Skip to main content
Topic: CV and mad panic behaviour (Read 438450 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2985
The problem statistic for that argument is as @DJC points out, total deaths have dropped. That statistic tears the concept you are asserting a new one!
Do you think every death is reported...?

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2986
Do you think every death is reported...?
If we are talking about here in Australia, yes every death is reported and accounted for.

It regards to the global statistics, it doesn't matter as long as the method of collecting them is consistent then the count remains valid.

You are an engineer, I don't expect we have to debate Regression to the Mean or Standard Deviations, or what they mean to the general trend, or what averages mean to an assertion that some numbers might be missing or that the count was somehow imperfect.
The Force Awakens!

 

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2987
Only one side of the debate is massaging numbers, the fake news vendors. That is where you go wrong trying to paint it as a level playing field of information. It isn't a level playing field, all the information is not the same quality, in just the same way all opinions are not equal.

The stats and numbers do not lie, they are not subject to human interpretation, influence or obfuscation, they are not like opinions that can be spun bent or twisted to an individuals will!

The emphasis on wanting COVID-19 deaths proven to support or refute the COVID-19 restrictions and other actions is also flawed, it's built on the premise that COVID-19 infections that aren't deadly are somehow OK! The evidence suggests the long term effects of long COVID-19 will potentially be far far costlier than the initial deaths. As abhorrent as it may read, a funeral is far far cheaper than a treatment or long term critical care!

You are asserting something yourself here.

That the statistics gathered are reliable accurate, and not embelished in any way shape or form.  That any potential deaths attributed to vaccinations are not attributed to vaccinations but other causes, and that any one who is listed as a covid death, died because they got covid.

Deliberately muddying long covid into there is a bit false.  The current batch are as asymptomatic as it gets unless they are reporting something I am missing.

You are confusing the data with the interpretation here.  You state the data doesnt lie, but those giving us the statistics are interpreting the data themselves, ergo, they create the ability to hide things they dont want to display and vice versa, to pick up things they do.  That vaccine deaths are correlation, and that covid deaths are causation is itself, an interpretation.  Hence why Peru's numbers are changing based on advise from people internationally.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2988
You are asserting something yourself here.

That the statistics gathered are reliable accurate, and not embelished in any way shape or form.  That any potential deaths attributed to vaccinations are not attributed to vaccinations but other causes, and that any one who is listed as a covid death, died because they got covid.

Deliberately muddying long covid into there is a bit false.  The current batch are as asymptomatic as it gets unless they are reporting something I am missing.

You are confusing the data with the interpretation here.  You state the data doesnt lie, but those giving us the statistics are interpreting the data themselves, ergo, they create the ability to hide things they dont want to display and vice versa, to pick up things they do.  That vaccine deaths are correlation, and that covid deaths are causation is itself, an interpretation.  Hence why Peru's numbers are changing based on advise from people internationally.
It's not a conspiracy, there are not hundreds of thousands of health workers collaborating to paint a false picture, it's completely untenable for you to make that assertion, and you work in the health industry! Aren't you indirectly arguing that we can't trust you?

The hundreds of thousands collaborating to paint a false picture are the anti-vaxxers, cynics and radicals on FB and Instagram, and the media panders to them for profit.

The reported numbers are not interpreted, they are just reported as is. It's the sceptics and cynics doing the interpretations and distortions.

Long COVID, short COVID, weak COVID, strong COVID, deadly COVID and asymptomatic COVID are all COVID.

The infected here can thank their good fortune, and to date their better outcomes, that they are here in Australia and not India. You can thank your lucky stars you work in the Australian Health System and not Brazil, Peru, India, Turkey, etc., etc., etc..!
The Force Awakens!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2989
If we are talking about here in Australia, yes every death is reported and accounted for.

It regards to the global statistics, it doesn't matter as long as the method of collecting them is consistent then the count remains valid.


Writing a death certificate and reporting a death are two different things..
It is a cause of death certificate not a comorbidity certificate.
Incidental diseases or medical conditions that the patient had but did not cause or contribute to the death
should not be included on a ‘death certificate but often they are when the cause of death is not verifiable without an autopsy and not every death that appears on a coroners inbox will get that far especially with the clogged waiting lists.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2990
Not sure what you want to assert @ElwoodBlues1‍ , the position you take seems at best arbitrary.

It reads like you assert there are deaths from vaccine that are not counted, and deaths from non-COVID or COVID-Comorbidity that are counted as COVID, you want both sides of the coin to match your call! I'd assert that is a fantasy position, unrelated to the real world.

I'd also revert to @DJC‍ point, the reality is that for your assertions to be true the total deaths would have to deviate significantly from the mean, because deaths caused by the COVID-19 vaccines or COVID-19 Comorbidities did not exist 2 years ago and a significant percentage of such deaths can only be "in addition to" not "instead of" other deaths! In areas where COVID-19 is rampant, that deviation is clear, you do no need any statistical tricks, institutional conspiracies or math errors to hide or expose it!

No matter whether you think the COVID-19 numbers are accurate or not, the baseline trends no longer meet the historical data in some regions by orders of magnitude. This is the power of big data.
The Force Awakens!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2991
In the US, people were reported as dying from Covid despite never actually taking a Covid test.

Are Australians that much more honest than the US?
LP assures me that there is no government coverups and misinformation emanating from the US. Something doesn't add up.

I'm not on any side of the fence here, but as soon as someone posts something contrary to LPs opinion it is easily dismissed as fake news. Who does that remind you of?  :o

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2992
Not sure what you want to assert @ElwoodBlues1‍ , the position you take seems at best arbitrary.

It reads like you assert there are deaths from vaccine that are not counted, and deaths from non-COVID or COVID-Comorbidity that are counted as COVID, you want both sides of the coin to match your call! I'd assert that is a fantasy position, unrelated to the real world.

I'd also revert to @DJC‍ point, the reality is that for your assertions to be true the total deaths would have to deviate significantly from the mean, because deaths caused by the COVID-19 vaccines or COVID-19 Comorbidities did not exist 2 years ago and a significant percentage of such deaths can only be "in addition to" not "instead of" other deaths! In areas where COVID-19 is rampant, that deviation is clear, you do no need any statistical tricks, institutional conspiracies or math errors to hide or expose it!

No matter whether you think the COVID-19 numbers are accurate or not, the baseline trends no longer meet the historical data in some regions by orders of magnitude. This is the power of big data.
I'm saying its easy to sign a death certificate by listing other conditions and picking a few as a cause as in the case of older folk as it happens all the time and nobody checks what actually caused the death even though it might have been the vaccine but like I said other conditions listed will be cited as the cause.
A reported death goes to the Coroner and has to be investigated but you wait in line and it could be 12 months or so before the cause is known or no definite cause at all.
How many potential fatal covid vaccine cases do you think would make the coroners list and in turn how many Hospital Registrars and their Grad Doctor teams would just sign the Death Certificate with the usual 3-4 possibilities?

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2993
You can't defeat the statistics.

If you assert that COVID kills and isn't reported, you can argue these might be people who were otherwise susceptible, and that might well hide or be hard to find in the figures.

But if you claim COVID vaccine kills people here in Australia, that is extra deaths you have to find, but the statistics tell you there is no increase in the death rate.

The stats are not a political opinion, they are not fake news, and they are not lies and more damn lies.
The Force Awakens!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2994
Germany are and were renowned for assigning old age deaths to covid ... they admitted it, even if it was clearly some other pre existing condition.  Convenient




Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2995
In the US, people were reported as dying from Covid despite never actually taking a Covid test.
In the early days of Covid, hospitals in the US didn’t have enough test kits. Doctors were told to use the kits they had on the living to determine who needed treatment. Consequently, the dead weren’t tested. That doesn’t mean they couldn’t be classed as Covid victims if their symptoms warranted it.

Just because a full autopsy isn’t conducted on someone whose head has been obliterated by a shotgun doesn’t mean the cause of death can’t be attributed to gunshot.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2996
In the early days of Covid, hospitals in the US didn’t have enough test kits. Doctors were told to use the kits they had on the living to determine who needed treatment. Consequently, the dead weren’t tested. That doesn’t mean they couldn’t be classed as Covid victims if their symptoms warranted it.

Just because a full autopsy isn’t conducted on someone whose head has been obliterated by a shotgun doesn’t mean the cause of death can’t be attributed to gunshot.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, sometimes that's because it's a duck.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2997
And US doctors are good at identifying ducks.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2998
Bilateral Pneumonia and Congenital Heart Failure might yield covid like results though.

Likewise, you can have those things, and also die with covid and be listed as a covid death.

There is scope for some rubbery nature of figures there and that depends on what you want the data to show.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #2999
In the early days of Covid, hospitals in the US didn’t have enough test kits. Doctors were told to use the kits they had on the living to determine who needed treatment. Consequently, the dead weren’t tested. That doesn’t mean they couldn’t be classed as Covid victims if their symptoms warranted it.

Just because a full autopsy isn’t conducted on someone whose head has been obliterated by a shotgun doesn’t mean the cause of death can’t be attributed to gunshot.
I guess the family of a very healthy person with no family history of blood clots who died a couple of days after their vaccine shot with some new large blood clots on board their body might argue the same thing.