Skip to main content
Topic: Football Department Review (Read 74672 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #870
One has to wonder, with this newfound emphasis on (wait for it).............winning games of football, how does this affect the new coach ? It seems clear to me that the club is expecting results instantly, so if it's Lyon, he will want to remake the team in his image, as all coaches do. How long will it take him to take the boys from attack to defence, bigger, stronger bodies, more tackling, more stoppages, etc. ? Can you do that in 1 pre season ? It seems highly likely that there will be a down period while he tinkers to get things on his terms. What if he misses finals next season ?

Surely the quickest way forward is to stick with Teague and iron out the kinks, rather than yet another dramatic change ?

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #871
One has to wonder, with this newfound emphasis on (wait for it).............winning games of football, how does this affect the new coach ? It seems clear to me that the club is expecting results instantly, so if it's Lyon, he will want to remake the team in his image, as all coaches do. How long will it take him to take the boys from attack to defence, bigger, stronger bodies, more tackling, more stoppages, etc. ? Can you do that in 1 pre season ? It seems highly likely that there will be a down period while he tinkers to get things on his terms. What if he misses finals next season ?

Surely the quickest way forward is to stick with Teague and iron out the kinks, rather than yet another dramatic change ?

If Clarko or Lyon come in it will have to be another reset. It won't be as bad as when Mick took over a team on the slide but it will take some time to bring a more defensive style to Carlton.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #872
If Clarko or Lyon come in it will have to be another reset. It won't be as bad as when Mick took over a team on the slide but it will take some time to bring a more defensive style to Carlton.

Sounds like another thrilling 43 games coming up !!
Let’s go BIG !

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #873
Don't shoot the messenger. I'm not shooting the messenger, simply suggesting his interests would be better served telling his truth to the people involved, directly and not publicly. It does not serve him to attempt to embarrass his employer publicly... it only satiates the bloodlust of the media and public. Speaking his truth directly to those concerned is far more beneficial.
Teague speaks the truth (like malthouse). It's uncomfortable to hear, but it's the truth. See above! It's no less the truth by speaking it to those directly responsible. MM too often chose to attempt to manipulate public perceptions and his employer with public comments. But he can handle himself with this kind of approach as he's got a few decades of success behind him. Ill-advised for The TT to travel the same road. Although it may be true, it also comes across to some as going the bleat, the whinge... publicly, which any future employer would not gather any confidence from.

You want Teague to our on a brave face and say 'all is well' so his replacement can come into the job... full of hope and optimism only to be fooled by the '3 idiots' conducting the review and those employing them? I don't want him to lie or bung on any false joy - just stick to talking about the team, not behind the scenes stuff... media sucked him in too easily. Declaring the folks doing the independent review as 'idiots' and those around them the same is a pretty unfortunate assumption without knowing much more about these people. If someone disagrees with us it doesn't automatically make them an idiot. They're just doing what they've been employed to do. We'll get to see the summary of their findings soon enough and then get to judge their work more accurately.

Play time is over.
Teague is upset and a lot in the media are starting to take his side... he has been treated very poorly. The media will take the side of anyone along as it's a juicy story/headline/clickbait - a fickle and vulturous creature is the media. Being 'treated very poorly' works both ways. I feel treated poorly, conned and deceived by what The TT and co. declared at the season's commencement after witnessing what we were dishing up early in the season - exactly the same inconsistent cr@p as last year. And if you look back to early posts this year you'll see that I expressed as such. Freddie the blind miner could see the direction of our season after very early rounds. In fact, 'same old, same old' were words used to describe us many, many times by mid season.

Now one more thing....
Someone made content about Clarko not commenting on the Carlton role, but Ross Lyon doing the opposite.
I've literally heard Ross say all year that he would not comment on a position that is not available....specifically in relation to coaching Carlton. So I'm not sure why he (appears to have) changed his mind on the matter other than that position has become available....at least privately. Remember there were rumours last week that the board had decided to sack Teague and was going to announce it....maybe they decided to wait a week? 'Maybe'... 'rumours'... not good foundations to build an argument upon.

Would make all the above make sense if true.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #874
If Clarko or Lyon come in it will have to be another reset. It won't be as bad as when Mick took over a team on the slide but it will take some time to bring a more defensive style to Carlton.

That's my hunch as well. But I'm not sure the powers that be will tolerate that, which is why I wondered how long it will take for them to sack the next guy.

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #875
One has to wonder, with this newfound emphasis on (wait for it).............winning games of football, how does this affect the new coach ? It seems clear to me that the club is expecting results instantly, so if it's Lyon, he will want to remake the team in his image, as all coaches do. How long will it take him to take the boys from attack to defence, bigger, stronger bodies, more tackling, more stoppages, etc. ? Can you do that in 1 pre season ? It seems highly likely that there will be a down period while he tinkers to get things on his terms. What if he misses finals next season ?

Surely the quickest way forward is to stick with Teague and iron out the kinks, rather than yet another dramatic change ?
Agree, no quick fix and I think most would expect Lyon to want the best of what he had at Freo and Stkilda, we have the heavy artillery up forward but have a lot of smaller bodies and lack of the physicality he will want to bring to games to employ his game plans. Maybe his plans are outdated but no doubt if he gets the job it will be on the basis to improve the defensive effort from all players and play a stronger more physically demanding game which will mean changing the list and that will take time.
I think he will get a bit more time than Teague has had presuming he is sacked but it all comes down to win loss ratios, but Lyon will be hammered in the media if he goes back to the Freo ultra close checking gameplan with 5 man forward lines and still loses games. Can you still have players like Baker, Crowley and turn games into low scoring slug fests?

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #876
I'm not shooting the messenger, simply suggesting his interests would be better served telling his truth to the people involved, directly and not publicly. It does not serve him to attempt to embarrass his employer publicly... it only satiates the bloodlust of the media and public. Speaking his truth directly to those concerned is far more beneficial.
His interests would be served....by towing the line?
His interests are not taken into consideration by the club, which is obvious to all, and you want to get on his back for not bending over and taking it? I think he's been remarkably restrained. Look at MM as a precedent to what would be fair.


FWIW, the 'idiots' comment was a vague movie reference that went over your head.

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #877
Lyon's last games at the Dockers was some of the ugliest football I've ever seen. I've heard Matthew Lloyd say he would hate to be a forward playing under Lyon (Harry McKay take note). Plus he's had 2 years out of clubland. A definite risk IMO.

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #878
But they didnt offer Eddie a contract... so they have been driving this runaway tram.
They COULD have come out and announced the review (if they needed to) and stated (at any time) that Teague would coach the year out, but nah, death by a thousand cuts.

Its messy, its ugly its on their hands.
Mate they did, they asked Liddle (I think) at the start of the review and he said Teague is contracted for 2022 and will coach.
I dont know what else they had to do, he is still coach today and for all we know might very well coach next year. Right now, its rumour, inuendo and media speculation.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time

 

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #879
Mate they did, they asked Liddle (I think) at the start of the review and he said Teague is contracted for 2022 and will coach.
I dont know what else they had to do, he is still coach today and for all we know might very well coach next year. Right now, its rumour, inuendo and media speculation.

Pretty sure it was MLG who came out and said it wasnt a Teague review.
And (without engaging in commentary) anyone could have come out in the past weeks to back Teague in for this season at least ?
NO ONE has, and its damning of our club.

And Instead, the club has allowed blokes to publicly throw their hats into the ring, after the axe has swung, by all means lets invite expressions of interest for the job (and the execution in 40 odd games time...) But while the guy is still under contract for 2022 he should be getting something.

Its just a morbidly slow, painful public execution of a bloke who deserves better by people who should know better.
Let’s go BIG !

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #880

Its just a morbidly slow, painful public execution of a bloke who deserves better by people who should know better.

Here's a bizarre theory..... after their respective reviews, both Geelong and Richmond re-appointed coaches who looked for all the world like they were dead men walking.  What followed both of these decisions was the most successful era that these two clubs had seen in over 40 years.  Granted other changes were made, but perhaps it was that show of faith in the head man that was the genesis of the kind of team spirit and hunger that led to prolonged success - the kind we so desperately need.  

Maybe, just maybe, after all of this rubbish, the best thing to do would be to re-appoint Teague, give him the other changes that are needed like decent assistants and development teams, and back him in.  And put some serious acid on the players to deliver (I reckon this is what Choco has done at the Demons this year).  I don't think the player buy-in and performance has been given enough scrutiny - after all, they are the ones out there running, tackling and executing.  You can't keep blaming someone else for your own lack of hunger and motivation.
This is now the longest premiership drought in the history of the Carlton Football Club - more evidence of climate change?

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #881
TBH @Tonyo, I think the way its been handled just shows that they dont know what theyre doing.

I wonder what Walsh, Pav and the other bloke (lol) think of the shiite pile theyve landed in @ cfc ?
Its going to take some amazing spin for it to look good on their resume...
Let’s go BIG !

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #882
Here's a bizarre theory..... after their respective reviews, both Geelong and Richmond re-appointed coaches who looked for all the world like they were dead men walking.  What followed both of these decisions was the most successful era that these two clubs had seen in over 40 years.  Granted other changes were made, but perhaps it was that show of faith in the head man that was the genesis of the kind of team spirit and hunger that led to prolonged success - the kind we so desperately need.  

Maybe, just maybe, after all of this rubbish, the best thing to do would be to re-appoint Teague, give him the other changes that are needed like decent assistants and development teams, and back him in.  And put some serious acid on the players to deliver (I reckon this is what Choco has done at the Demons this year).  I don't think the player buy-in and performance has been given enough scrutiny - after all, they are the ones out there running, tackling and executing.  You can't keep blaming someone else for your own lack of hunger and motivation.

Go even further. After Collingwood's 2017 review they kept Buckley and they made the GF and PF the next 2 years.

If the players had remotely some motivation this and last year we'd have played finals. With the attitude of our playing group it was amazing we were in some sort of contention. Just need that, a fit playing list, and a change in that and a tweak in the game plan ( maybe a better attitude might have seen the game plan executed better) and it would be a different side. Better people around him might've helped sort the game plan anyway. Unfortunately the motivation and culture aspect has bugged us for 20 years.

No support, a review creating a sword hanging over everyone for half a season, you get distrust and disunity. Hence you get games like we got 3 of the last 4 games.

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #883
Here's a bizarre theory..... after their respective reviews, both Geelong and Richmond re-appointed coaches who looked for all the world like they were dead men walking.  What followed both of these decisions was the most successful era that these two clubs had seen in over 40 years.  Granted other changes were made, but perhaps it was that show of faith in the head man that was the genesis of the kind of team spirit and hunger that led to prolonged success - the kind we so desperately need.  

Maybe, just maybe, after all of this rubbish, the best thing to do would be to re-appoint Teague, give him the other changes that are needed like decent assistants and development teams, and back him in.  And put some serious acid on the players to deliver (I reckon this is what Choco has done at the Demons this year).  I don't think the player buy-in and performance has been given enough scrutiny - after all, they are the ones out there running, tackling and executing.  You can't keep blaming someone else for your own lack of hunger and motivation.

Plenty of people have highlighted this point and it all makes perfect sense.......which is why the club won't do the same.

We are Carlton.....

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #884
Here's a bizarre theory..... after their respective reviews, both Geelong and Richmond re-appointed coaches who looked for all the world like they were dead men walking.  What followed both of these decisions was the most successful era that these two clubs had seen in over 40 years.  Granted other changes were made, but perhaps it was that show of faith in the head man that was the genesis of the kind of team spirit and hunger that led to prolonged success - the kind we so desperately need.  

Maybe, just maybe, after all of this rubbish, the best thing to do would be to re-appoint Teague, give him the other changes that are needed like decent assistants and development teams, and back him in.  And put some serious acid on the players to deliver (I reckon this is what Choco has done at the Demons this year).  I don't think the player buy-in and performance has been given enough scrutiny - after all, they are the ones out there running, tackling and executing.  You can't keep blaming someone else for your own lack of hunger and motivation.

Goodwin was on the verge of being sacked last year. It was a very close thing.