Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #60 – September 19, 2020, 08:48:47 pm I think it was a hand to the head from Polson after the initial tackle.
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #61 – September 19, 2020, 08:48:56 pm Hopefully we've had our Off q, and play the next 2q. And yes, some poor umpiring decisions- all to Lions advantage 9 - 1. Seriously. What are the chances?
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #62 – September 19, 2020, 08:49:47 pm Quote from: kruddler on September 19, 2020, 08:45:29 pmIf you initiate the high contact, you should not get a free.....unless your name is Joel Selwood.Rich literally ran into him with his head. NOT polsons fault, Rich's fault. So why penalise Polson? It’s irrelevant who’s fault it is. You cannot collect a player high. Is it the tacklers fault that Selwood ducks and the tackler collect him high. Nope but paid every time. That’s the rule and some players know how to draw fees from it
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #63 – September 19, 2020, 08:52:21 pm Strangely we're getting enough of the ball. Ball use though?? Teague's giving them a big spray 😁
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #64 – September 19, 2020, 08:52:28 pm One of the positives for me is Kennedy who is getting some ball and showing a bit of aggression
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #65 – September 19, 2020, 08:53:54 pm Teague has gone berserk in the rooms. Lots of F words in that lot. $hit he looked angry.
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #66 – September 19, 2020, 08:54:22 pm Quote from: shawny on September 19, 2020, 08:49:47 pmIt’s irrelevant who’s fault it is. You cannot collect a player high. Is it the tacklers fault that Selwood ducks and the tackler collect him high. Nope but paid every time. That’s the rule and some players know how to draw fees from it NoFrom 2017...https://www.afl.com.au/news/46561/high-tackle-rule-tweak-wont-see-selwood-changeQuoteUnder the new tightened interpretation, if a tackle is reasonable and the ball carrier is responsible for the high contact via a "shrug, drop, arm lift or duck, play on should be called".If you don't believe me, Murphy tried to do a selwood and the umpire flatly (and loudly) said "NO" as it was clear Murphy contributed to the high contact (as per rule above). - I think it was the freo game. 1 Likes
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #67 – September 19, 2020, 08:54:42 pm 3 goals from extremely doubtful free kicks, typical and we get nothing from those muppets. The channel 7 commentary makes me spew up. 1 Likes
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #68 – September 19, 2020, 08:54:50 pm Quote from: shawny on September 19, 2020, 08:49:47 pmIt’s irrelevant who’s fault it is. You cannot collect a player high. Is it the tacklers fault that Selwood ducks and the tackler collect him high. Nope but paid every time. That’s the rule and some players know how to draw fees from it You cannot run into players with your head ffs!Umps get your hands off it - that’s two non free kicks resulting in two goals to them. Pathetic.In saying that, Carlton. Can we please. Stop. Kicking. To.Opposition. Out. Of.defence. Ffs! 1 Likes
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #69 – September 19, 2020, 08:54:54 pm Quote from: Lods on September 19, 2020, 08:52:28 pmOne of the positives for me is Kennedy who is getting some ball and showing a bit of aggressionAnother positive is watching Teague losing it at half time. About time.
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #70 – September 19, 2020, 08:55:16 pm Quote from: percy on September 19, 2020, 08:54:42 pm3 goals from extremely doubtful free kicks, typical and we get nothing from those muppets. The channel 7 commentary makes me spew up.Richo has become an absolute flog.
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #71 – September 19, 2020, 08:56:37 pm Quote from: laj on September 19, 2020, 08:53:54 pmTeague has gone berserk in the rooms. Lots of F words in that lot. $hit he looked angry.Not before time Jim
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #72 – September 19, 2020, 08:57:52 pm Quote from: capcom on September 19, 2020, 08:56:37 pmNot before time JimProbably find he does it a few times. We just don't see what happens behind closed doors. With some, what you see publicly and what you see behind closed doors can be two different things. Can't not coach Carlton and not lose it a few times....lol.
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #73 – September 19, 2020, 08:58:19 pm McGovern in defence is the right move and that should be continued. He was very unlucky to be penalised for that crunching tackle. 2 Likes
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane Reply #74 – September 19, 2020, 08:59:47 pm Quote from: kruddler on September 19, 2020, 08:54:22 pmNoFrom 2017...https://www.afl.com.au/news/46561/high-tackle-rule-tweak-wont-see-selwood-changeIf you don't believe me, Murphy tried to do a selwood and the umpire flatly (and loudly) said "NO" as it was clear Murphy contributed to the high contact (as per rule above). - I think it was the freo game.It’s ok to not always have to prove the other posters your right. If you collect a player high, it’s a free. He got him high hence why the free was paid. EOS.