Carlton Supporters Club

So do you want the truth, or would you prefer to stick with your beliefs?

Your tackling is about as innocuous as most of our current players. Sadly.

We can't take anything offered by Dr Peter "HCQ" McCullough seriously, he's been discredited repeatedly for the last six months with every formal large scale study showing his original paper is worthless, at least in a scientific context, politically perhaps the paper is quite valuable when much of your funding comes from the certain right wing sources.

And yes, an R₀ = 7.0 is about a magnitude more infectious than R₀ = 2.5, so actually worse than 3x, the 3x Macron allegedly states, well maybe that a lost in translation moment, the question is was that a mistake on Dr HCQ's part of deviously manipulated for political purposes?

If it was so 'innocuous' why did you arc up so?

An important distinction. What Wingman MAV pointed out -- Epoch/Falon Gong/Qanon -- in response to your point of argument was to question the sources of your information. That is NOT playing the man, that is playing the ball.

You referred to Wingman MAV as 'petal' - that is condescension, which is person, which is playing the man.

What would your version of the truth be?

@ElwoodBlues1‍

So do you want the truth, or would you prefer to stick with your beliefs?

Can you define what qualifies as the highlighted part?
Will I get Vaccinated?....Yes...when I think there is a vaccine/s that suits my criteria, needs and more data available to make that choice.

One with less serious side effects with relation to my/family medical history, that is more effective for longer periods between jabs and that is accepted clearly as the best by Medical opinion universally and not by defined what can produced more cheaply or will assist the time frame of the economic aspirations of the Government in my own country.
Here is another version of the truth......
 https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/06/novavax-now-best-covid-19-vaccine/619276/

Yes, this is an interesting depiction / version.

You know the author's claims are based on a single clinical trial of only 7,580 dose of Novavax, which she claims delivers more accurate results than the hundreds of millions of doses of Pfizer that have been issued.

Do you think it's odd the article contains no comparison to AZ, given they use the same technology, does that not ring your suspicion bell?

Does a US perspective colour color the resulting conclusions?

I think we have to accept that in our society, there will be those who will follow the prevailing scientific and medical orthodoxy, and those who will follow the path less traveled, alternative therapies, natural medicines and the like. For all of us, whichever path you take, may you be safe, healthy and virus free.

Very promising but would I be jabbing myself with Novavax right now....No...not until I had more evidence of success in all areas of concern.

Paul, you are making me sound like a Hippie driving a Kombie van and deriving my medical information from Snoop Dogs weed Dealer😀. I'm definitely not that and pro Western medicine and its very much just deciding which Western Medicine is best IMHO.
I just think with CoVid numbers low in Aus I can afford to wait a bit longer and make a more informed decision as more data become available. Hope you and the family stay healthy and virus free too....same to all our forum members.

@LP the only thing I am waiting on is a response regarding where you sit re vaccination, have you had yours?