Re: Where are our goals going to come from?
Reply #41 –
The day Jack kicked 4 and was BOG and got 3 brownlow votes, he was yep, playing as a backup ruck.
People perceptions override the reality.
Jack
Games as ruck/backup ruck - 6
Goals while playing backup ruck -7
1.16 goals/game as a ruck/forward
Games with 2 rucks in the team (or 1 ruck and Young as backup) - 10*
Goals with 2 rucks in the team (or 1 ruck and Young as backup) - 8*
*Game vs Adelaide - SOJ was KPF, pitto got injured early in 1st quarter, Young/SOS played backup
0.8 goals/game as a pure forward
If we take out games against West Coast and North as they were just terrible and inflated averages.
1.2 goals/game as a ruck/forward
0.5 goals/game as a pure forward
So you may want to rethink your statement. 
Jack had three good games when he played as a back-up ruckman and five playing as a tall forward with no or occasional ruck duties.
When Jack plays as the third tall forward, he relieves Harry and Charlie, demands a decent tall defender, regularly finds space and can take contested marks. De Koning has a slightly different skill set but plays a similar role as third tall forward. When Jack is used as a back up ruckman, his forward craft suffers and Charlie and Harry have to work a lot harder.
Jack played as second ruck in seven games (Pitto was subbed off early in Rd 2). He kicked five goals in those seven games and we won three and drew one. In the nine games Jack wasn't second ruck, he kicked nine goals and we won five (including the game where he was subbed off). We lined up without Jack in the ruck in 17 games and won 12 of them. Pitto and the King rucked together in 12 games for nine wins.
Our forward line functions better (a) when Pitto and De Koning share the ruck duties and (b) when Silvagni and/or De Koning play as the third tall.