Skip to main content
Topic: CV and mad panic behaviour (Read 438513 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5520
Is this the next problem after Covid?

Dr. John Campbell discusses we are starting to see a major resurgence of illnesses like common colds, flu and stomach bugs, respiratory-type indicators increased nationally particularly, 1-14 years - the return of the 'common cold' and that with isolation our immunity has dropped.

https://youtu.be/7Vsp5DJtsXM

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5521
I know how you feel! I had 1 vitriolic poster suggesting I was the type who would have handed over Jewish people in Hitler's Germany for extermination. Can you believe that? It's hard to think of anything more vile, vitriolic and despicable than invoking the holocaust in that way. You'd think someone like that should have spent a bit of time reflecting on his behaviour.

You mean it wasn't you that said that we should round up all the vaccinated and put them in their own special state with its own border?

You are a chronic self loather though, so I wouldn't be surprised.  Happy to discriminate against anyone provided it fits your political agenda.  We are not as equal as you are Mav!  Good to know.

"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5522
Great to see you setting such a fine example when it comes to inflammatory and vitriolic remarks. You're nothing but a hypocrite.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5523
Thryleon, that’s 1 guy’s legal opinion and when cases come to court they are matched by an opposing legal submission which will also be incredibly well written and perhaps even more so. This is the sort of dispute that’s currently being heard by the NSW Supreme Court. When decisions start coming out of superior courts, we’ll have the answer about the legal enforceability of vaccine mandates.

Let’s acknowledge that no one will be physically or even legally forced to take the vaccine. Suggestions to the contrary are pure rhetoric. Like it or not, that’s a pretty major factor in challenging vaccine mandates.

As for blaming a failure of governments to educate, the old saying is apt: “A lie gets halfway around the world before truth puts on its boots”. No government has found a way to counter the firehouse of lies and disinformation through social media. Imagine how hard it would be for a regional government to fund an education campaign that would target its electorate as comprehensively as global anti-vaxxer propaganda. No doubt Government websites throughout Australia would educate anyone who bothers to access them. The media has educated the public via extensive interviews with epidemiologists and doctors. How do you educate someone who doesn't watch those interviews but instead binge-watches antivax propaganda promoted by algorithms whose sole aim is to keep people engaged with its site's content? 





Mav, did you read that article?
In its entirety where it talks about the charter of human rights?  Not just the quote I outlayed?   It is just one element of a very interesting legal minefield we are about to traverse.  Sure, its one guys opinion, but he is not just one guy, he is a teacher of future lawyers.

On a seperate topic, the majority of people I know of, who you propose have listened to the anti vax algorithm, are not what you think they are.

You assume far too much about them.  I see them all every day, in the front lines, genuinely questioning what we are being told, because they don't know what to believe, what is right, what is right for them, and because we as a liberated society have encouraged questioning what doesnt seem right (and that relies on a lot of people applying their brains with 0 bias, which is very difficult at the moment).

Going to the vic.gov website is extremely informative, but Dan Andrews press conferences are something I elected to turn off very eary on in this pandemic, because I could see the reaction to his words on the podium, from people who heard the same thing I did, and somehow managed to draw a very different conclusion about all the measures (I concluded framed by their own life experience).  It was then that I realised, that the message from the government in isolation, is simply another part of the problem.


Real Problem:  It should be a spectrum.  We have gone with a Utopian approach to this which is as much in the health services interest, as it is everyone else's and most people who are smart recognise this, and the reality is, that people frame all of whats going on through their life experience and how this has impacted them personally.   The hardest part, is that we haven't really had a proper covid journey, and the few elements we have seen, have seen political backlash (last years aged care in vic).

I can show you a multitude of different videos discussing the nuances of all of this (for and against), and conclude, that someone is correct, but that is just people choosing to believe one thing over another, but when those beliefs are linked to a world view, a lifestyle a method of earning a living, and the Utopian response runs contrary to those things, what do you think the outcome is?

Overwhelming acceptance?  No.  The opposite is true.  It becomes harder to accept. 

This is Portugal's COVID response:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10-05/how-portugal-managed-to-have-the-highest-rates-of-vaccination/100514138

Whilst politicians are telling people what to do, in an equation where they don't agree with the pandemic response, because politics, personal situation etc, rather than take the road of mandate (or in their opinion dictate) you open the conversation, and you can actually make more positive change, and win peoples hearts and minds (politicians take note).

You know, in the lead up to getting vaccinated, I did a lot of soul searching (as well as "research")  in the end I discovered a few things about why I wouldn't and largely it was about myself.  Fear was driving me more than critical thinking.  Ego was another.  The fear was the fear of what a "experimental" vaccine might do, and the unknown.  I recognised early through my arrogance that COVID would likely not hurt me.  I feared the vaccine more than covid for various reasons, one being my ego.  Once I recognised this, I had a tumultuous time once again, by my ego which then engaged my critical thinking to "research" Covid, and the stats, and all the data, the vaccines, etc.  Whilst I battled with this, I went to sleep one night, and realised that I fear was once again in the driving seat (its hard to recognise and this is a super long post, apologies and bear with me) and then I recognised a simple truth.  You cant find the answers online, because its an echo chamber.  It is literally going to give you what you look for and thats what the majority of people are finding.  Ways to discredit a pandemic that they deny exists so they wont have to take a vaccine they are fearful of.

Personally, I think that education is best.  If you don't, you can disagree if you like, but the one truth I see coming, is that mandating vaccination is problematic to do with the charter of human rights.  We are going to see a lot of people who may lose their job drag a few things through courts, some people who are trying to simply enforce the mandating of the vaccine are going to cop it in the neck as a consequence, and if we do need this to occur again in future, the government has allowed enough mis-trust of them to fester to the point, where things are problematic, and as EB1 says, its also their workforce in the health system we are talking about here.


"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5524
Great to see you setting such a fine example when it comes to inflammatory and vitriolic remarks. You're nothing but a hypocrite.
Takes one to know one!!

:D

How many posters have you made leave this forum now??
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5525
Gee, takes one to know one ... that takes me back to primary school days. Didn't you get suspended after your Hitler comment (not that I sought or wished that)? At least you had a bit of time to reflect (though it didn't seem you used the time all that well).

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5526
It's interesting that EVERY State has announced vaccine mandates in the healthcare sector. The US Govt has announced vaccine mandates for federal employees. Italy, France etc. Makes you think, doesn't it?

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5527
By the way, it pisses me off that anti-vaxxers are trying to co-opt “discrimination” in the fight against mandates. There are specific classes of people who are protected from discrimination and anti-vaxxers aren’t one of them. There’s heaps of discrimination that isn’t regulated. If an employer requires a degree or a VCE certificate, that’s allowed. Employers can refuse to employ people with tattoos. Paedophiles aren’t protected from being sacked by schools or childcare centres. Essendon footballers weren’t able to complain about discrimination against athletes who used PEDs. Hell, gay people weren’t even able to use anti-discrimination legislation to avoid being sacked by Catholic schools.

The great thing is that vaccine mandates don’t discriminate against people who hold anti-vax views. If they vaccinate, they can express as much antipathy towards vaccinations as they wish and the mandate won’t stop them working. But try telling a black person s/he can just avoid discrimination by changing his or her skin colour or a gay person can avoid discrimination by praying the gay away ...

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5528
Gee, takes one to know one ... that takes me back to primary school days. Didn't you get suspended after your Hitler comment (not that I sought or wished that)? At least you had a bit of time to reflect (though it didn't seem you used the time all that well).

I would have thought play on would have been the call....  ;) 

Just because I deleted my account at the time, doesnt mean I wasnt reading.




"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5529
Lumping people who choose not to get vaccinated against COVID into one category of "anti vaccer" does a lot of people a disservice.

We are simply creating yet another social issue, that we are going to have to solve. 

Quote
Human rights issues

Section 10(c) states that a person must not be subjected to medical treatment without his or her full, free, and informed consent. Because vaccination is a medical procedure, forcing a person to be vaccinated against his or her will is a clear violation of this right.

Section 12 states that every person lawfully within Victoria has the right to move freely within Victoria and to enter and leave it, and has the freedom to choose where to live. Requiring that a person may not travel to his or her place of employment without being vaccinated limits this right.

Section 13 states that a person has the right not to have his or her privacy unlawfully or arbitrarily interfered with. Requiring a person to disclose his or her vaccination status to an employer or a government agency potentially limits this right.

Section 14 states that every person has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion, and belief, and that a person must not be coerced or restrained in a way that limits his or her freedom to have or adopt a religion or belief in observance or practice. Conscience is a person’s conviction as to what is right and wrong. Some people may object on political grounds, believing that it is not the proper role of government to force people to be vaccinated, even if they do not object in principle to vaccination. Some people are genuinely concerned that receiving a vaccination poses a substantial risk of physical injury or harm. Some people may object on religious grounds to being vaccinated — for example, because tissue or cells from aborted foetuses have been used in the development of the vaccines. For all these categories of people, forcing a person to be vaccinated violates that person’s freedom of conscience or religious beliefs, or forces them to do something they believe is potentially harmful.

Underlying all the rights protected by the Charter Act is the concept of autonomy and dignity. Each person has the right to determine for himself or herself matters of bodily integrity including whether to be vaccinated.

As we simply create yet another wave of societal issues, we are now going to see a section of society who choose to thumb their nose at the mandates, and I suspect it would have been smaller, and less of a problem, had we just let the virus take care of the anti vaccers, without shoving it down people's throats.

Particularly in the context of people knowing of others who have had adverse reactions to the vaccine, and no one test positive to covid yet. 

"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5530
Good to see you saw what I posted. That's still my view. I'm happy to fight my own battles and I'm happy to cross swords/hatchets with you and bury the hatchets afterwards. But when you start digging up your hatchet, you surely wouldn't mind if I dig mine up too ...

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5531
I think you'll find the vaccine mandates have been responsible for increasing the vaccination rates and the number of holdouts has decreased. Overseas experience has shown that 50% of them talk tough to canvassers before D-Day arrives, saying they'd rather quit than be forced into taking the vaccine. But when push comes to shove, only 1-2% follow through.

Personally, I wouldn't mind if the mandates were repealed after the date for full vaccination. That would see most would end up fully vaccinated. But that sort of bluff would destroy the credibility of the government concerned, so that's not going to happen. On the other hand, if a court quashes the mandate after the date for full vaccination, face would be saved. 

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5532
Here ya go:   Fewer than than 0.1% of NSW health staff have quit due to Covid vaccination mandates, The Guardian.

Only 136 quit rather than vaccinate. The Liberal Government is crowing that the mayhem predicted by the Labor opposition didn't come to pass.

Quote
But according to Brett Holmes, the general secretary of the NSW Nurses and Midwives Association, opposition to mandates among staff have been overblown. Holmes said that while a small number of his members had resigned after the mandate, feedback suggested many of those were leaving the industry because of what he called “pandemic fatigue”.

But Holmes is concerned about staff shortages. In northern NSW, often held up as a stronghold of vaccine hesitancy, he said shortages had been a problem long before the pandemic.

So it's hard to be exact when it comes to the effect of the vaccine mandate. Some who have quit didn't do so because of the vaccine mandate, but the article also points out that others may be stood down for failing to vaccinate and may quit later.  But it doesn't seem that the feared backlash has occurred.

Final submissions were heard in the NSW Supreme Court cases of Al-Munir Kassam v Bradley Ronald Hazzard & Natasha Henry v Brad Hazzard last Wednesday, so that decision should be handed down reasonably soon.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5533
Tom Browne says AFL sources suggest vaccinations won't be made mandatory in the AFL but there are only a few hesitants whose hands will be forced anyway as air travel will require vaccination.

 

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #5534
I had to kick a guy of a construction site today because he wasn't vaccinated.

Initially he played the "but i've got my first jab booked in x weeks" and i felt for him, but it didn't change anything.
Upon further chatting, he ended up going into the usual spiels about dictator dan, how he wants to have kids some day and doesn't want his dna altered by the vaccine which has been 'proven' by videos he's seen on facebook etc etc.
Claims all pro-vaccine ads are paid actors and all the governments of the world are in the pocket of big pharma.

etc.

I'm not sure he ever did have his first jab booked in at all after hearing all that.

I spent a good hour with him chatting about the whole thing and trying to convince him that what he has heard via social media is basically nonsense. I got through a little bit, but an hour long chat is not going to reverse months/years of misinformation programming.

He was a good kid who is very confused.

I think the government needs to get on the front foot and debunk a lot of myths that similar people believe.