Skip to main content
Topic: SSM Plebiscite (Read 113084 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: SSM Plebiscite

Reply #225
You know, I really can't figure out which one of us is the bigger idiot - you, for your seemingly non existent comprehension skills, or me for falling for your sh1t time and time gain. In all honesty, it's probably me.

And there it is, when was it I bullied you PaulP?
The Force Awakens!

Re: SSM Plebiscite

Reply #226
My position is as blunt and clear as can possibly be - if you vote no, you're wrong. How exactly is this Machiavellian ?

In regard to your second question, don't be a smart ar$e.

Herein lies the issue.

Irrespective of whether or not you agree, one side is not "right", and the other is not "wrong".

They are ideological differences and remind me very much of the capitalist vs communist debate.

It isn't validated by a vote majority either, because the only thing that matters is how an individual views the world and society.

People can assert that their position is right, but as far as I am aware, that doesnt make anyone more correct.

Hitler thought he was right, and so did much of his nation.  Look how THAT turned out.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson


Re: SSM Plebiscite

Reply #228
Herein lies the issue.

Irrespective of whether or not you agree, one side is not "right", and the other is not "wrong".

They are ideological differences and remind me very much of the capitalist vs communist debate.

It isn't validated by a vote majority either, because the only thing that matters is how an individual views the world and society.

People can assert that their position is right, but as far as I am aware, that doesnt make anyone more correct.

Hitler thought he was right, and so did much of his nation.  Look how THAT turned out.

Thry, I'm actually a "yes" voter.

But that vote and the vote of others has to come for the right reasons not because of being guilted or bullied into it!

If people vote for the wrong reason, things will become very bad because they don't really believe it!

I also think people have the right vote anyway they choose, which seems to grate with some, but it is a democracy.
The Force Awakens!


Re: SSM Plebiscite

Reply #230
Thry, I'm actually a "yes" voter.

But that vote and the vote of others has to come for the right reasons not because of being guilted or bullied into it!

If people vote for the wrong reason, things will become very bad because they don't really believe it!

I also think people have the right vote anyway they choose, which seems to grate some.

LP, I don't really care which way you want to vote.

I have a different scenario for an outcome that I am much happier with.

I will be filling out my form ticking zero boxes and sending it back to our government.

The reason:  To make a statement.  Initially I was going to vote No, and then I swung around to Yes, and of late I have decided that this is a tiresome debate, and a message needs to be sent to our leadership that will actually have an impact.

Why??

Voting No achieves nothing. The status quo will remain, and the push for SSM will rage for the rest of my lifetime.  I personally believe we have much bigger issues that we need to be concerned about than whether or not this community can get married.

This made me start to think about voting Yes.  Get it over and done with, but I don't like the way this has gone.  Particularly the backlash towards Carlton for remaining Switzerland on the debate and being attacked for it.

I have decided the best way for me to make a statement on the issue, is to vote nothing.  I will send back my form blank, so I can make a statement that is more in line with where I sit on this subject, and that is for our government to make that decision so we can get on with it.  If they see fit to change legislation do so, but ensure that people's ideologies are protected.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: SSM Plebiscite

Reply #231
LP, I don't really care which way you want to vote.

I have a different scenario for an outcome that I am much happier with.

I will be filling out my form ticking zero boxes and sending it back to our government.

The reason:  To make a statement.  Initially I was going to vote No, and then I swung around to Yes, and of late I have decided that this is a tiresome debate, and a message needs to be sent to our leadership that will actually have an impact.

Why??

Voting No achieves nothing. The status quo will remain, and the push for SSM will rage for the rest of my lifetime.  I personally believe we have much bigger issues that we need to be concerned about than whether or not this community can get married.

This made me start to think about voting Yes.  Get it over and done with, but I don't like the way this has gone.  Particularly the backlash towards Carlton for remaining Switzerland on the debate and being attacked for it.

I have decided the best way for me to make a statement on the issue, is to vote nothing.  I will send back my form blank, so I can make a statement that is more in line with where I sit on this subject, and that is for our government to make that decision so we can get on with it.  If they see fit to change legislation do so, but ensure that people's ideologies are protected.

I understand your position.

The extremists won't you'll be lumped in the "No" vote category for showing a lack of support, just like Carlton has been, and that is extremists on both sides putting you in that category.

Even though if enough people took your position it would probably lead to a better long term outcome than a vote either way!

From my discussions in and around my social circles, you are not alone, there are many ticking nothing or ticking both, and they come from both sides of the question! The general consensus is this postal vote is Mickey Mouse!
The Force Awakens!

Re: SSM Plebiscite

Reply #232
Hawthorn's statement, where is the outrage???

Quote
Hawthorn Football Club embraces and welcomes all people, regardless of race, religion, gender, sexuality or cultural background.

The club celebrates diversity and demands equality, and also respects the rights of individuals to make their own personal choices and form their own opinions.

Hawthorn sees its role as providing an environment of respect, diversity and inclusivity where people can embrace their differences and unite in their love of the club and the game of AFL.  
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!

Re: SSM Plebiscite

Reply #233
Feel free to answer the original question!

When you come down from your drug induced high, and start :
a, making sense, and
b. understanding what I type,

sure, I'll answer. 

Re: SSM Plebiscite

Reply #234
Hawthorn's statement, where is the outrage???

As you point out Kochie's Sunrise program has happily lambasted Carlton.

Then Koch bailed, declaring any club taking a position as untenable!

Quote from: Koch on Sunrise
“A club by coming out is saying this is the view we think all our members should have, and not even political parties are making that decision,” Koch said on Sunrise.

“(The process) should be, OK do you represent all your stakeholders and are you meant to be representing them in something like this — you’re a footy club.”

Yet allegedly they openly threw Carlton to the media wolves this morning, after Carlton said it respects the right of individuals to choose!

The people with the power to end this horrific situation is Abbott and Barnaby Joyce, but they won't because their constituency doesn't support it they know who butters their bread!
The Force Awakens!

Re: SSM Plebiscite

Reply #235
sure, I'll answer.

I don't think you will, you seem too emotionally invested to make a objective assessment.
The Force Awakens!

Re: SSM Plebiscite

Reply #236
I don't think you will, you seem too emotionally invested to make a objective assessment.

I'm a man of my word.

I've been on this forum and its predecessor for over a decade, and in that time, you are the only one who misconstrues what i say. This isn't the first time it's happened. It's happened several times before. I strive for clarity and economy of expression with everything I type. Whether I get there is another matter. And out of the dozens and dozens of regular posters we've had over that time, only you seem to constantly twist what i say into something it isn't. Why is that do you think ?

Re: SSM Plebiscite

Reply #237
I'm a man of my word.

I've been on this forum and its predecessor for over a decade, and in that time, you are the only one who misconstrues what i say. This isn't the first time it's happened. It's happened several times before. I strive for clarity and economy of expression with everything I type. Whether I get there is another matter. And out of the dozens and dozens of regular posters we've had over that time, only you seem to constantly twist what i say into something it isn't. Why is that do you think ?

You still haven't answered my question PaulP.

You labeled me idiotic and Machiavellian, seemingly a contradiction, a smart-arse which is at least compatible with the Machievellian accusation, then through those clever economical posts implied that I was the bully without saying it. It's all there as a clear tone in your posts, clarity in the full context of the set which I am sure you are proud of!

Either it is true or it isn't, and I asked you to show cause for the bullying inference, which seems a reasonable request.

As for why I respond to your posts, perhaps because it's the right thing to do. Perhaps it's because you post about things that matter, which I am also invested in!

Perhaps I respond to other posts as well, and it's not just yourself who is the apparent victim!
The Force Awakens!

Re: SSM Plebiscite

Reply #238
And there it is, a perfect example of what I'm talking about.

I ask a very simple question - why it is that only you seem to constantly misunderstand what I post, and you answer on every topic but.

And for the record, no I do not.

Re: SSM Plebiscite

Reply #239
In the affairs of humans there is and always will be two perspectives.

I accept that is the case and I try to see both sides, but when I do I cannot just see those positions I find agreeable, and I'm free to discuss the positives and negatives from both sides even when some find it unpalatable.

Either we are nothing special, or we are all special, it's one in the same but it can never be the case we are half and half!
The Force Awakens!