We can't talk about these things. Fixture the only difference between Rounds 0-7 and the Fraser Era.
I am here to call out the BS that there has been "zero" change to the game style, pressure, player role changes and that we we have been working on it all pre-season and in season it was there to see in the 2nd half against the Lions.
Only a change in fixture. Everything else the same.
Pretty sure McKay has been covered a few times, but i can't make you read it.
But tell me.....what exactly has Fraser done to Cripps....removed the Voss shaped kryptonite from around his neck?
He was back in the coaches votes for the first time since R1 richmond game. How did we conspire to give him votes that game (and every game since) given that not only do we need to rig our votes, we need to rig the oppositions votes as well. This conspiracy goes deeper and deeper the more you look! We've got the whole AFL to work together on undermining Vossy now.
Cripps (and Walsh and McKay) have all been remarkably better since Voss left. Fact we all agree on.
You can assume that it's changes that Voss had made that hadn't kicked in yet, the fixture and a recovery to the body greater than Lazarus.
Or it's more help on this inside in Hewett, Ainsworth and Smith and less Contests. Maybe a less taxing game plan and holding on the ball a little bit to slow down momentum? Maybe neither of these things?
The real reasons? You don't really know. None of us do.
If you want to give Fraser 0% credit for any changes regardless of how small that's ok.
Still no explanation on the massive turn around in Cripps and Walsh's form/fitness in particular, the captain couldnt run out of sight on a dark night during last quarters under Voss and looked like the next club he would be playing for would be the Arcare or Aveo old boys.
Shhhh. Add McKay
We can't talk about these things. Fixture the only difference between Rounds 0-7 and the Fraser Era.
I am here to call out the BS that there has been "zero" change to the game style, pressure, player role changes and that we we have been working on it all pre-season and in season it was there to see in the 2nd half against the Lions.
Only a change in fixture. Everything else the same.
But I wouldnt hold any weight to these comments. I mean what do you expect these guys to say? They like Voss. The players liked Voss. He is a likeable person. The bloke has just been given the arse. Why would anyone speak poorly of him? For what purpose? He did some good things and lets celebrate them but lets not speak ill of the departed. It would be a poor look
Ok so lets ride your train of thought and assume everyone complety made it up, ill even borrow LPs tin foil hat for the journey, how do you explain all the statiatical evidence that was floated at the time showing a shift in oir game plan? Did we conspire with the media as well and champion data as well?
Failing all that, just have a look at the brisbane game and how we played.
I even made a comment the week after saying that i saw no difference from the brisbane game to the dogs game apart from the opposition and others agreed.
But if you wanna put it all down to fraser and the circuit breaker, be my guest, i wont be agreeing with you. Ill back the clubs comments, the statistical evidence and my own eyes instead.
It's the respectful thing to do is to give Voss his credit and he deserves it. The bloke is a champion of the AFL. It would be a terrible look for anyone to say "oh yeah. Fraser has been amazing and the changes he has made since we got rid of Voss has turn this ship around"
Like I said Voss did a lot right (for a half a game anyway) and the Lions game was another example of that. We trailed by 49 points with the Lions in complete control. Watching the game, I can't help think they took the foot of the gas and their players joked about this after the game. Bit like the Demons and Hawks game of last week, just how much can you take from a half of football when the game has been pretty much put to bed. The Lions then went on to lose the next 3 including their worst performance of the season against GWS. I guess we can put down this decent result down to fixturing and catching the Lions in the flat period.?
Not sure of the statistical change either:
Brisbane Game: Metres Gained from Handball down 80. 88 up under Fraser. Contest Possessions: Down -6.25 Uncontested Marks: No Change. Up 22.32 with Fraser. Tackles: 38 (Season Low)
Flowers for Voss: D50ToScore: Round 0 to 5: 4.78 D50ToScore: Round 6 to 9: 15.97
I was never anti Voss. He deserves credit. As does Fraser for the changes that he has made.
2. Are we meant to believe 3 weeks flicked a switch? Yes. It was said by every man and his dog, including Voss, Fraser, Wright and Davies....and the players. This is not my words, this has come from the club. You don't want to believe, nothing i can do to change your mind.
You have mentioned this a few times.
But I wouldnt hold any weight to these comments. I mean what do you expect these guys to say? They like Voss. The players liked Voss. He is a likeable person. The bloke has just been given the arse. Why would anyone speak poorly of him? For what purpose? He did some good things and lets celebrate them but lets not speak ill of the departed. It would be a poor look
Cmon Shakin, if it was as simple as 1 thing, then Voss and the club is an idiot.
But those who are anti-voss are making it out as if there was only 1 change that 'solved' everything, Fraser. Surely you can see that is not true.
Fixture, IMO, is the most important factor. Cripps' form is not a coincidence. Our best 2 games under voss was the 2 games Cripps got votes....and he has votes in every game since.
So ignoring those 2 things, which Fraser boosters continue to do, is my gripe. Similarly, people gave Fraser credit for bringing George back, playing Wilson, playing Harry in the ruck.....all occured before he took over.
Credit where credit is due, sure. I've got no issue with Fraser. I've got issues with people proclaiming he can walk on water and has the midas touch.
In terms of your CBA's, can you include the figures for Lord?
IMO thats been a huge difference. I copped some flack for questioning his long term future and him being too similar to our better mids. Initially i think he was playing a wing role that Cerra took over. He was playing midfield when we gave him a chance to lock it down with George out of the side. Eventually, Lord was forced out of the side through injury and hasn't (as yet) returned to the seniors, despite going ok in the 2's.
There is a lot of cause and effect, and correlation, and people not understanding the difference.
Just looking at Jagga for an example, he started in the midfield. Then plenty were suggested he looked tired and sore and might need a run in the 2's. Was moved out of the guts at the same time. Got himself back up to speed and was moved back in as a result. Is that Fraser being a genuis? Is it Voss looking after his young player so he doesn't break him??
You've got me wrong.
I actually thought we were doing a lot right under Michael Voss, and that our results were often a poor reflection of where we were as a football club.
The frustration was that under Voss we could play brilliant football for a half, then follow it up with football that looked like Under 12s at Diamond Creek.
Unfortunately, I think Voss will be remembered as the coach who couldn't stop momentum swings. This wasn't just a three-game issue or even a one-season issue. You said it yourself when you told your son to pick any score worm from the last 24 months—you'll almost always find a Voss-coached Carlton side conceding multiple unanswered goals.
Our worst performances this season highlighted that perfectly:
Second half vs Sydney Second half vs Richmond (Round 1) Second half vs Melbourne Last quarter vs North Melbourne Second half vs St Kilda Round 13 vs Essendon Round 17 vs Richmond
We all knew this was the issue that had to be fixed. We had an entire pre-season to address it, only to dish up the same thing again and again. Fast starts, no finish.
So now we're meant to believe we suddenly flicked a switch over the last three games and solved it?
I agree Voss leaving acted as a circuit breaker, but history tells us these sugar hits can be short-lived.
I liked Voss as a communicator and a leader. Where I was less convinced was his tactical coaching. Too often he struggled to stop opposition momentum or adjust during games, and I thought he was regularly beaten in the coaches' box. I was hoping the club would bring in someone like Adam Simpson to complement him with that tactical layer, but it never really happened.
Now, the wins over Geelong, the Western Bulldogs, plus away victories against Port Adelaide and GWS are all quality wins. They were games we weren't expected to win. The match committee deserves plenty of credit, particularly for responding when both Geelong and GWS got on top after we'd built healthy leads. Those are exactly the sort of games we would have lost previously.
Was the old game plan simply too taxing? Why couldn't we consistently run games out under Voss?
Under Josh Fraser we're clearly playing differently. We're less contest-focused, we retain possession more, and we're generating more metres gained by both hand and foot. Whether people think the changes are significant or subtle doesn't really matter—the numbers are what they are. They're not made up to annoy LP.
The game style has changed.
Harry McKay is probably the best example. If you're Michael Voss, you'd be wondering where this version of Harry has come from. After nine rounds, his season looked like it was heading towards "trade him for a late second-round pick." Since then, he's completely turned it around. Is it confidence? A different role? Better ball movement? Probably a combination of all three. He's just one example of several small changes that seem to have injected more energy into the side and allowed us to apply pressure for longer.
Now, could it simply be that:
George Hewett was dropped and got the kick up the backside he needed? Patrick Cripps is finally fully fit? The fixture has been favourable, with Richmond, Essendon and West Coast all struggling? Cerra moving to the wing, along with the Ainsworth and Smith changes, were already Voss ideas?
Absolutely. All of those factors have played a part.
I'm somewhere in the middle.
But to suggest there have been no changes in the way we're playing, or that the game style is exactly the same, is ridiculous in my opinion. Whether those changes are subtle or significant is open for debate, but pretending they don't exist ignores what we're seeing on the field and what the statistics are telling us.
Regarding Cripps, I was one of those who thought he was carrying an injury earlier in the season. However, as the club has never confirmed any current or previous injury, it's difficult to know if there was one, when it occurred, or how much it was affecting his performances. By the same token, it's also hard to suggest that Cripps is suddenly 100% injury-free simply because Michael Voss has departed. Without any information from the club, that's just speculation.
There have, however, been a number of changes under Josh Fraser that may have contributed to Cripps' improved performances.
Lower contested game
Carlton's game style has shifted significantly.
"Carlton’s strengths under Voss, contest and clearance, remain, but they are less reliant on these areas. Their contested possession rate is down from 37.3 per cent and sixth in Voss’s last five games to 32.8 per cent and 17th under Fraser. It’s a style more in keeping with how football is played in 2026."
A less contest-heavy game could reduce the physical toll on Cripps over four quarters. If he's not repeatedly crashing into stoppages, it makes sense that he'd have more energy and explosiveness around the ground.
It's also worth considering whether the greater midfield support from players like Hewett, Smith and Ainsworth has allowed Cripps to be more selective with his contests rather than carrying such a heavy workload himself.
Training standards
Players have also spoken publicly about Fraser's increased focus on fundamentals and raising training standards.
Interestingly, they've also said training sessions have become less physically demanding. Despite that, Carlton's match-day pressure has actually increased, and the group appears to have more energy late in games.
If players are fresher because they're not being physically taxed as heavily during the week, that could certainly benefit someone like Cripps. It's also possible that this is a broader team effect rather than something specific to the captain.
Ultimately, there are several plausible reasons for Cripps' resurgence, but without confirmation from the club about his physical condition, it's impossible to attribute it solely to a coaching change. The shift in game style, increased midfield support, and altered training approach all appear just as likely to have played a role.
And be careful repeating this rubbish, Hewett was back in the midfield the week before Voss left, McKay had been relief rucking at times most of the season but barely got a tap before his week off, and Cerra was in the Midfield because Hewett was in the maggos, leaving Lord and Smith to share the wing in the Mid rotation.
The commentators happily rewrite history, but they watch our games far less than we do!
So 1 game under Voss or 12.5% of Games. Under Fraser 7 for 7 or .... You guessed it 100%
So to suggest that McKay rucked under Voss all season isn't correct. It was a combo of O'Keefe and Young,
With Hewett until Round 9 Voss only played all three of Cripps, Hewett and Cerra in the same side and that was Round 4. With Cerra back he dropped Hewett. They did all play in Round 9 against the Lions however Cerra still had CBA's and not the wing role under Fraser.
They have all played together in the same side since. 7 for Fraser. 2 for Voss.
I don't think it's fair to suggest that the turnaround in form is due mainly to the fixture. Essendon, Richmond and West Coast we would have all started favorites for however the Wins against Geelong, Bulldogs, Port Adelaide (Away) and GWS (Away) are a significant change in fortunes.
"Carlton on track at round 9 to be one of the worst pressure rating teams on record..."
Our pressure and match day energy regardless of the opponent which requires no talent have been remarkably better under Fraser than Voss.
https://x.com/RileyBev/status/2051182183340253489 "Carlton's pressure rating of 152 against St Kilda was its lowest of the season, but that's no surprise. The Blues are the only team in the AFL yet to have a single game this year where they've recorded a higher pressure rating than their opposition."
Fraser has put Hewett back into the middle and Cerra (53% CBA's) on the Wing (0 CBA's). Credit too him I didn't think that Cerra could play Wing. Jagga is up 15% CBA's. McKay into the middle has turned his season around and Fraser has used Ainsworth in the middle to pinch hit up to 15%.
All the easy teams are gone now the real stuff begins.
I thought we were better last night than round 1.
Round 1: Disposal count pretty level and we lost the inside 50 count by 16. Round 17: 60+ in Disposals. Inside 50's level.
Round 1 I thought we were very lucky to have won it. This time I thought we should have been further in front, especially in the 2nd quarter and we would have been very unlucky to lose it.