Skip to main content
Topic: General Discussions (Read 114582 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1530
It's something I struggle with at times in these discussions...and not just race.
The human makeup is pretty complex
Folks want to identify as 'one' or the 'other' rather than embracing everything that is part of their makeup.
The net result is that it creates a barrier.
You v Me.
I guess the danger for those of indigenous backgrounds is that there may be a fear (justified, no doubt) that their culture is swamped and lost if they don't fight to preserve it.
It's not a new debate.
I remember that it was a discussion when I was back in High School
Assimilation v Integration.

Assimilation- where the population is blended together and minority identity is eventually filterered out v Integration- where the individual cultures are able to maintain and celebrate their identity within a larger society.


 

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1531
I’d be more inclined to take Roy seriously if he had shared his thoughts with anyone other than the human pustule.

It’s fraught to weigh up cultural ethnicity against biological ethnicity but the bottom line is that the blokes that Thorpe accused of stealing her people’s land are closer to her genetically than she is to the people who’s land was stolen.



Lidia strikes me as someone who seeks to be a victim and perhaps, eventually, a martyr. There seems to be an identity/personality issue (disorder?) happening there.

As for Bolt... he would have been desperate to invalidate Lidia's indigenous heritage and finding her father was a gold mine for him ('human pustule' is perhaps too kind, David). I notice on the depressing subject of Bolt he had little or nothing to say about the recent huge loss of Fr Bob, a shining example to the Catholic Church of real community and spiritual service to his people, but sure did come to the defence of Pell (the antithesis of Fr Bob) when he was in deserved strife. Makes a huge comment about Bolt.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1532
If Bob was wrongfully jailed for raping boys I'm sure he would have said something.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1533
If Bob was wrongfully jailed for raping boys I'm sure he would have said something.


I'm not talking about Pell's wrongful jailing, I'm talking about the Pell who knew of priest's violating young boys in Ballarat and did nothing about it accept to shuffle guilty priests around to other parishes to avoid negative publicity and law suits. Bolt chooses to ignore this when Pell admitted to it in a 60 Minutes feature.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1534
Lidia strikes me as someone who seeks to be a victim and perhaps, eventually, a martyr. There seems to be an identity/personality issue (disorder?) happening there.

As for Bolt... he would have been desperate to invalidate Lidia's indigenous heritage and finding her father was a gold mine for him ('human pustule' is perhaps too kind, David). I notice on the depressing subject of Bolt he had little or nothing to say about the recent huge loss of Fr Bob, a shining example to the Catholic Church of real community and spiritual service to his people, but sure did come to the defence of Pell (the antithesis of Fr Bob) when he was in deserved strife. Makes a huge comment about Bolt.
Weather you like Bolt or not is irrelevant here I think. Point is, that imbecile (I can't even bring myself to type her name) is as fake and as feral as humans come. She is doing more damage to indigenous culture going forward than all the current pollies put together.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1535
Lidia strikes me as someone who seeks to be a victim and perhaps, eventually, a martyr. There seems to be an identity/personality issue (disorder?) happening there.

As for Bolt... he would have been desperate to invalidate Lidia's indigenous heritage and finding her father was a gold mine for him ('human pustule' is perhaps too kind, David). I notice on the depressing subject of Bolt he had little or nothing to say about the recent huge loss of Fr Bob, a shining example to the Catholic Church of real community and spiritual service to his people, but sure did come to the defence of Pell (the antithesis of Fr Bob) when he was in deserved strife. Makes a huge comment about Bolt.

Not really understanding her point of view there Baggers old mate.  I think I see part of my own struggle in hers and perhaps I am wrong with this, but the following is my assessment of this person:

Odds are she had a similar issue that I at times felt.  Too Indigenous to be accepted by white Australians growing up, and potentially feeling isolated from her fathers peers and would have on occasion felt as though she never really fit in.  Too privileged to truly identify with the indigenous community and likely not really feeling part of that either and experiencing a level of rejection from that side of the family too. 

The end result is someone who never really feels accepted which might be why she is alligning herself with the indigenous struggle.  She would be the type that would be fighting vehemently on either side depending on whom was the one claiming mistreatment.

My brother is like minded to her.  He is 8 years older than me, and I think this problem was exacerbated by having our grandparents live with us and raise us.  They were born in the 1920's, emigrated in the 1950's then played a part in raising grandchildren 20 years later to live in a society that has effectively left a lot of those outdated values behind.  I find myself having to check and recheck whether or not I am living in the past, and to a degree catch myself doing so.  The problem that this creates, is a fragmented cultural identity from a time that no longer exists.  The Greek side of the culture is historic, not current, and the Greeks in Greece stopped behaving with the same values that we hold dear.   The Indigenous problem is a little bit different.  They are holding onto values that dont fit into a modern society where the values didnt evolve into it.  Where I can look at Modern Greece and say that they have moved away from it, so whats the point in me holding onto it, the Aboriginal and Torres Straight islanders have been forced to leave a lot of their old ways of life behind, because we delivered a more modern way of living.  They didnt get to choose it.  It was thrust upon them to a degree and Indigenous culture and way of living can be problematic in the modern world for various reasons including land ownership.

Its a real cultural issue where one must decide whether to hold onto these things, or accept that they are relics of a bygone era.  The problem there is some of them are identity defining and the Indigenous folk didnt get to choose.  I reckon I could write a thesis on this so Ill leave that there, and hopefully I have made my point well enough to not have to argue with anyone too vehemently.

On a human level, irrespective of where Lydia sits on culture and identity, she is wrong on many levels.


"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1536
It's something I struggle with at times in these discussions...and not just race.
The human makeup is pretty complex
Folks want to identify as 'one' or the 'other' rather than embracing everything that is part of their makeup.
The net result is that it creates a barrier.
You v Me.
I guess the danger for those of indigenous backgrounds is that there may be a fear (justified, no doubt) that their culture is swamped and lost if they don't fight to preserve it.
It's not a new debate.
I remember that it was a discussion when I was back in High School
Assimilation v Integration.

Assimilation- where the population is blended together and minority identity is eventually filterered out v Integration- where the individual cultures are able to maintain and celebrate their identity within a larger society.


We had the same subject matter at school in social studies but it was put more bluntly and differently and compared to the American Indians. The theme was when one side wins a war does the other side get a choice whether they assimilate or integrate and what responsibilities do the victors have. What has happened in other English colonized countries?
Of course I was schooled at the end of the white Australia policy era and Vietnam war so the curriculum was a tad skewed towards saluting Uncle Sam and whatever they were employing as social ethics and solutions.

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1537
Not really understanding her point of view there Baggers old mate.  I think I see part of my own struggle in hers and perhaps I am wrong with this, but the following is my assessment of this person:

Odds are she had a similar issue that I at times felt.  Too Indigenous to be accepted by white Australians growing up, and potentially feeling isolated from her fathers peers and would have on occasion felt as though she never really fit in.  Too privileged to truly identify with the indigenous community and likely not really feeling part of that either and experiencing a level of rejection from that side of the family too. 

The end result is someone who never really feels accepted which might be why she is alligning herself with the indigenous struggle.  She would be the type that would be fighting vehemently on either side depending on whom was the one claiming mistreatment.

My brother is like minded to her.  He is 8 years older than me, and I think this problem was exacerbated by having our grandparents live with us and raise us.  They were born in the 1920's, emigrated in the 1950's then played a part in raising grandchildren 20 years later to live in a society that has effectively left a lot of those outdated values behind.  I find myself having to check and recheck whether or not I am living in the past, and to a degree catch myself doing so.  The problem that this creates, is a fragmented cultural identity from a time that no longer exists.  The Greek side of the culture is historic, not current, and the Greeks in Greece stopped behaving with the same values that we hold dear.   The Indigenous problem is a little bit different.  They are holding onto values that dont fit into a modern society where the values didnt evolve into it.  Where I can look at Modern Greece and say that they have moved away from it, so whats the point in me holding onto it, the Aboriginal and Torres Straight islanders have been forced to leave a lot of their old ways of life behind, because we delivered a more modern way of living.  They didnt get to choose it.  It was thrust upon them to a degree and Indigenous culture and way of living can be problematic in the modern world for various reasons including land ownership.

Its a real cultural issue where one must decide whether to hold onto these things, or accept that they are relics of a bygone era.  The problem there is some of them are identity defining and the Indigenous folk didnt get to choose.  I reckon I could write a thesis on this so Ill leave that there, and hopefully I have made my point well enough to not have to argue with anyone too vehemently.

On a human level, irrespective of where Lydia sits on culture and identity, she is wrong on many levels.




Really appreciate your post, 3 Leos. Honest and insightful mate.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1538
Not really understanding her point of view there Baggers old mate.  I think I see part of my own struggle in hers and perhaps I am wrong with this, but the following is my assessment of this person:

Odds are she had a similar issue that I at times felt.  Too Indigenous to be accepted by white Australians growing up, and potentially feeling isolated from her fathers peers and would have on occasion felt as though she never really fit in.  Too privileged to truly identify with the indigenous community and likely not really feeling part of that either and experiencing a level of rejection from that side of the family too. 

The end result is someone who never really feels accepted which might be why she is alligning herself with the indigenous struggle.  She would be the type that would be fighting vehemently on either side depending on whom was the one claiming mistreatment.

My brother is like minded to her.  He is 8 years older than me, and I think this problem was exacerbated by having our grandparents live with us and raise us.  They were born in the 1920's, emigrated in the 1950's then played a part in raising grandchildren 20 years later to live in a society that has effectively left a lot of those outdated values behind.  I find myself having to check and recheck whether or not I am living in the past, and to a degree catch myself doing so.  The problem that this creates, is a fragmented cultural identity from a time that no longer exists.  The Greek side of the culture is historic, not current, and the Greeks in Greece stopped behaving with the same values that we hold dear.   The Indigenous problem is a little bit different.  They are holding onto values that dont fit into a modern society where the values didnt evolve into it.  Where I can look at Modern Greece and say that they have moved away from it, so whats the point in me holding onto it, the Aboriginal and Torres Straight islanders have been forced to leave a lot of their old ways of life behind, because we delivered a more modern way of living.  They didnt get to choose it.  It was thrust upon them to a degree and Indigenous culture and way of living can be problematic in the modern world for various reasons including land ownership.

Its a real cultural issue where one must decide whether to hold onto these things, or accept that they are relics of a bygone era.  The problem there is some of them are identity defining and the Indigenous folk didnt get to choose.  I reckon I could write a thesis on this so Ill leave that there, and hopefully I have made my point well enough to not have to argue with anyone too vehemently.

On a human level, irrespective of where Lydia sits on culture and identity, she is wrong on many levels.



Top shelf ol mate. Reminds me of Justin Murphy who used to be called Coconut by the other Indigenous players (Black on the outside, White on the inside) because of his heritage (I think one of his parents was from the UK) .
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1539
Not really understanding her point of view there Baggers old mate.  I think I see part of my own struggle in hers and perhaps I am wrong with this, but the following is my assessment of this person:

Odds are she had a similar issue that I at times felt.  Too Indigenous to be accepted by white Australians growing up, and potentially feeling isolated from her fathers peers and would have on occasion felt as though she never really fit in.  Too privileged to truly identify with the indigenous community and likely not really feeling part of that either and experiencing a level of rejection from that side of the family too. 

The end result is someone who never really feels accepted which might be why she is alligning herself with the indigenous struggle.  She would be the type that would be fighting vehemently on either side depending on whom was the one claiming mistreatment.

My brother is like minded to her.  He is 8 years older than me, and I think this problem was exacerbated by having our grandparents live with us and raise us.  They were born in the 1920's, emigrated in the 1950's then played a part in raising grandchildren 20 years later to live in a society that has effectively left a lot of those outdated values behind.  I find myself having to check and recheck whether or not I am living in the past, and to a degree catch myself doing so.  The problem that this creates, is a fragmented cultural identity from a time that no longer exists.  The Greek side of the culture is historic, not current, and the Greeks in Greece stopped behaving with the same values that we hold dear.   The Indigenous problem is a little bit different.  They are holding onto values that dont fit into a modern society where the values didnt evolve into it.  Where I can look at Modern Greece and say that they have moved away from it, so whats the point in me holding onto it, the Aboriginal and Torres Straight islanders have been forced to leave a lot of their old ways of life behind, because we delivered a more modern way of living.  They didnt get to choose it.  It was thrust upon them to a degree and Indigenous culture and way of living can be problematic in the modern world for various reasons including land ownership.

Its a real cultural issue where one must decide whether to hold onto these things, or accept that they are relics of a bygone era.  The problem there is some of them are identity defining and the Indigenous folk didnt get to choose.  I reckon I could write a thesis on this so Ill leave that there, and hopefully I have made my point well enough to not have to argue with anyone too vehemently.

On a human level, irrespective of where Lydia sits on culture and identity, she is wrong on many levels.

Thanks for sharing Thry.

Lidia has always been fully immersed in the Victorian Aboriginal community.  That's why I mentioned the difficulty of contrasting biological and cultural identity.  Many of her extended family have similar views, and are involved in the Pay the Rent Mob.  Her uncle, Robbie Thorpe, has been a Pay The Rent proponent since the 1970s and much of her rhetoric echoes his utterances from the 1970s.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1540
Top shelf ol mate. Reminds me of Justin Murphy who used to be called Coconut by the other Indigenous players (Black on the outside, White on the inside) because of his heritage (I think one of his parents was from the UK) .

Coconut is a derogatory term generally applied to Indigenous folk who work for government or are not involved with their community.  It doesn't reflect genetic origins.  Very few Indigenous Victorians don't have mixed genetic origins.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1541
I had a niece who has no Indigenous heritage but was fully immersed in Indigenous culture to the point they claimed to accept her as part of the mob, well at least to the point they could get a chunk of her pooled welfare cheques, and they shared drugs and alcohol with her as a minor which eventually lead to her death in her early 20s.

If Thorpe has been in that culture as an outsider, no matter what they may claim she will not be fully accepted. Through her close circle of friends she may think she is fully accepted, but behind closed doors a core sub-set of that culture will see her only ever in a utilitarian light, it's the ugly truth of the situation. Oddly, when we view her social media posts, it seems she is somehow drawn to a similar culture through the 1%ers she associates with, perhaps she is just gullible and blinded to manipulation through her closed minded focus on the cause whatever it may be!
The Force Awakens!

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1542
I'm not talking about Pell's wrongful jailing, I'm talking about the Pell who knew of priest's violating young boys in Ballarat and did nothing about it accept to shuffle guilty priests around to other parishes to avoid negative publicity and law suits. Bolt chooses to ignore this when Pell admitted to it in a 60 Minutes feature.

Bob's foundation gave a character reference that helped keep Joffa out of prison.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1543
Bob's foundation gave a character reference that helped keep Joffa out of prison.

The way this post is written could be suggestive of something that I'm not sure is quite right. The character references were written well in advance of these issues coming to light, when we all thought Corfe was a good bloke, because folks like us and Bob Macguire had no reason to think otherwise. One could read this post as implying that Macguire wrote his reference with the specific intention of getting a sex offender off the hook. The bigger issue is whether such references should be used at all.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-03-08/court-jeffrey-joffa-corfe-sentence-character-reference-alex-case/102070088

"The revelation that old references were provided to court without knowledge has sparked outrage and calls for prosecutors to appeal the sentence."

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1544
Courts should only accept references that are specifically written for the matter that is under consideration.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball