Carlton Supporters Club

The Carlton Arrogance I talk of brushes opponents aside, it's never about letting them in or leaving the door ajar!

I'd like to know how Ross is going to cope with the new rules, which seem designed to phase out the way he likes to play. 6-6-6, the mark rule, less rotations.

When you hear him analyse the game on Ch9 and MMM, he knows. FFIW my mate, Hawks supporter, is a junior footy coach and wannabe seniors coach (suburban level). Rates Lyon as the best footy analyst and coach in the business and reckons he would be perfect for us (more so than Clarkson).

If I walk into an organisation with the charter to make better, I don't assume anything, I review what's there and determine its status. Whatever I review falls into 3 categories.
1. Green Light - do nothing and proceed.
2. Yellow Light - Satisfactory, continue but needs improvement.
3. Red Light - Unsatisfactory, do no proceed needs replacing.

That's all fine, but he can still be employed by us as a tactician / footy analyst, then it's a win / win. I've only seen snippets of him (admittedly a lot of snippets) and I find him a little hard to follow. He has a unique take on the English language and particular turns of phrase that leave me scratching my head. I don't rate him as a good communicator.

If I walk into an organisation with the charter to make better, I don't assume anything, I review what's there and determine its status. Whatever I review falls into 3 categories.
1. Green Light - do nothing and proceed.
2. Yellow Light - Satisfactory, continue but needs improvement.
3. Red Light - Unsatisfactory, do no proceed needs replacing.

This comment is not me advocating Ross.

However, to address your honest comments on your perceptions, I'd like to offer this.

Communication has been my life, in many respects, since leaving school back in 1827. There are so many effective forms of communication. But we are talking here, specifically, about a physical, demanding sport. Not academia (which I admire and respect... but not so much when it comes to action, getting things done in the real world).

What I observe with Ross is that he is a deeply passionate person. I love that. Passionate people can do rather interesting things with the English language, however. It comes with the territory, and so what. What is most important does the message get through to the receiver, connect with the receiver and motivate the receiver. Language and passion working together can be irresistible, and deeply effective. Ross also has very broad tactical, strategic nous, as does Clarko. And you can't separate the passion from the tactical from everything else in the individual. It's a package.

Expecting Ross to take a role that used his analysis and strategic nous only would never work. It's the whole package that makes him good at what he does. I understand that there are many folks who are almost entirely intellectual, effectively controlling their emotions. And that is entirely appropriate in some settings. But we're talking about a senior coach.

Ross (and Clarko) have a unique ability to connect with those they coach. Their care for each of their players is palpable - passion can be an amazing communicator... without words!

Ross (and Clarko) are also born leaders. And that's where they do there best work... as a leader.

Our game is a gladiatorial sport which requires both passion and strategy - heart and brain.

I accept that it's way more critical that the players understand him than me. I'm not convinced that he cannot be employed only as a tactician / footy analyst. That's basically what he does now. If that's what the club offers him, and he says "no, senior coach or nothing", then we say arrivedverci. We can't be held to ransom. I am of course being hypothetical about what has or hasn't been offered.

We can't be held to ransom. I am of course being hypothetical about what has or hasn't been offered.

We are being held ransom already by our ineffective and reactive board, we've been held ransom for two decades!
 

Lyon is eccentric and contrarian... So we're some of his favourite players.
If every other team is playing free flowing wide running footy his team will be playing close checking ugly scrimmage footy. He thrives on
being different and backing in players like Dawson, Baker, Crowley, Ballantyne who the rest of the league hate. His problem will be the time frame and being able to turn a list around to his style of play. Can he modify his thinking to suit the modern game and work with what he has?