Somehow I do not think this thread will be as popular as it was last week. We really did not give a yelp after quarter time.
However, someone deserves some credit.
It is time to put the disappointment and irritation behind us and try to find some positives, and to reward our better performers.
Remember:
[1] At least 3 players need to get a mention.
[2] No more than 10 votes for any one player.
[3] Give a rating of team performance. It can be anywhere from A+ to F and will probably be nearer the latter.
[4] Votes must add up to 15.
I am almost certain the default rating will be an "F". :(
I am going to put up my votes tomorrow. If I write it now I will let my anger and frustration get the better of me, as the anger boils over on the post game thread. I can understand that. I just don't like it.
Team F
Judd 9
Everitt 3
Docherty 2
Casboult 1
Team F
7: Docherty
3: Simpson
2: Everitt
2: Judd
1: Casboult
Team F
Simpson 5
Docherty 5
Judd 3
Everitt 1
Yarran 1
Team E (icEd by the Junkies)
5 Simmo
5 Doc
5 Judd
Team. E.
Simpson. 6
Judd. 3
Everitt. 3
Docherty. 3
Team F
Judd 9
Everitt 3
Docherty 2
Casboult 1
I love Juddy but geez some on here overplay everything he does.
2 touches in 60 mins of footy?
Yet worthy of a 9 vote performance :o
Team: E
5 - Gibbs
4 - Everitt
3 - Docherty
2 - Simpson
1 - Casboult
Team : F
5 - Docherty
4 - Everitt
3 - Simpson
2 - Judd
1 - Gibbs
I love Juddy but geez some on here overplay everything he does.
2 touches in 60 mins of footy?
Yet worthy of a 9 vote performance :o
We scored 6 of our 9 goals whilst he was the dominant player on the ground. 9/15 is 60% of the vote, 6/9 is 66% of our goals. Fair enough? You vote on stats, I'll vote on influence.
Team E - disgraceful effort
4 Judd
4 Docherty
2 Gibbs
2 Tuohy
2 Everitt
1 Casboult
We scored 6 of our 9 goals whilst he was the dominant player on the ground. 9/15 is 60% of the vote, 6/9 is 66% of our goals. Fair enough? You vote on stats, I'll vote on influence.
Our voting system encourages people to vote as THEY see it. I hope that continues, as I am one of the least standard voters on the site.
5 Gibbs
4 Tuohy
3 Judd
2 Yarran
1 Bell
Team E - disgraceful effort
3 Everitt
3 Simpson
2 Tuohy
2 Docherty
2 Gibbs
2 Judd
1 Casboult
Team - E-, would have been F except for 1st qtr.
4 - Docherty
3 - Everitt
2 - Simpson
2 - Tuohy
1 - Bell
1 - Gibbs
1 - Judd
1 - Yarran
Team D-
5 - Docherty
3 - Simpson
3 - Judd
2 - Gibbs
2 - Everitt
5 Docherty
4 Everett
3 Simpson
2 Yarran
1 Judd
Team - F
4 - Docherty
3 - Judd
2 - Simpson
2 - Everett
1 - Wood
1 - Casboult
1 - Simpson
1 - Bell
Carlton vs. West Coast Votes
Team: F
The first quarter was very good, but after that there was nothing positive. It was embarrassing to see our better players become so ineffective and our midfield and defence being thrashed so badly. I really found it difficult to find contributors.
Votes:
[2.5] Everitt
[2.5] Simpson
[2.5] Docherty
[2.0] Tuohy
[1.5] Gibbs
[1.5] Judd
[0.5] Ellard
[0.5] Murphy
[0.5] Casboult
[0.5] Yarran
[0.5] Bell
Explanations:
[2.5] Everitt So much better than last week that it was hard to recognize the same player. Everitt got his fair share of the ball and functioned quite well under pressure. A solid effort.
[2.5] Simpson: Did his best and got his fair share of ball.
[2.5] Docherty: Another strong effort to follow on from last week. He did a god job and attacked as best he could from defence.
[2.0] Tuohy: Solid game. Worked hard and ran hard.
[1.5] Gibbs: Statistically our best player, but he was much less effective than his impressive stats suggest. He did have 10 tackles. however, and worked hard.
[1.5] Judd: First quarter was brilliant. Then he was well covered.
[0.5] Ellard: Did a brilliant negative job on Hurn for most of the game. Hurn only got a kick when they were totally on top. Unfortunately he didn't get a lot of the ball himself.
[0.5] Murphy: Improved upon last week but still far from his best. OP?
[0.5] Casboult: Gave a target up forward and took a couple of excellent marks. Hopeless in the ruck.
[0.5] Yarran: Almost as good as Judd in the first quarter, but also dropped out of the game thereafter.
[0.5] Bell: Solid contributor.
Honourable Mentions:
Carrazzo: A down night for Carrots, he worked hard and deserves a mention.
Other Comments:
So many guys did so little. Our forwards never had a chance. We managed only 33 Inside 50's for the night, with half of them coming in the first quarter.
Wood: Probably his least effective game for us. NicNat and Lycett really towelled him out.
With all these guys getting votes how the hell did we lose? :))
With all these guys getting votes how the hell did we lose? :))
Personally, I would have just given 3 or 4 votes total but you have to give 15 votes
With all these guys getting votes how the hell did we lose? :))
This is only a small sample from me. I usually name more. And there is usually a number in the 'Honourable Mentions' Category. This time I struggled to name 1.
There was a wider spread of votes last week, and we didn't lose by so much, so you would expect a larger number of better players.
I think the average rating will be very close to an "
F" this week, which gives a good idea of how we really played.
You're too nice Crash. way too nice.
Team = F
Judd
Docherty
Everett
Split the votes as you choose but it's quite acceptable to pass as well.
Team - Z
-5; Murphy
-4; Jammo
-3; Gibbs
-2; Henderson
-1; Rowe
Team - Z
-5; Murphy
-4; Jammo
-3; Gibbs
-2; Henderson
-1; Rowe
I take it they are negative votes Amers? 8)
Team E.
5. Simpson
4. Everitt
3. Docherty
2. Casboult
1. Judd
Most of those guys gave a four 1/4 effort. Everitt espcially impressed me (im not a fan) with his ability to run for most of the day. Simmo gave 100% as always.
You're too nice Crash. way too nice.
A sever character flaw, I admit. :)
I take it they are negative votes Amers? 8)
Correct. probably not allowed, but hey....