Princes Park => Robert Heatley Stand => Topic started by: crashlander on March 18, 2023, 08:34:09 pm
Title: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on March 18, 2023, 08:34:09 pm
I'll probably have to leave the Voting thread open until next weekend, as I doubt I'll be able to do anything to it with another midweek game. But get voting! The more the merrier!
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on March 26, 2023, 09:55:26 pm
AFL Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond One that got away? Perhaps. We really should have won it, but at least we didn’t lose.
Trends: [1] We managed 15 voters this round, which may not be huge, but it is a measure of how many people use this site these days. It was only one down from this game last year, which was a tremendous win. Hopefully we can keep this level up throughout the season.
[2] The rating was 8.22, which is close enough to a C+. There was a large range in ratings, far more so than for most matches: some voters were disappointed and let it show, while others were less pessimistic. Fair enough: every sees the game differently. This time last the rating was 9.58, but that was for a win.
[3]16 players managed to get at least 1 vote, which suggests that a lot of players made a contribution. When we had a big win, we often managed 19 last year. Not sure if that trend will continue.
[4] The average vote for this game was 27, which also shoes the level of satisfaction in voters. Scores of 31 are more common when we win, while 23 or 24 do happen when we lose.
[5] Last years Patrick Cripps had a huge number of votes (342) in an epic win. This time it was Lewis Young who stood out with 340 votes. George Hewett scored 230 to be 2nd.
[6]4 players managed 100 votes or more, a measure that shows how dominant our players can be. This time last year our 4 main mids all got over 100 votes. This time only 2 mids managed it. The others were defenders.
[7]Three players, Young, Hewett and Docherty, managed votes from everyone. Weitering missed 2.
[8] We blooded 3 recruits for this game, of which one, Ollie Hollands, managed a vote. As a general rule, the better our debutants fare in this game, the better we perform.
[9] This one was a game for defenders. We were thrashed in the middle, as can be identified by the lack of votes from many of our best midfielders.
Votes: Young, Lewis 340 Hewett, George 230 Docherty, Sam 197 Weitering, Jacob 143 McKay, Harrison 91 Curnow, Charles 52 Saad, Adam 49 Cripps, Patrick 44 McGovern, Mitchell 27 Cerra, Adam 19 de Koning, Tom 19 Kennedy, Matthew 11 Newman, Nicholas 11 Motlop, Jesse 11 Hollands, Oliver 5 Curnow, Edward 3
Progressive Voting: 340 - Young, Lewis (0) 231 - Hewett, George (0) 198 - Docherty, Sam (0) 143 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 72 - McKay, Harrison (0) 53 - Curnow, Charles (0) 50 - Saad, Adam (0) 44 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 28 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 20 - Cerra, Adam (0) 20 - de Koning, Tom (0) 11 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 11 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 11 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 6 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 3 - Curnow, Edward (0)
It is interesting to note the differences. This is due to how the program rounds the votes off. It does, however, make for some confusion.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on April 06, 2023, 12:30:53 pm
AFL Rd 2: Carlton vs Geelong
One of the more impressive wins in recent years, we dealt with the Premiers and controlled the game for most of the game.
Trends: [1] The rating of 9.67, which represents an A-, is about as good as we’ve seen for a long time. Certainly, it shows how maturely we played. [2] We managed 14 votes this week, which is down one from last week. Probably the number of voters we’ll have to get used to. [3]17 players managed a vote this round, which is impressive in anyone’s language. It is also a trend we have when winning these days. It shows how much of a team effort we put in when we win. [4] The average vote his week was 32, which is close to an all-time high. [5] This week we had 4 players who managed more than 200 votes, the first time I can recall seeing that. It was very close at the top. Charlie Curnow got his first BOG for the year. [6]4 players got more than 100 votes: seems an anticlimax after the previous point, but this stat usually suggests how many dominant games we have. [7]3 players managed votes from all voters; Acres, Charlie Curnow and Saad. Ed Curnow missed out from 2 voters. [8] Of our newbies, Oliver Hollands again managed votes. Cowan can’t be too far away. [9] This week defenders didn’t dominate the voting, even though they played well. We were much more competitive in the midfield, as can be seen in the increased voting for the mids. Our forward also played better, as the votes are much better than last week.
Votes: Curnow, Charles 290 Saad, Adam 235 Acres, Blake 231 Curnow, Edward 204 Cripps, Patrick 76 de Koning, Tom 76 Weitering, Jacob 59 Hollands, Oliver 59 McKay, Harrison 45 Kennedy, Matthew 45 Newman, Nicholas 31 Owies, Matthew 31 Cerra, Adam 28 Durdin, Corey 21 Pittonet, Marc 10 Young, Lewis 7 Docherty, Sam 3
Progressive Voting: 347 - Young, Lewis (0) 343 - Curnow, Charles (0) 285 - Saad, Adam (0) 232 - Acres, Blake (0) 231 - Hewett, George (0) 207 - Curnow, Edward (0) 202 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 201 - Docherty, Sam (0) 120 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 117 - McKay, Harrison (0) 96 - de Koning, Tom (0) 65 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 56 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 47 - Cerra, Adam (0) 43 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 32 - Owies, Matthew (0) 28 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 21 - Durdin, Corey (0) 11 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 11 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on April 15, 2023, 07:56:13 pm
I have been terribly remiss here. I'll try to update as much as I can in the next couple of days.
AFL Rd 3: Carlton vs GWS in Sydney Not the most outstanding game we’ve ever played, but we won, for just the 2nd time at the Giants’ home ground. That is a terrible statistic!
Trends: [1] There were 15 voters this week, This is the same as for Rd 1, but it does make me wonder how many people will vote when we lose. Never mind, thank you to everyone who voted. Your time is appreciated.
[2] The rating this week was 8.33, which represents a C+, which does show the general dissatisfaction with the way we played. It was not much higher than it was for the draw, back in Round 1.
[3]15 players managed to get votes this week. This is one better than last week’s win, and the same as the draw in Round1. It does represent that a lot of our players made a contribution, which is a positive.
[4] The average vote this week was 27, the same as for Round 1. It is a big drop compared to last week’s performance.
[5]5 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which suggests that he had a good spread of good players. Last week there were 4, but those 4 managed over 200 votes each, the first time I can remember that happening. Considering that the number of voters is less these days, last week amazing.
[6] Nic Newman managed the BOG this week, something he hasn’t done very often. He managed 322 votes, which is a truly dominant display. Cripps was second with 256 and Doc was third.
[7] We had 2 players who got votes from all voters this week, Newman and Docherty. Silvagni, Cripps and Acres missed by 1 voter each.
[8] Our newbies are doing their bit. Acres had his best game so far, while Cowan and Hollands did attract interest.
[9] Our mids attracted votes more than any other segment of the team, even though Newman and Docherty stood out as performers. It is noticeable that our mids have not been able to show the consistency that we managed early last year and we are down significantly in clearances.
Votes: Newman, Nicholas 322 Cripps, Patrick 256 Docherty, Sam 183 Acres, Blake 139 Silvagni, Jack 111 Motlop, Jesse 69 Saad, Adam 50 Curnow, Charles 33 Durdin, Corey 28 Hollands, Oliver 17 McGovern, Mitchell 14 de Koning, Tom 11 Pittonet, Marc 8 Cerra, Adam 6 Weitering, Jacob 3
Progressive Votes: 385 - Docherty, Sam (0) 376 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 376 - Curnow, Charles (0) 371 - Acres, Blake (0) 365 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 347 - Young, Lewis (0) 335 - Saad, Adam (0) 231 - Hewett, George (0) 207 - Curnow, Edward (0) 204 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 117 - McKay, Harrison (0) 112 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 107 - de Koning, Tom (0) 81 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 81 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 56 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 53 - Cerra, Adam (0) 49 - Durdin, Corey (0) 42 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 32 - Owies, Matthew (0) 19 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on April 15, 2023, 09:00:42 pm
And to catch up at last:
AFL Rd 4: Carlton vs North Melbourne on Good Friday We won, coming from behind. We really dominated in patches, even though we were thrashed in the middle.
Trends: [1] There were 16 voters this week, the best we’ve managed this year. Never mind, thank you to everyone who voted. Your time is appreciated.
[2] The rating this week was 8.81, which represents a B-. An improvement over last week.
[3]15 players managed to get votes this week, the same as last week. It does represent that a lot of our players made a contribution, which I consider a real positive.
[4] The average vote this week was 29, which is 2 better than last week. Not as good as the Geelong game though.
[5]5 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which suggests that he had a good spread of good players.
[6] Charlie Curnow managed the BOG this week, although he had considerable competition. He managed 297 votes, which is a truly dominant display. Three players managed more than 200 votes; Charlie, H and Mitch McGovern.
[7] We had 2 players who got votes from all voters this week, Charlie and H. Mitch McGovern missed from 1 voter.
[8] Our newbies were not as significant this week, but Ollie Hollands still is getting noticed.
[9] Our defenders and key forward dominated the voting this week. Our mids were beaten and struggled to attract votes. Not for the first time this year either.
Votes: Curnow, Charles 297 McGovern, Mitchell 251 McKay, Harrison 215 Young, Lewis 129 Weitering, Jacob 113 Cripps, Patrick 85 Saad, Adam 69 Fisher, Zac 36 Cerra, Adam 33 Docherty, Sam 28 Motlop, Jesse 25 Newman, Nicholas 14 Hollands, Oliver 14 Silvagni, Jack 8 Pittonet, Marc 6
Progressive Votes: 673 - Curnow, Charles (0) 477 - Young, Lewis (0) 461 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 412 - Docherty, Sam (0) 403 - Saad, Adam (0) 379 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 371 - Acres, Blake (0) 331 - McKay, Harrison (0) 317 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 292 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 231 - Hewett, George (0) 207 - Curnow, Edward (0) 120 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 107 - de Koning, Tom (0) 106 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 95 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 86 - Cerra, Adam (0) 56 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 49 - Durdin, Corey (0) 36 - Fisher, Zac (0) 32 - Owies, Matthew (0) 25 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on April 26, 2023, 11:09:20 am
AFL Rd 5: Carlton vs Adelaide What a shocker. We were butchered in the middle.
Trends: [1] There were 9 voters this week, the worst we’ve managed for ages. Thank you to everyone who voted. Your time is appreciated, especially after such a debacle.
[2] The rating this week was 5.81, which represents a E-. Not just a loss, but a real comment on just how bad we were this week.
[3]13 players managed to get votes this week, the worst of the season. It tells just uncompetitive we were this week.
[4] The average vote this week was 19, which is the worst I can remember. I guess I didn't bother recording this stat during some of our worst years, but this is low.
[5]2 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which suggests that we had few players were had significant contributions..
[6] Nic Newman managed the BOG this week, for the 2nd time this year. He managed 284 votes, significantly higher than any two other players.
[7] We had 2 players who got votes from all voters this week, Newman and Ed Curnow.
[8] Our newbies were not as significant this week, but Ollie Hollands still is getting noticed.
[9] Not even our defenders garnered many votes this week, as we were beaten in most aspects. Charlie Curnow managed to attract votes, as he always looks dangerous, but the other forwards didn't make a significant contribution.
Votes: Newman, Nicholas 284 Curnow, Edward 162 Walsh, Sam 90 Silvagni, Jack 71 Cerra, Adam 71 Curnow, Charles 52 Hollands, Oliver 45 Acres, Blake 39 Weitering, Jacob 29 Cripps, Patrick 13 de Koning, Tom 6 Motlop, Jesse 6 McKay, Harrison 3
Progressive Voting: 725 - Curnow, Charles (0) 663 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 477 - Young, Lewis (0) 474 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 412 - Docherty, Sam (0) 409 - Acres, Blake (0) 403 - Saad, Adam (0) 368 - Curnow, Edward (0) 346 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 335 - McKay, Harrison (0) 292 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 231 - Hewett, George (0) 191 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 157 - Cerra, Adam (0) 140 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 113 - de Koning, Tom (0) 112 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 91 - Walsh, Sam (0) 56 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 49 - Durdin, Corey (0) 36 - Fisher, Zac (0) 32 - Owies, Matthew (0) 25 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on May 04, 2023, 09:49:08 pm
AFL Rd 6: Carlton vs St. Kilda Not as bad as last week, we were actually the better team for much of the game. But the outcome was very disappointing.
Trends: [1] There were 9 voters again this week, the equal worst we’ve managed for ages. Thank you to everyone who voted. Your time is appreciated, especially considering the result.
[2] The rating this week was 6.89, which represents almost a D. Disappointing. Sounds accurate.
[3]15 players managed to get votes this week, which is a considerable improvement over last week. It tells us that we were competitive, just not for long enough.
[4] The average vote this week was 22, which is not as bad as last week. We made a step forward.
[5]4 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which suggests that we had some significant contributors out there. But we were too inefficient.
[6] Sam Walsh was the BOG this week, for the 1st time this year and in only his 2nd game for the season. He managed 233 votes, just higher than Patrick Cripps (207).
[7] We had 2 players who got votes from all voters this week, Walsh and Cripps. Cerra and McGovern missed one voter.
[8] Nice to see Cincotta show plenty on debut. Hollands managed a vote, but was not as effective as he has been.
[9] Our mids and defenders were significant this round, but we couldn't find a way to the forwards. H and Charlie Curnow were both dangerous, but didn't see enough of the ball.
Votes: Walsh, Sam 233 Cripps, Patrick 207 Cerra, Adam 180 McGovern, Mitchell 130 Curnow, Charles 61 Cincotta, Alex 42 Newman, Nicholas 38 Acres, Blake 31 Pittonet, Marc 27 Weitering, Jacob 15 McKay, Harrison 15 Silvagni, Jack 15 Fisher, Zac 15 Hewett, George 11 Hollands, Oliver 8 Young, Lewis 4
Progressive Voting: 786 - Curnow, Charles (0) 701 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 681 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 481 - Young, Lewis (0) 440 - Acres, Blake (0) 423 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 412 - Docherty, Sam (0) 403 - Saad, Adam (0) 368 - Curnow, Edward (0) 362 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 350 - McKay, Harrison (0) 337 - Cerra, Adam (0) 324 - Walsh, Sam (0) 242 - Hewett, George (0) 206 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 148 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 113 - de Koning, Tom (0) 112 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 56 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 52 - Fisher, Zac (0) 51 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 49 - Durdin, Corey (0) 43 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 32 - Owies, Matthew (0)
Charlie Curnow leads, from Nic Newman and Patrick Cripps.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: Blue Moon on May 19, 2023, 03:52:54 pm
So a guy who plays in the back pocket is our second best player after nine rounds tells you all you need to know about the team's performances this year.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on May 20, 2023, 08:40:17 pm
AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs West Coast The best we’ve performed in years, but just how bad are the Weagles?
Trends: [1] There were 12 voters this week, something of a disappointment considering that this is our first 100-point victory for a decade. Please do take the time to vote, the more voters we have, the more reliable our statistics become.
[2] The rating this week was 9.89, which was almost an A. It is our best result for some time and eclipsed our performance against Geelong.
[3] There were 14 vote getters this week. A solid distribution, showing a lot of players did a lot of good.
[4] The average vote this week was 32, equal to our best this year.
[5]6 players scored more than 100 votes, which is the best we’ve managed this year.
[6] Charlie Curnow scored 429 votes this week to be our BOG. A Judd-like score if there ever was one! Blake Acres and Nic Newman came in 2nd and 3rd respectively.
[7] Only [color=limegreen]1 player[/color], Blake Acres score votes from all voters. 2 missed from 1 voter and 2 missed from 2.
[8] Nice to see Cincotta and Kemp score votes this week.
[9] Our mids and forwards dominated this week, as we managed to get the ball out of the centre regularly. Pity we can’t replicate that.
Votes: Curnow, Charles 429 Acres, Blake 231 Newman, Nicholas 214 Cripps, Patrick 190 Cerra, Adam 169 Walsh, Sam 103 Hewett, George 82 Kemp, Brodie 21 Pittonet, Marc 12 Cincotta, Alex 12 McKay, Harrison 8 Docherty, Sam 4 Saad, Adam 4 Silvagni, Jack 4
Progressive Scores: 1215 - Curnow, Charles (0) 915 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 870 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 671 - Acres, Blake (0) 506 - Cerra, Adam (0) 481 - Young, Lewis (0) 427 - Walsh, Sam (0) 423 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 416 - Docherty, Sam (0) 408 - Saad, Adam (0) 368 - Curnow, Edward (0) 362 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 358 - McKay, Harrison (0) 325 - Hewett, George (0) 210 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 148 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 113 - de Koning, Tom (0) 112 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 64 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 56 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 55 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 52 - Fisher, Zac (0) 49 - Durdin, Corey (0) 32 - Owies, Matthew (0) 21 - Kemp, Brodie (0)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on May 20, 2023, 09:08:44 pm
AFL Rd 8: Carlton vs Brisbane What a comedown after last week. Very disappointing.
Trends: [1] There were 12 voters this week, which is something considering we lost like we did. Please do take the time to vote, the more voters we have, the more reliable our statistics become.
[2] The rating this week was [color=red]7.31[/color], which was almost an D+. Not quite a disaster, but not the sort of thing that is going to beat decent opposition.
[3] There were 16 vote getters this week. A solid distribution, showing a lot of players did something.
[4] The average vote this week was [color=red]24[/color], our second worst of the year.
[5]4 players scored more than 100 votes.
[6] Adam Cerra scored 353 votes this week to be our BOG. A Judd-like score if there ever was one!
[7] Only 1 player, Cerra. scored votes from all voters.
[8] Nice to see Cincotta, Hollands and Kemp score votes this week.
[9] Our backs and mids were our best this week; our forwards didn’t get a look-in.
Votes: Cerra, Adam 353 Docherty, Sam 183 McGovern, Mitchell 143 Kennedy, Matthew 103 Acres, Blake 73 Hewett, George 43 Pittonet, Marc 43 Weitering, Jacob 27 Hollands, Oliver 24 Cincotta, Alex 21 Walsh, Sam 18 Motlop, Jesse 18 Durdin, Corey 18 Kemp, Brodie 18 McKay, Harrison 6 Saad, Adam 3
Progressive Voting: 1215 - Curnow, Charles (0) 915 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 870 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 859 - Cerra, Adam (0) 744 - Acres, Blake (0) 599 - Docherty, Sam (0) 566 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 481 - Young, Lewis (0) 446 - Walsh, Sam (0) 411 - Saad, Adam (0) 389 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 368 - Curnow, Edward (0) 367 - Hewett, George (0) 364 - McKay, Harrison (0) 210 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 172 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 160 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 130 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 113 - de Koning, Tom (0) 106 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 76 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 52 - Fisher, Zac (0) 39 - Kemp, Brodie (0) 32 - Owies, Matthew (0)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on May 25, 2023, 08:41:02 pm
AFL Rd 9: Carlton vs Western Bulldogs We weren't that bad in a lot of ways, but the disconnect between the mids and forward line was lethal. And our incredibly poor disposal was the difference between winning and losing.
Trends: [1] There were 9 voters this week. Please do take the time to vote, the more voters we have, the more reliable our statistics become.
[2] The rating this week was [color=red]7.30[/color], which was almost an D+. The same as last week, which is simply not good enough.
[3] There were 14 vote getters this week. A solid distribution, showing a lot of players did something.
[4] The average vote this week was [color=red]24[/color], our second worst of the year, for the second week in a row.
[5]4 players scored more than 100 votes. But none of them were outstanding performances.
[6] Sam Walsh scored 203 votes this week to be our BOG. This was the lowest score for a BOG is some time.
[7] Only 2 players, Newman and Owies. scored votes from all voters. Not even Walsh.
[8] Not a big game from our youngsters this week, but then none of our performances were exactly brilliant.
[9] Our backs and mids were our best this week; our forwards didn’t get a look-in. Why? Because we couldn't kick it to them.
Votes: Walsh, Sam 203 Newman, Nicholas 178 Pittonet, Marc 178 Owies, Matthew 170 Kennedy, Matthew 81 Cottrell, Matthew 69 Docherty, Sam 61 Saad, Adam 53 Silvagni, Jack 53 Hewett, George 24 Young, Lewis 8 Hollands, Oliver 8 Cerra, Adam 4 McKay, Harrison 4
Progressive Voting: 1215 - Curnow, Charles (0) 1094 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 870 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 863 - Cerra, Adam (0) 744 - Acres, Blake (0) 660 - Docherty, Sam (0) 648 - Walsh, Sam (0) 566 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 489 - Young, Lewis (0) 463 - Saad, Adam (0) 392 - Hewett, George (0) 389 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 368 - McKay, Harrison (0) 368 - Curnow, Edward (0) 285 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 263 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 241 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 202 - Owies, Matthew (0) 180 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 130 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 113 - de Koning, Tom (0) 76 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 69 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 52 - Fisher, Zac (0) 39 - Kemp, Brodie (0)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on May 27, 2023, 08:49:50 pm
AFL Rd 10: Carlton vs Collingwood And our incredibly poor disposal was the difference between winning and losing. Again. We don't learn.
Trends: [1] There were 11 voters this week, 2 more than last week. Please do take the time to vote, the more voters we have, the more reliable our statistics become.
[2] The rating this week was 6.45, which was between an E- and D-. We are in a very poor vein of form.
[3] There were 13 vote getters this week. A solid distribution, showing a lot of players did something. But nobody did enough and we had only one or two winners.
[4] The average vote this week was 21, which is very ordinary. Good wins get scores above 30.
[5]4 players scored more than 100 votes. None brilliant, but better than last week.
[6] Sam Docherty scored his first BOG for the year with 229 votes. It was very close between the top three places, with Curnow and Cerra also getting *just) more than 200 votes.
[7] Only 1 player, Charlie Curnow, scored votes from all voters. Doc and Cerra missed one voter, Sam Walsh missed two.
[8] Not a big game from our youngsters this week, but then none of our performances were exactly brilliant although Hollands did get a mention.
[9] No real pattern in this week's voting. Not enough from anyone, really.
Votes: Docherty, Sam 229 Cerra, Adam 214 Curnow, Charles 202 Walsh, Sam 103 Owies, Matthew 53 Newman, Nicholas 50 McKay, Harrison 35 Pittonet, Marc 26 Kennedy, Matthew 18 Hollands, Oliver 18 Boyd, Jordan 9 Acres, Blake 6 Cripps, Patrick 3 Saad, Adam 3
Progressive Voting: 1417 - Curnow, Charles (0) 1144 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 1077 - Cerra, Adam (0) 889 - Docherty, Sam (0) 873 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 751 - Walsh, Sam (0) 750 - Acres, Blake (0) 566 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 489 - Young, Lewis (0) 466 - Saad, Adam (0) 404 - McKay, Harrison (0) 392 - Hewett, George (0) 389 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 368 - Curnow, Edward (0) 311 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 263 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 259 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 255 - Owies, Matthew (0) 198 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 130 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 113 - de Koning, Tom (0) 76 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 69 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 52 - Fisher, Zac (0) 39 - Kemp, Brodie (0) 9 - Boyd, Jordan (0)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on June 10, 2023, 06:27:16 pm
AFL Rd 11: Carlton vs Sydney[/color=red Another disappointing result. Our defence wasn’t that bad, but our forward work …
Trends: [1] There were 9 voters this week, 2 less than last week. Please do take the time to vote, the more voters we have, the more reliable our statistics become.
[2] The rating this week was 6.74, which was a D-. We are in a very poor vein of form.
[3] There were 13 vote getters for the second time in a row. A solid distribution, showing a lot of players did something. But nobody did enough, and we had only one or two winners. (I really hate repeating this – I hated writing it in the first place.)
[4] The average vote this week was 22, which is very ordinary. Good wins get scores above 30.
[5]5 players scored more than 100 votes. That is normally a good sign, but at the moment it only shows that we don’t have enough winners.
[6] Jacob Weitering scored his first BOG for the year with 262 votes. Matthew Cottrell was 2nd for the first time in his career.
[7] Only 2 players, Weitering and Cottrell, scored votes from all voters. Walsh missed one voter.
[8] Not a big game from our youngsters this week, but then none of our performances were exactly brilliant although Hollands did get a mention.
[9] No real pattern in this week's voting. Not enough from anyone, really.
Votes: Weitering, Jacob 262 Cottrell, Matthew 202 Walsh, Sam 165 Curnow, Charles 124 Docherty, Sam 105 Cerra, Adam 67 McGovern, Mitchell 26 Motlop, Jesse 26 Acres, Blake 15 Boyd, Jordan 7 Cripps, Patrick 4 Saad, Adam 4 Kemp, Brodie 4
Progressive Voting: 1541 - Curnow, Charles (0) 1145 - Cerra, Adam (0) 1144 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 993 - Docherty, Sam (0) 916 - Walsh, Sam (0) 877 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 765 - Acres, Blake (0) 651 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 592 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 489 - Young, Lewis (0) 470 - Saad, Adam (0) 404 - McKay, Harrison (0) 392 - Hewett, George (0) 368 - Curnow, Edward (0) 311 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 272 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 263 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 259 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 255 - Owies, Matthew (0) 198 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 157 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 113 - de Koning, Tom (0) 76 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 52 - Fisher, Zac (0) 43 - Kemp, Brodie (0) 17 - Boyd, Jordan (0)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: madbluboy on June 10, 2023, 06:31:49 pm
Just the other day I voted for the first time this season but seeing this I remembered why I stopped. Seriously in what world has McGovern been better than Saad?
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on June 10, 2023, 06:42:51 pm
Just the other day I voted for the first time this season but seeing this I remembered why I stopped. Seriously in what world has McGovern been better than Saad?
It is more that McGovern has had a couple of very good games, while Saad has been more consistent, we have a higher expectation of him. Hence it is more difficult for him to get votes. Both have scored votes in the same number of games.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on June 10, 2023, 06:50:19 pm
AFL Rd 12: Carlton vs Melbourne Another disappointing result. Our defence wasn’t that bad, but our forward work …
Trends: [1] There were 10 voters this week, 1 more than last week. Please do take the time to vote, the more voters we have, the more reliable our statistics become.
[2] The rating this week was 7.43, which was a D+. We are in a very poor vein of form.
[3] There were 12 vote getters this week. A solid distribution, showing a lot of players did something. But nobody did enough, and we had only one or two winners. (I really hate repeating this – I hated writing it in the first place.)
[4] The average vote this week was 24, which is ordinary. Good wins get scores above 30.
[5]5 players scored more than 100 votes. That is normally a good sign, but at the moment it only shows that we don’t have enough winners. Again!
[6] Adam Cerra scored his second BOG for the year with 335 votes. That normally is a match winning effort. But this week Cerra’s game just wasn’t that good. It was just a lot better than his teammates.
[7]3 players scored votes from all voters. The normal spread just wasn’t there.
[8] Brodie Kemp was the youngster to make his mark this week. But the other youngsters aren’t doing as much of late.
[9] No real pattern in this week's voting. Not enough from anyone, really.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on June 20, 2023, 12:45:02 pm
AFL Rd 12: Carlton vs Melbourne Another disappointing result. Our defence wasn’t that bad, but our forward work …
Trends: [1] There were 10 voters this week, 1 more than last week. Please do take the time to vote, the more voters we have, the more reliable our statistics become.
[2] The rating this week was 7.43, which was a D+. We are in a very poor vein of form.
[3] There were 12 vote getters this week. A solid distribution, showing a lot of players did something. But nobody did enough, and we had only one or two winners. (I really hate repeating this – I hated writing it in the first place.)
[4] The average vote this week was 24, which is ordinary. Good wins get scores above 30.
[5]5 players scored more than 100 votes. That is normally a good sign, but at the moment it only shows that we don’t have enough winners. Again!
[6] Adam Cerra scored his second BOG for the year with 335 votes. That normally is a match winning effort. But this week Cerra’s game just wasn’t that good. It was just a lot better than his teammates.
[7]3 players scored votes from all voters. The normal spread just wasn’t there.
[8] Brodie Kemp was the youngster to make his mark this week. But the other youngsters aren’t doing as much of late.
[9] No real pattern in this week's voting. Not enough from anyone, really.
What did I do with the votes?
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on June 20, 2023, 12:47:23 pm
Votes for Rd 12: Cerra, Adam 335 McKay, Harrison 206 Weitering, Jacob 173 Kemp, Brodie 132 Docherty, Sam 107 de Koning, Tom 37 Acres, Blake 33 Cincotta, Alex 33 Kennedy, Matthew 21 Cripps, Patrick 17 Silvagni, Jack 12 McGovern, Mitchell 8
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on June 20, 2023, 01:02:50 pm
AFL Rd 13: Carlton vs Essendon Another disappointing result.
Trends: [1] There were 8 voters this week, which is not great. Please do take the time to vote, the more voters we have, the more reliable our statistics become.
[2] The rating this week was 6.92, which was almost a D. We are in a very poor vein of form.
[3] There were 14 vote getters this week. A solid distribution, showing a lot of players did something. But nobody did enough, and we had only one or two winners. (I really hate repeating this – I hated writing it in the first place.)
[4] The average vote this week was 23, which is ordinary. Good wins get scores above 30.
[5]3 players scored more than 100 votes. That suggests w edidn't have a lot of winners on the night.
[6] Adam Cerra scored his third BOG for the year with 294 votes. That normally is a match winning effort. But this week Cerra’s game just wasn’t that good. It was just a lot better than his teammates.
[7]1 player scored votes from all voters, Adam Cerra. There were a couple who missed one voter.
[8] Brodie Kemp was the youngster to make his mark this week. Cincotta was also reasonable.
[9] No real pattern in this week's voting. Not enough from anyone, really. Not enough guys won on the night.
Votes: Cerra, Adam 294 Weitering, Jacob 121 de Koning, Tom 104 Kemp, Brodie 86 Walsh, Sam 78 Curnow, Charles 73 Docherty, Sam 65 Cincotta, Alex 65 Saad, Adam 61 McGovern, Mitchell 39 Acres, Blake 22 Curnow, Edward 13 Martin, Jack 13 Kennedy, Matthew 4
Progressive Voting: 1773 - Cerra, Adam (0) 1614 - Curnow, Charles (0) 1166 - Docherty, Sam (0) 1144 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 994 - Walsh, Sam (0) 946 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 894 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 819 - Acres, Blake (0) 639 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 610 - McKay, Harrison (0) 531 - Saad, Adam (0) 489 - Young, Lewis (0) 392 - Hewett, George (0) 381 - Curnow, Edward (0) 311 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 283 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 275 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 272 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 262 - Kemp, Brodie (0) 255 - Owies, Matthew (0) 254 - de Koning, Tom (0) 198 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 174 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 157 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 52 - Fisher, Zac (0) 17 - Boyd, Jordan (0) 13 - Martin, Jack (0)
Adam Cerra has taken the lead with his 3rd BOG of the season. He has been in the top 3 players 6 times this year. Charlie has fallen back to second, but is still a consistent poller. He has managed 5 games in the top 3, with 3 BOG's. Doc continues his consistent vote winning. Even though he probably played better last year, he has still managed votes in all but 2 games. Last year he got votes in every game we played. At this point, Cerra is the only Carlton player to get votes in every game.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on June 30, 2023, 11:28:15 am
AFL Rd 14: Carlton vs Gold Coast One of the better wins in recent times. However, with injuries to Pittonet and de Koning, it makes the future look problematical.
Trends: [1] There were 12 voters this week, a considerable improvement over recent games. Even so, please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.
[2] The rating was a 9.72, which is just above an A-, the second highest for the year. It is really nice to write that, I’ll tell you.
[3]18 players managed a mention this week, a considerable improvement on our recent form. It shows how just about everyone had a really solid contribution.
[4] The average vote this week was 32, which equals the season high. Another indication of a strong performance.
[5]6 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which is phenomenal! It shows we had a lot of dominant players, not just one or two.
[6] Adam Cerra managed his 4th BOG for the season. He scored 373 votes. Doc was 2nd, followed by Weitering and Cripps.
[7] Only one player, Cerra, managed votes from all of the voters. It was hard to reward everyone who deserved a mention. Docherty, Kemp and Walsh missed by one voter.
[8] Of our youngsters, Kemp stood out with what might be his best game yet. He managed over 100 votes. Cincotta was not as dominant, but he was worth his place.
[9] This week our mids were much more influential than they have been. Most of them garnered votes, but our defenders also stood out.
Votes: Cerra, Adam 373 Docherty, Sam 207 Walsh, Sam 158 Cripps, Patrick 150 Kemp, Brodie 138 Kennedy, Matthew 117 McKay, Harrison 69 de Koning, Tom 61 Saad, Adam 36 Newman, Nicholas 32 Weitering, Jacob 28 McGovern, Mitchell 20 Cottrell, Matthew 20 Boyd, Jordan 12 Dow, Patrick 12 Owies, Matthew 8 Cincotta, Alex 8 Cuningham, David 8
Progressive Voting: 2146 - Cerra, Adam (0) 1614 - Curnow, Charles (0) 1372 - Docherty, Sam (0) 1176 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 1152 - Walsh, Sam (0) 1043 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 974 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 819 - Acres, Blake (0) 679 - McKay, Harrison (0) 659 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 567 - Saad, Adam (0) 489 - Young, Lewis (0) 401 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 399 - Kemp, Brodie (0) 392 - Hewett, George (0) 381 - Curnow, Edward (0) 315 - de Koning, Tom (0) 311 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 292 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 275 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 263 - Owies, Matthew (0) 198 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 182 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 157 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 52 - Fisher, Zac (0) 29 - Boyd, Jordan (0) 13 - Dow, Patrick (0) 13 - Martin, Jack (0) 9 - Cuningham, David (0)
Cerra extended his lead at the top. There is a solid group over a 100 votes following him, lead by Charlie Curnow (who has been down for a while).
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on July 16, 2023, 12:36:08 pm
AFL Rd 16: Carlton vs Hawthorn Winning without a definite ruck was excellent. To win as we did, after the bye, was excellent.
Trends: [1] There were 14 voters this week,one of the best we've managed this season. Even so, please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.
[2] The rating was a 9.81, which is just above an A-, the second highest for the year.
[3]18 players again managed a mention this week. It shows how just about everyone had a really solid contribution.
[4] The average vote this week was 32, which equals the season high.
[5]7 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which is phenomenal!I thought last week's 6 was damned good, but 7!! And one other guy had 98 votes!
[6] Adam Cerra managed his 4th BOG in a row, his 5th for the season. He scored 301 votes. Cripps and McKay were equal second with 175 votes.
[7] Only two players, Cerra and Cripps, managed votes from all of the voters.
[8] Our youngsters didn't stand out this round, but both Concotta and Kemp were well worth their place.
[9] We really dominated in the midfield this week, although our key defenders and forwards also stood out.
Votes: Cerra, Adam 301 Cripps, Patrick 175 McKay, Harrison 175 Walsh, Sam 147 Weitering, Jacob 137 Silvagni, Jack 126 Docherty, Sam 116 Acres, Blake 98 Kemp, Brodie 32 Martin, Jack 32 Curnow, Charles 25 Fogarty, Lachlan 25 Cuningham, David 21 Newman, Nicholas 18 McGovern, Mitchell 18 Kennedy, Matthew 14 Boyd, Jordan 11 Saad, Adam 4
Progressive Votes: 2447 - Cerra, Adam (0) 1639 - Curnow, Charles (0) 1488 - Docherty, Sam (0) 1299 - Walsh, Sam (0) 1219 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 1193 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 1111 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 917 - Acres, Blake (0) 854 - McKay, Harrison (0) 677 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 570 - Saad, Adam (0) 489 - Young, Lewis (0) 431 - Kemp, Brodie (0) 415 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 402 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 392 - Hewett, George (0) 381 - Curnow, Edward (0) 315 - de Koning, Tom (0) 311 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 292 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 263 - Owies, Matthew (0) 198 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 182 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 157 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 52 - Fisher, Zac (0) 45 - Martin, Jack (0) 39 - Boyd, Jordan (0) 30 - Cuningham, David (0) 25 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0) 13 - Dow, Patrick (0)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on July 25, 2023, 09:22:18 pm
AFL Rd 17: Carlton vs Fremantle Winning in Perth, winning without a proper ruckman, winning like we did; so much to like this week.
Trends: [1] There were 13 voters this week, which is really solid. Especially as the game was in Perth and not on free-to-air TV. Even so, please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.
[2] The rating was a 9.97, which is an A, the highest for the year and one of the highest I can remember.
[3]16 players again managed a mention this week. It shows how just about everyone had a really solid contribution.
[4] The average vote this week was 33, which is the season high.
[5]5 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which is still brilliant. It really shows just how many players made brilliant contributions.
[6] Adam Cerra and Sam Walsh tied for top spot this week with 276 votes. I don't remember many ties. Weitering came in 3rd. It is Cerra's 5th week in a row on top, his 6th BOG for the year.
[7]No player managed votes from all of the voters, which is also something of a first. A number of players missed from 1 voter.
[8] Our youngsters didn't stand out this round, but both Concotta and Kemp were well worth their place again. Both did solid jobs and look to have long term positions.
[9] It was a very even distribution this week, with all areas of the game making significant contributions.
Votes: Cerra, Adam 276 Walsh, Sam 276 Weitering, Jacob 207 Cripps, Patrick 153 McKay, Harrison 153 Docherty, Sam 107 Saad, Adam 65 Silvagni, Jack 54 Kennedy, Matthew 42 Owies, Matthew 38 Curnow, Charles 35 Newman, Nicholas 35 Martin, Jack 27 Young, Lewis 15 Acres, Blake 8 Fogarty, Lachlan 4
Progressive Voting: 2723 - Cerra, Adam (0) 1673 - Curnow, Charles (0) 1595 - Docherty, Sam (0) 1575 - Walsh, Sam (0) 1372 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 1318 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 1228 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 1008 - McKay, Harrison (0) 925 - Acres, Blake (0) 677 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 636 - Saad, Adam (0) 504 - Young, Lewis (0) 457 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 455 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 431 - Kemp, Brodie (0) 392 - Hewett, George (0) 381 - Curnow, Edward (0) 315 - de Koning, Tom (0) 311 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 301 - Owies, Matthew (0) 292 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 198 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 182 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 157 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 72 - Martin, Jack (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 52 - Fisher, Zac (0) 39 - Boyd, Jordan (0) 30 - Cuningham, David (0) 29 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0) 13 - Dow, Patrick (0)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on July 27, 2023, 08:58:06 pm
AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Port Adelaide Probably our best win since our glory days, we smashed a premiership contender into the dust. It was so good to see.
Trends: [1] There were 13 voters this week, for the second week in a row. As good a turnout as we get these days. Even so, please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.
[2] The rating was a 10.21, which is aalmost an A+, the highest for the year and one of the highest I can remember. Even better than last week.
[3]15 players managed a mention this week, which is still brilliant. It shows how just about everyone had a really solid contribution, which has been a hallmark of our last few weeks.
[4] The average vote this week was 33, which is the equal season high. I haven't seen a bigger total since I've been doing this statistic.
[5]4 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which is still brilliant, even if it isn't as high as it has been of late. It really shows just how many players made brilliant contributions.
[6] Jack Silvagni won the BOG this week, for the first time in his career. he played the most complete game he's ever produced. Newman and Cripps also got more votes than most require for a BOG.
[7]2 players, Silvagni ad Cripps managed votes from all of the voters, which is more usual. Still there was a very wide spread of votes.
[8] Of our youngsters, Jesse Motlop stood out this week. As a late call-up, he surprised Port and slotted 4 brilliant goals. Cincotta and Kemp may not have got votes, but made valuable contributions.
[9] It was a very even distribution again this week, with all areas of the team making significant contributions.
Votes: Silvagni, Jack 353 Newman, Nicholas 306 Cripps, Patrick 255 de Koning, Tom 130 Docherty, Sam 86 Motlop, Jesse 86 Acres, Blake 82 Curnow, Charles 71 Walsh, Sam 63 McGovern, Mitchell 55 Cerra, Adam 12 Cottrell, Matthew 12 Martin, Jack 8 Cuningham, David 8 Weitering, Jacob 4
Progressive Votes: 2735 - Cerra, Adam (0) 1744 - Curnow, Charles (0) 1682 - Docherty, Sam (0) 1638 - Walsh, Sam (0) 1627 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 1534 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 1322 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 1008 - Acres, Blake (0) 1008 - McKay, Harrison (0) 809 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 732 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 636 - Saad, Adam (0) 504 - Young, Lewis (0) 457 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 444 - de Koning, Tom (0) 431 - Kemp, Brodie (0) 392 - Hewett, George (0) 381 - Curnow, Edward (0) 311 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 304 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 301 - Owies, Matthew (0) 243 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 198 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 182 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 80 - Martin, Jack (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 52 - Fisher, Zac (0) 39 - Boyd, Jordan (0) 37 - Cuningham, David (0) 29 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0) 13 - Dow, Patrick (0)
Cerra is still a clear leader, but it is very close for 2nd spot with 5 guys contested for that honour.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on July 29, 2023, 11:01:21 am
AFL Rd 19: Carlton vs West Coast The first half was as good a footballas anyone has played this century. The second half we limped over the line with injuries. But a 71 point win doesn't come around every day.
Trends: [1] There were 10 voters this week, which is as disappointing for a 12 goal win as could be imagined. Please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.
[2] The rating was a 10.03, which is an A, the second highest for the year and one of the highest I can remember. We very rarely score games this high.
[3]13 players managed a mention this week, which is still brilliant. It shows how just about everyone had a really solid contribution, which has been a hallmark of our last few weeks. Since I've been doing this we've never been this consistent all over the board as we've been these last 5 rounds.
[4] The average vote this week was 33, for the 3rd week in a row.
[5]5 players managed 100 votes or more this week. This is also something we haven't done since the glory days.
[6] Charlie Curnow managed an incredible 537 votes to be BOG. Not even Judd managed those figures. This was Charlie's 4th BOG for the year.
[7]2 players, Curnow and Docherty managed votes from all of the voters this week. There was againa considerable spread, but not as wide as it has been recently.
[8] Kemp and Hollands stuck out as youngsters who made a significant contribution this week.
[9] Other than Charlie, who was 300 votes better than anyone else, it was a very even distribution again this week, with all areas of the team making significant contributions.
Votes: Curnow, Charles 537 de Koning, Tom 221 Hewett, George 206 Docherty, Sam 176 Walsh, Sam 125 Weitering, Jacob 70 Newman, Nicholas 45 Kemp, Brodie 40 Saad, Adam 25 Dow, Patrick 25 Hollands, Oliver 15 Cuningham, David 15 Acres, Blake 5
Progressive Votes: 2735 - Cerra, Adam (0) 2281 - Curnow, Charles (0) 1857 - Docherty, Sam (0) 1763 - Walsh, Sam (0) 1627 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 1579 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 1392 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 1013 - Acres, Blake (0) 1008 - McKay, Harrison (0) 809 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 732 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 665 - de Koning, Tom (0) 661 - Saad, Adam (0) 597 - Hewett, George (0) 504 - Young, Lewis (0) 471 - Kemp, Brodie (0) 457 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 381 - Curnow, Edward (0) 311 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 304 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 301 - Owies, Matthew (0) 243 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 213 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 182 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 80 - Martin, Jack (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 53 - Cuningham, David (0) 52 - Fisher, Zac (0) 39 - Boyd, Jordan (0) 38 - Dow, Patrick (0) 29 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
Charlie's recent form and Cerra's injury has opened up voting somewhat. Charlie is now clearly in 2nd place. Pretty tight behind these two.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on August 13, 2023, 05:31:45 pm
AFL Rd 20: Carlton vs Collingwood To beat Collingwood the way we did was superb! One of the great wins.
Trends: [1] There were 11 voters this week, which is as disappointing for a such a win. Please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.
[2] The rating was a 10.28, which is an A+, the highest I can remember. Considering how we were playing not that long ago, I could barely believe it.
[3]15 players managed a mention this week, which shows just how we've played for the last 6 weeks. Just about everyone had a really solid contribution. Since I've been doing this we've never been this consistent all over the board as we've been these last 6 rounds.
[4] The average vote this week was 34, the best I can recall.
[5]5 players managed 100 votes or more this week, with 2 others getting 94 votes! Brilliant!
[6] Charlie Curnow managed 362 votes to be BOG. This was Charlie's 5th BOG for the year. Weitering and Newman also managed over 250 votes each!
[7]3 players, Curnow, Newman and Weitering attracted votes from all of the voters this week.
[8] While our youngsters weren't BOG this week, they all made a decent contribution..
[9] There was no one area of dominance this week, but all areas really made a contribution.
Votes: Curnow, Charles 362 Weitering, Jacob 301 Newman, Nicholas 258 Cripps, Patrick 138 Martin, Jack 129 Cerra, Adam 95 Docherty, Sam 95 McGovern, Mitchell 43 Motlop, Jesse 39 Hewett, George 22 Hollands, Oliver 22 Acres, Blake 13 Saad, Adam 13 Cincotta, Alex 9 Fogarty, Lachlan 4
Progressive Voting: 2830 - Cerra, Adam (0) 2642 - Curnow, Charles (0) 1952 - Docherty, Sam (0) 1838 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 1765 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 1763 - Walsh, Sam (0) 1694 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 1026 - Acres, Blake (0) 1008 - McKay, Harrison (0) 809 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 775 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 674 - Saad, Adam (0) 665 - de Koning, Tom (0) 619 - Hewett, George (0) 504 - Young, Lewis (0) 471 - Kemp, Brodie (0) 457 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 381 - Curnow, Edward (0) 311 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 304 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 301 - Owies, Matthew (0) 282 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 235 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 209 - Martin, Jack (0) 191 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 53 - Cuningham, David (0) 52 - Fisher, Zac (0) 39 - Boyd, Jordan (0) 38 - Dow, Patrick (0) 33 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0) Getting close at the top, since Cerra has missed with injury. This week he managed 95 votes in a half of a game. But Charlie is closing. Behind him is something of a logjam.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on August 20, 2023, 12:22:50 pm
AFL Rd 21: Carlton vs St. Kilda The first half was pretty ordinary, but the last half was something else.
Trends: [1] There were 11 voters this week, which is a little disappointing for a such an important win. Please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.
[2] The rating was a 9.85, which is an A-. Not quite as good as a couple of our recent wins, but very good all the same.
[3]17 players managed a mention this week, which shows just how we've played for the last 7 weeks. Just about everyone had a really solid contribution. Since I've been doing this we've never been this consistent all over the board as we've been these last 7 rounds.
[4] The average vote this week was 32. Not a bad effort at all.
[5]6 players managed 100 votes or more this week. That shows just how good our spread of good players has been.
[6] Nic Newman managed 398 votes to be BOG. This was Nic's 3rd BOG for the year. Acres was 2nd with his 2nd best total for the year.
[7]1 player, Nic Newman, got votes from everyone. Three others missed by 1 voter.
[8] While our youngsters weren't BOG this week, they all made a decent contribution. Hollands, Kemp and Motlop all garnered votes. Hollands got a Rising Star nomination.
[9] There was no one area of dominance this week, but all areas really made a contribution.
Votes: Newman, Nicholas 398 Acres, Blake 228 Weitering, Jacob 166 Cripps, Patrick 130 Docherty, Sam 125 Fisher, Zac 112 Hollands, Oliver 72 Dow, Patrick 54 de Koning, Tom 45 Hewett, George 40 Martin, Jack 40 Motlop, Jesse 31 Pittonet, Marc 9 Cottrell, Matthew 9 Owies, Matthew 9 Kemp, Brodie 4 Cincotta, Alex 4
Progressive Voting: 2830 - Cerra, Adam (0) 2642 - Curnow, Charles (0) 2236 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 2077 - Docherty, Sam (0) 1895 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 1859 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 1763 - Walsh, Sam (0) 1254 - Acres, Blake (0) 1008 - McKay, Harrison (0) 809 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 775 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 710 - de Koning, Tom (0) 674 - Saad, Adam (0) 659 - Hewett, George (0) 504 - Young, Lewis (0) 476 - Kemp, Brodie (0) 457 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 381 - Curnow, Edward (0) 320 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 313 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 313 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 310 - Owies, Matthew (0) 306 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 249 - Martin, Jack (0) 195 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 164 - Fisher, Zac (0) 91 - Dow, Patrick (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 53 - Cuningham, David (0) 39 - Boyd, Jordan (0) 33 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
It is getting close at the top; less than 200 votes between 1st and 2nd.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on August 27, 2023, 09:48:36 am
AFL Rd 22: Carlton vs Melbourne The first time we've beaten Melbourne in a long time, and a hard contest for the night. We really deserved this one.
Trends: [1] There were 11 voters this week, which is a little disappointing for a such an important win. This round last year we had 16 voters, even though we failed. Please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.
[2] The rating was a 10.09, which is an A. We've managed a consistency of score in this area like none other I can remember. It is great.
[3]17 players managed a mention again this week, which shows just how we've played for the last 8 weeks. Just about everyone had a really solid contribution. Since I've been doing this we've never been this consistent all over the board as we've been these last 8 rounds.
[4] The average vote this week was 33. The best run I can remember in this area.
[5]4 players managed 100 votes or more this week.
[6] Patrick Cripps managed 307 votes to be BOG this week, followed by Newman and Hewett. This was Cripps' 1st BOG for the year, although it was his 10th time in the top 4. Nic newman has been in the top 4 8 times this year.
[7]3 players, Cripps, Hewett and Newman, got votes from everyone this week. The rest of the votes were well spread.
[8] Our youngsters continued to make an impression, an excellent sig moving forwards. Kemp and Cincotta managed votes.
[9] There was no one area of dominance this week, but all areas really made a contribution.
Votes: Cripps, Patrick 307 Newman, Nicholas 284 Hewett, George 243 Acres, Blake 133 Kemp, Brodie 87 Saad, Adam 78 Weitering, Jacob 64 Docherty, Sam 60 Dow, Patrick 55 Martin, Jack 50 de Koning, Tom 41 Curnow, Charles 37 Owies, Matthew 23 Cincotta, Alex 23 Fisher, Zac 14 Marchbank, Caleb 9 Fogarty, Lachlan 5
Progressive Votes: 2830 - Cerra, Adam (0) 2679 - Curnow, Charles (0) 2520 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 2202 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 2137 - Docherty, Sam (0) 1923 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 1763 - Walsh, Sam (0) 1387 - Acres, Blake (0) 1008 - McKay, Harrison (0) 902 - Hewett, George (0) 809 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 775 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 752 - Saad, Adam (0) 751 - de Koning, Tom (0) 563 - Kemp, Brodie (0) 504 - Young, Lewis (0) 457 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 381 - Curnow, Edward (0) 333 - Owies, Matthew (0) 320 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 313 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 313 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 306 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 300 - Martin, Jack (0) 218 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 177 - Fisher, Zac (0) 146 - Dow, Patrick (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 53 - Cuningham, David (0) 39 - Boyd, Jordan (0) 38 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0) 10 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
It is getting pretty close at the top. Charlie Curnow and Cerra are now neck and neck, due to Cerra's injury and Charlie's good recent form. But the closing pack is closing fast; we've had a lot of players doing well in recent times. It will go down to the wire this year!
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on September 03, 2023, 12:22:07 pm
AFL Rd 23: Carlton vs Gold Coast Not our best game for the year; the 1st quarter was ordinary, but the last 3 were strong. But we won on the Gold Coast, which is a big positive.
Trends: [1] There were 14 voters this week, a significant improvement on recent games. Let's hope we can keep it up for the last couple of games. :) Please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.
[2] The rating was a 8.79, which is an B-. It is the worst score were had for months, but we still won.
[3]15 players managed a mention again this week, which shows just how we've played for the last 8 weeks. Just about everyone had a really solid contribution. Since I've been doing this we've never been this consistent all over the board as we've been these last 9 rounds.
[4] The average vote this week was 30. It goes to show that we were not at our peak. We've been up for a long time.
[5]4 players managed 100 votes or more this week. It shows that we had a handful of relatively dominant players. the 'bit players' were less significant this week.
[6] Charlie Curnow managed 432 votes to be BOG this week, followed by Newman and Hewett. This was Charlie's 6th BOG for the year. Nic Newman has been in the top 4 9 times this year.
[7]2 players, Charlie Curnow and Newman, got votes from everyone this week. The rest of the votes were well spread.
[8] Our youngsters continued to make an impression, an excellent sig moving forwards. Kemp and Cincotta managed votes.
[9] There was no one area of dominance this week, but all areas really made a contribution.
Votes: Curnow, Charles 434 Newman, Nicholas 238 Weitering, Jacob 225 Hewett, George 121 Motlop, Jesse 98 Dow, Patrick 85 Martin, Jack 52 Acres, Blake 46 Cripps, Patrick 16 Docherty, Sam 13 Fisher, Zac 13 Saad, Adam 10 Owies, Matthew 7 Curnow, Edward 3 Kemp, Brodie 3
Progressive Voting: 3113 - Curnow, Charles (0) 2830 - Cerra, Adam (0) 2759 - Newman, Nicholas (0) 2219 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 2151 - Docherty, Sam (0) 2149 - Weitering, Jacob (0) 1763 - Walsh, Sam (0) 1433 - Acres, Blake (0) 1023 - Hewett, George (0) 1008 - McKay, Harrison (0) 839 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 775 - McGovern, Mitchell (0) 762 - Saad, Adam (0) 751 - de Koning, Tom (0) 567 - Kemp, Brodie (0) 504 - Young, Lewis (0) 457 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 411 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 385 - Curnow, Edward (0) 353 - Martin, Jack (0) 340 - Owies, Matthew (0) 320 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 313 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 306 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 231 - Dow, Patrick (0) 218 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 191 - Fisher, Zac (0) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 53 - Cuningham, David (0) 39 - Jordan Boyd (0) 38 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0) 10 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on September 04, 2023, 08:35:24 pm
Sorry, I'm a bit slow at the moment. I stuffed up the spreadsheet and had to reconstruct a fair bit of the data. I've got it under control now, at least until I find the next glitch. I should have the GWS game up by Wednesday at the latest.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on September 06, 2023, 10:24:28 pm
AFL Rd 24: Carlton vs GWS We got the job done for Charlie, but we didn't get a lot more out of this game.
Trends: [1] There were 9 voters this week. Clearly the loss, and the way we lost, reduced voter participation this week. Please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.
[2] The rating was a 7.59, which is an C-. We weren't impressed this week.
[3]18 players managed a mention this week, but nobody got the scores that we've having recently. So. most players did something, but few did enough.
[4] The average vote this week was 27. It goes to show that we were not at our peak. We've been up for a long time.
[5]4 players managed 100 votes or more this week. It shows that we had a handful of relatively dominant players. the 'bit players' were less significant this week.
[6] Sam Walsh managed 234 votes to be BOG this week, just 4 votes better than Jacob Weitering.
[7]Nobody, got votes from everyone this week. The rest of the votes were well spread.
[8] Our youngsters didn't seem as prominent this week.
[9] Our defenders generally had better games than our mids or forwards this week.
Votes: Walsh, Sam 234 Weitering, Jacob 230 de Koning, Tom 200 Acres, Blake 101 McGovern, Mitchell 60 Dow, Patrick 60 Hewett, George 55 Cerra, Adam 46 Newman, Nicholas 41 Kemp, Brodie 37 Curnow, Charles 32 Owies, Matthew 32 Cuningham, David 32 McKay, Harrison 28 Saad, Adam 18 Fogarty, Lachlan 9 Fisher, Zac 5
Progressive Voting: 3145 - Curnow, Charles (33) 2876 - Cerra, Adam (46) 2800 - Newman, Nicholas (42) 2378 - Weitering, Jacob (230) 2219 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 2151 - Docherty, Sam (0) 1998 - Walsh, Sam (235) 1534 - Acres, Blake (102) 1078 - Hewett, George (56) 1036 - McKay, Harrison (28) 972 - de Koning, Tom (221) 839 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 835 - McGovern, Mitchell (60) 781 - Saad, Adam (19) 604 - Kemp, Brodie (37) 504 - Young, Lewis (0) 457 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 411 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 385 - Curnow, Edward (0) 372 - Owies, Matthew (33) 353 - Martin, Jack (0) 320 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 313 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 306 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 291 - Dow, Patrick (60) 218 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 195 - Fisher, Zac (5) 86 - Cuningham, David (33) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 48 - Fogarty, Lachlan (10) 39 - Jordan Boyd (0) 10 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
Still close at the top. Charlie inched his way forward, but Nic Newman's getting really close in 3rd spot.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: DJC on September 07, 2023, 08:31:16 am
Is this a particularly even leaderboard Crash?
Apart from some of Charlie’s efforts, the games Cez dominated and Weiter’s heroics, our season has been memorable for solid contributions by the team as a whole.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on September 07, 2023, 04:14:22 pm
There has never been a season where so many players get recognized in single games, and not just because I spread the votes out. There has been a big spread most weeks, even when we were losing. At it is unusual to be so close at the top. In the past, one or two players clear out from the rest. Not this year.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on September 16, 2023, 06:25:44 pm
AFL 1st Semi Final: Carlton vs Sydney Our first final for a decade and an excellent result.
Trends: [1] There were 10 voters this week, a really small number for such a significant game. Such is life, but I did expect more. Please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.
[2] The rating was a 9.17, which is an B. Probably s sign of what we've got used to in the last couple of months. Still, it was a terrific win.
[3]16 players managed a mention again this week, which shows just how we've played for the last couple of months. Just about everyone had a really solid contribution. Since I've been doing this we've never been this consistent all over the board as we've been in the last half of the season.
[4] The average vote this week was 37. I don't think that can be right, but I can't find any error yet.
[5]6 players managed 100 votes or more this week. It shows that we had a good group of significant players.
[6] Blake Acres managed 337 votes to be BOG this week, his first for us. Sam Walsh was only a handful of votes behind.
[7]3 players, Acres, Walsh and Cottrell, were awarded votes from everyone this week. The rest of the votes were well spread.
[8] Our youngsters continued to make an impression, an excellent signs moving forwards.
[9] There was no one area of dominance this week, but all areas really made a contribution.
Votes: Acres, Blake 337 Walsh, Sam 325 Cerra, Adam 225 Cottrell, Matthew 208 Martin, Jack 131 Weitering, Jacob 108 de Koning, Tom 86 Saad, Adam 86 Hollands, Oliver 57 Docherty, Sam 51 Newman, Nicholas 40 Kennedy, Matthew 11 Hewett, George 11 Fogarty, Lachie 11 Cripps, Patrick 6 Pittonet, Marc 6
Progressive votes: 3145 - Curnow, Charles (33) 3101 - Cerra, Adam (46) 2840 - Newman, Nicholas (42) 2486 - Weitering, Jacob (230) 2323 - Walsh, Sam (235) 2225 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 2202 - Docherty, Sam (0) 1871 - Acres, Blake (102) 1090 - Hewett, George (56) 1058 - de Koning, Tom (221) 1036 - McKay, Harrison (28) 867 - Saad, Adam (19) 839 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 835 - McGovern, Mitchell (60) 604 - Kemp, Brodie (37) 521 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 504 - Young, Lewis (0) 484 - Martin, Jack (0) 480 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 411 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 385 - Curnow, Edward (0) 372 - Owies, Matthew (33) 364 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 326 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 291 - Dow, Patrick (60) 218 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 195 - Fisher, Zac (5) 86 - Cuningham, David (33) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 59 - Fogarty, Lachlan (10) 39 - Jordan Boyd (0) 10 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on September 27, 2023, 02:31:16 pm
AFL 1st Semi Final: Carlton vs Melbourne Another win in a very important game.
Trends: [1] There were 13 voters this week, still fewer than I expected, but much better than last week. Please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.
[2] The rating was a 9.69, which is an A-. Probably a sign of what we've got used to in the last couple of months. Still, it was a terrific win.
[3]14 players managed a mention again this week, which shows just how we've played for the last couple of months. Just about everyone had a really solid contribution. Since I've been doing this we've never been this consistent all over the board as we've been in the last half of the season.
[4] The average vote this week was 37. I don't think that can be right, but I can't find any error yet.
[5]6 players managed 100 votes or more this week. It shows that we had a good group of significant players.
[6] Sam Walsh managed a massive 460 votes to be BOG this week. He has certainly stepped up this finals series. Cripps and Ares filled 2nd and 3rd places.
[7]1 player, Sam Walsh managed votes from everyone this week. Acres, Cripps and Weitering missed one voter.
[8] Our youngsters continued to make an impression, an excellent signs moving forwards. Motlop in particular.
[9] TOur midfield and defence were the dominant areas this week. Our forwards were not as affective as they have been.
Votes: Walsh, Sam 460 Cripps, Patrick 243 Acres, Blake 239 Weitering, Jacob 208 de Koning, Tom 152 Newman, Nicholas 108 Saad, Adam 69 Docherty, Sam 69 Motlop, Jesse 48 Pittonet, Marc 35 Cerra, Adam 22 Hewett, George 4 Fogarty, Lachlan 4
Progressive Voting: 3145 - Curnow, Charles (33) 3123 - Cerra, Adam (46) 2948 - Newman, Nicholas (42) 2783 - Walsh, Sam (235) 2694 - Weitering, Jacob (230) 2468 - Cripps, Patrick (0) 2271 - Docherty, Sam (0) 2110 - Acres, Blake (102) 1210 - de Koning, Tom (221) 1094 - Hewett, George (56) 1036 - McKay, Harrison (28) 936 - Saad, Adam (19) 839 - Silvagni, Jack (0) 835 - McGovern, Mitchell (60) 604 - Kemp, Brodie (37) 521 - Cottrell, Matthew (0) 504 - Young, Lewis (0) 484 - Martin, Jack (0) 480 - Kennedy, Matthew (0) 459 - Motlop, Jesse (0) 385 - Curnow, Edward (0) 372 - Owies, Matthew (33) 364 - Hollands, Oliver (0) 361 - Pittonet, Marc (0) 291 - Dow, Patrick (60) 218 - Cincotta, Alex (0) 195 - Fisher, Zac (5) 86 - Cuningham, David (33) 67 - Durdin, Corey (0) 63 - Fogarty, Lachlan (10) 39 - Jordan Boyd (0) 10 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
It is very close at the top; only 22 votes between 1st and 2nd.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on October 09, 2023, 12:31:12 pm
Sorry I haven't finished this up: I've just had a knee replacement and half my brains are still missing. I hope to finish this up in the next day or two.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: Tragic on October 13, 2023, 10:46:33 pm
Sorry I haven't finished this up: I've just had a knee replacement and half my brains are still missing. I hope to finish this up in the next day or two.
wish i had more than one brain, then i could afford to lose half my brains too. biggest problem i think i only have half a brain to start with...
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: DJC on October 13, 2023, 11:10:51 pm
Sorry I haven't finished this up: I've just had a knee replacement and half my brains are still missing. I hope to finish this up in the next day or two.
Take your time Crash ... and keep up the rehab :)
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: LoveNavy on October 14, 2023, 01:46:44 am
Sorry I haven't finished this up: I've just had a knee replacement and half my brains are still missing. I hope to finish this up in the next day or two.
All the best for your recovery and rehabilitation. I had mine replaced 10 months ago. Very long slow journey that’s as much mental as it is physical.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: Adelaideblue on October 14, 2023, 08:03:09 am
Mr Crash Hope you are back feeling 100% soon and sprightly on your new knee
Thank you for all your great input on this site. Ab
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on October 14, 2023, 10:52:03 am
Thanks for the good wishes. I probably need them. :D :D
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: madbluboy on October 14, 2023, 11:11:05 am
Walsh might steal it.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on October 14, 2023, 04:39:21 pm
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on October 14, 2023, 05:50:17 pm
There are 3 guys who are so close than the result will be affected by anyone else voting. I will leave the thread open until tomorrow. Please, vote. It makes a considerable difference!
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on October 16, 2023, 01:10:16 pm
AFL 1st Preliminary Final: Carlton vs Melbourne Alas, we couldn't put it together for 4 quarters. A disappointing way to finisha year or marvels. Now to put it altogether in 2024.
Trends: [1] There were 12 voters this week, still fewer than I hoped, but much better than it could have been. It appeared to be something of an effort to vote after the disappointment. Please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.
[2] The rating was a 8.78, which is an B-. Considering that we lost, it tells you a fair bit about the heart of our team.
[3]15 players managed a mention again this week, which shows just how we've played for the last couple of months. Just about everyone had a contribution. Since I've been doing this we've never been this consistent all over the board as we've been in the last half of the season.
[4] The average vote this week was 30. I still think this is dodgy, but I can't find where any error might be.
[5]4 players managed 100 votes or more this week. We used only get that in big wins, now it is the norm. Tells about how we've developed as a team.
[6] Sam Walsh managed a massive 410 votes to be BOG this week. He had a brilliant finals series and really shows how good he can really be. Marchbank came in second with 209 votes, something I don't think he has done before.
[7]1 player, Sam Walsh managed votes from everyone this week. A number of others garnered a lot of support, but nobody stuck out to everybody else.
[8] It wasn't a great game from our youngsters this week. They did their best, but ... Ollie Hollands managed to garner votes.
[9] This round it was our defence that stood out. We managed to keep our opposition to a losing score, but couldn't manage to kick one ourselves. Our forwards were not as affective as they have been, not our mids.
Votes: Walsh, Sam 410 Marchbank, Caleb 209 McGovern, Mitchell 159 Newman, Nicholas 121 Weitering, Jacob 83 Jordan Boyd 83 Saad, Adam 61 McKay, Harrison 61 Acres, Blake 49 Hollands, Oliver 30 Docherty, Sam 27 Cottrell, Matthew 23 Cripps, Patrick 19 Hewett, George 15 Martin, Jack 11 Cerra, Adam 4
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on October 16, 2023, 01:49:19 pm
And, here we go: The winner of the Jim Park Award for 2023 is: Sam Walsh! Yes, Walsh has come from the clouds to steal the Jim Park with a fantastic finals series. He scored a total of 3193 votes.
Then: 3145 - Curnow, Charles 3127 - Cerra, Adam 3069 - Newman, Nicholas
I cannot remember a top 4 vote getters being so close before.
After them: 2777 - Weitering, Jacob 2487 - Cripps, Patrick 2298 - Docherty, Sam 2159 - Acres, Blake A very solid group who performed well over the year.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on October 16, 2023, 01:51:48 pm
Complete voting: 3193 - Walsh, Sam 3145 - Curnow, Charles 3127 - Cerra, Adam 3069 - Newman, Nicholas 2777 - Weitering, Jacob 2487 - Cripps, Patrick 2298 - Docherty, Sam 2159 - Acres, Blake 1210 - de Koning, Tom 1109 - Hewett, George 1097 - McKay, Harrison 997 - Saad, Adam 994 - McGovern, Mitchell 839 - Silvagni, Jack 604 - Kemp, Brodie 544 - Cottrell, Matthew 504 - Young, Lewis 495 - Martin, Jack 480 - Kennedy, Matthew 459 - Motlop, Jesse 394 - Hollands, Oliver 385 - Curnow, Edward 372 - Owies, Matthew 361 - Pittonet, Marc 291 - Dow, Patrick 219 - Marchbank, Caleb 218 - Cincotta, Alex 195 - Fisher, Zac 122 - Jordan Boyd 86 - Cuningham, David 67 - Durdin, Corey 63 - Fogarty, Lachlan
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: PaulP on October 16, 2023, 01:59:23 pm
It's a pretty good top 10. Some may quibble about the order, but as a collective, they probably were our 10 best players over the season.
Thanks for all your work on this Stephen. Great stuff.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: LP on October 16, 2023, 04:04:25 pm
So happy to see Newman up there in the rankings, long overdue.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: Sub-Zero on October 19, 2023, 12:37:56 pm
A Brownlow medallist in waiting is Walsh. Congratulations and in particular for someone who missed about ten games or so, in our best season in a generation. To the podium places in C. Curnow and Cerra, career-best years. Well-deserved spots there. Newman, unlucky to miss out, same same. To everyone else here and maybe though unlikely not, thanks for your contributions in a wonderful year for the team. Crashlander, I'll be the grammar police here and say you need to swap Jordan Boyd's name around to be written down like everyone else's. Last name first. As they do with the East Asian names.
Title: Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023
Post by: crashlander on October 19, 2023, 12:42:14 pm
A Brownlow medallist in waiting is Walsh. Congratulations and in particular for someone who missed about ten games or so, in our best season in a generation. To the podium places in C. Curnow and Cerra, career-best years. Well-deserved spots there. Newman, unlucky to miss out, same same. To everyone else here and maybe though unlikely not, thanks for your contributions in a wonderful year for the team. Crashlander, I'll be the grammar police here and say you need to swap Jordan Boyd's name around to be written down like everyone else's. Last name first. As they do with the East Asian names.
Indeed. It will be something I fix for the 2024 season.