Skip to main content
Recent Posts
12
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench
Last post by Lods -
There is some seriously warped interpretations of what people are actually saying.
So far off the mark it's ridiculous.
Lost the plot completely.


I suspect some need a cup of tea, a Bex and a good lie down.

Saying Ollie may give us good service is nowhere near saying he's better than Charlie Curnow.

Its not about like for like though Lods. Its about what it gives to the team.
Charlie was a lone ranger.
Ollie is a team player.

If you asked chat GPT to rate these players based on what is said on these forums, it'd come to the same conclusion.....which would be opposite to the rest of the world.

I'm just highlighting that what is being said is also absurd.

Kruds, the slant that's being put on it is not what's being actually stated by posters.

No one would say that Ollie Florent could impact a game the way Charlie could...no-one!

The whole basis of these arguments is ..will the loss of the three key players mean our 2026 will be worse than our 2025.
Can we cover them, not necessarily like for like  but strengths in other areas.

Suggesting people are saying all the outs are duds and all the ins are champs...has been said by no-one... ever!

It's just 'extreme' language with no basis in fact.

We'll miss the players we've lost. But by this time next year I suspect we'll have an appreciation of what some of the new players can give us.


13
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench
Last post by kruddler -
There is some seriously warped interpretations of what people are actually saying.
So far off the mark it's ridiculous.
Lost the plot completely.


I suspect some need a cup of tea, a Bex and a good lie down.

Saying Ollie may give us good service is nowhere near saying he's better than Charlie Curnow.

Its not about like for like though Lods. Its about what it gives to the team.
Charlie was a lone ranger.
Ollie is a team player.

If you asked chat GPT to rate these players based on what is said on these forums, it'd come to the same conclusion.....which would be opposite to the rest of the world.

I'm just highlighting that what is being said is also absurd.
14
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench
Last post by Lods -
There is some seriously warped interpretations of what people are actually saying.
So far off the mark it's ridiculous.
Lost the plot completely.


I suspect some need a cup of tea, a Bex and a good lie down.

Saying Ollie may give us good service is nowhere near saying he's better than Charlie Curnow.

15
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench
Last post by kruddler -
Doesn't work that way Kruddler, we take the traitor's worst and our new player's best, even Chesser's 4 games lol.

Don't forget Reidy and his 3 games.
...and Hudson O'Keeffe has played 5 games and between them we've got cover for both TDK and Charlie.
Simples.

But don't be fooled, its not like for like.
You have to include Hayward and Ainsworth. Not sure who they are replacing, but they will pick up the slack.

Of course, not a single person has mentioned that McKays life will now be harder as Charlie is no longer the #1 target, he is, so his output will fall....if he can even stay on the park with his mental issues...but shhh.....don't say anything.....you'll just be labelled negative.
17
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench
Last post by kruddler -
I just said similar in another thread.
All outgoing players are now no good.
All incoming players have never played a bad game or missed a game through injury.
Its hypocrisy.

Take them all at 'average' levels and go from there.
You'll come up with the same conclusion if you are honest.
How can you measure a players Average output?

I.e.  Hayward?  His formline stacks up over 3 years.  Florent was sidelined by his coach, not his ability.  So not sure its fair to do that with him, and Ainsworth had a solid year. 

We are saying all these guys have to do is back up 2025 form, vs the outgoings 2025 form.  Thats 11 games without being subbed off injured for JSOS.

Charlie went bog average by key forward standards.  18 games for 32 goals.  1.8 goals a game.  Sure he kicked 27 behinds, but we wont miss those.  All we need is Kemp to chime in for 18 games and kick 30.  That will cover Charlie.  Hayward and Ainsworth might make up the rest, if Kemp falls short, and Skull is a wildcard here.  Played 5 games, kicked 3 goals.

TDK the ruckman is more of a unicorn than not.  Thing is, you yourself @kruddler  have stated that Pittonet shades him.  So if Pittonet Shades him, TDK's 2025 was a mixed bag, where he was generally good for half the season and then came back to the field.  Rucks are easier to cover, you just need a competitor.  I.e.  Is Cameron a better ruck than Grundy?  Probably not.  Cameron has played better footy than Grundy more often.  Collingwood didnt miss him.  Maybe we will have Pittonet finally have a consistent run.

JSOS.  I love the guy.  Is a competitor, hates being beaten.  Thing is, he played 13 games, and missed 2024 completely.  He was also not present for most of our best footy in 2023, and hasnt even played a final yet for us.  Are we really going to pine about that now? 

It reeks of agenda.  What happened to being measured?

For those of us on my side of the fence, we are fighting off people like yourself who can't seem to agree on where the issues are (or aren't)

I've been arguing about rucks for years and didn;t get many an ally in any of it.
Now it seems 'everyone agrees with me' and are using my arguments as if they were their own. You can't have it both ways.
I'm not rehashing years worth of arguments about those 2.

Going back to the heart of the matter....how do you measure average?

Let me try and explain with the 'olympic scoring' method.
Take out the best and the worst and work with whats left.
So ignore charlies injury year. Take out his best coleman year. Work with whats left. Pretty consistent and consistently above anything we got in.
Using the same logic with Hayward. Take out his 41 goal year and his best was 34 goals. If Charlies worst year last year was 32.
So who is better?

18
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench
Last post by kruddler -


I said the debate centred around whether we would improve stay the same or go backwards in 2026 compared to 2025.
And on that basis you can only judge on what was on display in 2025
Florent didn't have a great year compared to his previous year.
I don't think I've mentioned him much.
Defence wasn't really a concern...our issues stemmed more around entry to the 50 the ability to keep it there, and forward efficiency.

Anyway, we'll see how Ollie goes this year.

https://www.carltonfc.com.au/video/1941089/micd-up-ollie-florent-at-training?videoId=1941089&modal=true&type=video&publishFrom=1765440286001

Ollie played as well as his coach allowed him to.  Inexplicable coaching from someone who seems out of their depth.

I think that Ollie will make quite an impression next season both on the field and with his energy and leadership at training.

So Ollies issue wasn't talent. He pissed off the coach. Sure, plausible.
But...
Charlies issue wasn't talent either. He was forced to play injured to the point he was a liability.

Ollie we blame the coach.
Charlie we DONT blame the coach?

Remembering, Charlie got offered up for 3x first rounders and Ollie was steak knives......but Ollie will be better for us than Charlie?

What the hell are you drinking and where do i get some?
19
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench
Last post by kruddler -
You said we are only judging on 2025.
Defence wasn't really a concern...our issues stemmed more around entry to the 50 the ability to keep it there, and forward efficiency.

Defence wasn't really a concern?

Lets here a non-Carlton based perspective....
https://www.zerohanger.com/every-afl-teams-backline-ranked-1-18-171600/6/
Quote
13 - Carlton
If it weren't for Jacob Weitering, the Blues would be much worse on the list.

The All-Australian defender not only held his own, but also assisted his teammates in their matchups.

Nick Haynes was shaky early but found his groove in the end and proved vital to the club's intercepting ability.

Ollie Hollands and Matt Carroll showed their skillset across half-back as the Blues' go-to ball users, while Adam Saad, despite playing 21 games, took a backwards seat.

The retired Sam Docherty and emerging Lachlan Cowan struggled with form and injury, contributing to the defensive woes, which were heightened when Mitch McGovern was in the backline.

Jack Silvagni and Lewis Young played 13 matches each, and the former will be sorely missed after joining St Kilda in the off-season.

Harry O'Farrell showed plenty, but will likely miss the majority of 2026 due to an ACL injury.

So perhaps others rate Jack more than we did.
Perhaps others see we are in a far worse position than we do.

If we have the 13th best defence, and defence is not our issue.....then this backs up what i've been saying that we are in for a long season.

But, some bloke who couldn't get a game at his previous club will change everything for us?
2025 form and all.
20
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: List Building - More than one way to skin a cat
Last post by Lods -
Whilst I understand your viewpoint I don’t share your enthusiasm Lods.
Doesn’t matter how many pigs ears we’ve got, we ain’t going to be a high end supplier of silk purses.
But it is what it is and we’ll see what we can make of it.

It's 'to be determined'
With a bit of bad luck again with injury we could drop further.
A reasonable amount of luck (and we're overdue) and a break even position is more than likely.
A bit of development from the youngsters, the trades and draftees working in well...and none of the division and distraction of this year and a move up the ladder a few spots is more than possible.

Up one spot and we're playing finals (whatever they might like to call it) ;)