Skip to main content

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all Show Posts made by this member. Note that you can only see Show Posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Thryleon

2
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: AFL Rd 15 2026 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs GWS
Regardless of why you cannot say that changing the coach has not worked - i am Team Voss but there was obviously something there which meant the foundations if laid, could not be built upon.

It has worked, but not IMO, for the reasons given. I suspect it's more in the psychological space. Pressure's off, the media is off our case, Elijah and 2nd half lapses are distant memories. Everyone is having fun and enjoying the caretaker head space. Fraser is definitely pulling the right levers IMO, and he certainly deserves full credit for that.
the weight of expectation is gone too.

Our season turned around when we all accepted it was gone which allows the players to play woth more freedom.
4
The Sports Desk / Re: Formula 1
Thry - I understand tax deductible donations.  Your original premise was about:
 - the motivation behind donations and your cynical take
 - and then how easy it is to give away money when you're wealthy

That is what I have responded to.




yes and I am not wrong to think so, correct?  I self confessed being a cynic.

And it is easier to he a philanthropist when you have plenty to give away. 
5
The Sports Desk / Re: Formula 1
Not you, shawny and dodge.

Solely on that original donation mentioned there's no benefit.

Add in some tax deductions for travel, costs of living like hotels, airfares, car expenses, educational stuff for "research", other income tax breaks such as paying yourself via a contracted company based in the cayman Islands and then he tips into charity to help and comes out with the deals you mention all to look like a philanthropist.

Thats not to condemn him.  Good on him, probably costs him nothing and gives him the exact perks and public reputation, but its not that long ago that Lewis Hamilton had a very different reputation in the world.

Perhaps time and age have humbled him.  Declaring an outright position here is fraught with danger.  He might be an A1 bloke, or he could be a real tosser.  You wouldnt know for sure. 

Good luck to him and all that support him. 



Thryleon what are you on about! 

My comments were in reply to Kruddler post saying if your going to lose money to the government via tax he might as well give it to a charity. I explained that paying to a charity instead of paying the is not equal so implying it is was incorrect 

None of my posts discussed anything more but to clarify there is a vast difference.

While im not a big fan of LH his charity work and/or his reasoning why I never commented on - that was all the spin Kruddler added to not admit his first post was incorrect.

Anyhow thats it from me on the matter, I can see i wont convince him so wasting my time.

 
Shawny, ive said what i said, re read it.  what part of it didnt you understand?

@Dodge what part of tax deductible donations didnt you understand?

I dont really care one iota either way, but im not going over old ground again to spell it out for you.
6
The Sports Desk / Re: Formula 1
You guys are making an assumption that this donation is the only tax minimisation strategy.

No.
Which is why i wasnt implying what shawny said i was implying.

There are a million and 1 ways to benefit from things, shawny assumed there was 1.

I listed a couple, but its just the tip of the iceberg.
Kickbacks are another.

I donate to you, you get my fashion label some shelf space in paris and milan.

I donate to you, you give me some inside info on stock tips.

.....get me a good real estate deal.

Rich helping the rich.
Not you, shawny and dodge.

Solely on that original donation mentioned there's no benefit.

Add in some tax deductions for travel, costs of living like hotels, airfares, car expenses, educational stuff for "research", other income tax breaks such as paying yourself via a contracted company based in the cayman Islands and then he tips into charity to help and comes out with the deals you mention all to look like a philanthropist.

Thats not to condemn him.  Good on him, probably costs him nothing and gives him the exact perks and public reputation, but its not that long ago that Lewis Hamilton had a very different reputation in the world.

Perhaps time and age have humbled him.  Declaring an outright position here is fraught with danger.  He might be an A1 bloke, or he could be a real tosser.  You wouldnt know for sure. 

Good luck to him and all that support him. 

7
The Sports Desk / Re: Formula 1
You guys are making an assumption that this donation is the only tax minimisation strategy.

Its just one more, along with all the rest of the mechanisms used to reduce that income.

You could structure in a bunch of other tax deductions then use donations to reduce income tax further and you wouldnt know.

Only someone intimate with all his accounts would know, including stuff like cayman Islands payments etc.
8
The Sports Desk / Re: Formula 1
In this case hes correct.  Im a cynic, people are generally self interested.
9
The Sports Desk / Re: Formula 1
How would NFPs that don't have DGR1 status survive in Australia if that was the case?

Don't have a view on Gates Foundation, except to say that generally, it is very hard to donate money properly and effectively if you have lot to give away.  Also the rules in US are different to ours...

Of course there are strategies to best manage donations, particularly from windfall events - which not only benefit to donor, but the NFPs as well as there becomes more to give away.

Sorry - won't hijack the thread any further.
I think thats a different discussion and argument but given donations are capable of being tax deductible (the not for profit thing you mentioned is largely irrelevant) you may find an incentive exists for people to give more away, than pay it to the government for a net even or even greater result for themselves.

This is why it must be viewed with a cynical lens.  Philanthropy is easy when you have plenty and the levers suit you to pull them.

11
The Sports Desk / Re: World Cup 2026
Just to dot point the way the game has gone, we are seeing drinks breaks sponsored by x in both halves.

In the australia vs Turkey game it was a balmy 20 degrees in Canada.  

Hardly a heat rule situation.

You could argue fairness as a reason behind it, but the cynic in me says its about money and nothing more.
12
The Sports Desk / Re: Formula 1


Don't like Hamiliton but no doubt in the right car he is still one of the best.

Saw a clip of him in an interview talking about how there shouldn't be any large gaps of wealth and how there shouldn't be billionaires and how many should be shared around.  Noble ideal Lewis but the hypocrisy of it all is Lewis was wearing Paket Phillipe watch with 1.5M. His new GF is worth over 1.5B and he is worth a lazy 500M.
 
Have to love the likes of these elites making statements completely at odds with their very life.   


Agree but he does give a lot to charities and foundations. He's wealthy by he is a good good egg.

When you earn as much as they do, giving money to charity must always be viewed through the suits for tax reasons Lense.
13
The Sports Desk / Re: World Cup 2026
I have little interest in soccer outside of 2 things....

1. My son plays soccer, so i watch that every week.
2. The world cup.

Only today did i learn that there are 48 teams this year, thats how much of an eye i've been keeping on it.

Can anyone share how that came about?

Reeks of someone like Trump wanting bragging rights of 'the biggest' or 'the best'.
Fifa wanted bigger broadcast rights, so expanded comp with more games results in more money.

So not trump but the usual suspects for why it was extended.

Im a purist, this was a giant mistake.
14
The Sports Desk / Re: World Cup 2026
Turkey have a much stronger team of individuals, and for the most part played pretty well

This was a major win for us, and won well.

I had greek commentary over here so cant comment on that.

Least excited ive been for a world cup in years.
15
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: AFL Rd 13 2026 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Essendon


Like Brodie Grundy?

FYI, Pitto gives away 1.7 free kicks a game.
Grundy gives away 2.9 free kicks a game.

Maybe he doesn't know the rules either?

Witts gives away 1.9 free kicks a game.
McAndrew gives away 1.8 free kicks a game
Luke Jackson gives away 1.7 free kicks a game.
TDK gives away 2.0 free kicks a game.

Perhaps its the rules that are the problem.



would love to know how many of those are centre square frees (for both pitto and the others).   maybe its just because we watch him all the time,  but pitto does seem to give away a lot of those

i support pitto, but he isnt as dynamic as some of the other rucks in the comp (although he started the year kicking goals),  and if he isnt giving is first use in the middle (including giving away frees),  then he becomes even less useful

It would definitely show a bias.  I.e.  pittonet is penalised once per match for crossing the line in ruck contests over the course of 2026.  Most of that time, his opponent is running and jumping over him and also crossing the line but it seems that if you are off the ground, in the air, this doesn’t matter.

Ultimately the free kick thing is irrelevant as most of the ones he is giving away aren't really there to start with.

When you look at free kicks rather than worry about how many are given away, it needs to be viewed solely about how a player plays over the course of a match.  Some players are on the edge more and give more frees away.  Some teams play like this as a rule.

The number of frees simply represent the number of times you got penalised, and not the number of times you infringed or did something wrong as you wont be penalised every time, the umps tend to put the whistle away.