Skip to main content
Topic: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne (Read 9880 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #30
Certainly have grabbed the game back from the Roos, got the last 3 . Showing heart

Yes, we won that quarter by 7 points - given them a bit of a scare and something to think about.

Nice work lads. Keep it up.

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #31
Great umpiring today.
Gibbs gives a shoulder bump and the north player goes down. Free kick north.
Cas pushes a north player in the chest who goes down. Free kick north.
North player charges Wright after the kick and makes contact to the head. Play on.

Until the late charge we've clearly been subpar, but geez some fair treatment today could make this a lot closer

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #32
Not sure why we went with just one key forward today. If Levi comes up the ground we have nothing tall in the 50. Levi's got to be the lone key forward and back up ruck today. Tough gig.

Perhaps having Phillips in the side wasn't such a bad idea now.  :P

Said Weitering would play back which meant we wouldn't have much up front. Needed an extra tall. Best one going at present plays ruck....

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #33
How about the non free kick to zieball in our goal square. Divednon it clear and simple, butnpaid the same thing when Cripps did it. Ducking joke.

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #34
Where was this for the 1st qtr and a half ?? Having a crack now and look what happens.

It's the tackling and the pressure that's a big difference

Petrevski Seton hasn't had much of the ball but has been tackling fiercely , Alex Silvagni his usual good tackling efforts  ;)
Zac fisher went after about five of them in a row in one piece of play on the boundary and forced the ball out.

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #35
It's hard to see us winning but at least we didn't look like a rabble that quarter.
Good to see Cunningham involved in a couple of goals, it should help build his confidence.
Some of the young blokes have got a bit lost today.
The only thing in this world worth more than a hill of beans is the Carlton Football Club.

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #36
Someone flicked a switch... BT mentioned bruise free early in the qtr then all of a sudden we started tackling and harassing and it turned.
Da Di Da Di Dar..Da Di Da Di Dar..Da Di Da Di Da Di Darrr ...Darrr Darr.. We are the NAVY BLUES !!

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #37
Endeavour is there, just need to add that score board pressure so we do get reward.

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #38
Made it look it look hard but finally got the goal, pressure it's starting to tell & impact on the Roos

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #39
Really outclassed q1.
Certainly some dodgy umpiring, but we can usually rely on that one.
Part way into q2, we got some system going.
Charlie C looking great.

Go blues
Coming together is the beginning.
Keeping together is progress.
Working together is success.
Henry Ford.

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #40
Like what Alex  Silvagni brings to the back half adding that bit of leadership . Reminds me of Andy McKay back in the day

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #41
Inspirational goal by Cripps , love to see that

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #42
Silvagni should have went back and kicked that.... phew
Da Di Da Di Dar..Da Di Da Di Dar..Da Di Da Di Da Di Darrr ...Darrr Darr.. We are the NAVY BLUES !!

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #43
1 point down. All the momentum with us.

Re: Rd 10: In Game Attitude: Carlton vs North Melbourne

Reply #44
1 pt game who would have thought?