Voting is as usual: you have 15 votes to award pretty much as you will, with the following provisos:
[1] 15 votes in total, no more, no less.
[2] No more than 10 votes for any one player (even Sam Walsh or Patrick Cripps)
[3] Three players at least must get a mention.
[4] A grade for the game, A+ (what I want to see) to F-.
Hopefully we'll have guys to vote for. :))
Hopefully we have some people who want to vote!
It is a very bad sign when no one has put in any votes 24 hours after the match. I will start but it was a struggle.
Team: E
5. Newman
4. Weitering
3. E Curnow
2. Silvagni
1. C. Curnow
Team F for failure to learn anything from our previous encounter, and failure to engage in accountable football
5 Newman
4 Ed
3 Hollands
2 Charlie
1 Motlop
DM: pretty much everyone else involved. Walsh excluded.
Team F for failure.
4: Newman
3: Walsh
2: Holland
2: E Curnow
2: Acres
2: Cerra
Team: F
5. Newman -only winner
3. Ed Curnow - competitive
3. Silvagni - competitive
1. TDK - for effort
1. Walsh - for effort
1. Hollands - for effort
1. Cerra - for effort
5. Newman
4. Ed
3. Walsh
2. Acres
1. Cerra
Team E:
5: Newman
3: Walsh
3: Cerra
2: E.Curnow
1: Silvagni
1: C. Curnow
Team??? - F
6 - Newman
2 - Cerra
2 - Curnow C
2 - Curnow E
1 - Acres
1 - Hollands
1 - Walsh
HM: Goal umpires.
Team: D-
5 - Newman
4 - Silvagni
3 - Curnow, E
2 - Walsh
1 - Cerra
It is a very bad sign when no one has put in any votes 24 hours after the match. I will start but it was a struggle.
Team: E
5. Newman
4. Weitering
3. E Curnow
2. Silvagni
1. C. Curnow
I said I wouldnt vote this week, criteria is min 3 players and 15 votes. Impossible task for me, it would devalue other weeks votes.
Team Z-
Carlton vs Adelaide:
Not the result we wanted. Worst effort for quite a long time.
Team: E-
We were butchered in the middle, and it all went downhill from there.
Votes:
[4] Nic Newman
[2] Ed Curnow
[2] Patrick Cripps
[2] Charlie Curnow
[1] Blake Acres
[1] Adam Cerra
[1] Sam Walsh
[1] Jack Silvagni
[0.5] Jacob Weitering
[0.5] Harry McKay
Explanations:
[4] Nic Newman: Our best player, he didn’t lower his colours. He provided whatever drive we managed to get.
[2] Ed Curnow: Did a job and did it well enough. Not a superior game, but he made a contribution.
[2] Patrick Cripps: This one might be a little controversial, as our Captain only managed 19 possessions. However, he managed a large slice of a clearances (9), he had 10 tackles (a large fraction of the whole teams’) and he tried his guts out. Not a great game, but considering how little some of the others went, I’m comfortable giving him votes.
[2] Charlie Curnow: Charlie looked dangerous. We simply couldn’t get it near him often enough.
[1] Blake Acres: Not a brilliant game, but solid. He was a contributor.
[1] Adam Cerra: Probably the most productive of our mids on a poor night.
[1] Sam Walsh: Did his best in the circumstances. Will be better for the run.
[1] Jack Silvagni: Did his best and managed some clearances.
[0.5] Jacob Weitering: Could have been much worse without him.
[0.5] Harry McKay: Like Charlie, H looked dangerous. Unfortunately, we didn’t give him much of an opportunity to show much.
Honourable Mentions:
Ollie Hollands: Not his best night, but he kept trying and running.
I'll leave this thread open, but unpin it. I don't think anyone else will vote, but I do offer the opportunity for anyone who feels they need to put in their 2 cents worth.