Carlton Supporters Club

Have to disagree Paul, some of our players are lazy, want to play bruise free footy, get paid big money and leave too much to the likes of a few players who carry the team every week. They are killing the coach and providing not much leadership for our young kids. It's not about belting blokes, drinking 40 cans of VB and coming home at 3pm in the morning before a game to show how cool and tough you are. We just have too many blokes who don't care enough about what they are doing and it's frustrating. Sellers is a neanderthal stuck in the past but he did care about what happened on a Saturday afternoon and wouldn't have tolerated what our blokes dish up in terms of soft lazy disinterested football. Stkilda players are doing the same to Ratten....

I reckon any sort of coaching position would be the last thing on Buckley's mind. Can't remember where I heard it but someone suggested he'll be doing special comments stuff for the footy on Channel 7 next year....might even be sooner.

As much as I'm in favour of a review there is a fair bit of mixed messaging going on here.
Hopefully they sort it out, but it's a bit of a  dog's breakfast at the moment
It's quite confusing working out who is in charge, who's driving things, the scope and extent of any review and who is under scrutiny and who isn't.

I've always thought the 'rebuild' was a delaying tactic, a time buying exercise, to take the heat off a club under pressure.
By doing so they bought a couple of years free of criticism....because the expectations were low.

It may be a bit cynical but...Is the review just another one of these tactics to take the heat off for a bit...."Oh, we have a few problems but we're reviewing things so leave us alone for a while to sort it out."

As much as I'm in favour of a review there is a fair bit of mixed messaging going on here.
Hopefully they sort it out, but it's a bit of a  dog's breakfast at the moment
It's quite confusing working out who is in charge, who's driving things, the scope and extent of any review and who is under scrutiny and who isn't.

I've always thought the 'rebuild' was a delaying tactic, a time buying exercise, to take the heat off a club under pressure.
By doing so they bought a couple of years free of criticism....because the expectations were low.

It may be a bit cynical but...Is the review just another one of these tactics to take the heat off for a bit...."Oh, we have a few problems but we're reviewing things so leave us alone for a while to sort it out."

In context a president guaranteeing a coaches job confirms them as a dead man walking doesnt it??

I think Teague is safe and I feel they want to keep him to his contract. Only way he is not there is if he himself decides to pull the pin. As for every other position in the footy dept? Not so safe and all up for review and change if required. Thats my opinion.

I think Teague is safe and I feel they want to keep him to his contract. Only way he is not there is if he himself decides to pull the pin. As for every other position in the footy dept? Not so safe and all up for review and change if required. Thats my opinion.

Nice of the club to do the review, and heap all this pressure (but not pressure) on Teague soon after the loss of his mother in law too. Right after he's been shipped off to Sydney for a mini hub for a couple of weeks.

Who'd be a senior coach?