Jim Park Voting 2023 AFL Rd 13 Carlton vs Essendon June 10, 2023, 05:19:36 pm Voting is as usual: you have 15 votes to award pretty much as you will, with the following provisos:[1] 15 votes in total, no more, no less.[2] No more than 10 votes for any one player (even Sam Walsh or Patrick Cripps)[3] Three players at least must get a mention.[4] A grade for the game, A+ (what I want to see) to F-.Hopefully we'll have guys to vote for. Hopefully we have some people who want to vote! Numbers have been very low in the last couple of weeks.
Re: Jim Park Voting 2023 AFL Rd 13 Carlton vs Essendon Reply #1 – June 12, 2023, 02:29:54 pm Team D5 - Cerra4 - Weitering3 - McGovern2 - Walsh1 - Charlie
Re: Jim Park Voting 2023 AFL Rd 13 Carlton vs Essendon Reply #2 – June 12, 2023, 03:00:38 pm Team : C plus4. Cerra2. Docherty2. Charlie Curnow1. Walsh1. Saad1. Weitering1. Cincotta1. De Koning1. Kemp1. Acres
Re: Jim Park Voting 2023 AFL Rd 13 Carlton vs Essendon Reply #3 – June 12, 2023, 04:39:15 pm Team F:4: Kemp4: Cerra3: TDK2: Cincotta1: C. Curnow1: Saad
Re: Jim Park Voting 2023 AFL Rd 13 Carlton vs Essendon Reply #4 – June 12, 2023, 04:44:08 pm Team : D3.Cerra2.Walsh2.Saad1.Docherty1.Charlie Curnow1.Weitering1.Cincotta1.De Koning1.Kemp1.Acres1 McGovern
Re: Jim Park Voting 2023 AFL Rd 13 Carlton vs Essendon Reply #5 – June 12, 2023, 05:20:06 pm 5 Cerra4 Weiters3 TDK2 Saad1 CincottaTeam D-
Re: Jim Park Voting 2023 AFL Rd 13 Carlton vs Essendon Reply #6 – June 12, 2023, 06:32:15 pm Team : D5. Cerra2. Kemp2. Walsh (many possessions = more effort than most but questionable effectiveness) 1. Cincotta1. De Koning1. Docherty1. Martin (for one quarter)1. Charlie Curnow1. Ed Curnow (for keeping Merrett quiet in the first half)
Re: Jim Park Voting 2023 AFL Rd 13 Carlton vs Essendon Reply #7 – June 14, 2023, 10:20:55 am Team D 5 Cerra2 TDK 2 Weiters 2 Doc1 Cincotta 1 Kemp1 Walsh 1 Charlie
Re: Jim Park Voting 2023 AFL Rd 13 Carlton vs Essendon Reply #8 – June 16, 2023, 10:02:08 pm FL Rd 13: Carlton vs EssendonA third really disappointing game in a row. We were the better team for 3 quarters, but had no idea how to score.Rating: D+Votes:Voting has been difficult of late, as so few of our players are playing dominant games. A lot of guys are going something, but not enough and not together.[3] Adam Cerra[2] Jacob Weitering[1.5] Charlie Curnow[1.5] Sam Docherty[1] Sam Walsh[1] Tom de Koning[1] Adam Saad[1] Brodie Kemp[0.5] Matthew Kennedy[0.5] Alex Cincotta[0.5] Blake Acres[0.5] Mitch McGovern[0.5] Jack Martin[0.5] Ed CurnowExplanations:[3] Adam Cerra: Our most effective player, even he struggled to get a centre clearance.[2] Jacob Weitering: Thrashed his opponents. Back into something like form.[1.5] Charlie Curnow: Normally 17 possessions for a key forward would be a brilliant game, but 2 goals 4 really hurt.[1.5] Sam Docherty: Doc was strong, but his disposal was not what we need it to be.[1] Sam Walsh: Never has Sam Walsh had 35 possessions that meant so little.[1] Tom de Koning: One of Tom’s better ruck efforts. Unfortunately, we still could get a centre clearance.[1] Adam Saad: Did his job and took his small forward to the cleaners.[1] Brodie Kemp: A very solid game in defence. Producing some nice things.[0.5] Matthew Kennedy: Worked his guts out but couldn’t buy a centre clearance.[0.5] Alex Cincotta: Did his job and kicked a goal. On the improve.[0.5] Blake Acres: Got the ball well enough but doesn’t hurt enough when he gets them.[0.5] Mitch McGovern: Had a couple of rough patches but he did improve, and he did a decent job.[0.5] Jack Martin: One quarter of good stuff.[0.5] Ed Curnow: An excellent job in the first half keeping Merrett very quiet.Honourable Mentions:Harry McKay Not bad but didn’t make the most of his chances.Matthew Owies: At least he was dangerous.