Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic: Melbourne CBD Incident (Read 23507 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #75 –
Quote from: chalkybill on
It is the LACK OF PARENTING that is the problem.  Schools (and Education Departments) try to make up for it but can't.

This is a societal issue for various reasons.

The saying it takes a village to raise a child doesn't come from no where yet a by product of how we live means that anyone with differing input on how to raise a family is drowned out by the pc brigade these days.

As a consequence in the past where others would step up to help in lieu of a crappy parent they no longer can because of how we live.

I suspect greater family ties are the answer.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #76 –
All this talk about how to avoid a situation like this is in my opinion rubbish.

Sadly there will always be criminals. nutcases, serial killers, terrorists, pedophiles etc regardless of improved parenting or education.

This world has and always will be of all sorts of people - majority good, some bad and minority awful and capable of serious crimes against law abiding citizens.   

All you can do IMO is get extra tough on these sorts of characters by protecting the public more as soon as they stuff up once with a serious crime. The majority of serious crimes are done by criminals that are known to police and many times out on bail.

The majority of sentencing for serious crimes is way to soft - about half what I think they should be. Life sentence for first degree murder should be set at 50 years not 25 for example.

Sadly it wont happen as the longer a criminal is housed the more it costs the state. Death penalty is the option but i know many disagree with taking a life regardless.

I'm not one of them. Just listen to the paramedic who worked on the poor innocent 10 year old girl in Bourke St. I was a mess when I heard this man speak about not being able to save her and her just staring at him... :'( :'(

And to think the animal responsible for not only taking her life but destroying her family forever is allowed to still breath, be fed for free, watch TV, have a computer and have a roof over his head and for free is so wrong IMO.     


 

 


       
 

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #77 –
Quote from: shawny on
All this talk about how to avoid a situation like this is in my opinion rubbish.

Sadly there will always be criminals. nutcases, serial killers, terrorists, pedophiles etc regardless of improved parenting or education.

This world has and always will be of all sorts of people - majority good, some bad and minority awful and capable of serious crimes against law abiding citizens.   

All you can do IMO is get extra tough on these sorts of characters by protecting the public more as soon as they stuff up once with a serious crime. The majority of serious crimes are done by criminals that are known to police and many times out on bail.

The majority of sentencing for serious crimes is way to soft - about half what I think they should be. Life sentence for first degree murder should be set at 50 years not 25 for example.

Sadly it wont happen as the longer a criminal is housed the more it costs the state. Death penalty is the option but i know many disagree with taking a life regardless.

I'm not one of them. Just listen to the paramedic who worked on the poor innocent 10 year old girl in Bourke St. I was a mess when I heard this man speak about not being able to save her and her just staring at him... :'( :'(

And to think the animal responsible for not only taking her life but destroying her family forever is allowed to still breath, be fed for free, watch TV, have a computer and have a roof over his head and for free is so wrong IMO.     


 

 


      

Shawny, I have highlighted this point in bold to try and understand something.

Are people born bad eggs, or do they become that way?



"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #79 –
If its in their nature, can they be nurtured?

Or are they lost causes from the get go?

Im trying to understand something here, and I cannot figure out for the life of me why some people proceed through life one way yet their siblings go a completely different route and sure there are learning components for parenting in the process as the very few examples I can show you are the eldest children being the ones who stuff up more, yet in one family, 4 kids, we have the eldest and youngest both being terrors and the middle children being "good" kids, which makes me wonder if they are not shaped more by their experiences with their peers than the parenting.

IMHO, parenting is the easy target.  Ive yet to meet too many parents who "don't care" about their kids and as a consequence they turn into bad eggs, but I've met plenty who are molly coddled and turn into terrors.  (Note, the perpetrator of the bourke street incident is very much next level to anything I have witnessed.)
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #80 –
Quote from: Thryleon on
If its in their nature, can they be nurtured?

Or are they lost causes from the get go?

Im trying to understand something here, and I cannot figure out for the life of me why some people proceed through life one way yet their siblings go a completely different route and sure there are learning components for parenting in the process as the very few examples I can show you are the eldest children being the ones who stuff up more, yet in one family, 4 kids, we have the eldest and youngest both being terrors and the middle children being "good" kids, which makes me wonder if they are not shaped more by their experiences with their peers than the parenting.

IMHO, parenting is the easy target.  Ive yet to meet too many parents who "don't care" about their kids and as a consequence they turn into bad eggs, but I've met plenty who are molly coddled and turn into terrors.  (Note, the perpetrator of the bourke street incident is very much next level to anything I have witnessed.)

Nurture is not limited to their parents, but it is the obvious factor.

You can argue about this topic for ever and a day and there are plenty of studies on it.

I made a comment previously about limited adults having children as being the best fix (albeit most unlikely) in order to stop this problem. Meaning i believe its more nurture than nature.

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #81 –
I spent forty years working in the juvenile justice system.

Over that period of time I met countless parents.
The large majority of them appeared to be genuinely caring...but (judgmentally on my part) inadequate.
They appeared  to lack the ability to make good judgements or establish boundaries and controls.
Often these meetings would also take place with a grandparent and you could see that the parents were unprepared largely because their own childhood had lacked that parental guidance.
Single parent families were also common and more often than not it was the mother who was left to raise the child...in such cases the father had often been abusive to both mother and children.
Poverty or living on the fringe, which often accompanied such family breakups, contributed to the pressures on parents.
Without strong parental influences in their lives kids turn to peer groups which provide a more positive atmosphere of acceptance....but not necessarily of behaviour.

So that's basically your foundation for building a young offender.

Yes, there were kids who were off the rails despite having stronger family backgrounds and siblings who were never in trouble.
In most cases these were  the result of a mental condition... maybe not an obvious one, but there all the same.

Quote from: Thryleon on

I'm trying to understand something here, and I cannot figure out for the life of me why some people proceed through life one way yet their siblings go a completely different route and sure there are learning components for parenting in the process as the very few examples I can show you are the eldest children being the ones who stuff up more, yet in one family, 4 kids, we have the eldest and youngest both being terrors and the middle children being "good" kids, which makes me wonder if they are not shaped more by their experiences with their peers than the parenting.

Just taking the mental condition aspect out of it for a second...Elder children will often be the more difficult because they're the "first attempt". Folks learn from their mistakes with subsequent kids. They're also born at a time when parents are still  establishing themselves so attention is often on other things like careers, buying a home, change of lifestyle created by the new baby. As for the youngest ones...they're just bad eggs  ;D

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #82 –
Quote from: Lods on
So that's basically your foundation for building a young offender.

Yes, there were kids who were off the rails despite having stronger family backgrounds and siblings who were never in trouble.
In most cases these were  the result of a mental condition... maybe not an obvious one, but there all the same.

So if the problem cannot be cured upgrading societal skills, where does the "Kennett" rational come from to close all the asylums, I assume it was primarily a fiscal decision that comes at the expense of the general public?

Lods, posters will happily argue the causes with you, that is for sure. But from your experience, what is the fundamental solution?

I gather allowing troubled youth to run riot in detention is not going to make things better. That probably just reinforces bad behavior.

Sending kids to big persons prison won't be the answer either, that will just institutionalise them long term.

Where should we spend the smart money?
The Force Awakens!

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #83 –
Lods, top post. There's many factors and forces working together that create the problem.

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #84 –
Quote from: LP on
So if the problem cannot be cured upgrading societal skills, where does the "Kennett" rational come from to close all the asylums, I assume it was primarily a fiscal decision that comes at the expense of the general public?

Lods, posters will happily argue the causes with you, that is for sure. But from your experience, what is the fundamental solution?

I gather allowing troubled youth to run riot in detention is not going to make things better. That probably just reinforces bad behavior.

Sending kids to big persons prison won't be the answer either, that will just institutionalise them long term.

Where should we spend the smart money?

We had a similar situation occur in NSW many years ago.
At one stage the Community Services Department ran both State Ward homes and Juvenile detention Centres.
I worked in both.
The State Ward homes catered for a range of kids so that we had specialist centres for intellectually disabled, emotionally disturbed and just basically neglected kids...To tell you the truth they weren't great places and there are a number of horror cases that were no doubt looked at during the commission into institutional abuse...however they did serve a purpose in that these kids (Wards), especially the ones with emotional disturbance, were kept separate from the juvenile detention system.

Like with the Kennett situation these were gradually closed down, replaced in some part by smaller group homes...but large numbers of these kids then began showing up in the Juvenile Detention system.
Many may have ended up there anyway but their introduction into that system was fast tracked.

What to do?
Separate them, get them before they become entrenched in the JJ system. Provide the kids with emotional disturbance or more serious psychiatric disorders with a more suitable and hopefully productive program....but that costs money.
So the question then becomes one of cost effectiveness. 
At the very least trial a few.

Look, Juvenile Detention centres are streets ahead of what they used to be in terms of providing educational and rehabilitative opportunities for kids....but they're being called upon to do too much if they're also being asked to function as mental health facilities.
Mixing the populations is detrimental to both groups.

(and get some bloody razor wire on the roof of your JJ centres to stop the kids climbing all over them.....they'll fall and hurt themselves!)

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #85 –
One thing I wasn't aware of is that a young offender who enters the juvenile justice system as a minor can stay there until they're 25.  I would imagine that a bloke in their early 20s could wield quite an influence over first time offenders in their mid teens.

While I'm not advocating moving all young offenders to adult prison once the reach a certain age, it should happen when deemed appropriate.

“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #86 –
Quote from: DJC on
One thing I wasn't aware of is that a young offender who enters the juvenile justice system as a minor can stay there until they're 25.  I would imagine that a bloke in their early 20s could wield quite an influence over first time offenders in their mid teens.

While I'm not advocating moving all young offenders to adult prison once the reach a certain age, it should happen when deemed appropriate.

Not sure about 25...don't know how it works down there.
But we've had them up to about 20..usually undertaking some educational program or work release.
They stay because their behaviour is excellent.
Put a foot wrong, including intimidating younger ones, and they're gone.

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #87 –
Quote from: Lods on
Not sure about 25...don't know how it works down there.
But we've had them up to about 20..usually undertaking some educational program or work release.
They stay because their behaviour is excellent.
Put a foot wrong, including intimidating younger ones, and they're gone.

My son works in the system Lods, in a professional development capacity, and recently told me about the 25 year old rule.  A significant number of the young offenders now housed in an adult prison because they trashed a youth detention centre are in their 20s.

I fully support the idea of older young offenders staying in the youth system while they complete educational or vocational programs, but not if they muck up ...
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #88 –
Would any of the above have helped in this instance?

Would any of the above have helped avoid the Bourke street incident??

I don't think it would have unless I dont have the full background of this individual.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: Melbourne CBD Incident

Reply #89 –
Quote from: Thryleon on
Would any of the above have helped in this instance?

Would any of the above have helped avoid the Bourke street incident??

I don't think it would have unless I dont have the full background of this individual.

Probably not, but you can never be sure...the offender was a product of a whole range of influences (including mental health issues) over a lifetime that led him to this point.

But many could be helped by alternative or earlier intervention