Skip to main content
Topic: 2011 to 2015 comparisons (Read 20249 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: 2011 to 2015 comparisons

Reply #45
Remember smashing the Pies in Round 3 and being Premiership Favourites the next year..
"We are a club in a hurry"

#united #reset


Re: 2011 to 2015 comparisons

Reply #47
Remember smashing the Pies in Round 3 and being Premiership Favourites the next year..

Not bad for a side that peaked the previous year.
Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!

Re: 2011 to 2015 comparisons

Reply #48
Not bad for a side that peaked the previous year.

We didn't peak for very long.   It was a slow rise from being crap to playing finals.  Once we got there, we dropped off pretty quickly.

 

 

Re: 2011 to 2015 comparisons

Reply #50
We didn't peak for very long.   It was a slow rise from being crap to playing finals.  Once we got there, we dropped off pretty quickly.

Some may even argue we were yet to peak and that's just an excuse used by the propagandists.
Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!

Re: 2011 to 2015 comparisons

Reply #51
Why have we gotten worse relative to the rest of the comp though? Our group still had improvement in it, age wise. The 2013 team was supposedly entering its premiership window.

Geelong, Collingwood and West Coast have got worse as well.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!


Re: 2011 to 2015 comparisons

Reply #53
Why have we gotten worse relative to the rest of the comp though? Our group still had improvement in it, age wise. The 2013 team was supposedly entering its premiership window.

If we had the age profile of our 2001 side, fine but our list should still be on the up. So how did we get jumped?

Is it that lack of player development again, I think it keeps biting us on the ar5e? :o
The Force Awakens!

Re: 2011 to 2015 comparisons

Reply #54
Some may even argue we were yet to peak and that's just an excuse used by the propagandists.

All I know, is that the premiership window opened, but got slammed shut pretty quickly.   Club is looking at opening another window, but they are stuck in the basement.  A long way off

Re: 2011 to 2015 comparisons

Reply #55
When is the last time we loaded up on draft picks?   All we do is give them away.


Re: 2011 to 2015 comparisons

Reply #56
But they were all old sides. You should actually read the post properly.

What does age have to do with it? A prime Chris Judd carried the team back then and unfortunately none of the young guns from then have come close to filling his shoes.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!

Re: 2011 to 2015 comparisons

Reply #57
What does age have to do with it? A prime Chris Judd carried the team back then and unfortunately none of the young guns from then have come close to filling his shoes.

It's a player development problem, we've had kids who have stagnated but we can't keep blaming the kids because virtually none have reached their "potential"

We seem to have a club/coaching issue that has pervaded several senior coaches and administrations.
The Force Awakens!

Re: 2011 to 2015 comparisons

Reply #58
It's a player development problem, we've had kids who have stagnated but we can't keep blaming the kids because virtually none have reached their "potential"

We seem to have a club/coaching issue that has pervaded several senior coaches and administrations.

Yep, its called making coaches coach in self preservation mode the entire time they are here.

Sets them up to ignore nurturing young talent at the expense of a few wins in order to create a better learning environment.

Have a look at the fallout of having Smith as the sub.  If you listen to the common opinion, it should have been any one of 5 other players, all of which have played more than a season worth of senior footy rather than 1 debutant.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: 2011 to 2015 comparisons

Reply #59
Yep, its called making coaches coach in self preservation mode the entire time they are here.

Sets them up to ignore nurturing young talent at the expense of a few wins in order to create a better learning environment.

Have a look at the fallout of having Smith as the sub.  If you listen to the common opinion, it should have been any one of 5 other players, all of which have played more than a season worth of senior footy rather than 1 debutant.

Most player development happens at the VFL level.
The Force Awakens!