Skip to main content
Topic: CV and mad panic behaviour (Read 438813 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 35 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7185
But even so the public is still free to choose whether to be vaccinated or not, just I wish they wouldn't justify their choice by spreading a bunch of public misinformation.
I had an interesting encounter with a bloke in the local park while walking my dog. After he started by asking about my dog and showing me a picture of his dog, somehow things took an unexpected turn. He talked about his mother having cancer and the forces of evil trying to stop people getting the cures promoted on the internet. As a subtle way of distancing myself from that nonsense I mentioned the fact that Steve Jobs had an eminently treatable cancer but he managed to kill himself by adopting alternative (quack) cures such as vitamin C. Lo and behold, this guy then segues into another conspiracy theory, saying Jobs didn’t do what other elites did in his circumstances. He said it was well known that rich people travelled to Jeffrey Epstein’s island where young girls were imprisoned in dark basements and scared with spiders and other nasties so their adrenaline could be sucked from their bodies as a cure for cancer. I’m pretty sure he suggested some woman put out a video saying she was forced to kill her daughter as part of that conspiracy. Mind blown! The guy was friendly and pleasant but WTF …

Another weirdo is Kate Langbroek. A Hun story about her exploits on The Project says it all:
Quote
Waleed Aly shuts down The Project co-host Kate Langbroek over bizarre ‘conspiracy’ rant
Waleed Aly has shut down The Project co-host Kate Langbroek after she launched into a bizarre conspiracy theory rant on Tuesday night.

The discussion occurred during a segment on the 15-minute city conspiracy that has recently exploded around the world, including here in Australia.

The 15-minute city concept is a simple one – everyday essentials such as healthcare, schools, work, shops and eateries should be a convenient 15-minute walk, cycle or public transport trip away to make life more enjoyable and sustainable.

However, it has been hijacked by conspiracists, who claim it’s all part of a grand master plan by global elites to lock down and control the population.

After a video package explaining the concept and the associated conspiracy, Langbroek told the panel she enjoyed certain conspiracies, and was asked whether she believed in this one – which is when things took an odd turn.

“Um, well, I don’t know about you, but I have been locked down by governments recently, so I’m like, it’s kind of an easy thing to go, ‘oh, conspiracy theorists’, however, let us just remember this – that in the 1600s a guy called Galileo was put in jail, and I think died in jail, because he said the earth went around the sun,” Langbroek began.

That prompted Aly to sarcastically chime in: “Oh well, that’s that then”.

“OK, because that at the time was considered to be heresy, and now we know it to be the truth,” Langbroek continued.

“Yeah, but that’s not a conspiracy,” Aly argued.

“It was then Waleed!” a frustrated Langbroek replied, with Aly asking her to explain what the conspiracy actually was.

“The conspiracy was that what he believed was wrong, what he was telling people was wrong,” she said.
Aly acknowledged he could “see what you’re saying”, but argued it was a “slightly different argument”.

“I’m just feeling increasingly like there’s a battle for control of people, clearly, everywhere you go, there are cameras, everywhere you go – I just think, I don’t think conspiracy theorists in some cases are that crazy,” Langbroek continued.

Co-host Sarah Harris then interjected to lighten the mood, joking that a conspiracy theory that all birds were actually robots “is pretty crazy though”, prompting a strange reply from Langbroek.

“I don’t know about all of them, but I do know birds have got tiny little brains capable of anything … easily influenced like the sheep,” she said, before bleating on air.

“I guess the case has been made,” Aly said.

“I get the idea that people are losing trust in government and things like that … but the problem is the logical extension of that is any time someone comes up with what might be a good idea, we’ll just want to kill it because we’ll decide it’s a conspiracy somehow.”

The Project debate comes as the 15-minute city issue continues to blow up across the world, with thousands of protesters attending the Stop Oxford: No 15 Minute Cities community day of action in Oxford in the UK over the weekend.

I’m pretty amazed that Waleed Aly wasn’t able to shoot down her nonsense more effectively. She had the temerity to compare her fellow conspiracy theorists to Galileo. He was a scientist who went where the facts took him. He was then attacked by the Church on the basis of beliefs that were resistant to contrary proof. Conspiracy  theorists are the inheritors of the Church’s anti-scientific beliefs, though thankfully they have less power.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7186
Whilst i think Kate's Galileo connection is bizarre, I think the broader issue of increased surveillance of the populace by governments, electronic devices like phones, smart watches etc. that can track your exact location, possess loads of personal and important information, all there for the taking by corporations etc., is pretty real and pretty valid. The ability to know plenty about an individual or group is off the charts compared to what it once was. Maybe that was more along the lines of what Kate was trying to say.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7187
I think she said what she meant and she meant what she said. If she wanted to go off on the surveillance State she could have done that. The moment we reframe lunatic conspiracy theories that way is when we lose the ability to work for the common good. Every philanthropic policy can be undermined as some attempt by out-of-control governments and elites to turn the people into sheep. Try to take guns off the street and that’s the Government trying to prevent patriots from fighting against tyranny. Running vaccination programs will lead to accusations that chips are being inserted to track everybody. By all means, attack the use of tracking and pooling of private information but destroying beneficial government programs won’t do anything in that regard.

PS: Feel free to find some evidence that she has some coherent world view that should earn her some respect.

Edit: I did think she’d been uncharitable towards a mentally ill guy who believed she was in his house but he was given a substantial jail sentence suggesting his issues may have been caused by drug abuse rather than mental illness. Criticism withdrawn on that issue.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7188
I think she said what she meant and she meant what she said. If she wanted to go off on the surveillance State she could have done that. The moment we reframe lunatic conspiracy theories that way is when we lose the ability to work for the common good. Every philanthropic policy can be undermined as some attempt by out-of-control governments and elites to turn the people into sheep. Try to take guns off the street and that’s the Government trying to prevent patriots from fighting against tyranny. Running vaccination programs will lead to accusations that chips are being inserted to track everybody. By all means, attack the use of tracking and pooling of private information but destroying beneficial government programs won’t do anything in that regard.............................................

Yes, I guess those are fair points, and perhaps I gave her too much BOD.

At any rate, the walkable city is not exactly a new concept. It's called the "New Urbanism", and it's been around for decades.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7189
There's a fair bit of 20/20 hindsight going on now, 3 Leos.

We must factor in that we were unprepared for a pandemic and in many instances, flying in the dark; learning as we go. Also important to remember that our health care system was also not set up properly for a pandemic so most strong reactions (re lockdowns) were also for over burdened health care workers/institutions - we simply had to limit infections to limit hospital admissions.

Wingman MAV and the Spotted One are absolutely correct re severity of Covid relative to vaccine or no vaccine. I know how I respond to seasonal flues, and when I got Covid (twice), and having been vaccinated, the symptoms though flu-like were markedly reduced.

Not really I suggested as much earlier in the piece and have acknowledged that we were unprepared for any of the pandemic but can see without a shadow of a doubt that many of the measures to contain the pandemic actually had greater and worse outcomes than letting it rip probably would have.  Thing is in medical circles they knew before everyone was vaxxed what the likelihood was for the majority.  A quick infection and thats it, some would cop it bad, most wouldn't even know they had it.

Remember I was in the health care system and left in January of last year.  I spoke to people who were responsible for the covid pathways and monitoring before they needed care. 

I caught covid God knows where and my symptoms were as bad as anyone could have had without needing medical treatment and all it took to control it was paracetamol to really control them.

People stating and over stating the severity of covid are not helping matters.  The cat is out of the bag, and I'll call a spade a spade, and an enlightened mind will entertain the idea that we made some errors.

We did what we thought was necessary, and the data should show a catastrophic number of unvaccinated covid deaths if even one iota of what is stated about the data is true.  Thing is most of them would have had multiple co morbidities.  For those who don't understand what that means something that would likely have killed them anyway.


Lots of what has been said here is an angle of the truth.  A bit like the solar vs nuclear debate.  Its all an angle rather than a known truth.

This last month in particular has seen the trains go back to full capacity and the roads well and truly out of control.  They've stopped counting numbers,  they've stopped testing without a GP referral, the data collection is over and the results are in.  The pandemic was a false alarm.

It would be political suicide to come out and put that point out there with the hyper inflation we are facing now.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7190
I had an interesting encounter with a bloke in the local park while walking my dog. After he started by asking about my dog and showing me a picture of his dog, somehow things took an unexpected turn. He talked about his mother having cancer and the forces of evil trying to stop people getting the cures promoted on the internet. As a subtle way of distancing myself from that nonsense I mentioned the fact that Steve Jobs had an eminently treatable cancer but he managed to kill himself by adopting alternative (quack) cures such as vitamin C. Lo and behold, this guy then segues into another conspiracy theory, saying Jobs didn’t do what other elites did in his circumstances. He said it was well known that rich people travelled to Jeffrey Epstein’s island where young girls were imprisoned in dark basements and scared with spiders and other nasties so their adrenaline could be sucked from their bodies as a cure for cancer. I’m pretty sure he suggested some woman put out a video saying she was forced to kill her daughter as part of that conspiracy. Mind blown! The guy was friendly and pleasant but WTF …

Another weirdo is Kate Langbroek. A Hun story about her exploits on The Project says it all:
I’m pretty amazed that Waleed Aly wasn’t able to shoot down her nonsense more effectively. She had the temerity to compare her fellow conspiracy theorists to Galileo. He was a scientist who went where the facts took him. He was then attacked by the Church on the basis of beliefs that were resistant to contrary proof. Conspiracy  theorists are the inheritors of the Church’s anti-scientific beliefs, though thankfully they have less power.
notice how the second i suggest a logical thought process this sort of discussion comes up?  The reality is, that this is just the opposit extreme to those who spent the better part of the last couple of years working from home afraid to go out in public.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7191
Thryleon, you’ll note that my comments followed a quote from LP regarding anti-vax disinformation. I wasn’t implying that your post was an example of that and although I can’t speak for LP I doubt if he was doing that either. The nature of this thread is that we bounce from 1 aspect to another. Your post, after the 1st paragraph, wasn’t really anything to do with posts that preceded it which focussed on whether Covid came from the lab or not. You can’t assume that posts subsequent to yours build on your post rather than changing the subject a bit. Tangents are everywhere in our threads.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7192
10 countries say its impossible.
USA say its highly likely.

Even with some 'chinese influence', that is a huge turnaround that makes me think its more propaganda from the US.
I wouldnt trust China or the USA so I have an open mind on the Lab leak theory, agree with LP the Chinese covered up the outbreak and allowed it to spread and mutate before informing other countries which is probably a bigger crime.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7193
I’m pretty amazed that Waleed Aly wasn’t able to shoot down her nonsense more effectively. She had the temerity to compare her fellow conspiracy theorists to Galileo. He was a scientist who went where the facts took him. He was then attacked by the Church on the basis of beliefs that were resistant to contrary proof. Conspiracy  theorists are the inheritors of the Church’s anti-scientific beliefs, though thankfully they have less power.
Ignoring the Galileo comments which are just bizarre, Aly's problem countering the rest of the weirdo shizen highlights the issue. You can't oppose fantasy with fact, the best strategy is to extend the fantasy into any or all of the logical absurdities that it presents.

Many of the nutters suffer a disillusion that has them thinking they know something you don't, I see it as a form of pattern recognition, like when someone sees Jesus in some toast. But the more insidious types have learnt that you cannot disprove a negative, and leverage that technicality.

We try to do the rational thing and offer a proof of a positive, and they respond with more fantasy, which leads to circular rubbish.

Instead develop the fantasy with them, and then when they eventually offer a contradiction refer back to it, if that fails you know two things, you are wasting your time, and they are quite possible morons who are either in line for a Darwin Award or a Dunning-Kruger diagnosis.
The Force Awakens!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7194
Remember I was in the health care system and left in January of last year.  I spoke to people who were responsible for the covid pathways and monitoring before they needed care. 

People stating and over stating the severity of covid are not helping matters.  The cat is out of the bag, and I'll call a spade a spade, and an enlightened mind will entertain the idea that we made some errors.

As you know 3 Leos, I also work in health care (mental health) and during the pandemic had plenty of contact with medicos from a number of differing medical specialties. And just like here, there were plenty of differing opinions as to how the pandemic should be handled, how severe the virus was and who were the best qualified to recommend actions (to pollies). The one agreement was that our systems were ill-equipped to handled a massive influx of infected (yes, mostly medically vulnerable folks) people into hospitals.

With respect, I don't think you need an enlightened mind to see errors made. (I use the term hindsight in reference to those who condemn the actions of those in charge during the pandemic assuming that they should have or did know, what we know now). Simple experience and common sense see mistakes were made and we will and have learned from that. First among those lessons is how neglected our hospitals and associated emergency care agencies have been and still are. There are those of us, and I suspect you are among the ranks, who have been pointing out just how inadequate our health care agencies for years... decades! The systems were already stressed and hanging on by a thread before the pandemic.

The vulnerable. Yes there were vulnerable whose health was very compromised and Covid simply dealt the final blow to overwhelm their bodies. However, there were many vulnerable who were undergoing treatment who would have lived without the pandemic delivering a knockout blow. Both groups deserved our best efforts to protect them.

As far as mental health goes... we've learned that lockdowns can and do have a devastating effect on the mental health of many, ranging from those without mental health issues (in fact, creating issues) to those already struggling with mental health issues (worsening them, considerably). And a good % of these folks are still seeking and undergoing treatment in an area horribly under resourced. This area (mental health) is further hampered by the stigmas and ignorance still prevalent in the community. It's improving, but still too slowly.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7195
notice how the second i suggest a logical thought process this sort of discussion comes up?  The reality is, that this is just the opposit extreme to those who spent the better part of the last couple of years working from home afraid to go out in public.

You can't have a reasonable discussion about it.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!

 

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7196
In times of difficulty and uncertainty, we all need to take some kind of hit for the greater good. Being over cautious rather than under cautious seems a more sensible approach IMO, when the world really did not have a clear idea of what they were dealing with. There will be a downside to any preventive measure.

https://theconversation.com/did-the-covid-lockdowns-work-heres-what-we-know-two-years-on-176623

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7197
notice how the second i suggest a logical thought process this sort of discussion comes up?  The reality is, that this is just the opposit extreme to those who spent the better part of the last couple of years working from home afraid to go out in public.

Who was afraid to go out in public ?
I thought people were advised to minimise going out in public, maximise social distancing and try not to breath all over everyone (wear masks) ?
Let’s go BIG !

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7198
There will be a downside to any preventive measure.
And there will be opponents to any preventative measure too. If unanimous support is needed, then governments would never be able to do anything.

Let’s not forget that various diseases have been stopped in their tracks by concerted government and social action. SARS and MERS were also coronaviruses. Ebola has been contained or eliminated several times. Smallpox, a highly infectious virus, was virtually eliminated as was Polio. Measles was well contained by the MMR vaccine. Rarely have the 2 superpowers been so incompetent at combatting a potential pandemic.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour

Reply #7199
.