Skip to main content
Recent Posts
2
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by Gointocarlton -
Attitudes (hatred and anger) like Thorpe's create wars not solve problems or achieve outcomes. The only thing she has in common with MLK is that she is of the same species (human), that's about it.
4
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by LP -
Thorpe appears to be as disliked on her own side of politics as by the opposition.

I mentioned a long time ago that I fear many have lost their way, and when they become extreme they talk crap, then when they get called out for talking crap they claim it's institutionalised racism. This is straight out of Trump's play book, talk crap, then when they call you out for talking crap claim you are being persecuted and discriminated against.

I notice the NASCA board have come out and potted Thorpe today, declaring she doesn't speak for young indigenous Australians.
5
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by Lods -

Lidia Thorpes methods are the complete opposite of King's. Maybe she should take a leaf from that playbook.

(Oh...and King...well that's my generation) :D  :D

Perhaps my earlier post lacked clarity. Whether Thorpe's methods are same or different to MLK is not really the point. MLK was the most hated man in America when he died, and the consensus position among surveyed Americans is that he was divisive and his methods counterproductive to the Negro cause, which is where the comparison to Thorpe comes in, or Adam Goodes for that matter.

Do you really think history will judge Lidia Thorpe as Australia's equivalent of  MLK?

King was a leader of people. Thorpe seems to be only interested in her own profile.
6
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by PaulP -

Lidia Thorpes methods are the complete opposite of King's. Maybe she should take a leaf from that playbook.

(Oh...and King...well that's my generation) :D  :D

Perhaps my earlier post lacked clarity. Whether Thorpe's methods are same or different to MLK is not really the point. MLK was the most hated man in America when he died, and the consensus position among surveyed Americans is that he was divisive and his methods counterproductive to the Negro cause, which is where the comparison to Thorpe comes in, or Adam Goodes for that matter.
7
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by Lods -
This lack of a first nation's voice is really a bit of a myth.
First nations people have  a strong voice.  They don't always agree  and are not necessarily always listened to especially by political folk. If you dont think they have a voice then you haven't been paying attention.Indigenous departments are part of State and Federal  Govenments and contain many Indigenous people. We had Indigenous aides and teachers in my schools for the last 20 years of my teaching providing an Indigenous perspective.

The issues facing indigenous people are significant and complex. Is enough being done to address these real issues.? Certainly not!

And folks like Lidia Thorpe with her distractions are not helping the situation. She is divisive and alienates people. Of all the things she talked about yesterday none were solutions, just grievances and insults.

If the powers that be are not listening and not acting, or listening and not acting, then it proves my point that First Nations people are still lacking power.

With your last paragraph, Americans said exactly the same about MLK, i.e that his civil rights demonstrations etc. hurt Negroes more than they helped. I'm not in any way suggesting that Thorpe is on par with MLK, but the comparison hardly flatters our generation.

Lidia Thorpes methods are the complete opposite of King's. Maybe she should take a leaf from that playbook.

(Oh...and King...well that's my generation) :D  :D
8
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by PaulP -
This lack of a first nation's voice is really a bit of a myth.
First nations people have  a strong voice.  They don't always agree  and are not necessarily always listened to especially by political folk. If you dont think they have a voice then you haven't been paying attention.Indigenous departments are part of State and Federal  Govenments and contain many Indigenous people. We had Indigenous aides and teachers in my schools for the last 20 years of my teaching providing an Indigenous perspective.

The issues facing indigenous people are significant and complex. Is enough being done to address these real issues.? Certainly not!

And folks like Lidia Thorpe with her distractions are not helping the situation. She is divisive and alienates people. Of all the things she talked about yesterday none were solutions, just grievances and insults.

If the powers that be are not listening and not acting, or listening and not acting, then it proves my point that First Nations people are still lacking power.

With your last paragraph, Americans said exactly the same about MLK, i.e that his civil rights demonstrations etc. hurt Negroes more than they helped. I'm not in any way suggesting that Thorpe is on par with MLK, but the comparison hardly flatters our generation.
9
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by Lods -
Historically, power asymmetries have never been corrected voluntarily. There isn't one example that I can recall where those at the top cede power over a hot cocoa and marshmallows. Historically, their hand has always been forced. Lidia Thorpe is rough around the edges and doesn't mind crude tactics (or maybe doesn't know any better), but she does have a point. It's taken 200 years for First Nations voices to be even heard, and there's still plenty to do. Martin Luther King was correct when he said the arc of the moral universe is long.

This lack of a first nation's voice is really a bit of a myth.
First nations people have  a strong voice.  They don't always agree  and are not necessarily always listened to especially by political folk. If you dont think they have a voice then you haven't been paying attention.Indigenous departments are part of State and Federal  Govenments and contain many Indigenous people. We had Indigenous aides and teachers in my schools for the last 20 years of my teaching providing an Indigenous perspective.

The issues facing indigenous people are significant and complex. Is enough being done to address these real issues.? Certainly not!

And folks like Lidia Thorpe with her distractions are not helping the situation. She is divisive and alienates people. Of all the things she talked about yesterday none were solutions, just grievances and insults.

10
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: General Discussions
Last post by Thryleon -
No one in parliament is interested in changing the status quo remarkably.  They are only interested in feeding their own snout and making sure the trough they feed at is protected.

That's fine, so long as we have no illusions we won't be dissapointed.   They'll change bits and pieces along the way, but it has to suit.  As we see another onslaught of minority immigration it suits Australia the nation to tie itself to indigenous roots as a matter of national security.  Also fine unless you don't like that.  Pretty hard to topple the nation or invade it though.  You'll see tenuous links to being indigenous granted soon enough too.  People will embrace it.