Skip to main content
Topic: Football Department Review (Read 74457 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #945
He said something about mentoring indigenous boys but was not specific.

Our fingers are crossed, Fluffy One. I'd hate to lose Edwardo - again.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #946
Sorry Baggers, I don’t think I’ll ever forget that cringe worthy slogan we had back then.
I think "they know we're coming" was even more cringe worthy.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #947
I did find it curious that Edwardo, when interviewed the other day after announcing his retirement and asked what he was doing next, talked of a number of wonderful ventures... but none involved us/assistant coaching.
It sounds like no promises/commitments are being made to anyone wrt coaching staff until the review is complete.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #948
This makes for interesting listening/viewing (just the first half)... if you respect this first hand account from Nick R. I confess to valuing his perceptions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvx-Gtf17Fc&t=420s
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #949
Talk of chefs at CFC makes me nervous. Remember “can you smell what the Blues are cookin’?” and how that particular dish turned out?
Its been an embarrassing 10-15 years, I had a Blues sticker with" can you smell what the Blues are cooking" on the back of the car and didnt realize some smart Ar$e from work had crossed out the cooking and wrote "smokin" in permanent texta with Go Pies written underneath..


Re: Football Department Review

Reply #950
Its been an embarrassing 10-15 years, I had a Blues sticker with" can you smell what the Blues are cooking" on the back of the car and didnt realize some smart Ar$e from work had crossed out the cooking and wrote "smokin" in permanent texta with Go Pies written underneath..


EB, Footy Club Stickers Rule #1- Do not put them on your car ever under any circumstances (unless you want something untoward to happen to it). A mate of mine bought CFC number plates years ago, put them on, first game, car keyed at the MCG. Took them off and sold them.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #951
EB.....I've got a Carlton tattoo.....lost count of the times I've been given sh#t about it. But it's there forever so when we DO actually win another flag I only have to get the year added to it.

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #952
EB, Footy Club Stickers Rule #1- Do not put them on your car ever under any circumstances (unless you want something untoward to happen to it). A mate of mine bought CFC number plates years ago, put them on, first game, car keyed at the MCG. Took them off and sold them.
GTC, I should have known better...never again. :-[

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #953
EB.....I've got a Carlton tattoo.....lost count of the times I've been given sh#t about it. But it's there forever so when we DO actually win another flag I only have to get the year added to it.
Surfie, Sadly I think that Carlton Tatt is going to be lonely for a while...

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #954
I might have to say it's a Claremont logo for the time being.

 

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #955
This makes for interesting listening/viewing (just the first half)... if you respect this first hand account from Nick R. I confess to valuing his perceptions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvx-Gtf17Fc&t=420s

It's been noted for a while that Lyon is super loyal to his older, senior players, so perhaps that glowing endorsement should rightfully come with a few qualifications. Marty Sheargold is right - Lyon can come across as smug and sarcastic, and he shouldn't be putting his hand up for a position that isn't even vacant yet, unless as Teague said, Lyon knows something the rest of us don't.

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #956
It's been noted for a while that Lyon is super loyal to his older, senior players, so perhaps that glowing endorsement should rightfully come with a few qualifications. Marty Sheargold is right - Lyon can come across as smug and sarcastic, and he shouldn't be putting his hand up for a position that isn't even vacant yet, unless as Teague said, Lyon knows something the rest of us don't.

Reckon its the latter, had that smug look for a while...

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #957
Reckon its the latter, had that smug look for a while...

He seems to have had it for years IMO. There's just something about that guy that makes my skin crawl a little bit. The exit from St Kilda, shenanigans at Freo with those allegations, putting his hand up for the CFC job with "famous" people in his corner, seeing him at the footy on TV sitting with Stephen Milne. I realise these are not legitimate complaints, but still............

So far as I can tell, Clarko's main fault in this space is a massive temper. But his overall demeanour, presentation and quality of person seems better than Lyon's IMO.

Re: Football Department Review

Reply #958
Both the Geelong and Richmond reviews were initiated 6 years after Thompson and Hardwick took charge, not after 2 1/2 disrupted seasons. The Geelong review was initiated in August 2006 (near the end of the season) and included everybody :

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2006-08-17/geelong-announce-internal-review/1240604

It will look into administration, coaching, fitness, medical and sport science, list management, player leadership, recruiting and welfare and development.

That's how you do a review.

I understand the pro review crowd will extol the virtues of being proactive, getting on the front foot, nipping problems in the bud etc., but there is a fine line between proactive and knee jerk, and I'm not convinced our club understands the difference.

The thing is that our review is not a review of the coach, it is a review of the football department.  The length of time Teague has been in the job is largely irrelevant as our football department has been underperforming across the board since Brittain was coach.  Of course, some of the issues that led to Pagan's appointment have been addressed and others have evolved as other coaches, list managers, CEOs and footy department heads have attempted ad hoc remedies.

If anything, the review is too little, too late.  It should have been conducted before Bolton's first season at the helm.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball