Just because you believe it does work, doesn’t make it so…
You lot (yes, I generalise, sorry to those who have an open mind) are such sheep.
You clearly read jack sh%t, yet think you know it all (the old cereal packet professor).
You really think Kory doesn't know because some dumb ass ignorant journo makes that statement? Not that that's a relevant question in any event.
And by the by, any of you read any of the studies linked therein? (i know the answer)
Are you suggesting they're fake or made up?
The data doesn't lie - and I note none of you actually critiques any of the papers referenced therein?
Typical lazy ad hominem carp.
Ivermectin is but one of many viable early treatments, and if those percentages don't whack you in the face and make you pay attention, our society really is doomed.
Mantis, I wish I could share your optimistic view that the fully vaccinated have nothing to fear from the unvaccinated.
I am in the seniors group and will get the booster shot in mid January. Because of my age my immunity is lessening by the day and I certainly am at risk of getting Covid from a non vaccinated person. My wife does not share my good health and if she were to catch Covid her chance of recovery would be very slim.
According to your view the unvaccinated should be free to do whatever they want, go wherever they please and the community just has to grin and bear it.
Quite frankly, I've had a gutfull of these selfish pr%%ks who put their personal "rights to freedom" above the rights of the community.
I hope Andrews keeps the restrictions in place for the foreseeable future.
You presume an unvaxxed person has Covid?
Odd.
You presume an unvaxxed person is more likely to catch Covid and more likely to pass it on to you?
Irrational and unsupported by the data.
Vaxxed folk carry just as much viral load as an unvaxxed type.
And can just as easily transmit it.
Moreover, data is starting to show VAIDS is an issue....
Having a gutful of something doesn't excuse ignorance.
Are you telling me that they didn't release it yesterday... that they've been stockpiling it for months ?
Stockpiling isn't the right word, but this one has clearly been chosen (out of how many, literally thousands of mutations/variants?) to be the next go to scare everyone thing.
Commentary out of SA suggests it causes only mild illness....though there will be outliers of course.
“So far we’ve seen very mild cases… I’m not sure why everyone is up in arms.”
Angelique Coetzee, chair of the South African Medical Association.
Oh boy ... WHO has declared the new Sth African variant as a Variant of Concern and named it Omicron.
It has made it's way quickly through the 1st 2 stages of classification: Variant under Monitoring (24/11/21), Variant of Interest (26/11/21) and now meets the criteria for a Variant of Concern:
By rights it should have been named Xi.
And was it not first found in Botswana from what I have read.
Not much to see in the new cases, new deaths data, but heck with double vaxxers showing a marked disdain for the 3rd shot booster, need some leverage to keep the sheeple under control....
Drugs shown to have some efficacy In Silico or In Vitro do not always work In Situ, in fact most do not!
Example Ivermectin is a demonstrated 3CL Protease inhibitor In Silico, and at ridiculously high dose In Vitro it kills a virus like Sars-CoV-2, but at safe dose In Situ it did nothing, it was worse than chance. And they have tested it in millions of people now either through the actions of nefarious despots or very large trials.
Now that doesn't mean they won't find a way to combine and deliver Ivermectin in some way to specifically target Sars-CoV-2, but for now that mechanism doesn't exist. But we should hope they do find a way because it might be cheaper solution!
Proving 3CL Protease inhibition does not prove efficacy, it is just a broad label. Like pieces of metal shaped into keys that superficially look the same they can be cut subtly differently and as such one key does not work opening every lock. If being labelled a 3CL Protease Inhibitor was all you need there are dozens of drugs that should work, but no one drug works on every virus, it is not as simple as applying the broad label suggests.
The high dose claim is just another lie.
Ivermectin has been used widely and very successfully to treat CV19. Why deny it?
Well, none of the COVID vaccines are dead useless after 6 months but the flu vaccine is.
The facts don't support your position Flyboy and conspiracy theories don't cut the mustard. Unless you can come up with empirical evidence it's probably best just to fade away.
Is that right David. If you don't read what I put up you really are not well placed to comment.
Excess deaths and excess numbers of weird illnesses are just conspiracy?
You clearly have trouble interpreting government sourced data?
Let me know which chart or table you need help understanding?
LP, you really piss me off. Your certitude is shill like. And wrong.
And you never address any specifics raised other than in rhetorical verbiage. Opposite conclusions? Funny.
Equal viral loads - you're clearly not a rocket scientist.
COVID vaccine mandates are necessary because the protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn't protect the protected.
Smokescreens, you read the article about the kids dying? You think that's a smokescreen? Words fail me (polite ones)...
Stop being cheer leaders folks, this is serious stuff.
