81
Blah-Blah Bar / Re: Election 2025 (Poll added)
Last post by Thryleon -Your author https://7news.com.au/profile/sarah-keszler
The article, is a one sided report, based on alleged activity, with minimal proof and maximum grandstanding by the very victims.
The AEC encouraged the police to be called for bullying by volunteers. Are we sure this is what happened?
Here have a more emotive piece:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thepost.sydney/pre-poll-booth-clash-in-cherrybrook-has-police-called/
My instant response is to dismiss this as pure emotive propaganda, and in response to your claim, it's got people up and about online. So yes, people will be swayed by this.
No, it isn't balanced reporting of events, no its isn't substantiated and who knows what was actually said and done given the behaviour isn't commented on but the reaction is.
I'm confused!
You have quoted two reports of incidents at pre-polling booths. The incident involving Julian Leeser was reported to the always impartial AEC who notified the police as required under their legislation.
Here's another article covering three incidents, two at pre-polling booths and one at a campaign rally:
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/assault-intimidation-charges-after-separate-incidents-at-pre-polling-centres/6zvl8958k
In the first incident we have a MAGA supporter (WTF!) interfering with election advertising and being assaulted by a teenager who seems to have been a supporter of the PM. The teenager was charged and locked up. Then there's a person behaving aggressively towards Liberal volunteers who was also charged by police. Finally, a supporter of Independent Monique Ryan threw a punch at right wing protestors who were disrupting Ryan's campaign meeting.
That's pretty well the whole gamut of the political spectrum. It's reported on mainstream media, not social media. The police are involved in two incidents and the offenders have been charged. The reporting is balanced, factual, and certainly not emotive. The incidents are substantiated and there will be consequences ... and they won't make an iota of difference to the election outcomes in the electorates concerned or the overall result.
Strange as it may seem, not everything is a conspiracy, people of all persuasions can behave badly, police don't get involved without good reason, the media can provide accurate, impartial reports, and voting intentions are not swayed by bullying or reports of bullying.
Not by reputable journalists, but online news "writers". Effectively the police were called and the alleged perpetrator was gone and no charges pressed and then apparently people in tears. What happened though? Bullying is the article. Call the police if you feel threatened is standard IMHO.
The seven article and the post article that I and Paul have provided are the same incident at the same polling booth in the same electorate. Not sure about your confusion but this is where it all misses the mark as the articles I've referenced are refereed to in your sbs article.
Whatever other maga stuff you've read ive not heard of until you posted it, but watching the news last night there was mud slinging at Monique Ryan and ties to international interference in the election on her behalf by China.
Now I'm not sure why that is, that we get conflicting reports of events about her in particular but applying my theory, the TV news reported her china links whilst here you have SBS going into bat for her.
Reading your article my spider sense is straight to finding the problems with the article.
A 17 year old vandalising coreflute assaulting an old man. Guess what likely happened there. A knocked over sign and a confrontation and an unstable teen lashing out sounds about right. Teenager isn't voting age. So a vandal at a polling booth. Coreflute is likely those a frame signs they put out. Would vandalising include knocking it over?
Quote
Two people have been charged over incidents at pre-polling booths, including a teenager who seriously injured an elderly man during a tense stand-off in the prime minister's electorate.
The 17-year-old was due to face a children's court on Thursday after allegedly punching the 79-year-old at Ashfield, in Sydney's inner-west, on Wednesday afternoon.
The teenager allegedly punched a 79-year-old man in the face outside a pre-polling centre in the suburb, which falls within Anthony Albanese's electorate of Grayndler.
Is a pre polling centre the same as a early voting center? When did this event occur? It says Wednesday and due to go to children's court on Thursday... you get charged and to children's court in 24 hours? Meh its Wednesday today. Guess when this happened and it wasn't in the time line insinuated, and I'd argue that it likely isn't politically motivated but here we are today on wednesday discussing it.
This is how propaganda is born.
It's all plausible enough till you start thinking it through. The teenager might be up for charges seperate to this incident where he was vandalising and the punch to the 79 year old may have occurred at the same premises before early voting started (or it could have been last week) but the polls only really opened for early voting on the 22nd of April.
Why are we getting the reports now?
Your confusion stems from information overload. Emotive articles about Julian's electorate with no real information but condemnation of behaviour. Thats what propaganda does. It obfuscates and makes you unsure of what happened so you have to drop it all and read the content and skip the alleged details.