Carlton Supporters Club

Yep. This is what I go on. 6 v 2 humiliating Monday's. That's progress in my book

To get that set of stats we must have been winning the ball in the midfield and then having very shallow entries. So I'd assert that means we need deeper F50 entries with better targets deep inside F50.

Laj, are those ideas based on subjective opinion or objective fact.

On Stats Carlton is;

 - Top in kicks.
 - Bottom in handballs.
 - Bottom in disposals.

 - 3rd in Marks

 - 9th in Rebound 50.
 - 17th in Inside 50.

 - Middle on Overall Ratings.

That tells me we get the ball out of D50 very quickly with kicks, little run and carry, but cannot find a way of getting through the defensive zones. Sort of fits because we had more I50s than The Lions but generated less goals and less behinds. We offset that by having a very good defensive setup across the midfield which meant our R50s at 800 were way lower than the Lions 910.

To get that set of stats we must have been winning the ball in the midfield and then having very shallow entries. So I'd assert that means we need deeper F50 entries with better targets deep inside F50.

Laj, are those ideas based on subjective opinion or objective fact.

On Stats Carlton is;

 - Top in kicks.
 - Bottom in handballs.
 - Bottom in disposals.

 - 3rd in Marks

 - 9th in Rebound 50.
 - 17th in Inside 50.

 - Middle on Overall Ratings.

That tells me we get the ball out of D50 very quickly with kicks, little run and carry, but cannot find a way of getting through the defensive zones. Sort of fits because we had more I50s than The Lions but generated less goals and less behinds. We offset that by having a very good defensive setup across the midfield which meant our R50s at 800 were way lower than the Lions 910.

To get that set of stats we must have been winning the ball in the midfield and then having very shallow entries. So I'd assert that means we need deeper F50 entries with better targets deep inside F50.

Laj, are those ideas based on subjective opinion or objective fact.

On Stats Carlton is;

 - Top in kicks.
 - Bottom in handballs.
 - Bottom in disposals.

 - 3rd in Marks

 - 9th in Rebound 50.
 - 17th in Inside 50.

 - Middle on Overall Ratings.

That tells me we get the ball out of D50 very quickly with kicks, little run and carry, but cannot find a way of getting through the defensive zones. Sort of fits because we had more I50s than The Lions but generated less goals and less behinds. We offset that by having a very good defensive setup across the midfield which meant our R50s at 800 were way lower than the Lions 910.

To get that set of stats we must have been winning the ball in the midfield and then having very shallow entries. So I'd assert that means we need deeper F50 entries with better targets deep inside F50.

My impression is that many of our F50 entries are shallow and often wide.  Most of our kicks to the hot spot are from inside F50 and when our marking targets are covered.  Deep F50 entries are rare and often not to our forwards' advantage.  Charlie Curnow's great kick to Casboult on Saturday is a notable exception.  Kicks like that are virtually impossible to defend.

Most of the time we play seven back and only five forward......easy to win the ball across half back but the downside is less options to hit up down forward.
You need to be very quick and precise rebounding the ball to setup scoring opportunities...we dont do that well at clearances either especially with Cripps out so that also limits our goalscoring opportunities.

To Lods,

Thanks for this Goal Tracker. I have enjoyed reading it all seasons.