You know the rules. Hope there is someone to votes for!
Remember:
[1] At least 3 players need to get a mention.
[2] No more than 10 votes for any one player.
[3] Give a rating of team performance. It can be anywhere from A+ to F.
[4] Votes must add up to 15.
D
6 Cripps
5 Fisher
4 Jones
Team, C-
5 - Cripps
4 - Newman
3 - Thomas
2 - Fisher
1 - Murphy
HM: McKay, Plowman, Setterfield, Simpson, Walsh.
Shocker: Charlie.
Team E:
5: Cripps(led from front)
3: Thomas(inspired comeback)
3: Fisher(strong on Dusty and is a quality footballer)
2: Newman(would have got more but made some defensive mistakes early)
2: Jones(did the job on Reiwoldt)
Team. D
6. Cripps
2. Murphy
2. Thomas
2. Fisher
2 Newman
1. Setterfield
Team: D+
5 - Newman
4 - Cripps
3 - Weitering
2 - Curnow, E
1 - Murphy
Team C
Cripps 6
Newman 4
Weitering 2
Dow 1
Thomas 1
Cunningham 1
Team C
6 - Cripps
3 - Newman
2 - Thomas
2 - Fisher
1 - Walsh
1 - Simpson
Team D
Cripps 5
Weitering 3
Newman 3
Jones 3
Fisher 1
Team E
5 Cripps
4 Newman
3 Fisher
2 Weitering
1 Murphy
Team - D
5 - Cripps
4 - Newman
3 - Murphy
2 - Daisy
1 - Walsh
Team C-
5. Cripps
4. Murphy
3. Newman
2. Dow
1. Cuningham
Team C
5 - Cripps
4 - Newman
2 - Setterfield
2 - Weitering
2 - Fisher
2 - Walsh
-2 - C Curnow
Adelaideblue, your votes add up to 17.
Not if you subtract Charlie's negative score ;)
Yes, but that won't work.
Crash will be all over it :)
Yes, but you do know he's putting his laptop in for service / repairs ? The school has agreed to lend a him a chisel and stone tablet. :D
Just kidding crash. You do a stirling job matey.
I thought he'd be giving the abacus a run :)
The school uses it in 4 unit maths, I believe. 8)
He'd be used to that treatment if he worked for CSIRO, they promised tablets, then pre-delivered the chalk!
Sorry guys, that minus score was tongue in cheek. Just trying to make the point that Charlie's game was very poor! Happy for my scoring to be scrubbed,
About a year ago I thought Charlie's work rate was'nt good enough and suggested on another site that he could be played at CHB to learn the effort required and how backs play forwards etc. However our coaches know a lot more than I do and hopefully a bag of Charlie goals this week.
Cheers for now
Adelaideblue
No worries AB. Sometimes very small things on this site seem to snowball, for no particular reason.
Are you going to the CFC v Port game ?
Charlie's GPS numbers are elite. I think he's still working out the best running patterns to get the most of out his superior athletic ability, and also is playing one of the most difficult positions on the ground for a young player. When it all clicks, and it will, he will be awesome to watch. Could be as soon as the second half of this year
Team C
5 Cripps
4 Newman
3 Murphy
1 Thomas
1 Simpson
1 McKay
I'll take 1 off Fisher and Walsh: that should fix things up.
There have been times when I've been tempted to give negative votes, or imaginary votes, for that matter. However, my anger usually settled before I tried anything like that.
{Imaginary numbers: i = SQRT(-1) Sounds strange but it is useful in some areas. For those of you unaware.
For those of you who don't care, you didn't miss anything real at all :) }
I give this post i^2 votes.
:P
sorry about my late votes Crash.
Team D
5: Cripps
4: Newman
3: Weitering
2: Thomas
1 Fisher
HM's: Plow, Murf,Flip,Walsh and Simo.
I'll take 1 off Fisher and Walsh: that should fix things up.
Thank you for your tolerance Crashl.
I usually go along and suffer the pain of a Port game PaulP, but may not be able to make it tonight.
Go the Blues
I guess I need to put in my two cents worth, now that my computer is back and functional.
I can't vote for yesterday's game: I didn't see it. I didn't even know the result until this morning. :(
[4] Cripps
[3] Newman
[2] Thomas
[2] Walsh
[1] Fisher
[1] Murphy
[0.5] Cuningham
[0.5] Setterfield
[0.5] Weitering
[0.5] Jones
Honourable Mentins:
SPS
Ed Curnow: If he could hit a target, or not get in the way, he would have been worth votes, as he kept on getting the ball.
Simpson
Paddy Dow
And with that, I had best lock this thread.