I've seen multiple videos on what is now considered a travel in the NBA. Based on the rules, you can basically run half way down the court without bouncing depending on how you run, step, gather. Its a joke.
That doesn't support the 'conspiracy' narrative though.
Yep.....when you dare raise or question things on touchy topics like Politics, health, covid or 'science' you are quickly branded a nutter or Tin head or Anti Vaxxier - yet those who brand you are then happy to sell their 'conspiracy theories' on everything from AFL to F1 in as though its a proven fact.
Earlier in the season, there seemed to be a narrative that Piastri was a calmer driver than Norris, and Norris didn't handle the pressure well. The last few weeks it does seem to have reversed a bit...
Ever since the team made Oscar hand back the spot because of a poor pitstop to Norris at Monza.
5 races since then. Norris has beat Oscar in all 5 races Norris has beat Oscar in all 2 sprint races Norris has beat Oscar in all 2 sprint race qualifying Norris has beat Oscar in 4 out of 5 race qualifying.
Since McLaren clinched the manufacturers title at Singapore, Oscar has failed to be in front of Norris in any practice session, sprint qualifying session, sprint race, normal qualifying session or normal race. That is 0-14. (Would be 15 except Norris didn't drive 1 practice session for reserve driver)
So COULD the team be holding Oscar back? Absolutely. WOULD the team be holding Oscar back? Potentially, its happened before with Webber vs Vettel at Red Bull. Are the team holding Oscar back? Who knows. But to say its not possible or it would never happen goes against history. History repeats.
I know Kimi had Leclerc on his right but FMD he could have given Oscar a bit of room on the inside of the corner. He was lucky to have not sustained race ending damage himself. Many drivers have received penalties for that.
Leclerc left Antonelli plenty of space, Antonelli cut across Piastri, Piastri drove the same line and was turning in when Antonelli crushed him. Antonelli escaping penalty is the Mercedes tax.
McLaren favouring Lando has to be expected, Brit team, Brit driver, Brit billionaire, Brit marketing, it was always going to go that way.
What I don't get is Lando and McLaren seemingly oblivious to the crowds boing him, it's getting worse every race and even if Lando is thick skinned McLaren must certainly notice it. Maybe there was some truth to the earlier leaked rumours about Zac Brown not wanting Piastri, but it's more likely the Lando marketing dollars that McLaren want. We could say our bias is parochial, but when the rest of the world sees it happening then it can't be just our perception!
What it does highlight is just how little the teams rate the drivers as part of the setup, are they are like AFL coaches, are they megalomaniacs who think they can build a car to deliver anybody a win?
You're been given an inch and making it a mile.
However, playing devils advocate. If you were McLaren, and if favouring Piastri (or even giving them 100% even treatment) meant that Piastri would win the championship which could lead to Lando leaving in a huff, and along with it whatever potential sponsorship dollars that MAY have attached to it......would you do anything but what they are doing?
Is Oscar THAT much better than Lando that you'd risk it?
Not saying they are, not saying they are not, its possibly a sub-conscious thing they are not even aware of even if they are......but either way, it DOES make sense for them to do that.
Interestingly post race Leclerc who was the big victim of the incident come out and slammed the stewards saying they were completely wrong to penalise Piastri, he stated Antonelli contributed to the collision by turning in on Piastri.
Which is all true.
There was no 100% right call to make. They made one and copped it. Had they made the other, they wouldve copped it too
It was going to be harsh no matter which way the stars went with it.
Had oscar qualified better, he wouldn't have been so desperate to make the move when he did, not that it was desperate, but he was on the edge and ultimately just over it with the lockup.
Yes, but why would stewards penalise this now, they haven't applied such a penalty to a racing incident all season.
I understand when the stewards apply penalties to people crossing the line or making dangerous moves, but actually in this case they were all still on what is legally deemed the track and nobody really broke any rules, you could equally argue Antonelli failed to leave a car width. All season this type of event has been deemed a racing incident.
Is what happened between Piastri and Antonelli any more than what Norris did to Piastri, it's just luck nobody was on the other side of Piastri a couple of weeks back?
Did Piastri take/make the corner while having his car under control? The lockup means "no". So he took out another car (who took out leclerc) and he copped a penalty for it.
Plenty of similar incidents have been penalised. Plenty have been let go. If he doesn't lock up, he doesn't get a penalty.
It was going to be harsh no matter which way the stars went with it.
Had oscar qualified better, he wouldn't have been so desperate to make the move when he did, not that it was desperate, but he was on the edge and ultimately just over it with the lockup.
^^ that old chestnut, ill adjust the argument to make it look like i was right even when I was wrong?
Let me put it to you this way then if you want to adjust things like a politician does.
They kick so few goals ordinarily that holding a team to none is unremarkable. It only means stopping them from kicking 2 to 3 goals.
Got it now? Thats the opposite of impressive. Or maybe you're easily impressed.
You adjusted the argument to the 2 goal thing and saying how common it is... despite it not being half as common as you think.
That aside, if you don't think holding a top 4 side goalless is not impressive than that's all you need to say.
Despite their dominant performances and record winning run, not even the Kangas have held a top 8 side goalless before, certainly not a top 4 side.... and in a final no less!
More common than what? And why does 2 goals matter? This was 0 goals!
Top 8 teams that kicked 2 goals a game this year... Eagles - twice (including this game) Hawks - once in round 3 Blues - once against Hawks in round 2 (12 scoring shots!)
No top 8 team had kicked kids less than 2 goals in a game of aflw all year.
In fact only 1 team (gc twice) had failed to kick a goal in a match all year (0.6 twice). Finished last btw.
So Hawks are the only top 8 team to kick less than 2 goals in a game. Thus clearly the only top 4 team to do it. They also own the lowest score from anyone, for the year!
So that score is definitely an outlier no matter which way you want to look at it. If you want to diminish that by saying some other score is more common.... than whatever... then be my guest.
Pretty sure the message from Bucky at half time was to get the ball moving forward any way you can.
First goal from the 2nd half came from 6 different players soccers/toe pokes in a row from the centre circle to McKay 20m out from goal who remembered she can use her hands, picked it up and kicked truly.
That simple instruction was the difference in the 3rd quarter which set up a relatively easy win in the end.
Hawks got beaten up by the kangas. We had a relatively easy one against the eagles. That should account for the extra day they get. Bring on next week.
It'll be interesting to see the stats post game, but I'd expect that Vescio will be a stand out for contested possessions and efficiency, experience matters in tough conditions.
Having a few Irish girls probably makes a big difference in the otherwise chilly conditions!
Vescio handled the conditions well, but the love for Darcy is selling a lot of others short.
For instance.... Contested possessions....Darcy had 5. 10 Carlton players had more....but Darcy gets highlighted? Darcy had 16 touches, 5 contested and 3 uncontested.....where is the other 8 possessions? I expect majority of them is from kickouts. Thats par for the course for Darcys possessions.
Again, nothing against Darcy, but there are a lot of girls out there doing a great job that get no love because people fixate on Darcy.
Guerin 26 touches, 10 tackles, 6 clearances, 394m gained - 10 contested possessions What about our ruck tandem of Harrington and Good? 32 touches, 27hitouts, 9 clearances, 6 tackles and 573m gained - 19 contested possessions between them.
18yo kids... S. McKay - 19 touches, 4 tackles, 5 score involvements, 1 clearance, 237m and 2 goals - 9 contested Scholz - 9 touches, 5 tackles, 2 score involvements,189m and 1 goal - 4 contested - 3 free kicks won for tackles.
Haven't even mentioned, regulars, Hill, A. McKay, Sherar....