Re: CV and mad panic behaviour
Reply #3568 –
Without wanting to say a lot about whats right or wrong, there is a lot of testing of individuals happening who arent actually sick.
If its so dangerous you need to be tested to know you have it, is it even dangerous?
This is hard to quantify too. People who are positive today in future might experience longevitiy of life issues through other illness and we cant test for that. It could be nothing or it could be something, but depending on the assumptions made, it skews the data.
Darned if you do, darned if you dont.
Its why I look at both sides of the argument and cant work out what the best course of action is so to see a government erroring on the side of caution is likely a reasonable outcome. Where it falls flat for mine, is that the response doesnt match the risk, therefore, its a rethink required.