This section allows you to view all Show Posts made by this member. Note that you can only see Show Posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Jack may need more development, but he's coming along like a house on fire.
He's averaging nearly 3 goals a game (2.8 )
Really looking forward to this game... especially keen to see the progress of Flynn Young, Jack Ison, Wade Derksen, Billy Wilson. Hopefully B Camporeale returns to the midfield. Hopefully HOK improves. (Although Flynn, Jack and Billy should be in the seniors we know they won't get a gig... Vossy likes his faves and the tried and true).
I saw a video of Cottrell talking about Ainsworth. THATS the type of player we need at our club. The Application form should have 4 questions:
1. Can you run fast?
2. Can you kick well?
3. Do you want to win?
4. Are you a Kent?
If you answered yes to all 4, welcome to the CFC and you will be considered for the captaincy.
Moir is still only a kid. Just turned 21, hasn't even played 15 games yet.
He may well have a long career and i expect it to be similar to someone like Houlihan who will constantly be berated for the way he 'looks' when he plays.
Its not the 'in' thing at the moment for someone to conserve their energy and not waste it chasing someone they will never catch.
The 'in' thing is why someone like Fogarty has kept someone like Moir out of the side. Run, chase, tackle.
At the end of the day, whoever kicks the most goals wins games.
Moir might do nothing for 90% of the game, but he'll likely kick you a goal or 2 in the other 10%.....which is an upgrade on Fogarty.
I actually wrote that before deciding to double check my observations.
13 games
15 goals (7 behinds)
1.15 goals/ game
Fogarty
76 games
36 goals (40 behinds)
0.39 goals/game
Judge Bowden said "While I generally accept [her] evidence and have found that Mr Cable has the tendency alleged and I consider it more probable than not that she is telling the truth, I am not persuaded of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in respect of any count on the indictment."
To find Cable not guilty without discussing the difficulties both prosecution and defence had in presenting evidence and without mentioning the apparent truthfulness of the victim's testimony would have left her with a reputation as a liar.
The phrase "the tendency alleged" is in reference to a judge finding in a 2023 civil action that Cable had abused the plaintiff when she was a child.
Judge Bowden is basically saying that Cable probably did abuse the victim but the evidence is insufficient to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. By doing so, he is discharging his responsibilities to both the defendant and the alleged victim.
Still like a bit unfair. What is he basing his opinion on when he says 'its more probable then not she is telling the truth' if there isn't the evidence to prove it? Is that just his opinion?
Sounds like the AFL finding Butters guilty cause the umpire say i heard him say it.
I'm all for tougher judges and sentencing but there needs to be the evidence first to find them guilty or all you have is a testamony which is just a person's version of events isn't it.
I may be missing something but i think he should not comment if the accused is found not guilty.