Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic: CV and mad panic behaviour (Read 438204 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #6810 –
And just when were the covid vaccines developed and introduced in the U.S.?  December 2020.  ::)

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #6811 –
Your point being ... ?

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #6812 –
Quote from: DJC on
Nothing to do with his politics G2C; it's about his ongoing campaign to discourage vaccination and fight other measures put in place by governments of both persuasions to minimise the impact of COVID.  I think it's called karma.



Karma was Dan Andrews falling down the stairs.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #6817 –
No proof of that claim whatsoever.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #6818 –
I guess non-conspiracy theories are held to a higher standard than conspiracy theories. After all, the absence of evidence in support of a conspiracy theory is proof that it's true, because the conspiracy is designed to suppress that proof.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #6819 –
Quote from: Mav on
After all, the absence of evidence in support of a conspiracy theory is proof that it's true,
How could it be any other way!

btw., Did we ever start a "Climate change, Andrew Bolt Queensland floods" thread?
The Force Awakens!
 

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #6823 –
Quote from: kruddler on
Any proof of any alternative?

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/02/26/science/covid-virus-wuhan-origins.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20220226&instance_id=0&nl=breaking-news&ref=cta&regi_id=70059035&segment_id=84084&user_id=40608e3f7e716b627f2eb1551778d56d

Read ...

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #6824 –
Quote from: capcom on
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/02/26/science/covid-virus-wuhan-origins.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20220226&instance_id=0&nl=breaking-news&ref=cta&regi_id=70059035&segment_id=84084&user_id=40608e3f7e716b627f2eb1551778d56d

Read ...
Read.
“I think what they’re arguing could be true,” Dr. Bloom said of the new studies. “But I don’t think the quality of the data is sufficient to say that any of these scenarios are true with confidence.”

'Quality of data means they can't be sure.'
Does not mean it was released there from a lab.

If that's a you've got, I pity you.