Skip to main content
Topic: Football Department Review (Read 74477 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #900
Vacancy: Mug required.
Reality always wins in the end.

 

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #901
The dark horse in all this discussion is Buckley. He seems to have disappeared off the radar, which is the first thing that should make one suspicious.

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #902
No mate, no need for forgiving anyone, all good. My points were:
1. The club backed Teague at the start
2. They said no running commentary on the review or individuals, this is the quote from Liddle “The whole football department is part of this review and we look forward to the process. However, we are not going to provide ongoing commentary around individuals." Liddle in The Australian on 26 June 2021
Thats why I found Teague's comments today odd, he seems to be the one thats gone off script. There have been no leaks, its all be a media generated frenzy and I reckon TT dropped the ball today.


You still feel that way after listening to Lyon pitch for your job last night ?
I would have been pissed at the lack of support too !
Let’s go BIG !

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #903
You still feel that way after listening to Lyon pitch for your job last night ?
I would have been pissed at the lack of support too !

How about the lack of support The TT gave BB when the chips were down  ;)
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #904
In fairness the club publically backed Bolton then sacked him 2 weeks later.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #905
In fairness the club publicly backed Bolton then sacked him 2 weeks later.

Yes, and the club has perhaps been burnt and learned its lesson -say nothing, then sack them at the end of the season.

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #906
Yes, and the club has perhaps been burnt and learned its lesson -say nothing, then sack them at the end of the season.

Only if thats the "findings" of your review of course...
Let’s go BIG !



Re: Football Department Review

Reply #909
You still feel that way after listening to Lyon pitch for your job last night ?
I would have been pissed at the lack of support too !
I explained what I thought about Lyon's and Clarko's contrasting styles last night. Lyon should have said nothing IMO, but he is a paid member of the media now, not a coach. He was asked the question if he'd be interested and he answered truthfully whilst stating he wanted to be respectful to Teague. Carlton cannot control his or anyones comments, in the last few weeks if they had to respond to every media comment about Teague's job security, they'd do little else all day. I guess thats why they said "no running commentary.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #910
No running commentary is one thing, but to stand by whilst pickpockets are riffling through the almost deads pockets and checking to see if his boots fit is another...
I guess we just see it different..
Let’s go BIG !

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #911
Who was the last Carlton coach who was treated well and supported by the club at the time of their departure (sacking)?

The surprising thing is that folks are surprised at the treatment.

But the situation the club has now got itself into, is that whatever decision they make, they will alienate a large number of supporters.

Folks are divided on Teague
Folks are divided on a replacement...good luck to a new coach who will already have been judged and others preferred.
Many are angered at the treatment of Teague.

It is a real mess.

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #912
TT WILL STAY… Believe me….


Re: Football Department Review

Reply #914
The dark horse in all this discussion is Buckley. He seems to have disappeared off the radar, which is the first thing that should make one suspicious.
Agree...Good mate of Geoff Walsh is Buckley so he would know a bit about the Review, Nathan's a bit too busy to coach though and more interested in teasing his ex on the social media scene with pictures of him getting loved up with his new partner.
Reckon Nathan will join the media and do a Ross Lyon for a year or two....we might be able to pick him up when we sack Ross....