Skip to main content
Recent Posts
91
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by madbluboy -
DJC posts in a General "Discussion" thread about the findings of the trial and then pulls the old "Your opinion is not worth anything".




92
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by DJC -
Well I've followed this thread pretty closely and can't find anyone saying, 'One does not pash...' Even in this old bloke's day, we did plenty of 'pashing' at the disco, some times with a few different gals, but that did not signal, 'She wants a r**t.'

But from what you're saying MBB (& 3 Leos), if a person is three sheets to the wind, they're fair game, regardless of what they might say if sober. To moi this is not so much a legal issue but in fact goes far deeper than that... beyond the 'law.'

I must be quaintly old fashioned, but I think not. Simply put, and perhaps it was my upbringing, if a woman is drunk you look after her and protect her from sexual predators. And I have done this, as a young fella (and just as horny as the next) through to present day. In fact I find men who prey on drunk people to be cowardly and predatory. And this attitude is not righteousness (though to a predator it would seem so), it's just common bloody decency and a basic male responsibility. That drunk woman could be your mother, sister or daughter... how would you like the men around her to behave?

Then there’s Higgins’ remark about “***ing a log.

The quote MBB mentioned is “one does not pash passively” and ‘passively’ gives a completely different meaning.

The problem is that neither Lehrmann or Higgins are likeable characters and both are motivated by self interest.  And then there’s the holier than thou media personalities and networks!

Justice Lee’s “omnishambles” is very apt.
93
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by Thryleon -
Well I've followed this thread pretty closely and can't find anyone saying, 'One does not pash...' Even in this old bloke's day, we did plenty of 'pashing' at the disco, some times with a few different gals, but that did not signal, 'She wants a r**t.'

But from what you're saying MBB (& 3 Leos), if a person is three sheets to the wind, they're fair game, regardless of what they might say if sober. To moi this is not so much a legal issue but in fact goes far deeper than that... beyond the 'law.'

I must be quaintly old fashioned, but I think not. Simply put, and perhaps it was my upbringing, if a woman is drunk you look after her and protect her from sexual predators. And I have done this, as a young fella (and just as horny as the next) through to present day. In fact I find men who prey on drunk people to be cowardly and predatory. And this attitude is not righteousness (though to a predator it would seem so), it's just common bloody decency and a basic male responsibility. That drunk woman could be your mother, sister or daughter... how would you like the men around her to behave?





I think you have misunderstood my position.  I don't believe ms Higgins was anywhere near as inebriated as people are insinuating.  I think she and he ended up doing something that they were dismissed for, and have been in reputation fix mode ever since.  Her way to get around that, was to sling mud somewhere else, it has stuck, because he is a potato and was already covered in dirt.
94
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by Thryleon -
You must have extraordinary powers of observation to determine people’s intent from a couple of seconds of CCTV footage.

And yet eyewitnesses at the nightclub and security at Parliament House gave evidence that clearly contradicts your assessment of Higgins and Lehrmann’s state of sobriety.

Unless you sat through the entire trial and carefully considered every piece of material evidence and every sentence of testimony from Higgins, Lehrmann and all of the witnesses, you’re not really in a position to dispute Justice Lee’s findings.

Of course you can have an opinion, but it’s not worth much in this particular context.

No, I think you misunderstand what Im talking about.  I watched the interview with Lehrmann that showed footage of Brittany Higgins and Lehrmann walking into their office of employment.  I have worked in the hospitality industry, I have my RSA and I have interacted with my fair share of people inebriated and not.

In my experience, watching footage of the people we are talking about, I was not of the opinion that Brittany was intoxicated to the point of being comatose or anywhere near that point.  In fact, she looked like she was in good spirits.  I understand that this can and will change quickly, but they looked VERY much in control of their faculties.



95
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: AFL Rd 5 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Adelaide
Last post by DJC -
I have thought a lot about the game and, apart from inaccurate kicking for goal, I can’t really explain how we lost. 

The team stats tally with my impression of the game with one exception; free kicks!

Although both teams ended up with the same number of frees, we should have had more if the holding the ball rule was applied as I think it is supposed to be.  We also missed out on some crucial decisions that robbed us of scoring opportunities and presented the Crows with opportunities.  And then there’s the score review debacles.

That said, we didn’t play anywhere near our best footy, but I don’t think we have so far this season.

Perhaps this was the loss we had to have …
96
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by Baggers -
Did Justice Lee come to this conclusion based on his vast experience on the current nightclub/ bar hopping scene?

I think old folk who say things like "One does not
pash"  are completely out of touch with the current climate.

Well I've followed this thread pretty closely and can't find anyone saying, 'One does not pash...' Even in this old bloke's day, we did plenty of 'pashing' at the disco, some times with a few different gals, but that did not signal, 'She wants a r**t.'

But from what you're saying MBB (& 3 Leos), if a person is three sheets to the wind, they're fair game, regardless of what they might say if sober. To moi this is not so much a legal issue but in fact goes far deeper than that... beyond the 'law.'

I must be quaintly old fashioned, but I think not. Simply put, and perhaps it was my upbringing, if a woman is drunk you look after her and protect her from sexual predators. And I have done this, as a young fella (and just as horny as the next) through to present day. In fact I find men who prey on drunk people to be cowardly and predatory. And this attitude is not righteousness (though to a predator it would seem so), it's just common bloody decency and a basic male responsibility. That drunk woman could be your mother, sister or daughter... how would you like the men around her to behave?



97
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by Lods -
I think we probably bring some of our own biases to these issues.
Did folks who think the judgement was a bit dubious watch all of Justice Lee's summation?
98
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by DJC -
I saw the footage of Higgins walking through security with lehrmann.  Neither of them were 3 sheets to the wind.

Either there are some serious drugs and alcohol consumed on arrival or the giggling half running into the building Higginsis much better at retaining her composure under the influence than I am.

I dont need a judge to tell me what that footage showed and that was two people who knew exactly what they were getting up to.

You must have extraordinary powers of observation to determine people’s intent from a couple of seconds of CCTV footage.

And yet eyewitnesses at the nightclub and security at Parliament House gave evidence that clearly contradicts your assessment of Higgins and Lehrmann’s state of sobriety.

Unless you sat through the entire trial and carefully considered every piece of material evidence and every sentence of testimony from Higgins, Lehrmann and all of the witnesses, you’re not really in a position to dispute Justice Lee’s findings.

Of course you can have an opinion, but it’s not worth much in this particular context.
99
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by DJC -
Did Justice Lee come to this conclusion based on his vast experience on the current nightclub/ bar hopping scene?

I think old folk who say things like "One does not
pash"  are completely out of touch with the current climate.

A judge’s decision should not be influenced by their life experience.  Their role is to impartially weigh up the evidence presented by witnesses to the exclusion, as far as possible, to their own foreknowledge and beliefs.  The lawyers for both sides would have gone to great lengths to ensure that Justice Lee had a good understanding of nightclubbing behaviour.  That shows in the snippets of evidence referred to in his judgement.
100
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: AFL Rd 6 2024 Pre Game Prognostications Carlton vs GWS
Last post by Thryleon -
Not sure what everyone else has been watching but we are not cruising along, in fact, we are actually turning it over quite regularly in situations where there is more time than we think.

Also we are not making the most of our opportunities.

I would state that we are currently not playing well, but working hard which is positive. 

I think we actually need less effort and more composure.