Re: Pre-Game Pressure: AFL 2019 Rd 5: Carlton vs Western BUlldogs
Reply #6 –
Well, I can't comment much on the drop kick, but I think the preference these days is for zones and what is effectively an 18 man defence, as opposed to tagging. The theory I believe is that tagging interferes with zone structures, and is therefore discouraged.
IMO, tagging should be used on an as-needed basis. It may be useful only in certain games, or certain parts of games. I reckon used intelligently tagging can still be useful. I think you have to concede the zone when it's justified.
I'd like to see nine points awarded for a drop kick (or place kick) goal ... but that's another conversation.
As a spectator, I would prefer to see tagging banned. As a student of the game, I concede that there is a place for close-checking defenders but more creative coaches will find ways to negate the opposition's better players without compromising team defence. Samo's blocks on Kennedy at stoppages last week were a prime example, particularly as both Samo and Cripps were free to complete clearances.
I think that some commentators struggle with the nuances of the modern game and call stuff that isn't there. eg Kennedy was tagging Cripps. During the Melbourne-Sydney game, one of the commentators said that a Sydney player was tagging Oliver (why would you bother). Almost immediately, the commentators remarked that the Sydney player was opposed to Harmes. In reality, we were simply seeing the zone in action. Perhaps that's too hard for the commentators to take in.