Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal (Read 31283 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #180 –
Quote from: ElwoodBlues1 on
Agree....got carried away with his position of power too as a media commentator and because he has had a bit of respect in the industry a few people listen to him.

Yes he seems to have assumed a regal air now on SEN - presiding grandiosely over the program.  ::)

KB sounds great by comparison....... :))
Reality always wins in the end.

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #181 –
Quote from: cookie2 on
Yes he seems to have assumed a regal air now on SEN - presiding grandiosely over the program.  ::)

KB sounds great by comparison....... :))

KB doesn't take himself as seriously as Whatley, but he can be just as insidious!

People should start asking Whatley on air when his is opening his journalistic investigation into Geelong's BumberT era!
The Force Awakens!

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #182 –
In news just in:

Essendon player Jake Stringer may be charged with loitering, however the club are confident they can successfully defend any charge, particularly intent.

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #183 –
Quote from: spf on
In news just in:

Essendon player Jake Stringer may be charged with loitering, however the club are confident they can successfully defend any charge, particularly intent.

Bahahaha, the gift that keeps on giving. ;D
2024... Moir of the same to come

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #185 –
Charlie's case done and dusted....but they're going to hold the decision until Ed's is done and deliver both verdicts at the end.

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #186 –
We cannot really trust the AFL's ticker tape, it's paraphrasing both councils, but it feels like nobody wants Charlie done over.
The Force Awakens!

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #187 –
Someone needs to ask Whately why they used to have a segment on 360 that was a skit show of Bomber T off his chops.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #188 –
I've been on many similar tribunals (not in sport), and it strikes me as very odd that they don't render a verdict after each case? Why wait to give both verdicts at the end? I'm thinking the AFL wants to make a statement

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #189 –
Quote from: Lods on
Charlie's case done and dusted....but they're going to hold the decision until Ed's is done and deliver both verdicts at the end.

Peculiar, unless they knew the results from the get-go... ::)
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #190 –
One problem for the players is the change in the panel, Gleeson is presenting the AFL case, and he's old school legal along with Kellam and Green.

I got the feeling that our club thinks Charlie has a chance to have the appeal dismissed, but that Ed will have the appeal upheld!
The Force Awakens!

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #191 –

The AFL originally tried to get the cases heard together but that wasn't allowed

The joint announcement of the decision was probably a concession.

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #192 –
Here it comes

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #193 –
Charlie Curnow evidence clear saw umpire and spoke to him and had contact with him. But took place while he was trying to break up potential melee. Open to consider his actions as inadvertent.
 
Cannot be said Tribunal decision was so unreasonable.
 
Appeal dismissed.

Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal

Reply #194 –
Bet Ed gets a week, or has his fine increased.

Might be a while!
The Force Awakens!