Lawyer X - Police
I'v followed this debate with some interest, and in particular as is my bent how the media portray this story.
I'm made curious by this almost universal lack of a single perspective, there is almost zero commentary about "The Truth", an absence that to some degree exposes the hypocrisy of people.
Sure LawyerX is a snitch, but isn't that how the police get their information, and isn't that also how the media get their information as well?
To paraphrase, the outrage seems to be "Lawyers don't protect and project my lies!", and police have used nefarious means to expose the lie a lawyer used to protect a client.
Is a lie really privileged information when the lawyer knows it is a lie?
What of the lawyer's liability in this?
Even in the growing list of appeals, there seems to be little regard for the truth!