Skip to main content
Topic: CV and mad panic behaviour (Read 438321 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1515
The fairer comparison is to compare Sweden with it's Nordic neighbours.
On this comparison, it has endured a shocking death toll and a shocking case rate (and the unknown long term effects of that).
It has seen a big jump recently in cases and it doesn't have herd immunity. It needs 60-70% of the population to have herd immunity, if the virus does not mutate over the next year or so and outsmart the antibodies, or if the antibodies don't begin to disappear (which there is some evidence it does).

To have herd immunity it would require infections to be at least 8x higher than they have been, which of course is possible as we know that the true number is not really reflected in the positive test number, but the new rise in infections suggest that herd immunity has clearly not been achieved.

Now they are talking lockdowns, I would suggest losing close to 6,000 lives based purely on the strategy you undertook could be declared a disaster

CountryCasesDeathsPopulationCases Per MillDeaths Per MillTests Per Mill
Norway13,5452705,431,2542,49450186,167
Finland 9,577 3435,542,7771,72862173,227
Sweden90,923 5,88010,114,1848,990 581151,533
Denmark 25,5946475,797,0584,415112622,430
Iceland 2,56110341,767   7,49329786,609
Comparison
Australia27,015 87025,569,269 1,05734 293,979
Ans of course we should have had MUCH less, 50-70% less at least
You were 17x more likely to die from this virus if you were in Sweden, than if you were in Australia
Goals for 2017
=============
Play the most anti-social football in the AFL


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1516
It's not just the verified case count that is an issue, the number of infections exceeds the number of detections by some ratio.

Locally I heard a expert on radio state they think in Australia we only detect about 23% of infections, I haven't heard what the baseline is globally, but apparently Australia is quite good because we've tested about 1/3 of the population. That means here real infections could be 3x or 4x the detection rate.

When the number of test per head of population increase the detections increase, like Denmark and Iceland, where they have tested a large portion of the population, 60% or 70%

Now think of Sweden, where the death are almost an order of magnitude higher than Australia, Sweden's case detections exceed Denmark or Iceland but Sweden's testing is less than 15%! :o

Of course it's complicated because not everyone lives in the same geospacial, geosocial or economic conditions.

A lot of people put the stock in the graphs, but the graphs lag real-time by about 7 to 14 days, again based on an average some regions are faster others slower.

Detections always lag behind infections, if detections rise regularly at all, then infections are already on the steeper growth curve!
The Force Awakens!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1517
Don't for one minute think I'm underestimating the effects of this disease.
At 66 with heart and kidney issues I can't afford to get it.
I've been pretty much housebound for six months.
I'm still reluctant to stray far from home and I keep a record of all the places I've visited.
...and I'm currently living in QLD with very few active cases

The suggestion was that Sweden and the UK are heading for a world of pain.
I'm wondering whether they'll be any worse off than other European nations.

I'm not doubting Sweden adopted a poor strategy in the beginning.
I'm just curious as to how they will go long term.

So Sweden...yep, poor during the first wave.
But let's put those first wave stats aside for one minute.
At the moment we're seeing a rising trend in their second wave but how are they comparing  with others second time around
Are they(will they be) any worse off in their second wave than others.

The charts I'm looking at show a dozen nations with greater numbers of deaths per million than Sweden.
Are we singling them out because they seemed to follow a different strategy?


.

 

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1518
Lods you could be right, it is possible they are being singled out, but then the comparisons are interesting.

So Spain and Italy (as an example) we know part of their high original death tolls can be attributed to underestimating the power of this disease to cause the chaos it has, they were hit earliest and I think any country hit in this way was going to suffer a similar fate.
The other thing about these countries is that besides sharing land borders with other continental countries, they have high numbers of immigrants coming through unchecked from Africa, which means there is no quarantine for many of these people and if they have the virus it is going through unchecked. Not only is it going through unchecked, but if one person on an overcrowded boat makes it to those lands undetected, then that entire boat will almost certainly be infected also. This creates a situation where each fresh boat has the potential to be another wave starter.

Sweden on the other hand shares a land border with Finland (7 day average 90) and Norway (7 day average 111) whilst maintaining a 7 day average currently of 298.
It does share a bridge with Denmark (7 day average 535), which Denmark have restricted entry to from Sweden, but Sweden has to my knowledge left open. Freight traffic is still open both ways.
Denmark being a continental (thought Nordic) country of course shares a land border with Germany (7 day average 1780).

The reason for bringing that all up is that with less migration to Scandinavian countries than continental countries, there is less unchecked travel through borders and less chance for the virus to spread. England should have less issues as they have the ability to restrict traffic (as we do), but being a "destination" country there are also more attempts at illegal entry and all the problems that come with that, especially as until mid August they had removed the 14 day quarantine between itself and France (which by the way is self-quarantine). Why the UK didn't go into harder lockdowns I really don't know they left themselves on the precipice of a huge outbreak by sitting in a middle ground and hoped it would die out. It seems quite idiotic when you think about how they brought it down from 5,000 a day to 500 (about our average here at out peak), but started to ease restrictions, in that time is has increased 10 fold.

With regards to a dozen countries having worst death tolls per million than Sweden, this is true.. but it's neighbours are all between 60-100 ranking for deaths per million and sitting 14th (12th if you remove countries of less than 100,000 population) is not really a glowing endorsement.

You are right though, I feel like Sweden is being specifically judged because they made the decision that the financial importance was greater than the importance of life. There is no doubt they could have reduced their death toll by at least 70%, or if human terms at least 4,000 lives were sacrificed in an attempt to let the rest of the country live their lives. When you make a decision like that, you need to come out a clear winner, which Sweden hasn't done and it has resulted to them considering lockdown measures..

The UK has clearly mishandled their crisis, they are a destination country for sure, but they had fair warning, whilst most people who had the virus upon hitting continental Europe will have likely passed the worst of it by the time they setup in the Calais region to try and cross to England, there will be a lot that have picked it up during their travels from the south of Europe up to Calais and I suspect these camps often have large numbers of infections due to the transient nature of the people passing through there. Still, they should have been able to control their case load much better than they have and I don't know why they have not locked down through each county with hard lockdowns and tried to grow from there.

So yes continental countries are suffering worse than Sweden, but it is still suffering worse than it to land border  neighbours.

To be honest though, I would not want to be in any European country right now. Even Austria who, in my opinion, handled the first wave better than pretty well any other European country (along with maybe Norway) is suffering a lot at the moment. It is not surprising, it is a landlocked country with 8 borders and a number of those countries are exploding. Their deaths per million despite this are 87 (ranked 70th).
Goals for 2017
=============
Play the most anti-social football in the AFL


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1519
Don't for one minute think I'm underestimating the effects of this disease.
At 66 with heart and kidney issues I can't afford to get it.
I've been pretty much housebound for six months.
I'm still reluctant to stray far from home and I keep a record of all the places I've visited.
...and I'm currently living in QLD with very few active cases

The suggestion was that Sweden and the UK are heading for a world of pain.
I'm wondering whether they'll be any worse off than other European nations.

I'm not doubting Sweden adopted a poor strategy in the beginning.
I'm just curious as to how they will go long term.

So Sweden...yep, poor during the first wave.
But let's put those first wave stats aside for one minute.
At the moment we're seeing a rising trend in their second wave but how are they comparing  with others second time around
Are they(will they be) any worse off in their second wave than others.

The charts I'm looking at show a dozen nations with greater numbers of deaths per million than Sweden.
Are we singling them out because they seemed to follow a different strategy?


.

The few sources of information I have seen on Sweden has them faring much worse during the second wave than their Nordic neighbours based on trend.

We wont know until we know for sure but data is coming out to show that herd immunity is impossible to achieve and they did take some lockdown measures but think of us in June and that was closer to what they did.  Businesses and schools open.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1520
Lods you could be right, it is possible they are being singled out, but then the comparisons are interesting.

So Spain and Italy (as an example) we know part of their high original death tolls can be attributed to underestimating the power of this disease to cause the chaos it has, they were hit earliest and I think any country hit in this way was going to suffer a similar fate.
The other thing about these countries is that besides sharing land borders with other continental countries, they have high numbers of immigrants coming through unchecked from Africa, which means there is no quarantine for many of these people and if they have the virus it is going through unchecked. Not only is it going through unchecked, but if one person on an overcrowded boat makes it to those lands undetected, then that entire boat will almost certainly be infected also. This creates a situation where each fresh boat has the potential to be another wave starter.

Sweden on the other hand shares a land border with Finland (7 day average 90) and Norway (7 day average 111) whilst maintaining a 7 day average currently of 298.
It does share a bridge with Denmark (7 day average 535), which Denmark have restricted entry to from Sweden, but Sweden has to my knowledge left open. Freight traffic is still open both ways.
Denmark being a continental (thought Nordic) country of course shares a land border with Germany (7 day average 1780).

The reason for bringing that all up is that with less migration to Scandinavian countries than continental countries, there is less unchecked travel through borders and less chance for the virus to spread. England should have less issues as they have the ability to restrict traffic (as we do), but being a "destination" country there are also more attempts at illegal entry and all the problems that come with that, especially as until mid August they had removed the 14 day quarantine between itself and France (which by the way is self-quarantine). Why the UK didn't go into harder lockdowns I really don't know they left themselves on the precipice of a huge outbreak by sitting in a middle ground and hoped it would die out. It seems quite idiotic when you think about how they brought it down from 5,000 a day to 500 (about our average here at out peak), but started to ease restrictions, in that time is has increased 10 fold.

With regards to a dozen countries having worst death tolls per million than Sweden, this is true.. but it's neighbours are all between 60-100 ranking for deaths per million and sitting 14th (12th if you remove countries of less than 100,000 population) is not really a glowing endorsement.

You are right though, I feel like Sweden is being specifically judged because they made the decision that the financial importance was greater than the importance of life. There is no doubt they could have reduced their death toll by at least 70%, or if human terms at least 4,000 lives were sacrificed in an attempt to let the rest of the country live their lives. When you make a decision like that, you need to come out a clear winner, which Sweden hasn't done and it has resulted to them considering lockdown measures..

The UK has clearly mishandled their crisis, they are a destination country for sure, but they had fair warning, whilst most people who had the virus upon hitting continental Europe will have likely passed the worst of it by the time they setup in the Calais region to try and cross to England, there will be a lot that have picked it up during their travels from the south of Europe up to Calais and I suspect these camps often have large numbers of infections due to the transient nature of the people passing through there. Still, they should have been able to control their case load much better than they have and I don't know why they have not locked down through each county with hard lockdowns and tried to grow from there.

So yes continental countries are suffering worse than Sweden, but it is still suffering worse than it to land border  neighbours.

To be honest though, I would not want to be in any European country right now. Even Austria who, in my opinion, handled the first wave better than pretty well any other European country (along with maybe Norway) is suffering a lot at the moment. It is not surprising, it is a landlocked country with 8 borders and a number of those countries are exploding. Their deaths per million despite this are 87 (ranked 70th).

My brother lives in London.  UK strategy is being dictated by BREXIT.  they're trying not to inflict more damage to their economy because they have a very bleak outlook before covid19 hit and he seems to think things are about to really go pear shaped.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1521
The few sources of information I have seen on Sweden has them faring much worse during the second wave than their Nordic neighbours based on trend.

We wont know until we know for sure but data is coming out to show that herd immunity is impossible to achieve and they did take some lockdown measures but think of us in June and that was closer to what they did.  Businesses and schools open.

Really?

There is a lot of evidence to show that herd immunity is very much achievable...and at much lower thresholds than we originally thought was needed.

The Brit Nic Lewis wrote a great paper (tying in some of the work of Garbriela Gomes).

https://www.nicholaslewis.org/herd-immunity-to-covid-19-and-pre-existing-immune-responses/

Several of the great minds in the relevant field agree.

Start with  Sunetra Gupta.

One example, from a very level headed lady - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbvO4sUg1eA

Finals, then 4 in a row!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1522
The fairer comparison is to compare Sweden with it's Nordic neighbours.
On this comparison, it has endured a shocking death toll and a shocking case rate (and the unknown long term effects of that).
It has seen a big jump recently in cases and it doesn't have herd immunity. It needs 60-70% of the population to have herd immunity, if the virus does not mutate over the next year or so and outsmart the antibodies, or if the antibodies don't begin to disappear (which there is some evidence it does).

To have herd immunity it would require infections to be at least 8x higher than they have been, which of course is possible as we know that the true number is not really reflected in the positive test number, but the new rise in infections suggest that herd immunity has clearly not been achieved.

Now they are talking lockdowns, I would suggest losing close to 6,000 lives based purely on the strategy you undertook could be declared a disaster

CountryCasesDeathsPopulationCases Per MillDeaths Per MillTests Per Mill
Norway13,5452705,431,2542,49450186,167
Finland 9,577 3435,542,7771,72862173,227
Sweden90,923 5,88010,114,1848,990 581151,533
Denmark 25,5946475,797,0584,415112622,430
Iceland 2,56110341,767   7,49329786,609
Comparison
Australia27,015 87025,569,269 1,05734 293,979
Ans of course we should have had MUCH less, 50-70% less at least
You were 17x more likely to die from this virus if you were in Sweden, than if you were in Australia

https://www.aier.org/article/swedens-high-covid-death-rates-among-the-nordics-dry-tinder-and-other-important-factors/

and a great recent piece from Ivor Cummins:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UvFhIFzaac&t=745s
Finals, then 4 in a row!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1523
An article on News.com reveals its the Commissioner Ashton who is largely responsible for private security being used. He didnt want Police "babysitting" returned travellers. My question is, why didnt the police minister tell the silly old kent to pull his head in and do as he was told?

https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/tapes-solve-the-mystery-of-victorias-covid-hotel-whodunit/news-story/68067f4af991a8dc15a962c5173a8283
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1524
Actually GTC I don't think it would have been appropriate for police to be looking after quarantine.  Maybe PSOs would have been ok but if the ADF was offered ????

This whole affair reeks of a massive internal squabble within the government and a subsequent very amateurish cover up.
Reality always wins in the end.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1525
Actually GTC I don't think it would have been appropriate for police to be looking after quarantine.  Maybe PSOs would have been ok but if the ADF was offered ????

This whole affair reeks of a massive internal squabble within the government and a subsequent very amateurish cover up.

Not sure I agree about not appropriate.
The resources dedicated to maintaining quarantine etc far outweigh the resourcing that would have been required for babysitting.
Well unless there is another objection?

But of course what this doesn't speak to, is that of course the police could have also made mistakes and the ADF also.

It was just less likely they would when you compare to untrained security.
Goals for 2017
=============
Play the most anti-social football in the AFL


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1526
https://www.aier.org/article/swedens-high-covid-death-rates-among-the-nordics-dry-tinder-and-other-important-factors/

and a great recent piece from Ivor Cummins:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UvFhIFzaac&t=745s

I watched a bit of it, but it turned me off quite quickly.

I wonder flyboy so you believe that masks have no impact on disease control in general or no impact on the transmission of covid?
Also the same goes for lockdowns?
Do you think that there have been more deaths from covid compared to other viruses?

See the reality is this guy is  picking out statistic that suit his agenda (well this is not so abnormal) and saying here is proof, whether the statistics are all accurate or not. There is a lot of "denier" material out there, much as there is a lot of material to suggest 9/11 was an insider job, man never walked on the moon etc.

The problem is I don't agree with them and I don't have the time or energy to look at each... If I was seeing statistical anomalies that made me question the data. made me question the efficacy of masks and lockdowns, then yes I would be looking for answers in these place and questioning potentially, but everything I am seeing from a statistical point of view suggests the lockdowns, and the stage 3 restrictions with masks before them, are effective. They are reducing numbers at reliably predictable rate. So I don't have a reason for throwing an alternative view in, because the data matches the hypothesis.

I can tell by your posts you read a lot, you research your data and I am not trying to be dismissive, I just have an alternate view and it is not dissimilar if I was a democrat and someone said, you need to watch Fox News, they really have the answers...

But I appreciate you taking the time to post, I did look at for a few minutes
Goals for 2017
=============
Play the most anti-social football in the AFL


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1527
Not sure I agree about not appropriate.
The resources dedicated to maintaining quarantine etc far outweigh the resourcing that would have been required for babysitting.
Well unless there is another objection?

But of course what this doesn't speak to, is that of course the police could have also made mistakes and the ADF also.

It was just less likely they would when you compare to untrained security.

I think "babysitting " was used metaphorically not literally. PSOs would have been OK imo.
Reality always wins in the end.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #1529
Really?

There is a lot of evidence to show that herd immunity is very much achievable...and at much lower thresholds than we originally thought was needed.

The Brit Nic Lewis wrote a great paper (tying in some of the work of Garbriela Gomes).

https://www.nicholaslewis.org/herd-immunity-to-covid-19-and-pre-existing-immune-responses/

Several of the great minds in the relevant field agree.

Start with  Sunetra Gupta.

One example, from a very level headed lady - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbvO4sUg1eA


herd immunity only works if you actually achieve immunity.  Reinfection means herd immunity is temporary hence impossible.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson