
5 - Scotland
4 - Tuohy
3 - Simpson
2 - Walker
1 - Judd
Team - D
5 - Simpson
4 - Scotland
3 - Tuohy
2 - Judd
1 - Watson
Team performance = C
7 - Simmo
3 - Judd
2 - Scotland
2 - Watson
1 - Tuohy (purely for his 3 goals, his defensive work was actually crap)
Some giving Walker votes......*sigh*.......
Team D+
5 Simpson
5 Scotland
2 Judd
1 Watson
1 Kreuzer
1 Touhy
Team B until 3/4 time, then D in the last qtr... so I'll average it out to...
Team C
4 - Scotland
4 - Simpson
3 - Judd
2 - Tuohy
1 - Hendo
1 - Robbo
Team C
4 Scotland
4 Simpson
2 Robinson
2 Tuohy
1 Henderson
1 Gibbs
1 Kreuzer