Police minister interview was very stern in condemning the Far left wing throwing glass shad missiles at police while the far right protesters were congratulated on following the rules. Hmmm arent the right wing aligned with being the violent ones?
The police minister sounded fed up and at breaking point putting up with these twits.
Goverments that refuse to accept any accountability and dont have the brains to do something productive to arrest the slide have turned our once great state into a debt ridden lawless violent crap hole.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on October 19, 2025, 10:27:13 pm
Been saying it for ages, the joint is lawless. Youth Crime Starting filling jails with the perps and their parents when they are minors. The hunt down the organised crime gang members who are "hiring" kids to their dirty work and jail them for a long time. Parents will start paying attention on where their children are and being, well, parents. Kids will started thinking about consequences, as will crime.gang members. Time to get serious, nuffs e farken nuff now.
Protest Play nice or lose the right. Track down the glass and rock throwers (left, middle or right) and make them accountable for their actions.
WTF has gone wrong with the general behaviour of society? Its disgusting the things humans do to other humans.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on October 20, 2025, 08:02:32 am
I've said this before.... Punishing parents is futile. Many parents of young offenders have been in jail or are currently in jail. Many suffer from mental health issues. They are drug and alcohol dependent. Many are illiterate. Some intellectual disability or social inadequacy is common. They come from poor socio-economic backgrounds. They struggle to look after themselves, let alone their kids.
But here's the thing.... For the most part they do love and care about their kids. They want a better life for them. They just don't have the means or the ability to provide that.
Educated well off families don't provide a large percentge of kids in detention. It's the 'circle of crime'. And the current generation in detention will provide the next generation. Over the 40 years I spent in the system I've taught both parents and their children Often the same family names kept appearing.
The other issue is the value of incarceration. The Juvenile System is in many respects are 'Schools of Crime' as bonds are formed and strategies for offending are shared.
Kids reach a point when they reach about 18 where they choose a path. Many go on to lead productive lives...the others keep offending and spend much of their life in jail. Once in the system it's often too late. There are some offenders who definitely need to be kept in custody. But there are probably just as many who should never see the inside of a centre.
The answer doesn't lie with locking them all up. Keeping a kid in custody for a period is a surprisingly expensive strategy. Money that could be much better spent on pre-offending diversionary programs with many youngsters.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Professer E on October 20, 2025, 09:16:15 am
Dunno Lods, I went to the same schools adjacent to Heidelberg West and Olympic Village as many former recidivists and received the same education, yet the outcome was different. Some people just keeping making poor choices and I reckon a lot of it comes down to poor parental guidance, but everyone has their pet theory
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on October 20, 2025, 09:19:39 am
Two articles worth a read IMO. On a surface read they seem a little contradictory, but I imagine understanding crime in toto is a fairly complex business.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: northernblue on October 20, 2025, 09:27:31 am
Dunno Lods, I went to the same schools adjacent to Heidelberg West and Olympic Village as many former recidivists and received the same education, yet the outcome was different. Some people just keeping making poor choices and I reckon a lot of it comes down to poor parental guidance, but everyone has their pet theory
People are individuals and make both good and poor choices and there is no “one solution” to these or pretty much any other problem. As to making parents “responsible” for their children’s crimes, where does that stop ? My son has a hairy arse and he makes his own choices, do you want me to break his legs to limit where and what he does ?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Baggers on October 20, 2025, 09:54:48 am
Police minister interview was very stern in condemning the Far left wing throwing glass shad missiles at police while the far right protesters were congratulated on following the rules. Hmmm arent the right wing aligned with being the violent ones?
The police minister sounded fed up and at breaking point putting up with these twits.
Goverments that refuse to accept any accountability and dont have the brains to do something productive to arrest the slide have turned our once great state into a debt ridden lawless violent crap hole.
Shawny, I suspect you may have bought into the HUN puerile and simplistic assumption that it was 'lefties' who threw the rocks. That's called shoehorning events to suit your own political agenda. FA to do with left, right, middle, up down... whateverthefck.
For a far more accurate and relevant assessment of who may do these things, read Principal LODs' insightful contribution above... with an open mind.
I, too, have worked in the system but not for 40 years as Principal LODS did, I only lasted just over a month at Winlaton young female offenders detention centre. These girls were disaffected, disenfranchised (for many of the reasons Principal LODS mentioned) and mostly, also, sexually abused. And generally speaking they fell into three categories, they were either angry, and as a result very violently antisocial ...or totally withdrawn, self-destructive and suicidal... or had a serious mental health issue, or three (schizophrenia/bi-polar/panic disorders/PTSD etc.).
When your solution to youth street violence is to build more prisons, and keep building more prisons, doesn't that tell you that prisons are not the solution for young offenders?
Why did I only last just over a month? Well after listening to the horrors stories of sexual abuse from the girls, in considerable detail -- took a couple of weeks to earn their trust, they knew I really did care -- it was just too much. Broke me/triggered my own PTSD. So I knew I wasn't suited to the job.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on October 20, 2025, 10:18:37 am
lol i have my own thread!!
More gang machete action at Luna park. May need to order more bins Jacinta.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on October 20, 2025, 10:52:40 am
Nothing to do with Taco and deserves its own thread:
Shawny, I suspect you may have bought into the HUN puerile and simplistic assumption that it was 'lefties' who threw the rocks. That's called shoehorning events to suit your own political agenda. FA to do with left, right, middle, up down... whateverthefck
I didnt buy into anything simply quoted what the police minister said in his press conference which was so refreshing to see someone stand up to these lowlifes and call them out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbliCmt0QqA
As others have said enough is enough. The politicians are weak and compulsive liars and the current lot are simply incapable of fixing the mess they caused. The machete bins fiasco says enough of the incompetence of those we elected to run the state (well i didn't but enough did unfortunately) - they focus on topics to win votes and fail to address the important issues. Our state is being overrun with criminals, majority out on bond, no repercussions for violent protesters against the law as well as the effect of letting tens of thousands of immigrants in weekly with too many that don't want to assimilate to our customs and worst part is when they commit a serious crime they is stuff all to deter the next lot from offending. Lack of mental health facilities to monitor and house those who should not be on the street. That poor chef that was stabbed in the city last week for no reason was just sickening.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on October 20, 2025, 11:14:01 am
Dunno Lods, I went to the same schools adjacent to Heidelberg West and Olympic Village as many former recidivists and received the same education, yet the outcome was different. Some people just keeping making poor choices and I reckon a lot of it comes down to poor parental guidance, but everyone has their pet theory
That's actually a good point Prof.
Why do some kids thrive in the same system while others fail? There is no doubt parental authority sometimes has little impact, but as I pointed out before that's largely through lack of parental skills. For some, 'parental control' manifests itself through physical abuse. Kids wont respond to that....they'll avoid it by running with their peers and avoiding home.
As to failure... There's a conversation a teacher in a JJ detention setting once had with a student
Teacher: We all have different things we can be good at. Student: We're good at crime. Teacher: No you're not! Good criminals don't get caught.
The fact is these kids have failed at most things. They've even failed at being criminals. I lost count of the number of kids I've taught who reached the age of 15-16 and were still unable to read. Failure at school leads them to avoiding a place of failure and finding alternative often anti-social activities.
The kids have failed, but the systems have failed them too. So there has to be a better way for these kids, something more intensive that gets them early, and works to divert them away from criminal activities, or at least provide them with skills to cope. It'll cost, but there won't be a lot of difference between the cost of those programs and the cost of locking them up.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: dodge on October 20, 2025, 11:29:41 am
Why are we all of a sudden turning everything into 'Left' or 'Right' issues. They aren't. They are societal ones. Until language and actions return to reasonableness, this division will continue. It is well and truly time to stop. A rally to 'Unite to fight the right'? (as one banner said). Burning police effigy's? Throwing rocks at police? Deliberately organising counter protests? Protest to improve society, not to divide it further.
While the State Government has a lot of work to do on crime, what is the opposition's response? Their federal leader comes and visits and suggests how unsafe Victoria is (from the Dutton playbook) What is the Vic opposition's solution? Until we get some ideas from the opposition, we are stuck with what we have. Tough on crime isn't a solution - it's a slogan.
In the meantime, whenever a crime is now committed, it is mentioned if the offender was on bail. Yes, it is an issue, but is it an increasing or decreasing one? We have to have bail laws - Government writes them, courts apply them. Police are frustrated particularly at how they are being applied and a reluctance (?) to lock up the repeat offenders. I have no idea where the solution is.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on October 20, 2025, 11:58:39 am
Why are we all of a sudden turning everything into 'Left' or 'Right' issues. They aren't. They are societal ones. Until language and actions return to reasonableness, this division will continue. It is well and truly time to stop. A rally to 'Unite to fight the right'? (as one banner said). Burning police effigy's? Throwing rocks at police? Deliberately organising counter protests? Protest to improve society, not to divide it further.
While the State Government has a lot of work to do on crime, what is the opposition's response? Their federal leader comes and visits and suggests how unsafe Victoria is (from the Dutton playbook) What is the Vic opposition's solution? Until we get some ideas from the opposition, we are stuck with what we have. Tough on crime isn't a solution - it's a slogan.
In the meantime, whenever a crime is now committed, it is mentioned if the offender was on bail. Yes, it is an issue, but is it an increasing or decreasing one? We have to have bail laws - Government writes them, courts apply them. Police are frustrated particularly at how they are being applied and a reluctance (?) to lock up the repeat offenders. I have no idea where the solution is.
We don't know what the opposition would do as the current mob have been in power for the last 12 years and its hard to find an area of the state they have improved under their leadership.
Any half decent opposition should have been a shoe in the last few elections and its a blight on the sad state of local government that despite doing such a poor job the same party keeps getting re-elected. The libs do little to instill confidence amongst the people but the current mob has had 12 years and look at where we are at - time is well and truly up and someone else should be given the chance to improve right the wrongs.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 20, 2025, 12:02:18 pm
To me the main problem seems to be the gutless mask wearing thugs opportunistically hiding behind legitimate causes to create havoc, "Sovereign Citizens", 1%ers", "Conspiracy Nutters" and "Neo-Nazis" hiding behind university students and grandmothers.
This has little or nothing to do with the political left or right, that's just an excuse to bash a political opponent, the p1ssweak political parties are happy to schtuum it up when the target is the opposition.
Laws were passed to unmask these extremists, but they have never been enacted, it's as my signature quote states.
Step one should be removing the opportunity to profit from this sort of behaviour and a lot of it will evaporate, like that nutter who runs the Desi Retreats!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: madbluboy on October 20, 2025, 12:19:35 pm
It was the anti racism protesters yesterday throwing rocks the size of coke cans at police.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on October 20, 2025, 01:21:30 pm
To me the main problem seems to be the gutless mask wearing thugs opportunistically hiding behind legitimate causes to create havoc, "Sovereign Citizens", 1%ers", "Conspiracy Nutters" and "Neo-Nazis" hiding behind university students and grandmothers.
This has little or nothing to do with the political left or right, that's just an excuse to bash a political opponent, the p1ssweak political parties are happy to schtuum it up when the target is the opposition.
Laws were passed to unmask these extremists, but they have never been enacted, it's as my signature quote states.
Step one should be removing the opportunity to profit from this sort of behaviour and a lot of it will evaporate, like that nutter who runs the Desi Retreats!
Crime increases when society breaks down more and people get more desperate in their efforts to survive. Australia has become like the old Germany post WW1 when it transitioned from a semi-authoritarian empire to the Weimar Republic, a democracy that protected individual right and limited police power. You end up with the people looking for alternatives to restore safety and order and thats when you get right wing extremists and nutters like the Nazi Party back then or in our case One Nation gaining popularity, political support and eventually power. A lot of what went on back then mirrors what is happening in Australia even down to recent events with Jewish folk being hassled and buildings defaced etc due to society tolerating and being weak on offenders under the banner of democracy and freedom of speech etc but it all gets down to politics. In short you have to fix the economic problems to fix the crime problems or you will get a repeat of history on a world wide level not just Australia..
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: dodge on October 20, 2025, 01:34:53 pm
We don't know what the opposition would do as the current mob have been in power for the last 12 years and its hard to find an area of the state they have improved under their leadership.
Any half decent opposition should have been a shoe in the last few elections and its a blight on the sad state of local government that despite doing such a poor job the same party keeps getting re-elected. The libs do little to instill confidence amongst the people but the current mob has had 12 years and look at where we are at - time is well and truly up and someone else should be given the chance to improve right the wrongs.
Isn't that the problem Shawny - that we don't know what the opposition will do, because they won't tell us? Great at highlighting issues, not so great at offering solutions.
Don't know if they want to fix anything - that would require them to be in in government and to actually do something. Much easier complaining from opposition. There have been three terms of Liberal/LNP government in Vic since 1982 - they have no idea how to win an election. When Bolte won in 1955, Libs were in power until 1982 - 27 years.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 20, 2025, 03:24:04 pm
The opposition has nothinged itself into oblivion, they are beyond pathetic, utterly spineless in opposition. They spend more time usurping each other than they do countering the government.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on October 20, 2025, 09:02:50 pm
To me the main problem seems to be the gutless mask wearing thugs opportunistically hiding behind legitimate causes to create havoc, "Sovereign Citizens", 1%ers", "Conspiracy Nutters" and "Neo-Nazis" hiding behind university students and grandmothers.
This has little or nothing to do with the political left or right, that's just an excuse to bash a political opponent, the p1ssweak political parties are happy to schtuum it up when the target is the opposition.
Laws were passed to unmask these extremists, but they have never been enacted, it's as my signature quote states.
Step one should be removing the opportunity to profit from this sort of behaviour and a lot of it will evaporate, like that nutter who runs the Desi Retreats!
Crime increases when society breaks down more and people get more desperate in their efforts to survive. Australia has become like the old Germany post WW1 when it transitioned from a semi-authoritarian empire to the Weimar Republic, a democracy that protected individual right and limited police power. You end up with the people looking for alternatives to restore safety and order and thats when you get right wing extremists and nutters like the Nazi Party back then or in our case One Nation gaining popularity, political support and eventually power. A lot of what went on back then mirrors what is happening in Australia even down to recent events with Jewish folk being hassled and buildings defaced etc due to society tolerating and being weak on offenders under the banner of democracy and freedom of speech etc but it all gets down to politics. In short you have to fix the economic problems to fix the crime problems or you will get a repeat of history on a world wide level not just Australia..
We were talking about this at the dinner table tonight and the saying "the fish rots from the head" dawned on. Here you have our leaders getting on TV or on radio saying things like "there's no problem" or "Melbourne is safe". They are either delusional, dumb, talking crap/spin or all of the above. As the average Joe Blow if Melbourne is safe or If crime is in check or not and see what responses you get. Keep burying heads in the sand and talking the softly softly approach, its got us this far so should keep working a treat...not
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on October 20, 2025, 09:04:08 pm
In short you have to fix the economic problems to fix the crime problems or you will get a repeat of history on a world wide level not just Australia..
It's a furphy that they are strugglers, they turn up to protests in Landcruisers and tricked up twin cabs, using your tax dollars to fund protests, then use more tax dollars to fund legal action against police with bogus brutality claims, and win compo funded with more of your tax dollars.
Look carefully at the crowds, it's the same faces, that is why they do their best to hide them, they have turned protest into a profession.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on October 21, 2025, 05:35:07 am
Crime increases when society breaks down more and people get more desperate in their efforts to survive. Australia has become like the old Germany post WW1 when it transitioned from a semi-authoritarian empire to the Weimar Republic, a democracy that protected individual right and limited police power. You end up with the people looking for alternatives to restore safety and order and thats when you get right wing extremists and nutters like the Nazi Party back then or in our case One Nation gaining popularity, political support and eventually power. A lot of what went on back then mirrors what is happening in Australia even down to recent events with Jewish folk being hassled and buildings defaced etc due to society tolerating and being weak on offenders under the banner of democracy and freedom of speech etc but it all gets down to politics. In short you have to fix the economic problems to fix the crime problems or you will get a repeat of history on a world wide level not just Australia..
We were talking about this at the dinner table tonight and the saying "the fish rots from the head" dawned on. Here you have our leaders getting on TV or on radio saying things like "there's no problem" or "Melbourne is safe". They are either delusional, dumb, talking crap/spin or all of the above. As the average Joe Blow if Melbourne is safe or If crime is in check or not and see what responses you get. Keep burying heads in the sand and talking the softly softly approach, its got us this far so should keep working a treat...not
this occurs when politicians enjoy privilege and dont understand what Joe average goes through.
According to them, property affordability isnt an issue, they live in affluent suburbs so everything is rosy there too with minimal crime and probably minimal youths.
The distance between the haves and the have nots has grown significantly and circling back to the house thing, why would a young person get a job? Is it to afford to live? They are unlikely to earn enough money to put a roof over their own heads and face arguably the biggest challenge in working to afford something and live their life at the same time when they can go on unemployment benefits and simply live their life. They wont ever earn big bucks doing so but most of them dont care, and frankly aside from building a career what are they working for? There is more scope for them to make money off instagram videos than there is in the workforce for the majority of them.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Baggers on October 21, 2025, 08:57:48 am
Shawny, I suspect you may have bought into the HUN puerile and simplistic assumption that it was 'lefties' who threw the rocks. That's called shoehorning events to suit your own political agenda. FA to do with left, right, middle, up down... whateverthefck
I didnt buy into anything simply quoted what the police minister said in his press conference which was so refreshing to see someone stand up to these lowlifes and call them out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbliCmt0QqA
As others have said enough is enough. The politicians are weak and compulsive liars and the current lot are simply incapable of fixing the mess they caused. The machete bins fiasco says enough of the incompetence of those we elected to run the state (well i didn't but enough did unfortunately) - they focus on topics to win votes and fail to address the important issues. Our state is being overrun with criminals, majority out on bond, no repercussions for violent protesters against the law as well as the effect of letting tens of thousands of immigrants in weekly with too many that don't want to assimilate to our customs and worst part is when they commit a serious crime they is stuff all to deter the next lot from offending. Lack of mental health facilities to monitor and house those who should not be on the street. That poor chef that was stabbed in the city last week for no reason was just sickening.
Like your work, Shawny. You call it as you see it - gotta respect that. And you identify many legitimate concerns and problems.
**warning, corporate cliche coming** Let's 'drill down' into the important issues you raise.
1. Politicians. Former Liberal Party minister Don Chipp once commented that the Australian Democrats were there to 'keep the bastards honest.' He was the AD's inaugural leader after leaving the Libs. Today you'd call him a 'moderate' or 'progressive' conservative. Eventually the AD folded. Seems 'keeping the bastards honest' is a lost cause. Looking to politicians for courageous leadership is bound to result in disappointment. The Libs. Nationally and in our state of Victoria, they're a rabble with the inevitable happening - the Far Right and Moderates are at war with each other betraying their founders' vision, especially Bob Menzies. But they are doing more than betraying Bob (a one-eyed Bluebagger by the way), they are letting down the nation and state, respectively, by failing to provide a viable alternative to the incumbents effectively handing them the keys. Absolute power corrupts... bla bla bla.
2. Machete bins. Oh dear. A pale attempt to emulate Howard's moratorium on firearms and their voluntary surrender. Abject failure to address the root causes of too many angry youths taking to the streets with violent intent, though locking up more of them now will help... a little bit, for a little while. I'll throw in a left field item that I believe contributes to youth crime (and serious mental health issues)... divorce. Back in the 80s and 90s many folks in the mental health field identified that young males in particular would be future problems owing to being, simply put, under fathered and over mothered. Sheesh, it's tough enough for an 'in tact' family to raise one child, let alone two or more on your own! Then you have the issues that Principal LODS identified in the lower socio-economic, welfare and crime families/groups - a hapless revolving door. What are we doing, on a meaningful level, to address this?
3. Protests. A reminder that it was the 'left' that created the term 'non-violent protesting' ...in the 60s. The Spotted One (LP) was probably closest to the pin with his comment about the professional, angry, malcontents who infiltrate peaceful demonstrations and in this case, hurl rocks. FA to do with the Left, everything to do with d*ckheads. This is not a recent occurrence, been going on for decades but now with sensational news reporting it does seem the state is being overrun by crims. It's a problem for sure, but over and agenda driven reporting, clouds and exaggerates the very real problem. As an aside, a mate who served with me in the Navy on leaving the service went into commercial TV in Sydney and was telling me only recently how in news rooms (TV and print) the footage would come in from a protest and they would edit the coverage in such a way that the focus was on scuffles, and worse, greatly exaggerating the extent of any violence.
4. Immigration. Holy mackeral I recall the same racism/xenophobia in the 50s against the poms ('The $10 immigrants'), 60s, 70s and even 80s against Greeks, Italians and Middle Eastern immigrants... then to Indian and Asian folks, and so on it goes. This is nothing new, Shawny. Seems to be spliced into the DNA of some folks (Xenophobia).
5. Mental health. Yes, closing facilities and farming out folks with serious (and sometimes dangerous) mental health issues back to families and the community is a tragic, urgent issue. Mr Kennett has a fair bit of blood on his hands in this regard. And this very real problem is still a long way from being dealt with properly and well.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 21, 2025, 12:29:16 pm
As an aside, a mate who served with me in the Navy on leaving the service went into commercial TV in Sydney and was telling me only recently how in news rooms (TV and print) the footage would come in from a protest and they would edit the coverage in such a way that the focus was on scuffles, and worse, greatly exaggerating the extent of any violence.
I've travelled a lot for work and recreation, while overseas on more than one occasion I've had alarmed family call me after being exposed to "creatively edited" media content. On one occasion I was in a foreign capital that was apparently burning to the ground after riotous protests in the central park, my hotel room overlooked that park and I was strolling through it enjoying the sun and fresh air when the call came in! When I checked with my local contacts the event that was represented in Oz as mass worker protest was in effect a union picket outside a single government building opposing redundancies. But let's not let the facts get in the way of a highly rating racist story!
The stupid thing is local protestors model their behaviour and tactics on the fake reports that they watch, so in effect this is a feedback loop caused by the media's own fake reporting.
Even worse, when I was at News Ltd, the tip offs about protests and demonstrations, in most cases union related back then, would come in from the same handful people no matter the industry sectors involved. So as you mentioned this has been going on for a long long time.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on October 21, 2025, 06:03:47 pm
I didnt buy into anything simply quoted what the police minister said in his press conference which was so refreshing to see someone stand up to these lowlifes and call them out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbliCmt0QqA
As others have said enough is enough. The politicians are weak and compulsive liars and the current lot are simply incapable of fixing the mess they caused. The machete bins fiasco says enough of the incompetence of those we elected to run the state (well i didn't but enough did unfortunately) - they focus on topics to win votes and fail to address the important issues. Our state is being overrun with criminals, majority out on bond, no repercussions for violent protesters against the law as well as the effect of letting tens of thousands of immigrants in weekly with too many that don't want to assimilate to our customs and worst part is when they commit a serious crime they is stuff all to deter the next lot from offending. Lack of mental health facilities to monitor and house those who should not be on the street. That poor chef that was stabbed in the city last week for no reason was just sickening.
4. Immigration. Holy mackeral I recall the same racism/xenophobia in the 50s against the poms ('The $10 immigrants'), 60s, 70s and even 80s against Greeks, Italians and Middle Eastern immigrants... then to Indian and Asian folks, and so on it goes. This is nothing new, Shawny. Seems to be spliced into the DNA of some folks (Xenophobia).
Don't agree with this one - the immigrants that flooded our shores in the 50s-80s, the vast majority assimilated into the Aussie culture, worked and worked bloody hard, respected our laws and authority and if kids of Wog parents like me dared to disrespect the law or even just be rude to anyone older then we were we coped it. From what i hear the current crop we are letting in by the tens of thousands just don't have those traits at all and its clear to see how things are headed.
The amount of crime in certain pockets of this state, in particular the western suburbs is worse than its ever been. There is no respect for the law whatsoever and regardless of which side of the political fence you sit on serious crime such as car jackings, home invasions, knife offences against civilians has never been this brazen. Everytime im out and about function party etc and im speaking to an emergency workers I always ask them for thir experiences and im yet to met one that said its the same as it was 20 years ago. They all say in different ways that there is a disproportion number of serious crimes coming from individual's from certain war torn regions. Sure there was crime in the 50, 60 and 70s from the Europeans, Asian, Indian etc but nothing like this.
If you are not fully committed to our culture our laws our flag and our peaceful way of life and are not willing to work hard then you should not be allowed in regardless of how bad your current life is. I know it sounds a bit cold but allowing those in who don't 100% buy into our values is slowly turning our streets like the ones they escaped.
And if you commit a serious crime their citizenship should be revoked.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on October 21, 2025, 06:20:13 pm
4. Immigration. Holy mackeral I recall the same racism/xenophobia in the 50s against the poms ('The $10 immigrants'), 60s, 70s and even 80s against Greeks, Italians and Middle Eastern immigrants... then to Indian and Asian folks, and so on it goes. This is nothing new, Shawny. Seems to be spliced into the DNA of some folks (Xenophobia).
Don't agree with this one - the immigrants that flooded our shores in the 50s-80s, the vast majority assimilated into the Aussie culture, worked and worked bloody hard, respected our laws and authority and if kids of Wog parents like me dared to disrespect the law or even just be rude to anyone older then we were we coped it. From what i hear the current crop we are letting in by the tens of thousands just don't have those traits at all and its clear to see how things are headed.
The amount of crime in certain pockets of this state, in particular the western suburbs is worse than its ever been. There is no respect for the law whatsoever and regardless of which side of the political fence you sit on serious crime such as car jackings, home invasions, knife offences against civilians has never been this brazen. Everytime im out and about function party etc and im speaking to an emergency workers I always ask them for thir experiences and im yet to met one that said its the same as it was 20 years ago. They all say in different ways that there is a disproportion number of serious crimes coming from individual's from certain war torn regions. Sure there was crime in the 50, 60 and 70s from the Europeans, Asian, Indian etc but nothing like this.
If you are not fully committed to our culture our laws our flag and our peaceful way of life and are not willing to work hard then you should not be allowed in regardless of how bad your current life is. I know it sounds a bit cold but allowing those in who don't 100% buy into our values is slowly turning our streets like the ones they escaped.
And if you commit a serious crime their citizenship should be revoked.
Agree, Western suburbs in Victoria is a nightmare place to try and live and survive, there a lot of good people doing it tough out there and suffering with the criminal types running amok. You have to live there to understand how bad it is, said it before that my daughter lived out at Caroline Springs/Fraser Rise and it was a madhouse. She copped the lot ,gangs at the shops doing car jackings, damaged cars in the street, attempted break ins to her home, people stabbed at Watergardens shopping centre ,even a drone hovering outside her kitchen window with a white package onboard. One in Nine people known to police she was told, lucky she moved to Greensborough where the only break ins are from possums and the odd bird or two trying to nest in a gap under your eaves.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Professer E on October 22, 2025, 10:47:59 pm
Still can't believe you can't protect your own family on your own property. Seriously, if people come onto someone's property with an intent to commit a crime common sense says you should be able to defend yours with zero legal repercussions.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 23, 2025, 03:36:27 am
Still can't believe you can't protect your own family on your own property. Seriously, if people come onto someone's property with an intent to commit a crime common sense says you should be able to defend yours with zero legal repercussions.
It's gamed by savvy kids, if they know that you are prone to react they setup people with a tactic called swatting. That in particular is why females should never respond solo to calls for help even if they think it is someone they know.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: kruddler on October 23, 2025, 03:41:11 am
Still can't believe you can't protect your own family on your own property. Seriously, if people come onto someone's property with an intent to commit a crime common sense says you should be able to defend yours with zero legal repercussions.
Theres a doco just out on netflix that ahows a reason why that isnt always a good thing - the perfect neighbour.
Granted, its american and they are a bit more over the top, but it exposes a problem
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Baggers on October 23, 2025, 09:24:49 am
Still can't believe you can't protect your own family on your own property. Seriously, if people come onto someone's property with an intent to commit a crime common sense says you should be able to defend yours with zero legal repercussions.
100%. Personally, I don't give a rusty fck what the law says... Anyone entering our home or property with ill intent has forfeited their rights. Only ever happened once to us many years ago -- think I've mentioned it here previously -- our Doberman sent him packing - the dopey pr1ck moved quicker (to get over the back fence) than Gout Gout.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on October 23, 2025, 10:13:10 am
The abstracts and summaries of studies I've read indicate that guns in the home don't actually make people safer, and create an increased risk of injury and fatalities unrelated to intruders.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 23, 2025, 10:50:17 am
The abstracts and summaries of studies I've read indicate that guns in the home don't actually make people safer, and create an increased risk of injury and fatalities unrelated to intruders.
My “Client interaction and defensive tactics” instructor warned against using weapons in a home invasion situation. He said that weapons generally ended up in the intruder’s hands and were used against the innocent party.
I have firearms at my place. If I wanted to use one for self defence I would have to retrieve the keys from a key safe, go to the gun safe and unlock it, take out my weapon of choice, unlock the ammunition storage safe, get the right ammunition and load the firearm. I generally can’t manage that in time to get a shot at the foxes that occasionally visit.
Our security service sign and “caution - dogs on premises” sign probably mean that I won’t have to decide about trying to retrieve a firearm.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 23, 2025, 12:23:41 pm
Our security service sign and “caution - dogs on premises” sign probably mean that I won’t have to decide about trying to retrieve a firearm.
These are the two important and under-rated aspects of security.
People install home alarms systems and cameras, then refuse to put up the signs provided by the security companies because they are "ugly". But the hard truth is the sign is a huge part of the deterrent, and it works.
The equal best option is a medium to large dog, small dogs are useless for defence and might only be marginally useful as an alert.
Years ago a relative was heavily involved in the first use of police dogs in Victoria, he could never understand why the program wasn't expanded more widely and faster. It was so successful when it first rolled out he had expected dogs to eventually be paired with every patrol. Unfortunately, opportunistic lawyers got involved and started suing the police for injuries incurred while resisting arrest.
If people want to have private security patrols in the local area, security with dogs is a much better deterrent than security with guns. A gun can only be used when in safe range, dogs can run someone down from hundreds of meters away, you can't hide from them, and they won't go through a wall or window and kill an innocent bystander!
When you watch a protest, the protesters harass mounted police, butt cigarettes on horses, throw projectiles at them, when the dogs are present the protesters give them a wide berth.
Finally, there are some specific cultural demographics that courtesy of long standing epigenetics are thoroughly petrified of dogs.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Professer E on October 23, 2025, 12:35:05 pm
Be careful,vid your dog bites an intruder can't you be charged with assault by a dangerous animal of some such rubbish? Crazy world we live in
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 23, 2025, 12:37:55 pm
Be careful,vid your dog bites an intruder can't you be charged with assault by a dangerous animal of some such rubbish? Crazy world we live in
If you chase them out of your house and they trip and fall, they will claim injury and you'll be charged with assault and battery. The problem isn't really the crook or the law, the problem is the crooked lawyer.
So you might as well let the dog finish the job!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 23, 2025, 01:19:58 pm
Be careful,vid your dog bites an intruder can't you be charged with assault by a dangerous animal of some such rubbish? Crazy world we live in
Incorrect.
If your dog bites someone, it is a defence if that person was (a) trespassing, (b) attacking you or (c) teasing or harming the dog.
My two are more likely to lick than bite but their very large size tends to intimidate people who don't know them.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: madbluboy on October 23, 2025, 02:58:45 pm
I recall a couple of years ago a father choked out an intruder in his house and he faced no charges??
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: madbluboy on October 23, 2025, 02:59:15 pm
And the intruder died.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on October 23, 2025, 03:42:37 pm
Council advised us we have to erect and maintain signage at our property saying we have a Dog and the signage has to visible from the entrance to the property. We also asked our lawyers a while back when attending to another matter and they said while not breaking any laws or being enforceable its advisable to have clear signage and the Dog restricted to the back yard. Problem we have that being a very large male German Shepherd our dog while not classified officially as a dangerous dog is stereotyped as an aggressive breed and has less leeway if an incident was to occur and we have to be very careful with him. In Victoria the law states: The law expects you to act proportionately to the threat and stop using force once it’s no longer necessary. However, once the threat is over—say, the intruders run away—it’s not lawful to chase after them and attack like a dog would do. The law expects you to act proportionately to the threat and stop using force once it’s no longer necessary. Which in the case of Dogs becomes a grey area, if there is no one home, your little Maltese terrier or plump lab is probably going to have a nip at the intruder then call it a day but a GS, Rottie, Doberman, Akita etc are going to keep going until the intruder escapes or either subdues the dog or the reverse... Any severe or fatal injuries is probably going to end up badly for the dog especially if the intruder was unarmed or under adult age plus you could be facing a civil suit with claims against you for owning and training a dangerous animal.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Baggers on October 23, 2025, 04:20:47 pm
Council advised us we have to erect and maintain signage at our property saying we have a Dog and the signage has to visible from the entrance to the property. We also asked our lawyers a while back when attending to another matter and they said while not breaking any laws or being enforceable its advisable to have clear signage and the Dog restricted to the back yard. Problem we have that being a very large male German Shepherd our dog while not classified officially as a dangerous dog is stereotyped as an aggressive breed and has less leeway if an incident was to occur and we have to be very careful with him. In Victoria the law states: The law expects you to act proportionately to the threat and stop using force once it’s no longer necessary. However, once the threat is over—say, the intruders run away—it’s not lawful to chase after them and attack like a dog would do. The law expects you to act proportionately to the threat and stop using force once it’s no longer necessary. Which in the case of Dogs becomes a grey area, if there is no one home, your little Maltese terrier or plump lab is probably going to have a nip at the intruder then call it a day but a GS, Rottie, Doberman, Akita etc are going to keep going until the intruder escapes or either subdues the dog or the reverse... Any severe or fatal injuries is probably going to end up badly for the dog especially if the intruder was unarmed or under adult age plus you could be facing a civil suit with claims against you for owning and training a dangerous animal.
Makes sense and fair enough.
There is an element of responsibility for those of us who own a large dog with strong protective instincts. Recipe for disaster when a big dog is owned by irresponsible folks.
Our gal has been socialized, trained and came from a reputable breeder. I believe her bark and/or presence at any window is plenty of a deterrent. And a deterrent is far better than anything that is a step further. Our critter even qualified sufficiently to have our home and contents insurance costs reduced to the same as if we had an alarm system!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 23, 2025, 04:51:49 pm
The Domestic Animals Act 1994 defines dangerous dogs and restricted breeds. Restricted breeds are the Japanese Tosa, fila Brasileiro, dogo Argentino, Perro de Presa Canario (or Presa Canario), and American Pit Bull Terrier (or Pit Bull Terrier). A dangerous dog is a dog that has been declared dangerous by the local Council, a dog that is, or has been, a guard dog for the purpose of guarding non-residential premises, or a dog that has been trained to attack or bite any person (or the protective sleeve worn when training guard dogs).
If a dog that is not a dangerous dog or a restricted breed "attacks or bites any person or animal" or "causes death or a serious injury to the person or animal" or "rushes at or chases any person" the owner of the dog and/or the person in charge of the dog is guilty of an offence. However, the Act specifies that "it is a defence to that offence if the incident occurred because— (a) the dog was being teased, abused or assaulted; or (b) a person was trespassing on the premises on which the dog was kept; or (c) another animal was on the premises on which the dog was kept; or (d) a person known to the dog was being attacked in front of the dog."
There's no "grey area" and the provisions of the Domestic Animals Act 1994 are completely separate from the "self-defence" provisions set out in the Crimes Act 1958:
Section 322K 1. A person is not guilty of an offence if the person carries out the conduct constituting the offence in self-defence. 2. A person carries out conduct in self-defence if – 1. The person believes that the conduct is necessary in self-defence; and 2. The conduct is a reasonable response in the circumstances as the person perceives them.
Section 322M adds specific provisions for self-defence in a family violence situation.
As an example, it would be lawful to choke someone who attacked you with a knife and there's no requirement to stop choking them provided that you believe that it's the only way to stop them stabbing you.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on October 23, 2025, 08:31:51 pm
Be careful,vid your dog bites an intruder can't you be charged with assault by a dangerous animal of some such rubbish? Crazy world we live in
If you chase them out of your house and they trip and fall, they will claim injury and you'll be charged with assault and battery. The problem isn't really the crook or the law, the problem is the crooked lawyer.
Thats a bit of a myth me thinks. I do know of a business owner (and state level rifle shooter) who shot an intruder (wounded him the leg) who broke into his High St Northcote business in the 80s. Got off those chargers IIRC. Years later, was broken into again, again he shot the intruder in the leg but did some time for the second offence.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 23, 2025, 10:09:58 pm
Thats a bit of a myth me thinks. I do know of a business owner (and state level rifle shooter) who shot an intruder (wounded him the leg) who broke into his High St Northcote business in the 80s. Got off those chargers IIRC. Years later, was broken into again, again he shot the intruder in the leg but did some time for the second offence.
That's almost 50 years ago, and I've had a couple of encounters with a bloke called Pat Lennon that suggests otherwise.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 24, 2025, 12:20:04 am
Thats a bit of a myth me thinks. I do know of a business owner (and state level rifle shooter) who shot an intruder (wounded him the leg) who broke into his High St Northcote business in the 80s. Got off those chargers IIRC. Years later, was broken into again, again he shot the intruder in the leg but did some time for the second offence.
That's almost 50 years ago, and I've had a couple of encounters with a bloke called Pat Lennon that suggests otherwise.
The law hasn’t changed LP.
As long as you believe that you’re in strife and use appropriate force to defend yourself, you’re fine.
A smallish woman being attacked by a large bloke can use whatever means she has to defend herself. A large bloke being attacked by an old woman can’t shoot or stab her.
You can’t be charged with “assault and battery” if someone trips over. For a start, battery is now considered as assault and would have to involve the application of unlawful force.
Can you give an example of a crook who successfully sued someone after tripping over?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 24, 2025, 04:29:55 am
It's not that black and white, the law takes into account cause, so if the home owner contributes to injury even for someone there illegally they can be liable. These cases are usually settled long before any formal ruling, nobody in their right mind will risk their house for a punitive amount and lawyers know it.
Crooks want cash not a cellmate.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 24, 2025, 10:22:12 am
It's not that black and white, the law takes into account cause, so if the home owner contributes to injury even for someone there illegally they can be liable. These cases are usually settled long before any formal ruling, nobody in their right mind will risk their house for a punitive amount and lawyers know it.
Crooks want cash not a cellmate.
That’s garbage LP. My late brother specialised in representing crooks - the same people he used to arrest when he was a copper. He would often speak of “in pari delicto” - a wrongdoer is barred from seeking damages arising from their own illegal activity.
No such case could ever be settled because it could never be made.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 24, 2025, 02:02:09 pm
We are discussing two different things, you are talking about post criminal convictions, I'm talking about being sued long before or in the absence of any criminal conviction. Nobody given the sensible advice would take a civil case to court risking 30K+ in legal fees if the alternative was to settle for $10k.
If you want to see the same mechanism at play study Workcover, or study how the CCCP leverages people into become spies, it's all about risk management. Why do you think companies settle or people relent, because the risk on the other side of the equation is too great.
You'd be a dead set dud if you legally advised someone to risk $30K, $50k or there house to save $10k, and it is in that margin that blokes like Lennon worked because they can. I suppose if you have cash to burn you can stand the high moral ground.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 24, 2025, 05:47:25 pm
We are discussing two different things, you are talking about post criminal convictions, I'm talking about being sued long before or in the absence of any criminal conviction. Nobody given the sensible advice would take a civil case to court risking 30K+ in legal fees if the alternative was to settle for $10k.
If you want to see the same mechanism at play study Workcover, or study how the CCCP leverages people into become spies, it's all about risk management. Why do you think companies settle or people relent, because the risk on the other side of the equation is too great.
You'd be a dead set dud if you legally advised someone to risk $30K, $50k or there house to save $10k, and it is in that margin that blokes like Lennon worked because they can. I suppose if you have cash to burn you can stand the high moral ground.
You cannot sue for injuries suffered while committing a crime EOS.
If you managed to get the case to court, it would be laughed out by the judge and/or jury.
“Just how did you injure your leg Mr Smith?”
“I was kicking in the door so we could do a burg yer honour.”
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: kruddler on October 24, 2025, 07:43:58 pm
We are discussing two different things, you are talking about post criminal convictions, I'm talking about being sued long before or in the absence of any criminal conviction. Nobody given the sensible advice would take a civil case to court risking 30K+ in legal fees if the alternative was to settle for $10k.
If you want to see the same mechanism at play study Workcover, or study how the CCCP leverages people into become spies, it's all about risk management. Why do you think companies settle or people relent, because the risk on the other side of the equation is too great.
You'd be a dead set dud if you legally advised someone to risk $30K, $50k or there house to save $10k, and it is in that margin that blokes like Lennon worked because they can. I suppose if you have cash to burn you can stand the high moral ground.
You cannot sue for injuries suffered while committing a crime EOS.
If you managed to get the case to court, it would be laughed out by the judge and/or jury.
“Just how did you injure your leg Mr Smith?”
“I was kicking in the door so we could do a burg yer honour.”
In Australia, correct. A lot different overseas
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 24, 2025, 11:02:47 pm
You cannot sue for injuries suffered while committing a crime EOS.
If you managed to get the case to court, it would be laughed out by the judge and/or jury.
“Just how did you injure your leg Mr Smith?”
“I was kicking in the door so we could do a burg yer honour.”
You haven't committed a crime until you are found guilty, at least here in Australia.
When there is a settlement there is no jury, no judge and not many questions, it all happens across a desk.
My recommendation is you have a long long calm chat with legal aid before you jump at a defence.
No lawyer would seek a settlement or advise their client to agree to a settlement for a damages claim arising from a criminal act.
What are our crime statistics based on? Incidents reported to police, not convictions.
A trespasser may sue if they were harmed by a man-trap, but with little chance of success. The law is very clear, there is no duty of care owed to a trespasser regardless of whether that trespasser is ever convicted of a crime.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on October 25, 2025, 01:13:20 pm
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 25, 2025, 01:58:48 pm
It is funny that the two States with the highest crime rates aren't getting the same attention as third placed Victoria ... not that I think all Governments couldn't do more.
Victoria is mainly suffering at the hands of under 6,000 crooks and you'd think that the police, courts and politicians could come up with a more effective way of curtailing their illegal activities.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on October 25, 2025, 02:59:26 pm
Victoria is mainly suffering at the hands of under 6,000 crooks and you'd think that the police, courts and politicians could come up with a more effective way of curtailing their illegal activities.
Easy solution….. order more machette bins.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on October 25, 2025, 03:20:51 pm
Thought this was kind of funny, and shows why all statistics regarding crime probably need to be handled with a bit of caution. They're not always equal. :D :D
Quote
The most common principal offences for police proceedings were:
fare evasion in New South Wales (26%) acts intended to cause injury in the Australian Capital Territory (29%), the Northern Territory (27%), and Victoria (22%) illicit drug offences in South Australia (25%) theft in Tasmania (24%), and Queensland (20%).
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on October 25, 2025, 04:31:38 pm
But Jacinta and her cronies say everything is fine.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Professer E on October 25, 2025, 06:41:29 pm
What a ******g sick joke....machete bins at what, $1M each. Impossible to justify
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: dodge on October 25, 2025, 09:17:44 pm
Or ~$2,400 each. It is not dividing the cost of the whole program by the number of bins. Not that the idea is a great one.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 25, 2025, 10:51:40 pm
Machete amnesty bins cost $2,400 each. The budget for the whole program - bins, advertising, collection, recycling, etc - is $13M, and there are 45 bins.
I was unhappy with little Johny Howard’s firearms ban - I lost my semi-auto .22 and 12 gauge - but I have to admit now that it was good public policy.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Professer E on October 26, 2025, 08:11:16 am
I had blackberries and other invasive weeds on our place and actually had a use for machetes and scrub hooks, but exemptions are too hard. The problem I have is that the perps don't hand in their stuff, so "In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king" so to speak with those types.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on October 26, 2025, 10:26:21 am
Machete amnesty bins cost $2,400 each. The budget for the whole program - bins, advertising, collection, recycling, etc - is $13M, and there are 45 bins.
I was unhappy with little Johny Howard’s firearms ban - I lost my semi-auto .22 and 12 gauge - but I have to admit now that it was good public policy.
oh my...
Are you actually comparing the success of Howards guns laws with Jacinta machete bin debacle?
And the 'cost' of implementing this totally useless policy was a staggering $13M - pls dont try and downplay it by saying the 'bins actual cost' was $2400 as that just makes the whole thing even worse! HTF do they 'waste' over $12M of OUR money on this rubbish. All while cutting hospitals funding.
How many potholes does 12M fix? Disgusting governance whichever way you look at it.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 26, 2025, 11:06:29 am
Machete amnesty bins cost $2,400 each. The budget for the whole program - bins, advertising, collection, recycling, etc - is $13M, and there are 45 bins.
I was unhappy with little Johny Howard’s firearms ban - I lost my semi-auto .22 and 12 gauge - but I have to admit now that it was good public policy.
oh my...
Are you actually comparing the success of Howards guns laws with Jacinta machete bin debacle?
And the 'cost' of implementing this totally useless policy was a staggering $13M - pls dont try and downplay it by saying the 'bins actual cost' was $2400 as that just makes the whole thing even worse! HTF do they 'waste' over $12M of OUR money on this rubbish. All while cutting hospitals funding.
How many potholes does 12M fix? Disgusting governance whichever way you look at it.
I did a firearms and prohibited weapons course last weekend. The VicPol officers presenting have a very different view of the machete ban and see it as $13M well spent. They are actually dealing with machete crime, but what would they know?
I’m exempted from the ban by the way, but I prefer to use other implements.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Professer E on October 26, 2025, 12:25:02 pm
Does a firearms and prohibited weapons course pavd the way to a firearms license, I need the old "destruction of vermin" clause on my place
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 26, 2025, 12:47:48 pm
Does a firearms and prohibited weapons course pavd the way to a firearms license, I need the old "destruction of vermin" clause on my place
No, this was an RSL course that I did as manager of the collection of memorabilia at our RSL.
I foolishly let my shooter's licence expire in the 2000s and had to dispose of my firearms. When we moved out of the burbs, I needed firearms again so I could control vermin at our place.
It was relatively simple to get a new shooter's licence. You have to complete an evening course run by VicPol and Sporting Shooters and answer every question correctly (with a bit of prompting from the instructors). My course was held at Waurn Ponds Police Station. You then have to apply for a licence and that includes getting someone to verify that you're a suitable person, have a genuine reason (vermin control or just hunting), and you have to be a member of Sporting Shooters or Field and Game. Your licence will be revoked if you let your membership lapse.
You have to have an approved gunsafe - and VicPol will come and check that your firearms are stored correctly - and then you can apply to purchase a firearm. The firearms dealer walks you through the process and it takes around a month to get permission to purchase. Any subsequent permits go through in a week or so. I bought my gunsafe and firearms from Wild Outdoors in North Shore but Bunnings sells gunsafes.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on October 26, 2025, 01:27:59 pm
The machete bins are a disgrace.
You could not hand one back with 0 recourse. Knife wielders will just pick up another sharp blade of a different size. Maybe something like a tomahawk axe for gardening and chopping wood.
Its not like the gun thing. Guns have a single purpose. To shoot.
The bins are simply about optics.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on October 26, 2025, 02:10:48 pm
You could not hand one back with 0 recourse. Knife wielders will just pick up another sharp blade of a different size. Maybe something like a tomahawk axe for gardening and chopping wood.
Its not like the gun thing. Guns have a single purpose. To shoot.
The bins are simply about optics.
Agree...The problem that I see is that the senior officials involved are not on the same page in terms of providing solutions and all have different ideas on how to solve the problem with the Government more interested in appeasing voters. The new Police Commissioner Mike Bush a Kiwi himself favours the NZ model which is characterised by crime prevention, steering low-level offenders away from the judicial system with diversions and warnings. However the Police Association(Union) have said "I think the courts are failing in their connection to community," Police Association of Victoria secretary Wayne Gatt told ABC Radio Melbourne. "There's a massive chasm between what the community expects and demands and what is delivered by the courts. "We need to stop making excuses and we need to toughen the hell up." Then you have senior police officers like Assistant Commissioner Robert Hill last week said Victorians were feeling unsafe and frustrated amid the ongoing crime crisis.He indicated police were frustrated too and "There is an unacceptable level of crime occurring in the state of Victoria. Our police members are doing a magnificent job, but we can't be everywhere," he said. He said appropriate consequences for wrongdoers would act as a decent deterrent. Then looking at community programs for young offenders you find the Government claiming they have increased funding to these agencies but Blake Edwards from The Youth Junction, a youth crime prevention organisation based in Sunshine in Victoria's West, said the service and partner organisations have had their funding reduced in recent years. He said at least 19 full-time roles working in youth case management and crime prevention initiatives had been cut across those organisations, which he estimated would impact 800 young people. "What we're seeing at the moment is a small number of young people committing a large number of crimes," he said. "So when we start taking away funding for the young people who are at risk of entering the justice system … my concern is that that small number who are committing a large number of crimes will grow substantially. "When there's 800 young people that no longer can access services in Melbourne's west, that certainly is concerning." He said the inconsistency in funding for crime prevention programs was also resulting in "poor outcomes for everybody". "When you're working with highly skilled, highly experienced practitioners, who are providing services on the ground, it means that they never have job security," he said. "It means that they are often leaving positions with three to six months of funding still left."
So IMO the system to deal with these issues is a mess with not much co-ordination and the machete bins etc are not really where the problem is and the affected parties are not on the same page. re: The Bins....I think the problem is all the decent folk will hand in their machetes/large knives etc but the smaller group of offenders wont and the idea is compromised by other States not having the same laws nation wide and the police cant control those who want to purchase them out of Victoria or by other shady means.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on October 26, 2025, 04:24:45 pm
Are you actually comparing the success of Howards guns laws with Jacinta machete bin debacle?
And the 'cost' of implementing this totally useless policy was a staggering $13M - pls dont try and downplay it by saying the 'bins actual cost' was $2400 as that just makes the whole thing even worse! HTF do they 'waste' over $12M of OUR money on this rubbish. All while cutting hospitals funding.
How many potholes does 12M fix? Disgusting governance whichever way you look at it.
I did a firearms and prohibited weapons course last weekend. The VicPol officers presenting have a very different view of the machete ban and see it as $13M well spent. They are actually dealing with machete crime, but what would they know?
I’m exempted from the ban by the way, but I prefer to use other implements.
sorry this is just rubbish talk.
i have quite a few police officers in the family and all jave the same thoughts and that is the current goverment is completely at odds with reality.
love to know honestly ‘how many’ officers actually gave you that opinion.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: madbluboy on October 26, 2025, 04:37:37 pm
You could not hand one back with 0 recourse. Knife wielders will just pick up another sharp blade of a different size. Maybe something like a tomahawk axe for gardening and chopping wood.
Its not like the gun thing. Guns have a single purpose. To shoot.
The bins are simply about optics.
I found some crazy looking mini axe in my mum's shed the other week. Looked like a viking weapon, she bought it off amazon to cut the branches off of some trees.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 26, 2025, 06:10:55 pm
I did a firearms and prohibited weapons course last weekend. The VicPol officers presenting have a very different view of the machete ban and see it as $13M well spent. They are actually dealing with machete crime, but what would they know?
I’m exempted from the ban by the way, but I prefer to use other implements.
sorry this is just rubbish talk.
i have quite a few police officers in the family and all jave the same thoughts and that is the current goverment is completely at odds with reality.
love to know honestly ‘how many’ officers actually gave you that opinion.
I suspect we all have a few police officers in the family. My late brother left as a detective sergeant and I was a military policeman and held an enforcement role throughout my civilian career. My cousin recently retired as a police dog handler. His sister was a policewoman for a while. My brother in law’s step daughters are policewomen. One of the officers killed in the Eastern Freeway tragedy was my nephew. Several members of my RSL branch are serving or former police officers and the local police regularly attend our meetings. Four mates from the Jeep Club are serving police officers and an old school friend who I occasionally catch up with recently retired with the rank of Inspector.
Of course, they don’t all have the same opinions but getting machetes and edged weapons off the streets is a priority for most.
Two police officers presented at the course and one spoke about the machete ban.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: cookie2 on October 26, 2025, 06:22:27 pm
Where do you stop though. Machetes are ugly weapons no doubt but just looking around the kitchen or garage there are some pretty fearsome alternatives. The problem goes way beyond the choice and availability of a particular weapon.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: kruddler on October 26, 2025, 07:49:28 pm
Where do you stop though. Machetes are ugly weapons no doubt but just looking around the kitchen or garage there are some pretty fearsome alternatives. The problem goes way beyond the choice and availability of a particular weapon.
Yep.
Its all about optics from the government. Look we made it safer. Meanwhile, large kitchen knives and butchers cleavers crime skyrockets instead.
I've seen more than my fair share of horror movies to know that anything can be used as a weapon.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 26, 2025, 08:04:43 pm
Where do you stop though. Machetes are ugly weapons no doubt but just looking around the kitchen or garage there are some pretty fearsome alternatives. The problem goes way beyond the choice and availability of a particular weapon.
Exactly Cookie - it's the people wielding the machetes that need to be dealt with. However, making it hard for them to get their hands on machetes, swords, knives, firearms, etc is part of the solution. Few, if any, social problems can be solved with just one preventative measure.
It's illegal to sell any knife to someone under 18 and it's illegal to carry any knife - even a multi-tool - unless you have a valid reason to do so, a chef taking his knives to work for example. That stops the law-abiding folk but may not stop the crooks. Fines and gaol time will discourage them as may family and peer pressure, education programs and proactive policing.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on October 28, 2025, 04:55:15 pm
From the HS ‘We need more prisons’: Pat, 76, woke with armed thugs inside her Brighton home A brave Brighton grandmother has described the moment she confronted two knife-wielding men inside her loungeroom in the latest Bayside home invasion — and issued a plea for the state to get the crime crisis under control.
A 76 year old lady, come on guys. This farken beyond a joke now.
But nah, Jacinta says it's all good, nothing to see here Pat. Get back in your box.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: dodge on October 28, 2025, 05:25:20 pm
Obviously, a 76 year old is vulnerable, but shouldn't be the driver for outrage. Yes, she will be affected in several different ways which may make her life difficult (eg fear of going out, recurring flashbacks, general feeling of being unsafe in her own home etc).
We have gone through several times on the site about solutions - prevention and rehab programs, stronger initial penalties and stronger consequences for broken penalties eg bail.
Then it is about funding and real effectiveness of these solutions - jail can be school to become a less worse crook.
The new Chief seems to be strong on prevention - more police presence on the streets and education. Be interesting to see the effect of the new bail laws that have just come into operation - I don't know what they are.
This all takes time. It won't be solved tomorrow.
Will it make a difference? Dunno. Youth crime seems to be much more brazen now - offenders don't care if there are alarms or cameras, whether it is 3am or 3pm, who sees them, whether there is anyone home etc. It will take time to turn this around.
The Liberal policy seems to be Jack's law (greater search powers on the street), rehab (school, post offending programs, mentoring), and if bail is broken, a holiday courtesy of the King is awaiting. Cynical me thinks that this won't make much difference and is a long way in the future.
Curious as to what it actually was or is that lead to the current situation - knowing what it is can help lead to the solution.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on October 28, 2025, 05:30:02 pm
Obviously, a 76 year old is vulnerable, but shouldn't be the driver for outrage. Yes, she will be affected in several different ways which may make her life difficult (eg fear of going out, recurring flashbacks, general feeling of being unsafe in her own home etc).
We have gone through several times on the site about solutions - prevention and rehab programs, stronger initial penalties and stronger consequences for broken penalties eg bail.
Then it is about funding and real effectiveness of these solutions - jail can be school to become a less worse crook.
The new Chief seems to be strong on prevention - more police presence on the streets and education. Be interesting to see the effect of the new bail laws that have just come into operation - I don't know what they are.
This all takes time. It won't be solved tomorrow.
Will it make a difference? Dunno. Youth crime seems to be much more brazen now - offenders don't care if there are alarms or cameras, whether it is 3am or 3pm, who sees them, whether there is anyone home etc. It will take time to turn this around.
The Liberal policy seems to be Jack's law (greater search powers on the street), rehab (school, post offending programs, mentoring), and if bail is broken, a holiday courtesy of the King is awaiting. Cynical me thinks that this won't make much difference and is a long way in the future.
Curious as to what it actually was or is that lead to the current situation - knowing what it is can help lead to the solution.
1. Organised crime gangs using youths to do the dirty work, mainly stealing high end cars to be used in subsequent crimes. They use kids because they know when they get caught, they are immediately released over and over again. 2. Youth Gangs - Imbeciles here copying the US gang culture, it's stepped up to another level (in both prevalence and level of violence) compared to what it was in years gone by.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on October 28, 2025, 05:43:24 pm
From the HS ‘We need more prisons’: Pat, 76, woke with armed thugs inside her Brighton home A brave Brighton grandmother has described the moment she confronted two knife-wielding men inside her loungeroom in the latest Bayside home invasion — and issued a plea for the state to get the crime crisis under control.
A 76 year old lady, come on guys. This farken beyond a joke now.
But nah, Jacinta says it's all good, nothing to see here Pat. Get back in your box.
Not a huge fan of Bec Judd but she was right pointing to a crime wave that had hit those wealthy bayside suburbs a couple of years ago and was calling for more police action. Dan Andrews dismissed her fears and it led to more private security firms being employed to look after those affected areas and it has that Sth African feel to it with their gated communities and clearly residents are having to take matters into their own hands which never ends well and if you want to live in those wealthy areas security is going to be an added cost unfortunately. When violence is used and weapons involved then Im calling that adult crimes are deserving of adult time in jail...yep more jails required unfortunately.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on October 28, 2025, 06:00:44 pm
While I'm bit reluctant to go here it is important....
There is often a reluctance to discuss ethnicity in terms of young offenders. Personally I see that reluctance as a barrier to solutions. The problem is some use it to demonise a group, but the issues of adaption to a completely different culture are extremely difficult for some young people, especially those exposed to the horrors in their countries of origin.
We often try to downplay that cultural aspect for political correctness, when it is at the heart of the issue. And the support and positive role models of elder members of that ethnic group can have a much greater impact than those enforcing rules and laws.
Youngsters, especially those with different cultural backgrounds tend to bond to like peers. I've spoken before about 'cultural waves' of different ethnic backgrounds in juvenile detention centres over the years and how they peak with immigration trends and then dissipate as that community settles and adapts.
Any solutions must include a total input from all stakeholders. It takes a village to raise a child.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: madbluboy on October 29, 2025, 06:38:15 am
Some punk tried to break into my mum's 2 hours ago.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on October 29, 2025, 08:06:39 am
Some punk tried to break into my mum's 2 hours ago.
Sorry to hear that MBB, hope she is ok and not too traumatized. Sad when older folk are not safe in their own home and when the system is weighted in favour of the punks it's not going to get any better as most of us know now.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: madbluboy on October 29, 2025, 09:09:35 am
He was spooked by the ring camera and was trying to cover his face and open the door at the same time. Mum was delayed in looking at her phone by about 5 minutes as she was asleep so he was long gone. Hopefully sometime soon he gets into the wrong house.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Baggers on October 29, 2025, 10:06:21 am
He was spooked by the ring camera and was trying to cover his face and open the door at the same time. Mum was delayed in looking at her phone by about 5 minutes as she was asleep so he was long gone. Hopefully sometime soon he gets into the wrong house.
I must confess, MBB, that I find myself really angered by what your mum had to endure. And other older folks in our community confronted by similar. When a society cannot care for its aged and infirmed (and children) properly, there is a major problem.
If the state govt doesn't come good with an increased police presence, and knowing how ex military folks think, we may well see vigilante groups pop up.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Professer E on October 29, 2025, 11:02:12 am
More low life filth polluting our once great state
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on October 29, 2025, 11:11:25 am
The major problem with law enforcement is that the only time you come across any component of it its in the form of a stationary speed camera parked on the side of the road in an suv.
Beyond that you'll see some psa's but there arent enough cops on the street to be a visual deterrent.
Add a growing gap between the have and have nots. The young people have nothing to aspire to. What are they working for? Home ownership? Good luck. They might be able to buy something somewhere far 50kms from the cbd. Careers? They'll spend their life commuting to go to work in a job they probably dont like (like the rest of us really, but at least we dont have a 2 hour commute in one direction to get there). Thats not to condone what is happening but all of a sudden a life of crime might actually be more fun.
Those moaning about our once great state as well, might want to have a think about how far away from Melbourne previous generations were situated. Now its beyond far. Go out to officer, mickleham, past Caroline Springs. Its not like what hawthorn used to be ten minutes from Toorak and south Yarra.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 29, 2025, 11:18:33 am
I don't wish to detract from the awful experience MBB's mother endured. It must have been terrifying and the scumbag should be dealt with very harshly. I just want to raise another example of lawlessness that could have had tragic consequences.
Grubb Road runs from Ocean Grove to Drysdale and runs through residential areas, industrial and retail zones, and agricultural land. It is two lanes, has intersections with traffic lights, roundabouts and stop and give way signs and the speed limit varies from 50-80kph depending on the surroundings. It is a busy road and always has a constant stream of traffic in both directions. I travel on it almost daily.
Police recently observed a Haval Jolion travelling at 82kph in a 60kph zone on Grubb Road. When the police attempted to pull the Haval over, the driver sped off, reaching a top speed of 144kph in the 80kph zone. The Haval overtook when unsafe and forced oncoming traffic to take evasive action.
The driver was apprehended and has been charged on summons for driving at a dangerous speed, dangerous driving while being pursued by police as well as other traffic offenses. The driver was a woman in her twenties.
Apart from the utter disregard for the safety of other motorists and the futility of attempting to flee after a traffic infringement - particularly in a Haval Jolion - exceeding the speed limit by 60kph should incur an immediate 12 month automatic license suspension. Perhaps this did happen and the summons is to address the other serious traffic infringements but I really don't want to share the road with this irresponsible moron ... ever!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Professer E on October 29, 2025, 11:25:00 am
I'm tired of excuses for perpetrators. Break into a property.....castle law. Drive 60 km over the speed limit....do time. No more excuses, no more touchy feely bullcrap. If you can't take responsibility for your actions, face real consequences.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on October 29, 2025, 11:34:28 am
Worst part of speeding is, time it wrong amd you get a fine. I got one recently cost 300 dollars for 54 in a 50 zone on a road that used to be 60. Stationary 4wd, Saturday night 11.30pm on the way home. No excuse, but I was on the way home from dinner and Bolton Street is the only stretch thats 50km from templestowe to Diamond Creek road. Used to be 60km. Less of this please. Not helpful to anyone but the government purse.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: cookie2 on October 29, 2025, 12:28:11 pm
Worst part of speeding is, time it wrong amd you get a fine. I got one recently cost 300 dollars for 54 in a 50 zone on a road that used to be 60. Stationary 4wd, Saturday night 11.30pm on the way home. No excuse, but I was on the way home from dinner and Bolton Street is the only stretch thats 50km from templestowe to Diamond Creek road. Used to be 60km. Less of this please. Not helpful to anyone but the government purse.
Used to live near there and Bolton St was and still is a farce. After years of squabbling between Nillumbik and State it was finally revamped over a very long period of time for no improvement imo and the 50 limit remains.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on October 29, 2025, 01:09:23 pm
Standard of driving in Melbourne has got worse, everyday you drive to are having to think ahead, anticipate poor driving and be over cautious . Nearly got hit in a roundabout today carrying one of my grandsons by an Nissan X Trail that didn't stop and just plowed through at speed. Parking is my other gripe, why can't people park in the bay between the lines instead of on the line or encroaching on the other bay.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on October 29, 2025, 01:43:19 pm
Like the lying Dictator before her Jacinta is not willing to listen or acknowledge anything is wrong despite the statistics clearly showing how bad things are getting across the state on majority of the important issues such as the souring crime rates amongst our youth.
They closed Malmsbury youth justice centre 2 years ago and now are forced to re-opening it yet when quizzed they said 'it was the correct decision 2 years ago to close it and its the correct decision now to re open it'
Very sad state of affairs we are forced to live in when you have such incompetent so called 'leaders' in power.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 29, 2025, 02:37:51 pm
Malmsbury, one of the best bakeries in the state and the hottest speed gun in town, made Doc Holiday look slow on the draw!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: kruddler on October 29, 2025, 05:24:51 pm
Worst part of speeding is, time it wrong amd you get a fine. I got one recently cost 300 dollars for 54 in a 50 zone on a road that used to be 60. Stationary 4wd, Saturday night 11.30pm on the way home. No excuse, but I was on the way home from dinner and Bolton Street is the only stretch thats 50km from templestowe to Diamond Creek road. Used to be 60km. Less of this please. Not helpful to anyone but the government purse.
Bolton Street, the road that is up and down like a roller coaster and they had a radar there? That's BS.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on October 30, 2025, 08:40:56 am
Appalling, divisive and racist policy. Hoping this is not true
Yes, if true, a policy or triage stupidity. But I do muse to myself... Over how many decades were 'whites' prioritized over indigenous folks!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on October 30, 2025, 10:51:51 am
Another nothing burger "scoop". How shocking that a google search reveals this story shows up only in the Newscorpse press and other egregiously trashy tabloids.
The article gives a perfectly clear and reasonable explanation for the policy, but then you'd have to move beyond the rage bait headline and sensationalist wording and reporting of the article.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on October 30, 2025, 11:27:53 am
Appalling, divisive and racist policy. Hoping this is not true
Yes, if true, a policy or triage stupidity. But I do muse to myself... Over how many decades were 'whites' prioritized over indigenous folks!
two wrongs dont make a right Baggers.
"The triaging of patients should be done on medical need, not based on the colour of your skin,”
Direct quite from the article. Short sharp and to the point. Category 3 patients are usually those who rock up with a broken leg. Not urgent, in pain, so giving them priority over other cat 3, 4, 5 patients is not necessarily going to cause life threatening issues, but it will fast track them over folks who have been waiting. Where this becomes problematic is when the sla for cat 4 and 5 patients is not being met.
Also this doesnt close an equality gap it creates one. The point of racism is to eliminate the difference not create gaps.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on October 30, 2025, 11:29:19 am
Another nothing burger "scoop". How shocking that a google search reveals this story shows up only in the Newscorpse press and other egregiously trashy tabloids.
The article gives a perfectly clear and reasonable explanation for the policy, but then you'd have to move beyond the rage bait headline and sensationalist wording and reporting of the article.
does that mean left leaning papers just dont consider it newsworthy?
Beware the echo chamber.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on October 30, 2025, 11:35:37 am
does that mean left leaning papers just dont consider it newsworthy?
Beware the echo chamber.
Newscorpse has a very well understood and documented approach to "news." It's not really a left or right issue. To characterize news outlets as simply left or right is IMO a mischaracterization.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 30, 2025, 12:03:24 pm
It would be wrong to triage patients on the basis of ethnicity ... unless there was an evidence-based reason for doing so.
The evidence is that Indigenous patients were waiting much longer than non-Indigenous patients at St Vincents and the hospital took action to improve their access to health care.
St Vincents in Sydney has a similar policy and "the rate of incomplete treatment among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients fell from 19.5% to 5.2% of presentations - a five-fold decrease. No decrease in benchmarked provision of care levels for non-Aboriginal patients was seen after the implementation."
There hasn't been a racist outburst over the Sydney St Vincents policy and procedures, perhaps because it has been explained in simple terms.
You can read about it here: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/healthcare-variation/user-guide-reviewing-clinical-variation/case-studies/reducing-incomplete-treatment-ed-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-patients
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: tonyo on October 30, 2025, 01:06:45 pm
does that mean left leaning papers just dont consider it newsworthy?
Beware the echo chamber.
Newscorpse has a very well understood and documented approach to "news." It's not really a left or right issue. To characterize news outlets as simply left or right is IMO a mischaracterization.
Newscorp is becoming increasingly biased - they stopped being a media organisation long ago, and now specialise in trying to manipulate consumers into their world view.
When does news end, and opinion begin? That line is very blurry in the halls of Newscorp organisations......
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 30, 2025, 03:25:19 pm
It’s also worth noting that Indigenous Australians make up less than 4% of the population. Even if they are over represented in public hospital presentations, triaging every Indigenous patient as Category 1 would have minimal impact on the quality and promptness of the care provided to non-Indigenous patients.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on October 30, 2025, 04:30:48 pm
Those who won't allow to be seen as leaning one way or another but like clockwork claim 'fake news' on all matters against their beliefs.
If you want to debunk the link i put on go right ahead but the discussion i raised has been all over the news on several platforms - as we know certain sections of the media go quiet on matters against their followers bias. It's 100% happens on both sides of politics but its assuming how old mate Trump was ridiculed for calling out media outlets as 'Fake news' yet those disputing his calls are the first to do exactly the same when the shoe is on the other foot.
I quickly googled the topic and there is pages and pages and more pages of different sources all discussing it - are they all fake?
It’s also worth noting that Indigenous Australians make up less than 4% of the population. Even if they are over-represented in public hospital presentations, triaging every Indigenous patient as Category 1 would have minimal impact on the quality and promptness of the care provided to non-Indigenous patients.
That's no excuse and not the point.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on October 30, 2025, 05:28:33 pm
"Those" who think that such distinguished news outlets as The Daily Mail, 2GB, The Spectator, Herald Sun, Fox News, Sky News, and distinguished individuals like Douglas Murray, are going to provide a broad spectrum of opinion, are going to interrogate the data legitimately, are representing some kind of legitimate discourse,.......Maybe "those" should actually listen to and read those discussions first.
"Those" who are very concerned about pot holes and the slim possibility that a brown person may, with genuine reason, be given preferential medical treatment, because in a properly functioning, supposedly Christian society, giving assistance and offering preferential options to the poorest and most vulnerable among us, is in fact a good thing and to be encouraged, not to be used as fodder for rage baiting.
Maybe "those" should sit this one out.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 30, 2025, 05:46:24 pm
It’s also worth noting that Indigenous Australians make up less than 4% of the population. Even if they are over-represented in public hospital presentations, triaging every Indigenous patient as Category 1 would have minimal impact on the quality and promptness of the care provided to non-Indigenous patients.
That's no excuse and not the point.
It’s not meant to be an excuse because good public policy doesn’t need to be excused.
It is the point though because hospitals have taken steps to address a failure to care for a small and vulnerable cohort without any negative impacts on the care provided to everyone else.
Don’t be sucked in by the righteous outrage of the Murdoch media. Find the facts … it’s not that hard.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on October 30, 2025, 06:15:35 pm
It’s not meant to be an excuse because good public policy doesn’t need to be excused.
It is the point though because hospitals have taken steps to address a failure to care for a small and vulnerable cohort without any negative impacts on the care provided to everyone else.
Don’t be sucked in by the righteous outrage of the Murdoch media. Find the facts … it’s not that hard.
Longer waiting times are a negative impact for non indigenous patients as will the extra load that other Hospital ED's like Royal Melbourne will have when patients bypass St Vincents for fear of extra long waiting periods. This is Victoria, Australia not Sth Africa, Jacinta doing her best impression of PW Botha and creating an Apartheid fix where we have skin colour as the criteria for when citizens receive treatment shows how far this state has slipped into the abyss. Whats next, donor organs being issued to patients based on colour or race?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: madbluboy on October 30, 2025, 06:19:55 pm
Obviously if you are white don't go to emergency there.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on October 30, 2025, 06:43:24 pm
It’s not meant to be an excuse because good public policy doesn’t need to be excused.
It is the point though because hospitals have taken steps to address a failure to care for a small and vulnerable cohort without any negative impacts on the care provided to everyone else.
Don’t be sucked in by the righteous outrage of the Murdoch media. Find the facts … it’s not that hard.
And where do i find the 'not that hard facts' that is going to confirm my original post was all made up by Murdoch media?
Please enlighten me.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on October 30, 2025, 06:53:34 pm
The whole atricle is worth a read, but I highlight the following :
The organisation also noted that efforts to make emergency departments culturally safe began under Victoria's previous Liberal Government through the Koolin Balit strategy, the first to explicitly address racism in public hospitals.
"VACCHO applauded that Liberal Government when Koolin Balit was launched, and we remind the current Liberal Party that it was a legacy to be proud of," the spokesperson said, calling the Opposition's recent comments a "shameful betrayal of a legacy of bipartisanship"..............................
VACCHO's Executive Director of Population Health, Abe Ropitini, said targeted action to improve Aboriginal cultural safety in emergency departments began under the previous Liberal Government - a legacy "they should be proud of, because it was a serious commitment to Closing the Gap".
"It is disappointing they have traded in that legacy for race baiting and punching down on our most vulnerable people," Mr Ropitini said.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on October 30, 2025, 06:56:33 pm
The whole atricle is worth a read, but I highlight the following :
The organisation also noted that efforts to make emergency departments culturally safe began under Victoria's previous Liberal Government through the Koolin Balit strategy, the first to explicitly address racism in public hospitals.
"VACCHO applauded that Liberal Government when Koolin Balit was launched, and we remind the current Liberal Party that it was a legacy to be proud of," the spokesperson said, calling the Opposition's recent comments a "shameful betrayal of a legacy of bipartisanship"..............................
VACCHO's Executive Director of Population Health, Abe Ropitini, said targeted action to improve Aboriginal cultural safety in emergency departments began under the previous Liberal Government - a legacy "they should be proud of, because it was a serious commitment to Closing the Gap".
"It is disappointing they have traded in that legacy for race baiting and punching down on our most vulnerable people," Mr Ropitini said.
You shut down 7 different media platforms being Murdoch click bait rubbish 'in your eyes' then go on to quote from an indigenous media source on an indigenous favored policy?
I think thats its from me on this matter.
Really?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on October 30, 2025, 07:07:18 pm
You shut down 7 different media platforms being Murdoch click bait rubbish 'in your eyes' then go on to quote from an indigenous media source on an indigenous favored policy?
I think thats its from me on this matter.
Really?
Did you read the article ?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 30, 2025, 07:21:18 pm
It is the point though because hospitals have taken steps to address a failure to care for a small and vulnerable cohort without any negative impacts on the care provided to everyone else.
The only concern I have over this is the question of who is indigenous.
In my direct personal experience, I know of people claiming Federal benefits because the local mob declared them as members of the mob, despite not have a drop of indigenous heritage. Then another segment of the same mob use access to those benefits as a form of blackmail, skimming "a donation" of the top in return for silence.
If we leave the classification of such matters to hearsay and opinion, the dark side of humanity will prevail, it has to be more formal.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 30, 2025, 07:54:14 pm
It is the point though because hospitals have taken steps to address a failure to care for a small and vulnerable cohort without any negative impacts on the care provided to everyone else.
The only concern I have over this is the question of who is indigenous.
In my direct personal experience, I know of people claiming Federal benefits because the local mob declared them as members of the mob, despite not have a drop of indigenous heritage. Then another segment of the same mob use access to those benefits as a form of blackmail, skimming "a donation" of the top in return for silence.
If we leave the classification of such matters to hearsay and opinion, the dark side of humanity will prevail, it has to be more formal.
LP, you know that I worked in Indigenous affairs for over 30 years and that's not how the system works. For a start, what "Federal benefits" would they be claiming? With some exceptions, like Abstudy, Indigenous Australians access the same Centrelink payments as everyone else. Skimming Centrelink payments wouldn't be a very lucrative form of blackmail.
In my experience, the mob is very quick to expose anyone who falsely claims to be Indigenous. For example, see Michael Mansell's rejection of Bruce Pascoe's claim of Tasmanian Aboriginal ancestry: https://tasmaniantimes.com/2020/01/bruce-pascoe-is-not-aboriginal/
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 30, 2025, 08:09:11 pm
It’s not meant to be an excuse because good public policy doesn’t need to be excused.
Do you really believe this - If Trump did a similar thing would you call it good policy. Don't bother answering that.
And btw racism is racism regardless of which skin colour is the one being discriminated against
I won't bother answering your Taco question because we have another thread dedicated to the shenanigans of the senile, misogynistic, convicted felon who is making such a balls up of his second go at playing at being POTUS.
Yes, racism isn't confined to folk of a particular skin colour, it's much more than that.
"Racism is the process by which systems and policies, actions and attitudes create inequitable opportunities and outcomes for people based on race. Racism is more than just prejudice in thought or action. It occurs when this prejudice – whether individual or institutional – is accompanied by the power to discriminate against, oppress or limit the rights of others."
The key point there is that racism is prejudice by those with power over others, such as that exercised by the Chinese government against the Uyghurs and Tibetans. Ensuring that an ethnic minority has equal access to health care is affirmative action, not racism.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Baggers on October 30, 2025, 08:25:15 pm
Yes, if true, a policy or triage stupidity. But I do muse to myself... Over how many decades were 'whites' prioritized over indigenous folks!
two wrongs dont make a right Baggers.
"The triaging of patients should be done on medical need, not based on the colour of your skin,”
Direct quite from the article. Short sharp and to the point. Category 3 patients are usually those who rock up with a broken leg. Not urgent, in pain, so giving them priority over other cat 3, 4, 5 patients is not necessarily going to cause life threatening issues, but it will fast track them over folks who have been waiting. Where this becomes problematic is when the sla for cat 4 and 5 patients is not being met.
Also this doesnt close an equality gap it creates one. The point of racism is to eliminate the difference not create gaps.
I think you misunderstood my tongue in cheek post. Not for one second would I support any notion of triage favouring anything other than medical need.
Like Pauly I read the article which stunk of beat up, manipulation, click-bait and any number of shallow, foolish motives. Pardon the pun, but sickening 'journalism.'
My tongue in cheek comment was in relation to if it were true... the outrage is huge... and pregnant with hypocrisy when considering treatment of indigenous folks. Simply a musing on my part.
Yes, triage, I emphasize, is about prioritizing patients in terms of needs... not hair colour, personal wealth, religion, race, ear size or any other irrelevancy.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on October 30, 2025, 09:33:53 pm
Do you really believe this - If Trump did a similar thing would you call it good policy. Don't bother answering that.
And btw racism is racism regardless of which skin colour is the one being discriminated against
I won't bother answering your Taco question because we have another thread dedicated to the shenanigans of the senile, misogynistic, convicted felon who is making such a balls up of his second go at playing at being POTUS.
Yes, racism isn't confined to folk of a particular skin colour, it's much more than that.
"Racism is the process by which systems and policies, actions and attitudes create inequitable opportunities and outcomes for people based on race. Racism is more than just prejudice in thought or action. It occurs when this prejudice – whether individual or institutional – is accompanied by the power to discriminate against, oppress or limit the rights of others."
The key point there is that racism is prejudice by those with power over others, such as that exercised by the Chinese government against the Uyghurs and Tibetans. Ensuring that an ethnic minority has equal access to health care is affirmative action, not racism.
this is not affirmative action.
If i walk in to this ED and an indigenous bloke walkS in, both with category 4 classification, EXACT SAME ISSUE, he goes first because he's indigenous even though I was triaged before him. He gets upgraded to category 3.
Effectively they're fast tracked based on race. Seems fair....
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 30, 2025, 09:59:56 pm
I won't bother answering your Taco question because we have another thread dedicated to the shenanigans of the senile, misogynistic, convicted felon who is making such a balls up of his second go at playing at being POTUS.
Yes, racism isn't confined to folk of a particular skin colour, it's much more than that.
"Racism is the process by which systems and policies, actions and attitudes create inequitable opportunities and outcomes for people based on race. Racism is more than just prejudice in thought or action. It occurs when this prejudice – whether individual or institutional – is accompanied by the power to discriminate against, oppress or limit the rights of others."
The key point there is that racism is prejudice by those with power over others, such as that exercised by the Chinese government against the Uyghurs and Tibetans. Ensuring that an ethnic minority has equal access to health care is affirmative action, not racism.
this is not affirmative action.
If i walk in to this ED and an indigenous bloke walkS in, both with category 4 classification, EXACT SAME ISSUE, he goes first because he's indigenous even though I was triaged before him. He gets upgraded to category 3.
Effectively they're fast tracked based on race. Seems fair....
He is fast tracked because his chances of a good outcome are lower than yours, because of his race.
But what are the chances of an Indigenous Australian walking into an ED at the same time as you? I bet that it will never happen in your hopefully very long lifetime.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: northernblue on October 30, 2025, 10:59:24 pm
I won't bother answering your Taco question because we have another thread dedicated to the shenanigans of the senile, misogynistic, convicted felon who is making such a balls up of his second go at playing at being POTUS.
Yes, racism isn't confined to folk of a particular skin colour, it's much more than that.
"Racism is the process by which systems and policies, actions and attitudes create inequitable opportunities and outcomes for people based on race. Racism is more than just prejudice in thought or action. It occurs when this prejudice – whether individual or institutional – is accompanied by the power to discriminate against, oppress or limit the rights of others."
The key point there is that racism is prejudice by those with power over others, such as that exercised by the Chinese government against the Uyghurs and Tibetans. Ensuring that an ethnic minority has equal access to health care is affirmative action, not racism.
this is not affirmative action.
If i walk in to this ED and an indigenous bloke walkS in, both with category 4 classification, EXACT SAME ISSUE, he goes first because he's indigenous even though I was triaged before him. He gets upgraded to category 3.
Effectively they're fast tracked based on race. Seems fair....
Mate, they die younger, they live sicker lives. Come up and visit me and you’ll see that 40-70% of the NT mob are wrapped in filthy bandages despite the medical professions best efforts. We are not discussing intelligent well educated and articulate people like say Ernie Dingo here, we are discussing the downtrodden. If you and he presented simultaneously you would both recieve the same treatment as (relatively) young fit healthy men, of this I have no doubt. Certainly so here in the Territory.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on October 31, 2025, 07:56:45 am
The article I presented earlier from the NI Times makes clear this policy has been a bipartisan initiative starting with the last Liberal government, which was 2014. Which means that in some format (discussion, planning, implementation) it has been around for over a decade. And in that time, no one noticed the grave injustice being proposed / inflicted upon non indigenous people. And the reason no one noticed is because there is nothing to notice. Just another beat up, nothing trying desperately to be something, based on racist fear mongering, lies, manipulation of facts, and the stoking of hatred and division. Just like the Voice referendum.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 31, 2025, 08:57:33 am
Let's hear from St Vincents:
"Hi everyone, Many of you will be aware of media coverage over the last few days related to our Emergency Department (ED) and our efforts to deliver fairer health outcomes for First Nations patients. I wanted to share a brief message with you to explain what we’re doing and why. Across almost every indicator, First Nations Australians experience worse health outcomes than non-Indigenous Australians. Research conducted in St Vincent’s Melbourne’s ED showed First Nations patients were three times more likely to leave without being seen than non-Indigenous patients. First Nations patients were also waiting, on average, three times longer compared to non-Indigenous patients. But our research also showed that First Nations patients were more likely to remain engaged with their care if seen within their first hour in the ED. We’ve been working to address this issue for many years, but in April 2024, we took a new approach and implemented what’s known as a Minimum Category Three Triage policy. The idea is straightforward: in an ED, patients assigned as being ‘Category Three’ receive medical assessment and start their treatment within 30 minutes of arrival. Under our policy, we now assign a minimum Category 3 to all First Nations patients so that they begin their treatment promptly and to minimise the risk of disengagement and poorer health outcomes.
The results have been outstanding. Since introduction, we have successfully closed the gap in ED wait times between First Nations and non-Indigenous patients. While there is still much work to do, that is something to celebrate. Let me be very clear about what this approach does not do… It has not affected overall wait times in the ED. Analysis of our approach – which concerns only a small number of First Nations patients in the ED each day – shows it has had no impact on overall ED flow. Patients presenting with a serious or life-threatening emergency – regardless of their background – will always be seen first. That's what ED triage is designed to do. We can do both. We’ve arranged our resources and processes so that the small number of First Nations patients in our ED don’t have their care delayed for longer than 30 minutes, while also making sure that the most urgent cases are still seen as a priority. We've closed the gap between two groups without negatively affecting either. This is what good healthcare looks like. The St Vincent’s mission has always been about helping people who face barriers to accessing quality healthcare. That’s who we are. It’s what defines us. And it’s core to this approach. I’m proud of what we’ve been able to achieve. I’m proud of our Aboriginal Health Liaison Team, our Emergency Department team, and all our staff who continue to show leadership through initiatives like this. While there has been much said over the past few days, please know that we will continue to advocate for what is right and for evidence-based healthcare. And if you’ve found the last few days upsetting, please approach your manager, colleagues, or our EAP service should you need assistance.
Kind regards, Nicole"
Evidence-based healthcare that has closed the gap between two groups without negatively affecting either? That's got to be grounds for racist outrage!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: northernblue on October 31, 2025, 09:20:23 am
"Hi everyone, Many of you will be aware of media coverage over the last few days related to our Emergency Department (ED) and our efforts to deliver fairer health outcomes for First Nations patients. I wanted to share a brief message with you to explain what we’re doing and why. Across almost every indicator, First Nations Australians experience worse health outcomes than non-Indigenous Australians. Research conducted in St Vincent’s Melbourne’s ED showed First Nations patients were three times more likely to leave without being seen than non-Indigenous patients. First Nations patients were also waiting, on average, three times longer compared to non-Indigenous patients. But our research also showed that First Nations patients were more likely to remain engaged with their care if seen within their first hour in the ED. We’ve been working to address this issue for many years, but in April 2024, we took a new approach and implemented what’s known as a Minimum Category Three Triage policy. The idea is straightforward: in an ED, patients assigned as being ‘Category Three’ receive medical assessment and start their treatment within 30 minutes of arrival. Under our policy, we now assign a minimum Category 3 to all First Nations patients so that they begin their treatment promptly and to minimise the risk of disengagement and poorer health outcomes.
The results have been outstanding. Since introduction, we have successfully closed the gap in ED wait times between First Nations and non-Indigenous patients. While there is still much work to do, that is something to celebrate. Let me be very clear about what this approach does not do… It has not affected overall wait times in the ED. Analysis of our approach – which concerns only a small number of First Nations patients in the ED each day – shows it has had no impact on overall ED flow. Patients presenting with a serious or life-threatening emergency – regardless of their background – will always be seen first. That's what ED triage is designed to do. We can do both. We’ve arranged our resources and processes so that the small number of First Nations patients in our ED don’t have their care delayed for longer than 30 minutes, while also making sure that the most urgent cases are still seen as a priority. We've closed the gap between two groups without negatively affecting either. This is what good healthcare looks like. The St Vincent’s mission has always been about helping people who face barriers to accessing quality healthcare. That’s who we are. It’s what defines us. And it’s core to this approach. I’m proud of what we’ve been able to achieve. I’m proud of our Aboriginal Health Liaison Team, our Emergency Department team, and all our staff who continue to show leadership through initiatives like this. While there has been much said over the past few days, please know that we will continue to advocate for what is right and for evidence-based healthcare. And if you’ve found the last few days upsetting, please approach your manager, colleagues, or our EAP service should you need assistance.
Kind regards, Nicole"
Evidence-based healthcare that has closed the gap between two groups without negatively affecting either? That's got to be grounds for racist outrage!
I’m triggered… 🙄
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 31, 2025, 09:46:07 am
I should say that Nicole’s response is overdue. The weasel word responses from the Victorian Government have fanned the flames and they should have been on the front foot as soon as the Murdoch media sought to foment outrage.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on October 31, 2025, 11:10:19 am
If i walk in to this ED and an indigenous bloke walkS in, both with category 4 classification, EXACT SAME ISSUE, he goes first because he's indigenous even though I was triaged before him. He gets upgraded to category 3.
Effectively they're fast tracked based on race. Seems fair....
Mate, they die younger, they live sicker lives. Come up and visit me and you’ll see that 40-70% of the NT mob are wrapped in filthy bandages despite the medical professions best efforts. We are not discussing intelligent well educated and articulate people like say Ernie Dingo here, we are discussing the downtrodden. If you and he presented simultaneously you would both recieve the same treatment as (relatively) young fit healthy men, of this I have no doubt. Certainly so here in the Territory.
st Vincent's is not solely in the NT.
So are we saying they dont want to wait like the rest of us are forced to?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 31, 2025, 11:44:20 am
Mate, they die younger, they live sicker lives. Come up and visit me and you’ll see that 40-70% of the NT mob are wrapped in filthy bandages despite the medical professions best efforts. We are not discussing intelligent well educated and articulate people like say Ernie Dingo here, we are discussing the downtrodden. If you and he presented simultaneously you would both recieve the same treatment as (relatively) young fit healthy men, of this I have no doubt. Certainly so here in the Territory.
st Vincent's is not solely in the NT.
So are we saying they dont want to wait like the rest of us are forced to?
Did you miss “First Nations patients were also waiting, on average, three times longer compared to non-Indigenous patients.”?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on October 31, 2025, 12:12:47 pm
So are we saying they dont want to wait like the rest of us are forced to?
Did you miss “First Nations patients were also waiting, on average, three times longer compared to non-Indigenous patients.”?
I didnt miss this claim. In fact there is no way to substantiate that and its precisely what someone defending this move would say irrespective of whether or not its fair.
Thing is, why is that the case? Why are they waiting longer? Is it because the data is skewed by hospitals in areas where there is more indigenous people being treated than not?
More questions than answers out of the claim. So by doing this in metro hospitals they treat the minority as priority to paper over not enough health care institutions in remote communities where the majority of indigenous patients presents skewing the data?
Is that the right outcome? Or more manipulation of the books to satisfy criteria?
Ultimately i dont know how anyone can defend a policy where an ethnic group is treated differently to others for right or wrong reasons. Sounds like they cant be bothered fixing the real reasons the issue exists and are papering over the cracks to me.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: madbluboy on October 31, 2025, 12:26:40 pm
If St Vincent's were making indigenous wait 3 times longer because they're indigenous then they should be shut down.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 31, 2025, 12:46:33 pm
LP, you know that I worked in Indigenous affairs for over 30 years and that's not how the system works. For a start, what "Federal benefits" would they be claiming? With some exceptions, like Abstudy, Indigenous Australians access the same Centrelink payments as everyone else. Skimming Centrelink payments wouldn't be a very lucrative form of blackmail.
In my experience, the mob is very quick to expose anyone who falsely claims to be Indigenous. For example, see Michael Mansell's rejection of Bruce Pascoe's claim of Tasmanian Aboriginal ancestry: https://tasmaniantimes.com/2020/01/bruce-pascoe-is-not-aboriginal/
Yes, I understand all this, and I do not want to hijack this debate. My point is more about the elimination of subjectivity in the assessment, not whether or not it is actually needed.
If St Vincent's were making indigenous wait 3 times longer because they're indigenous then they should be shut down.
On the specific issue, like the St Vincent's study, there are stats and then there are damn stats and lies, which feeds back into my doubts. You can take the numbers and make them say whatever you want through flexible categorisation or cherry-picking categories that paint a picture towards your desired conclusion.
For example, I was made aware was one of the key reasons for waiting for treatment in general is alcohol abuse preventing immediate treatment. So if you have a small subset that is categorised differently because of the choice of category they will show up strongly despite there being no embedded systematic discrimination. The root of the problem is then not really the system, but the social driver that causes alcoholism. So if the group you analyse has a higher percentage representation in terms of presenting under the influence of alcohol they will show up strongly.
Alcohol is a great example because some ethic groups present with a greater percentage allergic to alcohol, if you analyse treatments that delayed or denied due to alcohol allergy, without listing the alcohol allergy as a cause, the numbers will show up as Asians being discriminated against.
Like most stats, the problems are not the numbers, but how the numbers get interpreted, the conclusions drawn and the politics. The sad thing is that the politicians and media know this, they just choose not to communicate it because clear explanations do not rate.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on October 31, 2025, 01:04:01 pm
You have one disadvantaged group whose health outcomes are improved because of this policy, and other advantaged groups whose health outcomes are the same as a result of this policy.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on October 31, 2025, 01:12:45 pm
You have one disadvantaged group whose health outcomes are improved because of this policy, and other advantaged groups whose health outcomes are the same as a result of this policy.
I don't think anyone is genuinely disadvantaged, but I also fear the reason for the change is not really a reason at all!
If we first subset the health study by alcoholics, then subset the alcoholics by ethnicity, we will see biases appear but they aren't or may not be genuine biases as they are created by the selection of categories. If you remove the alcoholism from the figures and present the remaining data you have manufactured a bias that appears social or racist.
However, it could be argued if you swiftly promote someone to admission who you cannot yet begin treating, you will potentially be consuming a bed waiting for the opportunity to treat. In this case maybe someone is disadvantaged, but at the bare minimum you have created waste and inefficiency.
I would think in a resource stretched system the case for the "good of the many" suggests greater throughput.
I could be even more cynical, and suggest administrators see this as a way of getting increased funding, they need more resources to maintain or improvement treatment levels in the face of a "systematic bias"! ;) The Admins certainly know politicians won't make decisions that negatively impact their constituency.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: northernblue on October 31, 2025, 03:10:15 pm
Mate, they die younger, they live sicker lives. Come up and visit me and you’ll see that 40-70% of the NT mob are wrapped in filthy bandages despite the medical professions best efforts. We are not discussing intelligent well educated and articulate people like say Ernie Dingo here, we are discussing the downtrodden. If you and he presented simultaneously you would both recieve the same treatment as (relatively) young fit healthy men, of this I have no doubt. Certainly so here in the Territory.
st Vincent's is not solely in the NT.
So are we saying they dont want to wait like the rest of us are forced to?
st V isn’t in the nt. What I’m saying is that if a white one and a black one present with the same problem the black one is more likely to die, statistically.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on October 31, 2025, 03:39:08 pm
So are we saying they dont want to wait like the rest of us are forced to?
st V isn’t in the nt. What I’m saying is that if a white one and a black one present with the same problem the black one is more likely to die, statistically.
That's a presumption based on General rule of thumb and I accept that and the statistics but there will be cases when the white fella might have a poor medical history himself which isn't going to be apparent to a time poor under pressure triage nurse asking the usual basic triage questions ie what's your problem today, pain level, medications, and check the vitals. Unless you have patient history from previous visits if any then you are guessing..
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on October 31, 2025, 03:47:54 pm
Did you miss “First Nations patients were also waiting, on average, three times longer compared to non-Indigenous patients.”?
I didnt miss this claim. In fact there is no way to substantiate that and its precisely what someone defending this move would say irrespective of whether or not its fair.
Thing is, why is that the case? Why are they waiting longer? Is it because the data is skewed by hospitals in areas where there is more indigenous people being treated than not?
More questions than answers out of the claim. So by doing this in metro hospitals they treat the minority as priority to paper over not enough health care institutions in remote communities where the majority of indigenous patients presents skewing the data?
Is that the right outcome? Or more manipulation of the books to satisfy criteria?
Ultimately i dont know how anyone can defend a policy where an ethnic group is treated differently to others for right or wrong reasons. Sounds like they cant be bothered fixing the real reasons the issue exists and are papering over the cracks to me.
No way to substantiate it? Hospitals record whether patients are Indigenous and they record how long it takes for patients to be seen. That's part of their reporting against performance indicators and closing the gap measures. You can read all about the disparity in health care on the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare website. For example:
"Between July 2019 and June 2021, the proportion of hospitalisations for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (First Nations) people that had a procedure recorded was 12 percentage points lower than for non-Indigenous Australians, based on age-standardised percentages (66% compared with 78%)."
Then there's the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care:
"The Board of St Vincent’s Hospital in inner Sydney monitors a number of indicators of quality of care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, including rates of incomplete treatment in the Emergency Department (ED). Incomplete treatment includes patients who leave the ED before the medical team recommends discharge, those who are not present when called to be seen by a doctor and those who attended ED and did not wait to complete treatment - collectively known as leave events.
Incomplete treatment is associated with an increased risk of readmission and death.1 The NSW Ministry of Health has identified the high rate of incomplete treatment in EDs among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients compared to other patients (8.6% and 6.1%, respectively, nationally, 2019)2 as a priority issue.
The hospital Board requested that the ED department work to reduce the rate of incomplete treatment among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients."
Hospitals and agencies charged with monitoring health care outcomes don't make figures up. They report actual data.
You're right to some extent about data skewing "with First Nations males and females living in Major cities expected to live around 5 years longer than those living in Remote and very remote areas". However, St Vincents and other hospitals are working off their own patient data and remote hospitalisations and outcomes don't come into it .
And your assumption that the majority of Indigenous patients present for treatment in remote communities is incorrect. NSW has the highest Indigenous population with 339,500. Victoria is just ahead of the NT with 78,600 people to 76,700 and no communities in Victoria are considered to be remote.
Yes, it would be good to know why Indigenous patients at St Vincents and other hospitals have longer wait times and higher rates of incomplete treatment. More importantly, it's good that these issues have been identified and are being addressed.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on November 01, 2025, 11:05:52 am
I didnt miss this claim. In fact there is no way to substantiate that and its precisely what someone defending this move would say irrespective of whether or not its fair.
Thing is, why is that the case? Why are they waiting longer? Is it because the data is skewed by hospitals in areas where there is more indigenous people being treated than not?
More questions than answers out of the claim. So by doing this in metro hospitals they treat the minority as priority to paper over not enough health care institutions in remote communities where the majority of indigenous patients presents skewing the data?
Is that the right outcome? Or more manipulation of the books to satisfy criteria?
Ultimately i dont know how anyone can defend a policy where an ethnic group is treated differently to others for right or wrong reasons. Sounds like they cant be bothered fixing the real reasons the issue exists and are papering over the cracks to me.
No way to substantiate it? Hospitals record whether patients are Indigenous and they record how long it takes for patients to be seen. That's part of their reporting against performance indicators and closing the gap measures. You can read all about the disparity in health care on the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare website. For example:
"Between July 2019 and June 2021, the proportion of hospitalisations for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (First Nations) people that had a procedure recorded was 12 percentage points lower than for non-Indigenous Australians, based on age-standardised percentages (66% compared with 78%)."
Then there's the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care:
"The Board of St Vincent’s Hospital in inner Sydney monitors a number of indicators of quality of care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, including rates of incomplete treatment in the Emergency Department (ED). Incomplete treatment includes patients who leave the ED before the medical team recommends discharge, those who are not present when called to be seen by a doctor and those who attended ED and did not wait to complete treatment - collectively known as leave events.
Incomplete treatment is associated with an increased risk of readmission and death.1 The NSW Ministry of Health has identified the high rate of incomplete treatment in EDs among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients compared to other patients (8.6% and 6.1%, respectively, nationally, 2019)2 as a priority issue.
The hospital Board requested that the ED department work to reduce the rate of incomplete treatment among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients."
Hospitals and agencies charged with monitoring health care outcomes don't make figures up. They report actual data.
You're right to some extent about data skewing "with First Nations males and females living in Major cities expected to live around 5 years longer than those living in Remote and very remote areas". However, St Vincents and other hospitals are working off their own patient data and remote hospitalisations and outcomes don't come into it .
And your assumption that the majority of Indigenous patients present for treatment in remote communities is incorrect. NSW has the highest Indigenous population with 339,500. Victoria is just ahead of the NT with 78,600 people to 76,700 and no communities in Victoria are considered to be remote.
Yes, it would be good to know why Indigenous patients at St Vincents and other hospitals have longer wait times and higher rates of incomplete treatment. More importantly, it's good that these issues have been identified and are being addressed.
A couple of points:
1. I've spent 14 years working in public health institutions. Im no stranger to how data is collected.
2. My wife is a member of HIMAA. Im no stranger to health information management, how data is collected, coded and submitted about health and outcomes. If st Vincent’s are using their own data here there's already a problem because they dont have access to other hospitals data.
To quote you "Incomplete treatment includes patients who leave the ED before the medical team recommends discharge, those who are not present when called to be seen by a doctor and those who attended ED and did not wait to complete treatment - collectively known as leave events."
So I was correct in one assumption earlier based on what you've quoted. They dont want to wait and contribute to their own adverse outcomes so to fix this, we are now fast tracking them against the rest of the population.
IMHO, anyone who contributes to their own mistreatment with the above behaviour gets what they deserve despite their backgrounds or indigenous status, and withdraws their right to complain.
The figures are provided by the organisations implementing these policies, and are audited by bodies associated with them. Forgive me for not trusting the accuracy of said numbers and figures as they are simply reported by the bodies that came up with this discriminatory decision and continue to find ways to see people who dont identify as indigenous as lesser.
Of course, lets just explain away the fact we are discriminating based on ethnic and cultural backgrounds. Its clear that being non indigenous to Australia puts me on a less equal standing to the indigenous mob.
You know ive often wondered what it takes to identify as indigenous or Torres straight Islander. I get that the indigenous people would need to accept this but on government forms you tick a box. Is it audited and reviewed properly? Does it ever get challenged? and now for the final point from me for this whole discussion, in the past all I have heard is about the reluctance for indigenous people to actually identify themselves as indigenous on these due to historic mistrust and mistreatment, so how do you come up with trustworthy figures when they would often abstain from doing so?
The figures arent trustworthy is my contention and it means a decision affecting many has been made based on the outcomes of the few standardised. Thats possibly giving incorrect outcomes but as per usual our options are limited to whinging on a forum.
All people want, is equal treatment. Special treatment serves only to further divide us.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on November 01, 2025, 11:20:46 am
I'll say this, I used to see a liver specialist at a public hospital here in Melbourne. Check is via swiping your Medicare card at a console where you get a ticket with a number. The wait at the specialist clinics there is normally horrendous. On one occasion, in my haste, I accidentally clicked yes to the Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander question. I can tell you on that occasion my wait was minuscule, I virtually got called in straight away. Coincidence? Perhaps.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on November 01, 2025, 11:39:44 am
I'll say this, I used to see a liver specialist at a public hospital here in Melbourne. Check is via swiping your Medicare card at a console where you get a ticket with a number. The wait at the specialist clinics there is normally horrendous. On one occasion, in my haste, I accidentally clicked yes to the Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander question. I can tell you on that occasion my wait was minuscule, I virtually got called in straight away. Coincidence? Perhaps.
Oh no! You've skewed the data :)
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on November 01, 2025, 11:56:21 am
I don't feel even remotely divided because I may be in a hospital waiting room, and once in my lifetime a First Nations person may get taken in a few minutes before me. Equality of outcome and facilitating a more level access to medical treatment are what's important IMO.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on November 17, 2025, 06:01:27 pm
Looks like Brad Battin's days as Victorian Opposition Leader are numbered.
If shadow treasurer Jess Wilson rolls him as expected, that will be three Opposition Leaders in less than 12 months.
You would think that the Coalition have the next election sewed up but the deep divisions in the Liberal Party could see them lose yet another election. All they would really have to do is put on a united front and avoid major gaffes but that seems to be beyond them.
I can't say that I'll be sorry to see the back of Battin and I don't know anything about Wilson. John Pesutto was doing OK until he upset the right by taking on Moya Deeming. I can't see them letting him back.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on November 18, 2025, 09:05:42 am
It looks like Battin is toast.
To paraphrase Bill Hayden, “A drover’s dog could lead the Libs to victory at the next election,” but they’re focused on their own internal conflicts and getting even 🙄
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on November 18, 2025, 09:35:31 am
That’s a meteoric rise for Jess Wilson who is a first term MP.
First female leader of the Victorian Libs too.
Good luck to her 🙏
She might need it; the Liberal right is up in arms!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on November 18, 2025, 10:48:40 am
I suppose the fundamental problem with the Liberals even at a state level is that they are percieved as a coalition not a party, and that is because they behave like a coalition and not a party, they do not exhibit unity. And the people being offered as alternatives to the right might not be as pure as the general public is lead to believe.
There is quite a bit of irony for the anti-soclialist and anti-union LIberals to be torn apart by obvious factions even if they refuse to call them factions.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on November 18, 2025, 02:04:41 pm
I know Brad's brother. We are loosely related by marriage. Seems like a good type to lead, no wonder he got dumped by politicians.
:P
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: cookie2 on November 18, 2025, 03:04:13 pm
And another one bites the dust………..
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on November 18, 2025, 06:01:25 pm
I suppose the fundamental problem with the Liberals even at a state level is that they are percieved as a coalition not a party, and that is because they behave like a coalition and not a party, they do not exhibit unity. And the people being offered as alternatives to the right might not be as pure as the general public is lead to believe.
There is quite a bit of irony for the anti-soclialist and anti-union LIberals to be torn apart by obvious factions even if they refuse to call them factions.
There are factions alright at a federal level...
The National Right (the largest faction) -Angus Taylor, Mickey Cash, Hastie (although he's probably moving around a bit due to leadership aspirations.
The Moderates (the party's left-such as it is)- Ley and Ted O'Brien sit here.
And the Centre Right (the group in the middle)-once the largest group during Morrison's time...now a shell of less than half a dozen due to lost seats and factional movement.
I'm not sure how those grouping tanslate to Victorian politics.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: dodge on November 18, 2025, 06:05:27 pm
Not factions in the Libs/Nationals. They are one big broad church! ^-^
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on November 18, 2025, 06:34:00 pm
Jess Wilson is an attempt from the Libs to change course and try and appeal to younger voters and female voters. Be interested if rusted on older Lib voters buy what she is selling given she is a more moderate Liberal and has some personal views that are not aligned with normal liberal policy offerings.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on November 18, 2025, 07:52:14 pm
Jess Wilson is an attempt from the Libs to change course and try and appeal to younger voters and female voters. Be interested if rusted on older Lib voters buy what she is selling given she is a more moderate Liberal and has some personal views that are not aligned with normal liberal policy offerings.
That's going to be her big challenge EB.
Jess Wilson had a good first day and I think that she could drag the Liberals out of the quagmire, if given the freedom to do so. I think that she will appeal to younger voters and female voters and they've both been the Libs' Achille's heels over the last quarter of a century. It's those crusty, old, misogynistic Libs that will act as a sheet anchor, or worse, and will fight to stop the party regaining the centre ground.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on November 18, 2025, 10:29:32 pm
Jess Wilson is an attempt from the Libs to change course and try and appeal to younger voters and female voters. Be interested if rusted on older Lib voters buy what she is selling given she is a more moderate Liberal and has some personal views that are not aligned with normal liberal policy offerings.
That's going to be her big challenge EB.
Jess Wilson had a good first day and I think that she could drag the Liberals out of the quagmire, if given the freedom to do so. I think that she will appeal to younger voters and female voters and they've both been the Libs' Achille's heels over the last quarter of a century. It's those crusty, old, misogynistic Libs that will act as a sheet anchor, or worse, and will fight to stop the party regaining the centre ground.
I think she presents well and ticks quite a few boxes that her predecessors haven't. Having said that, I have a feeling that Allan and her more experienced cronies will eat her alive and run her out of town.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on November 19, 2025, 11:39:38 am
I'm not sure how those grouping tanslate to Victorian politics.
From what I have heard about the back room stuff there is some irony the media calling the factions left, moderate or right, perhaps the term "fundamental" might be a better description of the lines of division.
God help us!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on November 29, 2025, 11:49:57 pm
Jacinta tells us the state is safe and our bail laws are the toughest in the country.
Yet an 11 year old stabs a 8 year old and police have confirmed no charges will be laid as he is under the age of criminal conviction. He wore a balaclava had a fake gun and proceeded to stab a grade one child and a teacher. Did an adult crime so why allow him off scott free- Htf is this kid going to learn? Can you imagine in 5 years time what he will do. Juvenile detention is a min for this kid yet cant be charged.
Meanwhile at coles in Laurimar Machettes gang members terrorise innocent citizens going about their daily business - 2 of these criminals were charged yet unbelievably were yet again released on bail!! Can you fking believe it - nothing changes.
WTF has happened to our state - its out of control and regardless of which side of the political fence you sit on something needs to change and change fast.
The Laws and sentencing need major overhaulling yet nothing will happen as those running the state deny there is any issue.
Sad sad state of affairs
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: kruddler on November 30, 2025, 12:12:29 am
Jacinta tells us the state is safe and our bail laws are the toughest in the country.
Yet an 11 year old stabs a 8 year old and police have confirmed no charges will be laid as he is under the age of criminal conviction. He wore a balaclava had a fake gun and proceeded to stab a grade one child and a teacher. Did an adult crime so why allow him off scott free- Htf is this kid going to learn? Can you imagine in 5 years time what he will do. Juvenile detention is a min for this kid yet cant be charged.
Meanwhile at coles in Laurimar Machettes gang members terrorise innocent citizens going about their daily business - 2 of these criminals were charged yet unbelievably were yet again released on bail!! Can you fking believe it - nothing changes.
WTF has happened to our state - its out of control and regardless of which side of the political fence you sit on something needs to change and change fast.
The Laws and sentencing need major overhaulling yet nothing will happen as those running the state deny there is any issue.
Sad sad state of affairs
Are you near laurimar shawny? I know a lot of residents are losing their crap over this and it appears people are very close to pitchforks and torches.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on November 30, 2025, 11:22:23 am
On topic and highly recommended, Alec Karakatsanis' book Copaganda, released earlier this year.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on November 30, 2025, 11:56:55 am
Jacinta tells us the state is safe and our bail laws are the toughest in the country.
Yet an 11 year old stabs a 8 year old and police have confirmed no charges will be laid as he is under the age of criminal conviction. He wore a balaclava had a fake gun and proceeded to stab a grade one child and a teacher. Did an adult crime so why allow him off scott free- Htf is this kid going to learn? Can you imagine in 5 years time what he will do. Juvenile detention is a min for this kid yet cant be charged.
Meanwhile at coles in Laurimar Machettes gang members terrorise innocent citizens going about their daily business - 2 of these criminals were charged yet unbelievably were yet again released on bail!! Can you fking believe it - nothing changes.
WTF has happened to our state - its out of control and regardless of which side of the political fence you sit on something needs to change and change fast.
The Laws and sentencing need major overhaulling yet nothing will happen as those running the state deny there is any issue.
Sad sad state of affairs
Are you near laurimar shawny? I know a lot of residents are losing their crap over this and it appears people are very close to pitchforks and torches.
Im about 20mins away and yes the local FB noticeboard comments in the area were filled with very angry fed up locals inferring its time we take matters into out own hands and draw arms. They think there is no other option to protect their families against what is groups of young violent men that have no respect for the law or for anyone that is around when these clashes go down. As we know they have no regard for human life.
Scary times and bloody sad to see what our state has turned into. Its hard to believe and only going to increase with the lack of accountability and governance we have.
These offenders dont operate in ways we are used to. They have no regard for anyone and until we get super tough by locking them up for long sentences they laugh at our p1ss weak ridiculous responses like macheete bins weak sentences and majority being bailed within 48 hours of getting apprehended - they will just go on their merry way causing havoc with these violent clashes and if you get caught up in it they wont think twice to stab slash kill and why citizens are privately preparing to do whats needed to protect their families as the leaders are incapable of it.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on November 30, 2025, 01:05:07 pm
In this case i don't care what media report or our head in the sand leader telling us everytime another stabbing is reported that the state is safe and great but as i was born with eyes and ears in this case I will trust what i see first hand and how bad things have rather then believe a left leaning publication that happens to be 4 months old. If you like i can send you 100s of links of articles saying the complete opposite but i know you will say its 'Fake news' being from the other direction.
Talk to those who live in the west or those that go out into the city after dark or talk to emergency service workers who are on the front line and ask them. There is no denying it - the wheel has turned to a point where Vics are leaving in droves to get out.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on November 30, 2025, 01:36:44 pm
The solution to this violence problem is to support VicPol and it's actions, not undermine it, the problem for everybody at the moment is the left wing govnerment is basically creating and anti-police legal structure.
Add to that, many of the same people most loudly complaining about machetes and calling for vigilantism are the same ones throwing rocks at the police lines, it's ironic this weekend that many roll up to the Australia Protest, an event effectively organised and managed by a white neo-nazi New Zealander.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on November 30, 2025, 01:52:36 pm
In this case i don't care what media report or our head in the sand leader telling us everytime another stabbing is reported that the state is safe and great but as i was born with eyes and ears in this case I will trust what i see first hand and how bad things have rather then believe a left leaning publication that happens to be 4 months old. If you like i can send you 100s of links of articles saying the complete opposite but i know you will say its 'Fake news' being from the other direction.
Talk to those who live in the west or those that go out into the city after dark or talk to emergency service workers who are on the front line and ask them. There is no denying it - the wheel has turned to a point where Vics are leaving in droves to get out.
Rather than poisoning the well, you should post those 100's of links and let me decide for myself. Also, I didn't realize Victoria's crime rate had spiraled out of control in the last 4 months.
That article is part of a 4 part series, and all 4 are well worth a read.
EDIT : I should also state that the main reason I post articles from The Conversation is that : a : the authors are typically experts in their field, and b: the articles frequently contain links to data, research, statistics and other articles that back up the claims being made.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: kruddler on November 30, 2025, 03:42:27 pm
@Paul, i think the issue is what Shawny is seeing locally and in the news and comparing that to the same area previously. On that front he is right. The area is getting worse. Whether that translates to victoria wide, not sure. Maybe all these crimes occuring there used to occur in a different area that has cleaned up its act, essentially handballing the problem further down the field in a game of hot potato
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on November 30, 2025, 05:03:35 pm
Maybe all these crimes occuring there used to occur in a different area that has cleaned up its act, essentially handballing the problem further down the field in a game of hot potato
That's often the case in a big city. With population movement the character of an area can change dramatically. Areas that were once reasonably quiet suddenly become places of unrest, while others that seemed troubled settle and become more stable. It certainly happened in Sydney over my lifetime. Suburbs that were once considered places to avoid became trendy and up market as populations moved further from the original centre of the city.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on November 30, 2025, 05:12:18 pm
@Paul, i think the issue is what Shawny is seeing locally and in the news and comparing that to the same area previously. On that front he is right. The area is getting worse. Whether that translates to victoria wide, not sure. Maybe all these crimes occuring there used to occur in a different area that has cleaned up its act, essentially handballing the problem further down the field in a game of hot potato
I'm not denying these incidents occurred - plainly they have. What I take issue with is the framing and reporting of such incidents, the lack of detail and context, the fact that outside of outlets like The Conversation and similar, expert opinion is rarely sought. Once the level of fear mongering reaches a fever pitch, which in the current climate does not take long, government policy and resources is forced to prioritize, and therefore needs to be seen to be taking action. In a space where resources are limited, this means other areas miss out. As I mentioned earlier, violent crime rates have been in decline for 20 or so years, except very significantly in the area of domestic violence, where the rates have been regrettably stable over the same period. Yet you won't read about that nearly as much because it doesn't grab the public's attention in the same way as black kids with machetes.
I'm safely assuming we can all agree that there has never been and never will be a zero crime rate, anywhere on earth, which means we must all accept some level of crime. The issue then becomes one of perceptions and personal boundaries : is there is difference between "feeling" safe and "being" safe ? What crime rate would constitute the government having crime "under control" and conversely at what point is crime "out of control" ? Etc.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: kruddler on November 30, 2025, 05:32:47 pm
@Paul, i think the issue is what Shawny is seeing locally and in the news and comparing that to the same area previously. On that front he is right. The area is getting worse. Whether that translates to victoria wide, not sure. Maybe all these crimes occuring there used to occur in a different area that has cleaned up its act, essentially handballing the problem further down the field in a game of hot potato
I'm not denying these incidents occurred - plainly they have. What I take issue with is the framing and reporting of such incidents, the lack of detail and context, the fact that outside of outlets like The Conversation and similar, expert opinion is rarely sought. Once the level of fear mongering reaches a fever pitch, which in the current climate does not take long, government policy and resources is forced to prioritize, and therefore needs to be seen to be taking action. In a space where resources are limited, this means other areas miss out. As I mentioned earlier, violent crime rates have been in decline for 20 or so years, except very significantly in the area of domestic violence, where the rates have been regrettably stable over the same period. Yet you won't read about that nearly as much because it doesn't grab the public's attention in the same way as black kids with machetes.
I'm safely assuming we can all agree that there has never been and never will be a zero crime rate, anywhere on earth, which means we must all accept some level of crime. The issue then becomes one of perceptions and personal boundaries : is there is difference between "feeling" safe and "being" safe ? What crime rate would constitute the government having crime "under control" and conversely at what point is crime "out of control" ? Etc.
What i was trying to get across, was that it could be a case of 'you are both right' from your own point of view.
What he is seeing, and i'm not far from their either, is definitely an increase in these types of crimes over previous. Real world statistics may ultimately suggest otherwise, and i gave a reason for that in which Lods agrees is plausible if not probable.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on November 30, 2025, 06:11:52 pm
I imagine that most folk were shocked at the report of the 11 year old boy stabbing the 8 year old at school. What a terrible experience for the two children, their classmates, the teachers and the families. But then, when you think about it, there over 380,000 children attending government primary schools in Victoria. One out of 380,000 isn't too shabby, particularly when you consider that more than 4,300 children and teens are shot and killed in the USA every year and over 17,000 more are shot and wounded. It is estimated that 3 million children in the US are exposed to shootings per year but successive governments there do nothing about it ... and that fruitcake Pauline Hanson tried to solicit donations from the NRA in return for watering down Australia's gun laws.
Who knows what motivated the 11 year old to do what he did? We can speculate about domestic violence, abuse, the influence of violent video games or TV programs and mental health issues. Has anyone else noticed how TV characters suffer punches, and knife and bullet wounds and carry on as if nothing is wrong? Does that unrealistic ability to absorb punishment give children the impression that violence doesn't really do any harm?
So why hasn't the 11 year old been charged? Quite simply, the age of criminal responsibility in Victoria is 12 (It was raised which was raised from 10 earlier this year) and the law recognises that children are unlikely to understand the impact of their actions or to comprehend criminal proceedings. Brain studies have conclusively shown that the prefrontal cortex – the part of the brain responsible for risk assessment, decision making and impulse control – doesn’t fully develop until after adolescence (10–19 years) and into early adulthood (20–29 years). This developmental process means children and young people are unable to think about their actions and understand the potential consequences in the same way as adults.
I think that most of us can look back with horror at some of the things we got up to as pre-teens and teenagers. Converting spud guns to fire .22 bullets and shooting at cars on Bell Street, Coburg was not one of my brightest ideas.
Obviously steps need to be taken to understand why the eleven year old did what he did and to ensure that it doesn't happen again. I don't know how that can be done but I do know that charging him and dragging him before the courts is not the answer.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on November 30, 2025, 08:17:21 pm
There’s a few reports around that Australia is on track to eliminate cervical cancer by 2035. Hopefully we can achieve this target. 2021 was a particularly good year, with zero cases diagnosed. It’s one of the most common cancers in women, so a super effort from all concerned.
The linked article is a bit of a plug for GP’s, but it does contain the important facts.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Baggers on November 30, 2025, 08:32:16 pm
There’s a few reports around that Australia is on track to eliminate cervical cancer by 2035. Hopefully we can achieve this target. 2021 was a particularly good year, with zero cases diagnosed. It’s one of the most common cancers in women, so a super effort from all concerned.
The linked article is a bit of a plug for GP’s, but it does contain the important facts.
Such an important post, Pauly. Thank you. Yep, brilliant effort from Oz.
(I declare my bias in that my paternal grandmother died of this cancer at the age of 31... in the 1940s).
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on November 30, 2025, 09:59:00 pm
This in how unsafe Victoria has become: For the year ending June 2025, according to the Crime Statistics Agency(https://www.crimestatistics.vic.gov.au/) , there were:
18,482 serious assaults - a 16 per cent increase 7,856 residential aggravated burglaries - a 22 per cent increase 3,828 robberies - a 17 per cent increase 33,018 motor vehicle theft - a 42 per cent increase 86,351 steal from a motor vehicle - a 39 per cent increase 41,667 steal from a retail store - a 28 per cent increase 11,075 prohibited and controlled weapon offences - a 12 per cent increase. 9,663 family violence related serious assaults - a 23% per cent increase.
You add in all the graffiti, unoccupied run down buildings full of squatters, needles everywhere you walk, increases in ambulance staff and nurses getting attacked on the job, drones landing in family members backyards with white packs of powder on board, kids getting murdered on the way home from a basketball game. The you have the Victorian Government actually cutting funding for Youth Crime Prevention programs and the Youth Support and Advocacy Service (YSAS). Debt in Victoria continues to grow faster than both the economy and revenue, with government sector gross debt nearing 30 per cent of the state’s economy. Credit rating has gone backwards and the auditor-general said gross debt was forecast to grow to $240 billion by 2028-29, about 202 per cent of operating revenue. Crime is on the rise and so is the expenditure for victims of crime...Liabilities from redress schemes, and financial assistance for victims of crime grew from $30 million five years ago to $853 million. Anyone living in Victoria should be concerned where the State is heading....future is bleak and the Crims are winning with the amount of unsolved crimes also increasing.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on November 30, 2025, 10:34:43 pm
There’s a few reports around that Australia is on track to eliminate cervical cancer by 2035. Hopefully we can achieve this target. 2021 was a particularly good year, with zero cases diagnosed. It’s one of the most common cancers in women, so a super effort from all concerned.
The linked article is a bit of a plug for GP’s, but it does contain the important facts.
I like that we are on track.
2021's lack of diagnosis is more likely to be due to the covid virus reactions and our ongoing issues with lock down.
Conspiracy theorist or not, its a fact that people just weren't keeping up with those routine checks and appointments.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on November 30, 2025, 10:38:33 pm
This in how unsafe Victoria has become: For the year ending June 2025, according to the Crime Statistics Agency(https://www.crimestatistics.vic.gov.au/) , there were:
18,482 serious assaults - a 16 per cent increase 7,856 residential aggravated burglaries - a 22 per cent increase 3,828 robberies - a 17 per cent increase 33,018 motor vehicle theft - a 42 per cent increase 86,351 steal from a motor vehicle - a 39 per cent increase 41,667 steal from a retail store - a 28 per cent increase 11,075 prohibited and controlled weapon offences - a 12 per cent increase. 9,663 family violence related serious assaults - a 23% per cent increase.
You add in all the graffiti, unoccupied run down buildings full of squatters, needles everywhere you walk, increases in ambulance staff and nurses getting attacked on the job, drones landing in family members backyards with white packs of powder on board, kids getting murdered on the way home from a basketball game. The you have the Victorian Government actually cutting funding for Youth Crime Prevention programs and the Youth Support and Advocacy Service (YSAS). Debt in Victoria continues to grow faster than both the economy and revenue, with government sector gross debt nearing 30 per cent of the state’s economy. Credit rating has gone backwards and the auditor-general said gross debt was forecast to grow to $240 billion by 2028-29, about 202 per cent of operating revenue. Crime is on the rise and so is the expenditure for victims of crime...Liabilities from redress schemes, and financial assistance for victims of crime grew from $30 million five years ago to $853 million. Anyone living in Victoria should be concerned where the State is heading....future is bleak and the Crims are winning with the amount of unsolved crimes also increasing.
Does this confirm Pauls link is fake news?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on November 30, 2025, 10:50:08 pm
This in how unsafe Victoria has become: For the year ending June 2025, according to the Crime Statistics Agency(https://www.crimestatistics.vic.gov.au/) , there were:
18,482 serious assaults - a 16 per cent increase 7,856 residential aggravated burglaries - a 22 per cent increase 3,828 robberies - a 17 per cent increase 33,018 motor vehicle theft - a 42 per cent increase 86,351 steal from a motor vehicle - a 39 per cent increase 41,667 steal from a retail store - a 28 per cent increase 11,075 prohibited and controlled weapon offences - a 12 per cent increase. 9,663 family violence related serious assaults - a 23% per cent increase.
You add in all the graffiti, unoccupied run down buildings full of squatters, needles everywhere you walk, increases in ambulance staff and nurses getting attacked on the job, drones landing in family members backyards with white packs of powder on board, kids getting murdered on the way home from a basketball game. The you have the Victorian Government actually cutting funding for Youth Crime Prevention programs and the Youth Support and Advocacy Service (YSAS). Debt in Victoria continues to grow faster than both the economy and revenue, with government sector gross debt nearing 30 per cent of the state’s economy. Credit rating has gone backwards and the auditor-general said gross debt was forecast to grow to $240 billion by 2028-29, about 202 per cent of operating revenue. Crime is on the rise and so is the expenditure for victims of crime...Liabilities from redress schemes, and financial assistance for victims of crime grew from $30 million five years ago to $853 million. Anyone living in Victoria should be concerned where the State is heading....future is bleak and the Crims are winning with the amount of unsolved crimes also increasing.
Overreaction EB, Jacinta says everything is fine. I'd love to debate this with you but have to tend to the pink elephant that flew passed my window. Then I need to get the chimney ready for Santa in 26 days.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on November 30, 2025, 11:06:22 pm
I heard that radical Steve Price on the wireless a couple of days ago. His prediction for the next State Election; comfortable win for Labor.
Something’s not adding up.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 15, 2025, 11:36:11 am
Once again the inevitable happens thanks to our weak as piss namby pamby in denial governments. When asked a pointed question by a report last night, Albo fill his shorts. Pathetic.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on December 15, 2025, 01:49:05 pm
I'm safely assuming we can all agree that there has never been and never will be a zero crime rate, anywhere on earth, which means we must all accept some level of crime. The issue then becomes one of perceptions and personal boundaries : is there is difference between "feeling" safe and "being" safe ? What crime rate would constitute the government having crime "under control" and conversely at what point is crime "out of control" ? Etc.
My problem here is that you would think it should be fairly black and white regarding the statistics, courts, police and auditors (Public and private) should be largely in agreement at least in the trending of data.
Yet that doesn't seem to be the case, which makes it very hard to perform an authentic assessment. There are so many contradictory sources, too many, both official and pseudo-official, that you can just pick and choose the version that suits your personal narrative on pretty much any issue.
What's the motive for this contradictory analysis behaviour, farming distrust seems to be a big driver, which just further clouds the issue.
When entities like the media can publish false claims without consequence, and harvest large profits while doing so, the situation will never change. I wouldn't stop them, I'd let them speak, but I have a big stick available for when they found to be deceptive.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on December 15, 2025, 01:59:11 pm
Once again the inevitable happens thanks to our weak as piss namby pamby in denial governments. When asked a pointed question by a report last night, Albo fill his shorts. Pathetic.
I havent been following. Whats happened now?
Was it in relation to the Bondi thing?
I think we need to treat those situations a little differently. Activism, violence, and potential co-ordination between extremists groups. Hard to pin this on a local government for anything here.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on December 15, 2025, 02:12:35 pm
Horrendous events.
Every action has a reaction, no matter where or when it occurs, if people are outraged, they should be equally outraged at the likes of Netanyahu and Trump for stoking of the fires, mostly for their own political and financial gain.
I have a former associate, a young career physicist, who after cutbacks at CERN found employment in the EU as a weapons inspector. He said the amount of subterfuge and false flag operations that go on from all sides of investigations is extraordinary. But he said he is lucky, because he only has to audit physical resources, he does not have to assess the political or social motives like some of his colleagues the political science analysts, they identify trolls on pretty much every team in high numbers, but they are not permitted to expose them as most hold diplomatic status. Such hypocrisy from all sides.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on December 15, 2025, 02:18:28 pm
Once again the inevitable happens thanks to our weak as piss namby pamby in denial governments. When asked a pointed question by a report last night, Albo fill his shorts. Pathetic.
I havent been following. Whats happened now?
Was it in relation to the Bondi thing?
I think we need to treat those situations a little differently. Activism, violence, and potential co-ordination between extremists groups. Hard to pin this on a local government for anything here.
Governments have been pandering to protesters/activists and allowing a underlying anti semitic tone to develop in the community. States and the Federal Government have been weak in cracking down on this political unrest between these opposing factions, its got nothing to do with Australian Politics and those pursuing their agendas through terrorism need dealing with more severely and made an example of to deter future attacks. Albanese needs to stop making policy to get re-elected and start protecting the community and make the country secure from these nutcase radicals bringing their politics and problems to Australia.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 15, 2025, 03:09:34 pm
The Bondi massacre appears to be Islamist terrorism ... and the hero who disarmed one of the terrorists is Muslim.
You have to wonder at the warped thinking that enables a father and son to commit such an atrocity.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 15, 2025, 03:20:13 pm
It's easy to lump the protests against the Israeli genocide in Palestine into the antisemitism basket. However, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance makes the point that "criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic". Many of the Jewish callers to the ABC this morning made similar points and said that they would maintain their protests against Israel's actions in Palestine and Lebanon.
That said, It would be refreshing for all Australian governments to ban all protests at least for the duration of the festive season.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on December 15, 2025, 03:26:48 pm
I think we need to treat those situations a little differently. Activism, violence, and potential co-ordination between extremists groups. Hard to pin this on a local government for anything here.
Governments have been pandering to protesters/activists and allowing a underlying anti semitic tone to develop in the community. States and the Federal Government have been weak in cracking down on this political unrest between these opposing factions, its got nothing to do with Australian Politics and those pursuing their agendas through terrorism need dealing with more severely and made an example of to deter future attacks. Albanese needs to stop making policy to get re-elected and start protecting the community and make the country secure from these nutcase radicals bringing their politics and problems to Australia.
You just described the sole function of a politician. Get elected and stay elected.
I don't condone extremists, but this action of "condoning anti semitism tone and developing" is not a product of anything to do with Australia, but its more about the war in the west bank and the events of the last 500 odd days there, along with the last 2000 years of history (and possibly beyond).
At no step along the way, has Australia condoned any of the anti semitism that has occurred, but the reason why I state Bondi and its events cant be tied to government and anti semitism, is because its not the same game as simply targetting minorities for the sake of a sick and twisted hate crime. Its a more politically motivated effort with a goal to change a status quo (not that this makes it much better) but what Im trying to articulate, is that this isnt the same as some spray paint on a temple, or hate speech etc. Its activism. The sort that sends the message to the nation state that Jews belong to, and that is a non Australian consequence of mixed society. We will see more of the same as a result.
Would any government policy change this? No. I dont think so.
The label "anti semitism" in this context does it a disservice. This was not a simple anti Jewish event. It was a political statement to fuel the continuing middle eastern conflict. This was not a neo nazi scenario, and any attempt to paint it as such is an over simplification of what is going on. Likewise it minimises the why behind the action. Its not just anti Jewish. You need to review it in context with happenings over in Palestine/Israel and that ongoing conflict. It also appears to have been co-ordinated with another event.
No one deserves to lose their life at a cultural event particularly half a world away. Its not soley about semitism, or anti semitism in this regard. This was a political statement that has arrived on our shores vicariously. It is not the first of its kind, and it wont be the last, and whilst that conflict occurs in the middle east, any discussion of "anti semitism" should be shelved, because its not anti arabian or muslim to label the Palestinians or other nation states in the middle east terrorists or harbingers of doom. WE need to stop that, because that fuels the same violence. I put 2 and 2 together instantly last night as soon as the shootings occurred in Bondi and figured, something to do with Channukah makes sense, and immediately thought it would come to light that this was a terrorism event.
It is simply another part of the greater under current of war that is occurring over there.
This is not to say its ok, nor make it ok.
War is war. When people stop looking at each conflict in isolation, and tie them back to history and all goings on, it changes the context of every event. Those conflicts in the middle east are as much a power vaccuum situation after Rome fell, and then the Ottoman empire as any thing else. All the events are intrinsically linked, and just like the Jews were expelled from Israel thousands of years ago, only to return in the 20th century, simply reignites the old feuds.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 15, 2025, 07:51:36 pm
I think we need to treat those situations a little differently. Activism, violence, and potential co-ordination between extremists groups. Hard to pin this on a local government for anything here.
Governments have been pandering to protesters/activists and allowing a underlying anti semitic tone to develop in the community. States and the Federal Government have been weak in cracking down on this political unrest between these opposing factions, its got nothing to do with Australian Politics and those pursuing their agendas through terrorism need dealing with more severely and made an example of to deter future attacks. Albanese needs to stop making policy to get re-elected and start protecting the community and make the country secure from these nutcase radicals bringing their politics and problems to Australia.
Albanese and the like will take the piss weak option of changing gun laws penalising law abiding citizens like me who pose zero threat to anyone. He and all the agency leaders should admit to yet more failures in: - Identifying people who should not be in the country let alone on the streets. - Dealing with the organisations in this country who spread and preach hate, who's sole purpose is to nurture and promote animals like the two perpetrators of yesterdays atrocity. The agencies know who they are, where they are and what they are up to and do nothing about it. They've dropped the ball and they know it. They will back peddle, deflect and bring in bullcrap laws that will make not one iota of difference.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: crashlander on December 15, 2025, 08:01:49 pm
Gun laws might need a tweak, but it is the enforcing that appears to be lacking. If laws get ignored or not followed because it is too hard, then things like this will happen.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 15, 2025, 08:23:14 pm
Gun laws might need a tweak, but it is the enforcing that appears to be lacking. If laws get ignored or not followed because it is too hard, then things like this will happen.
Laws are being followed by 99.99% of the population. I recently had to take ownership of my brothers firearms because his licence lapsed and he had to go through the whole process as his "grace" period elapsed. 1. The district firearms officer contacted him and advised his to dispose of them that day or else. 2. Within a week of acquiring them, I had the local police contacting me to do a compliance inspection of the storage of all my firearms. The bloke who committed the murders yesterday probably had his firearms stored legally also. If its not firearms, it's something else. Evil people will always find a means of inflicting carnage on others, it's the evil people you need to focus on getting rid of.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 16, 2025, 10:31:42 am
Jeremy Liebler, who is head of a Zionist group, was on the wireless a couple of days ago and one of the things he said that I agreed with is that now is not the time to look at gun laws. However, what Albo is talking about is establishing a national register and ensuring that all States and Territories have digital registers. Queensland, South Australia, the Northern Territory, and the Australian Capital Territory still have paper-based or outdated firearms registers and that is unacceptable.
I now have a digital shooter’s licence on my phone. If the Victorian Government can manage that, Albo should be kicking arses to get the lagging States and Territories to bring their registers into the 21st century.
Of course, having a national digitised register won’t prevent terrorist or sovereign citizen attacks but it would make it easier for ASIO to determine whether radicalised nutters have access to firearms.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on December 16, 2025, 11:00:16 am
More controls arent a bad thing, but its not a panacea.
You just end up with a sponsor. i.e. Outsource the gun sourcing to a stand up citizen who can sell it to the highest bidder for bitcoin.
Unregulated access to firearms will always be a thing and making people jump through hoops will flag them early to authorities that they are potentially aiming to do something, but hypothetically, if I am the gun owner, and I do it all above board, thats not going to stop some undesirable from using my guns. If it is proven my guns were used, then that would change it for next time, but as we have seen, these things arent regular occurrences and it would be like the Hydra. The next cab off the rank would be arming the nutters.
(not that I would do it, but a stand up citizen on paper has thoughts and feels that cant be measured).
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 16, 2025, 11:14:11 am
I will just add this, thankfully the animals on Sunday didn't have semi automatic rifles or automatic assault rifles as the carnage would have been horrific (double or triple the toll). One shooter however appeared to have a pump action shotgun of sorts and these need to be made illegal immediately as the Howard ban intended after Port Arthur. Automatic shotguns have popped back into circulation (legally obtained) with a special condition licence. I have always been against this as in my opinion, there is no need for them whatsover. Break open over/under or side by side shot guns (2 cartridges max) should be all that is legal along with bolt action rifles for registered hunters and target shooters, nothing else. Over and above this, without going into a racist type commentary, the authorities need to revamp who holds a firearm licence. Currently, If you have a mental illness and are taking medication, you cannot hold a licence for obvious reasons. The authorities need to extend this by tracking down all the members of known terrorist organisations and remove their licences (perhaps before deporting them altogether). As for people who visit and frequent known terrorist training camps and hot spots like in the Philippines for example, those people cannot hold a firearms licence IMO. Extreme measures and strategic tactics are needed to combat this.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on December 16, 2025, 11:52:10 am
Gun laws might need a tweak, but it is the enforcing that appears to be lacking. If laws get ignored or not followed because it is too hard, then things like this will happen.
People are not crooks until the commit a crime, and true criminals do not give a rats-ar5e about the law.
All that making more laws does is increase the burden on society.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on December 16, 2025, 12:03:23 pm
The Bondi massacre appears to be Islamist terrorism ... and the hero who disarmed one of the terrorists is Muslim.
You have to wonder at the warped thinking that enables a father and son to commit such an atrocity.
This is the uncomfortable truth for many who wish to point fingers at various segments of the population.
Criminals commit crimes, good citizens obey laws, more law is not the answer.
The whole gun laws debate reminds me about the futility of domestic violence orders in the protection of women and children, for the lunatic and criminal a piece of paper is just another thing to wipe your ar5e with!
Language is important, not just the language after the event, because it is the language before the event that is the motivation. In this Bondi case both sides are guilty of a long history of linguistic rock throwing, and when people stand up for and defend the actions of a lunatic they contribute to the events that occur in reaction. A terrorist hiding in the basement is not a justification for bombing a hospital, a dispute at the border is not an excuse to fire on a music festival, never was and never will be. There will be reprisals in both directions, all of them grossly misplaced.
In the meantime, somebody profits selling weapons, should we make the war mongers responsible for the actions of their customers? It's not achievable, it's like making a car maker responsible for the actions of a drunk driver. Yet, when Netanyahu spoke he blamed Australia for the actions of a terrorist, it's deliberate and deceptive, he is laying the groundwork for the justification of further violence. In case you do not know, Israel is one of the world's biggest weapons traders, Netanyahu grows richer from war.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 16, 2025, 12:04:07 pm
This letter in the HS is from the daughter of a man who was killed on Sunday. He was seen throwing an object at the shooter who was disarmed. He was later wounded (fatally).
Sheina’s full statement
My father was murdered. In cold blood. Shot. For being Jewish. He did not cower. He did not lay low. He sprang to action. To fight. He was a man bigger than life itself. No boundary was uncrossable. Impossible was not a word in his mind. He put others before himself. It cost him his life. Ripped from his wife, daughter, son-in-law, and dear grandchildren. Leaving a gaping, heaving wound of sorrow. His love reached far and wide. His impact on the world was quiet, but absolutely immense. A philanthropist with a heart of gold, bigger than his chest. A man with humour and wit. A friend whose loyalty knew no bounds. It is a surreal nightmare from the deepest, darkest depths of hell. A reality far too horrendous for any human mind to process. Devoted to his faith. A loud and proud Jew. He fled the USSR to live as a Jew without fear. To an Australia that welcomed him with open arms. Where he rekindled his faith. Where he built a family, a successful business, and became a quiet philanthropist. A large man of immense kindness, who put the needs of others before his own. Who brought light into every life he touched. And then. Australia did not fail quietly. It failed loudly, repeatedly, and with full knowledge. Its government watched hatred grow and chose to do nothing. They minimised it. They excused it. They dismissed Jewish warnings as noise. A black, monstrous tornado cloud of antisemitic hate rolled in. It marched on bridges. It waved green, black, and red flags. It called for death to the Jews. This was not a shock. This was not sudden. This was not unpredictable. Antisemitism was out in the open. Threats were real. Fear was voiced again and again. And the government did nothing that mattered. Collectively, they abandoned us all, allowing antisemitism to fester.
Instead of running from the bullets that flew toward his community. Instead of running from the bullets that flew toward his community. A government that refuses to protect Jews after being warned does not get to claim innocence. A government that lets hate fester holds responsibility for the blood that follows. It has his blood on its hands. The blood of all the victims. To those sheep who mindlessly reposted calls for intifada, you are guilty. To those who adorned themselves in keffiyehs and pro-Pal slogans, you are guilty. My father was murdered because leaders were weak. Because they were lazy. Because they cared more about optics than lives. Do not dare call this a lone act. Do not dare speak of bad luck or bad timing. This was the result of neglect and moral rot at the top. Australia betrayed him. Its government betrayed him. They cleared the way. My father is dead because those in power chose inaction. And that stain will not wash off.
You are guilty.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on December 16, 2025, 12:08:47 pm
The pain is palpable, but the conclusions are all wrong, I understand they want to blame someone, the person firing the gun is the best place to start.
Further laws, further words, won't stop what is happening, the solution lies beyond Australia's border. You cannot escape a religious war by crossing a border, it goes where you go, you have to solve the problem at it's genesis.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on December 16, 2025, 12:55:08 pm
Robert Pape has done significant work in the related and adjacent space of suicide attacks and terrorism. His book Dying To Win contains original research and is now a landmark study in the field. It may surprise some that most people who carry out such attacks are not motivated by religion. As Pape shows, their scriptural literacy and interest in religion is low. Many of the attackers are secular. What motivates them more than anything is foreign powers doing s h i t t y things to their people and on their land, removing any possibility of self determination and removing any chance of building a life of some meaning and purpose.
Material conditions always take precedence over theological principles and considerations.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 16, 2025, 12:56:36 pm
The pain is palpable, but the conclusions are all wrong, I understand they want to blame someone, the person firing the gun is the best place to start.
Further laws, further words, won't stop what is happening, the solution lies beyond Australia's border. You cannot escape a religious war by crossing a border, it goes where you go, you have to solve the problem at it's genesis.
The footage I saw shows the rock throwing man pick up the discard shotgun, aim it the terrorist then put it down again before being shot. It's not clear whether he was shot while aiming the shotgun. Not everyone is capable of shooting at another human being and the rock throwing man may not have known how to fire the shotgun. Either way, he was another hero and his daughter's words are powerful, but wrong. Governments can only do so much to minimise terrorist attacks and it seems pretty clear that the perpetrators were radicalised long ago and not by those protesting against Israel's genocide in Palestine. In the words of Tom Waits:
"So thousands dead and wounded on both Sides most of them middle eastern civilians They fill their children full of hate to fight an old man's war And die upon the road to peace"
It's people, not governments, that allow terrorists to strike.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 16, 2025, 01:07:51 pm
I will just add this, thankfully the animals on Sunday didn't have semi automatic rifles or automatic assault rifles as the carnage would have been horrific (double or triple the toll). One shooter however appeared to have a pump action shotgun of sorts and these need to be made illegal immediately as the Howard ban intended after Port Arthur. Automatic shotguns have popped back into circulation (legally obtained) with a special condition licence. I have always been against this as in my opinion, there is no need for them whatsover. Break open over/under or side by side shot guns (2 cartridges max) should be all that is legal along with bolt action rifles for registered hunters and target shooters, nothing else. Over and above this, without going into a racist type commentary, the authorities need to revamp who holds a firearm licence. Currently, If you have a mental illness and are taking medication, you cannot hold a licence for obvious reasons. The authorities need to extend this by tracking down all the members of known terrorist organisations and remove their licences (perhaps before deporting them altogether). As for people who visit and frequent known terrorist training camps and hot spots like in the Philippines for example, those people cannot hold a firearms licence IMO. Extreme measures and strategic tactics are needed to combat this.
I thought that it was a pump action shotgun too G2C.
I don't know the NSW regulations but assume they're much the same as Victoria. If so, owning a self loading or pump action firearm requires a category C or D licence that is only available to primary producers or professional vertebrate pest controllers.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: dodge on December 16, 2025, 02:28:22 pm
Thanks for the Tom Waits lyrics, DJC - I haven't listened to that album for a long time.
I find a lot of comfort and peace as well in music - been listening to Nina Simone's You'll never walk alone, Gabriel's Oboe & Like a bridge over troubled water quite a bit. They all have sadness, strength and some peace in them.
I hope this brings a change to Australia - back to unity and respect. Unfortunately, I can't see it at the moment.
It seems that the gun laws need admin tweaks more than anything eg National digital registers, number of guns to own. Would changing guns laws prevent what happened if the perpetuator is determined enough?
I have a book about the global rise of anti-Semitism. I didn't get far - it is a hard read, but I think I need to get through it now.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 16, 2025, 03:05:12 pm
I try to transition from work to relaxation with at least 30 minutes of music every evening. The artist/genre depends a lot on how I'm feeling, what's going on locally or globally, or who has just died; my Jimmy Cliff collection got a work out recently. Tom Waits, and particularly, Road to Peace, are regulars.
When I heard that one of the terrorists was a licenced shooter with six firearms, my immediate reaction was why have six. I have four firearms, one of which is deactivated. But then I live on a property where I'm obliged to control pest animals and each of those three firearms has a specific purpose. I'm not sure why a gun club member, who may hunt and/or target shoot, would need six firearms, one of which seems to restricted to a very limited number of licenced shooters.
I really find it hard to believe that Queensland, South Australia, NT and the ACT don't have state of the art firearms registers - not that that would prevented the Bondi massacre and the recent Yackandandah and Wieambilla shootings
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on December 16, 2025, 03:50:35 pm
It's people, not governments, that allow terrorists to strike.
Somebody knew about this, somebody always knows about an event like this before it happens.
Calling for greater vigilance, surveillance, laws is just spreading the embers across already tinder dry ground.
It's not a laughing matter, but you have to laugh at Netanyahu's calls for Australia to act. Does he mean act to the same level as Israel, the most surveilled society on the face of the planet, they spy on their neighbours, they spy on their citizens, they spy on friends and foe equally, yet they cannot stop and have no hope of stopping such events as Bondi, events which have become so routine in their own backyard that they are barely reported anymore.
This event gets the global attention because it's such a rare event to happen here, and let's hope it remains that way!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 16, 2025, 04:14:58 pm
The pain is palpable, but the conclusions are all wrong, I understand they want to blame someone, the person firing the gun is the best place to start.
Further laws, further words, won't stop what is happening, the solution lies beyond Australia's border. You cannot escape a religious war by crossing a border, it goes where you go, you have to solve the problem at it's genesis.
The footage I saw shows the rock throwing man pick up the discard shotgun, aim it the terrorist then put it down again before being shot. It's not clear whether he was shot while aiming the shotgun. Not everyone is capable of shooting at another human being and the rock throwing man may not have known how to fire the shotgun. Either way, he was another hero and his daughter's words are powerful, but wrong. Governments can only do so much to minimise terrorist attacks and it seems pretty clear that the perpetrators were radicalised long ago and not by those protesting against Israel's genocide in Palestine. In the words of Tom Waits:
"So thousands dead and wounded on both Sides most of them middle eastern civilians They fill their children full of hate to fight an old man's war And die upon the road to peace"
It's people, not governments, that allow terrorists to strike.
Governments doing "only so much" and SFA are two different things. They are reaping what they have sewn.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on December 16, 2025, 05:35:50 pm
Quote from: Quote from: Gointocarlton on Tue Dec 16 2025 16:14:58 GMT+1100 (Australian Eastern Daylight Time)
Governments doing "only so much" and SFA are two different things. They are reaping what they have sewn.
The widespread calls for action are meaningless, bordering on dog whistling, when they are delivered without offers of a genuine solution.
Of course, when challenged the old "What can I do" response is specifically part of the problem!
It's clear to me, the loudest calls coming from the likes of Netanyahu and RedTrump is disingenuous, they profit from this violence, they do not want it to stop, they captain very highly profitable war machines.
I'll finish today with this, there is significant irony in the media commentators claiming the political dialogue has become too dangerous, too vindictive, many might not understand that irony, they are the medium, they are the editors and producers. They will profit heavily as well.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on December 16, 2025, 05:49:07 pm
The widespread calls for action are meaningless, bordering on dog whistling, when they are delivered without offers of a genuine solution.
Of course, when challenged the old "What can I do" response is specifically part of the problem!
It's clear to me, the loudest calls coming from the likes of Netanyahu and RedTrump is disingenuous, they profit from this violence, they do not want it to stop, they captain very highly profitable war machines.
I'll finish today with this, there is significant irony in the media commentators claiming the political dialogue has become too dangerous, too vindictive, many might not understand that irony, they are the medium, they are the editors and producers. They will profit heavily as well.
It's essentially one of the standard Liberal/ conservative talking points, the imputation and sometimes direct accusation that Labor governments are "soft on crime."
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 16, 2025, 06:46:40 pm
Does anyone bother to read the ASIO Director-General's Annual Threat Assessments?
"Over the next five years, a complex, challenging and changing security environment will become more dynamic, more diverse and more degraded.
Many of the foundations that have underpinned Australia’s security, prosperity and democracy are being tested: social cohesion is eroding, trust in institutions is declining, intolerance is growing, even truth itself is being undermined by conspiracy, mis- and disinformation.
Similar trends are playing out across the Western world.
So what does this mean for our security environment?
Australia is facing multifaceted, merging, intersecting, concurrent and cascading threats. Major geopolitical, economic, social and security challenges of the 1930s, 70s and 90s have converged. As one of my analysts put it with an uncharacteristic nod to popular culture: everything, everywhere all at once.
Or as I described it a moment ago, more dynamic, diverse and degraded." ...
"The war in the Middle East has not yet directly inspired terrorism in Australia, but it is prompting protest, exacerbating division, undermining social cohesion and elevating intolerance. This, in turn, is making acts of politically motivated violence more likely."
Terrorism is a subset of politically motivated violence. It covers acts or threats intended to advance a political, religious or ideological cause through intimidation. So while a protest or an attack on an electoral office might be an act of politically motivated violence, it may not meet the threshold of terrorism.
We raised the national terrorism threat level in 2024 and I do not anticipate being able to lower it in the foreseeable future.
Politically motivated violence is raising the temperature of the security environment and making acts of terrorism more likely.
At the same time, traditional transnational terrorist groups such as Islamic State, al-Qa’ida and their affiliates are exploiting permissive spaces to revive and renew their capabilities, particularly in Afghanistan and parts of Africa. The groups have demonstrated their ability to conduct successful external attacks, although I stress that none of last year’s terrorist incidents in Australia were directed by an offshore group, and our greatest threat remains a lone actor using an easily obtained weapon."
Our greatest threat in part because, despite all of the surveillance and intelligence at ASIO's disposal, lone actors are almost impossible to detect and apprehend.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on December 18, 2025, 04:52:04 pm
Disappointing, but hardly surprising, that the Libs can't follow the example of past Labor governments in offering bipartisan support after a tragedy. Beazley after Port Arthur and Shorten after the Lindt Cafe siege being two obvious examples. I'm no fan of Labor, but credit where it's due.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: northernblue on December 18, 2025, 05:23:27 pm
Some things are bigger than point scoring or the next election
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 19, 2025, 09:58:00 am
Dunno whether to laugh or cry, AFP boss says the Bondi shootings were "not religious". Um, 15 people were murdered because they were Jewish. If that's not religiously motivated I don't know WTF is. She needs to be relieved of her duties immediately.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 19, 2025, 10:24:19 am
Dunno whether to laugh or cry, AFP boss says the Bondi shootings were "not religious". Um, 15 people were murdered because they were Jewish. If that's not religiously motivated I don't know WTF is. She needs to be relieved of her duties immediately.
Robert Pape has done significant work in the related and adjacent space of suicide attacks and terrorism. His book Dying To Win contains original research and is now a landmark study in the field. It may surprise some that most people who carry out such attacks are not motivated by religion. As Pape shows, their scriptural literacy and interest in religion is low. Many of the attackers are secular. What motivates them more than anything is foreign powers doing s h i t t y things to their people and on their land, removing any possibility of self determination and removing any chance of building a life of some meaning and purpose.
Material conditions always take precedence over theological principles and considerations.
Many other researchers have drawn the same conclusions as Pape, almost all terrorists, and particularly lone wolf terrorists, are motivated by the real and/or perceived repression of those they identify with. The slaughter of 70,000 Palestinians since October 2023 is the likely motivation with the victims representing Netanyahu's IDF. Krissy Barrett is correct, the Bondi terrorist attack wasn't religious even if the intended and actual victims were Jewish.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on December 19, 2025, 10:54:55 am
There's a difference between Anti-Zionsim and Antisemitism.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: madbluboy on December 19, 2025, 11:14:15 am
Dunno whether to laugh or cry, AFP boss says the Bondi shootings were "not religious". Um, 15 people were murdered because they were Jewish. If that's not religiously motivated I don't know WTF is. She needs to be relieved of her duties immediately.
Islamic extremist deniers are worse than climate change deniers.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 19, 2025, 12:18:19 pm
Dunno whether to laugh or cry, AFP boss says the Bondi shootings were "not religious". Um, 15 people were murdered because they were Jewish. If that's not religiously motivated I don't know WTF is. She needs to be relieved of her duties immediately.
Robert Pape has done significant work in the related and adjacent space of suicide attacks and terrorism. His book Dying To Win contains original research and is now a landmark study in the field. It may surprise some that most people who carry out such attacks are not motivated by religion. As Pape shows, their scriptural literacy and interest in religion is low. Many of the attackers are secular. What motivates them more than anything is foreign powers doing s h i t t y things to their people and on their land, removing any possibility of self determination and removing any chance of building a life of some meaning and purpose.
Material conditions always take precedence over theological principles and considerations.
Many other researchers have drawn the same conclusions as Pape, almost all terrorists, and particularly lone wolf terrorists, are motivated by the real and/or perceived repression of those they identify with. The slaughter of 70,000 Palestinians since October 2023 is the likely motivation with the victims representing Netanyahu's IDF. Krissy Barrett is correct, the Bondi terrorist attack wasn't religious even if the intended and actual victims were Jewish.
And the October 7 slaughter of Jews by Palestinians? Let me guess, they didnt like the music at the Music Festival?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on December 19, 2025, 12:30:31 pm
And the October 7 slaughter of Jews by Palestinians? Let me guess, they didnt like the music at the Music Festival?
Since that terrible, unforgiveable slaughter by Hamas terrorists, the IDF has killed 70,000 Palestinians and thousands of children are starving and being denied basic human rights like education and healthcare. Is that being done on religious grounds or is it just acceptable collateral damage on the way to more land for Israeli settlers or Taco's 'Riviera of the Middle East'?
What pisses me off about our Government is that they won't push back against the corrupt war criminal Netanyahu, who is more responsible for the anti-Zionism that's sweeping the world than anyone else.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on December 19, 2025, 08:41:21 pm
Since that terrible, unforgiveable slaughter by Hamas terrorists, the IDF has killed 70,000 Palestinians and thousands of children are starving and being denied basic human rights like education and healthcare. Is that being done on religious grounds or is it just acceptable collateral damage on the way to more land for Israeli settlers or Taco's 'Riviera of the Middle East'?
What pisses me off about our Government is that they won't push back against the corrupt war criminal Netanyahu, who is more responsible for the anti-Zionism that's sweeping the world than anyone else.
Generally agree. I found it very helpful to read some of the leading historians and scholars in the field : Avi Shlaim, Norman Finkelstein, Ilan Pappé, Benny Morris, Joseph Heller and others. Even though in some cases I don't agree with their theses or politics.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on December 20, 2025, 10:02:23 am
And the October 7 slaughter of Jews by Palestinians? Let me guess, they didnt like the music at the Music Festival?
Since that terrible, unforgiveable slaughter by Hamas terrorists, the IDF has killed 70,000 Palestinians and thousands of children are starving and being denied basic human rights like education and healthcare. Is that being done on religious grounds or is it just acceptable collateral damage on the way to more land for Israeli settlers or Taco's 'Riviera of the Middle East'?
What pisses me off about our Government is that they won't push back against the corrupt war criminal Netanyahu, who is more responsible for the anti-Zionism that's sweeping the world than anyone else.
as true as that is, they've been negotiating a two state solution for as long as ive been alive.
Netanyahu is within rights to steam roll palestine and solve that problem once and for all, but that wont stop things like the Bondi shooting (it will just inflame it) which dot points why labelling it anti jew misses the mark by the length of the flemigton straight.
Its a proxy war.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on December 20, 2025, 08:18:11 pm
Netanyahu is within rights to steam roll palestine and solve that problem once and for all,
Surely nobody, neither side in this dispute and nobody in any dispute, has the right to target facilities or take actions that cause the collateral death of children and infants, either directly or indirectly.
Target military, terrorists and gorillas all you like, but stay away from civilians and children.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on December 20, 2025, 09:58:55 pm
Netanyahu is within rights to steam roll palestine and solve that problem once and for all,
Surely nobody, neither side in this dispute and nobody in any dispute, has the right to target facilities or take actions that cause the collateral death of children and infants, either directly or indirectly.
Target military, terrorists and gorillas all you like, but stay away from civilians and children.
its war.
In war there are winners and losers.
These days this stuff kicks off, and then state there needs to be a peaceful outcome.
There is no peaceful outcome for the loser unless they assimilate to the invading party.
Let this thing kick off rather than have a bunch of "now now, play nice" and pretend that one side is better than the other. There is no better. Its just two nations at war.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on December 21, 2025, 11:04:27 am
Even in war, win or lose, combatants go to trial and often jail for targeting and killing women and children, I think the legal name for it is genocide!
As an aside I have some very good friends who are Iranian, they had to flee their own country due to radicals, leaving behind a beautiful family home with hundreds of years of heritage. For people here to look at them and label them amongst the same radicals that they had to flee, radicals who destroy their country, is also in my opinion criminal and racist. But that is what some including local Israeli lobbyists do on a daily basis, they claim my friends have no place in Australia because of the behaviour of criminals back in the country they had to flee.
Blokes like Frydenberg and Netanyahu seem to willfully ignore the hypocrisy of that behaviour just for political point scoring, and destroy any unity the world has managed to build in the process. But there are crooks on both sides, there are just as many Imans guilty of this as there are Israeli politicians.
That psalm or proverb, or whatever you want to call it, about casting the first stone, it's a wise set of words and I suspect it exists for a reason, somebody somewhere learned a lesson and didn't ignore it.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on December 21, 2025, 11:11:17 am
To me, it looks like a settler colonial project, not a war.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on December 21, 2025, 11:18:26 am
Whatever it is, it is. The Palestinians might have wanted to think harder about their musical festival stance a couple of years ago.
IMHO, you dont provoke the bear and then complain when it attacks. Sure, let's not go all out and bomb innocent children and women, but the anniversary of a certain event just past in greek history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dance_of_Zalongo
The women and children are always impacted in these power struggles but of not for growing independence from ottoman rule would it have occurred? Their options were, pay the jizziah (spelling), convert to Islam and bow to ottoman rule or protect their ideology and become martyrs.
This isnt a condoning of it. Its just reality. A price paid to secure independence from ottoman rule. Thing is, there are no guarantees and that doesnt guarantee an outcome.
These things are going to happen and continue happening and whilst we live in easy prosperous times, wait until resources become scarce and watch what happens. This wont be about religion. Its always been about the supply chain of important goods, but when you have people squabbling over borders and territory the unfortunate wash out is the innocents become displaced.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on December 21, 2025, 11:22:07 am
Gutless bullies, no matter which side of the fence they dwell on, always go after the weakest target.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 21, 2025, 12:31:06 pm
The bottom line is that the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, the former Minister of Defense of Israel, alleging responsibility for the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts during the Gaza war. Even in war there are lines that aren't crossed by civilised countries or their leaders.
A subsequent UN Commission of Inquiry called for genocide charges to be added to the warrant after finding the Israeli government guilty of multiple violations of the 1948 Genocide Convention.
The ICC also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif but it was later learned that he had been killed in an Israeli airstrike.
Just as all Jews aren't Zionists or Israelis, very few Palestinians are Hamas. Israel's Palestinian genocide is a disproportionate response to Hamas terrorism.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on December 21, 2025, 12:46:28 pm
Not saying it isnt, and whilst we like to place rules on this, where were these rules when Islamic militants abducted innocent party goers at a music festival?
This isnt sports. With a referee that can adjudicate, and when the Palestinians hide their militants in the gen pop and under hospitals then what is expected?
I know there are rules of conduct and what not, but whos rules are they? History is always written by the victor.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on December 21, 2025, 12:59:28 pm
The bottom line is that the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, the former Minister of Defense of Israel, alleging responsibility for the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts during the Gaza war. Even in war there are lines that aren't crossed by civilised countries or their leaders.
A subsequent UN Commission of Inquiry called for genocide charges to be added to the warrant after finding the Israeli government guilty of multiple violations of the 1948 Genocide Convention.
The ICC also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif but it was later learned that he had been killed in an Israeli airstrike.
Just as all Jews aren't Zionists or Israelis, very few Palestinians are Hamas. Israel's Palestinian genocide is a disproportionate response to Hamas terrorism.
That's no excuse to bring their wars to Australia.Last time I checked Bondi beach wasnt connected to the Gaza strip. Same with these pro Palestinian demonstrations where Australian Flags are burnt and ISIS flags are flown, it's got nothing to do with Australia and we are not a battleground for religious holy wars. Albanese by his own admission hasn't done enough, sat on his Envoys report for 5 months and now we are having to look over our shoulder every time we shop at Westfield or Myer during the Christmas period. NSW police now want Rifles so they have more firepower...too little , too late from Albo and now our once safe country is a war zone.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Baggers on December 21, 2025, 03:56:45 pm
Gutless bullies, not matter which side of the fence they dwell on, always go after the weakest target.
Well said, Spotted One.
No matter our chosen political or religious view when defenseless, innocent folks attempting to go about their daily lives are slaughtered, starved or persecuted, we're simply witnessing profane cowardice.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 21, 2025, 05:29:15 pm
Not saying it isnt, and whilst we like to place rules on this, where were these rules when Islamic militants abducted innocent party goers at a music festival?
No outrage, no action, people were horrified by it but it was all a bit meh. The world stood by and did SFA. As soon as the retaliation started, outrage, protests, sanctions, you name it. Australian Councillors wearing keffiyehs in session, anti semitic graffiti on business, no action. Disgraceful.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: crashlander on December 21, 2025, 05:44:33 pm
Gutless bullies, not matter which side of the fence they dwell on, always go after the weakest target.
Well said, Spotted One.
No matter our chosen political or religious view when defenseless, innocent folks attempting to go about their daily lives are slaughtered, starved or persecuted, we're simply witnessing profane cowardice.
Can't argue with that. Unfortunately, there are those who feel the only way they can get their point across is to hurt the innocent. And it isn't just terrorists, as much as I dislike them. Look at the demonstrations: they aren't helping anyone, but they are hurting innocents (although mainly financially). And they certainly stimulate people against their cause, no matter how 'good' it might be.
One of our advantages a century ago was that we were literally half a world away. Modern communications and transportation has changed that. Not all of the consequences are positive, not are they ever likely to be so: anything can be misused if someone tries hard enough. But I much preferred it when people left their wars behind them and came here for a new start: it is what Australia was founded for. But now it is hard to leave anything behind.
Should it influence our policy on immigration? I would prefer not. Australia being a melting pot has been a very good thing. But, some minority definitely have more influence than others. We have a lot more Buddhists in Australia than Muslims, for one example, yet which group is more vocal in wanting its tenants followed? Does changing our migration policies make us racist? A good question. I would think so, but I do not want extremists from anywhere coming here and disrupting our society. But how do you identify them? How much of the economy should be spent on such things?
Gun laws: we already have quite restrictive gun laws. Do they need tightening? Possibly. There certainly seems to be a crack in which the Bondi terrorists fell through. Actually following up on the laws we have seem to be pretty difficult for law enforcement. I think people should be able to have guns if they have use for them, and a licence to show it. But what sort of guns? And I certainly don't think we should be like the USA, where they have guns everywhere. That gives them incidents like Bondi on a weekly basis. A country where all citizens are armed is Switzerland. They have laws that control their guns. They don't have mass shootings. The US should look at their model; it makes a lot more sense of you want an armed populous. I don't think that is what we want here. We just have to work out how to control them effectively.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on December 21, 2025, 06:03:16 pm
Gutless bullies, not matter which side of the fence they dwell on, always go after the weakest target.
You cant get anymore gutless they to stand on a bridge picking off innocent men women and children with a high powered weapon all about a conflict on the other side of the world.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on December 21, 2025, 06:13:41 pm
The bottom line is that the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, the former Minister of Defense of Israel, alleging responsibility for the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts during the Gaza war. Even in war there are lines that aren't crossed by civilised countries or their leaders.
A subsequent UN Commission of Inquiry called for genocide charges to be added to the warrant after finding the Israeli government guilty of multiple violations of the 1948 Genocide Convention.
The ICC also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif but it was later learned that he had been killed in an Israeli airstrike.
Just as all Jews aren't Zionists or Israelis, very few Palestinians are Hamas. Israel's Palestinian genocide is a disproportionate response to Hamas terrorism.
That's no excuse to bring their wars to Australia.Last time I checked Bondi beach wasnt connected to the Gaza strip. Same with these pro Palestinian demonstrations where Australian Flags are burnt and ISIS flags are flown, it's got nothing to do with Australia and we are not a battleground for religious holy wars. Albanese by his own admission hasn't done enough, sat on his Envoys report for 5 months and now we are having to look over our shoulder every time we shop at Westfield or Myer during the Christmas period. NSW police now want Rifles so they have more firepower...too little , too late from Albo and now our once safe country is a war zone.
spot on as usual Eb.
why allow protests when relating to oversea issues? they are fanatical and protests builds unity among them and just strengthens there beliefs until they end up taking thinga into their own hands when the issues are not resolved
We are way too soft here we allow their hatred to grow and manifest until one of them does an evil act and the innocent are slaughtered. Same as our p1ssweak sentencing - they gave bail (was later revoked) to the nutcase who stabbed that poor innovent chef a few months back in the city. disgusting and weak and the sorts that commit these vile acts prey on the weak so unless we get serious and make big changes its going to happen again.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 21, 2025, 06:46:30 pm
To be honest, I dont know what the answers are to the problems we face here that are related to issues overseas, smarter and more tolerant people than me might figure it out (hopefully). What I do know, and I think we can all agree on, is that these acts of violence on our shores are so un Australian it's not funny. Once upon a time, I felt comfort in that fact that the vast expanses of water surrounding an our great land was the worlds greatest DH and Issue filter. I feel like that powers that be have allowed this comfort to be eroded away. I feel like the smarter we have become as a society in general, the dumber we have actually become. What I mean by that is despite the wealth of knowledge available at everyone's fingertips, we've outsmarted ourselves and neglected the basics. I used the word tolerant above, I wonder if that's the crux of the problem? Perhaps there needs to be a better balance between hard ass laws/policies and tolerance, I think it's swayed too much one way and here we are. People are scared at home at night, people are scared in shopping centres, people are scared walking down the street, people are scared gathering at church, sporting events, concerts etc. I never in my wildest dreams thought Australia would be like this. I dont know the answers but I sure as hell know something aint right.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 21, 2025, 07:03:29 pm
Not saying it isnt, and whilst we like to place rules on this, where were these rules when Islamic militants abducted innocent party goers at a music festival?
This isnt sports. With a referee that can adjudicate, and when the Palestinians hide their militants in the gen pop and under hospitals then what is expected?
I know there are rules of conduct and what not, but whos rules are they? History is always written by the victor.
That's the thing though Thry, the terrorists who attacked innocent Israelis aren't professional soldiers, don't wear a uniform, don't answer to a government and aren't bound by the rules that govern conflicts between nations. If they are apprehended, they are charged with terrorism offences (although the ICC did charge the now dead head of Hamas with war crimes). When I was a member of the ADF, I was taught the provisions of the Geneva and Hague Conventions and regularly reminded to comply with them at all times. Of course, professional soldiers may find it hard to adhere to the rules when the enemy doesn't, as we saw in Afghanistan.
Israel is a party to all four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and is legally bound by their rules ... and they're the first to bleat if any IDF personnel are not treated in accordance with the conventions.
Again, you're falling into the trap of assuming that the militants represent all Palestinians and all Palestinians are militants. The vast majority of Palestinians just want the Israelis and Hamas to leave them alone and they are not hiding "their militants" anywhere.
The 7 October attacks killed 1,195 people, 815 of whom were Israeli civilians. In addition, around 250 people were taken hostage and many of them haven't survived. The Israeli offensive that followed has killed 70,925 Palestinians, foreign aid workers and reporters and another 171,185 have been wounded. Around 1,200 IDF personnel have been killed since 7 October, on all fronts. Since the "ceasefire", 379 Palestinians, including 70 children, have been killed and three IDF soldiers have died. Those figures aren't surprising when you have one of the largest, most ruthless and well-equipped military forces waging war on unarmed civilians and defenceless children.
Hamas was estimated to have between 20-40,000 fighters of varying capacity and access to weapons in October 2023. The IDF claims to have killed around 17,000 to 23,000 militants (that's around one third of Palestinian casualties) since then. Of course, the ongoing persecution of Palestinians is likely to radicalise more fighters but there's a finite number.
The ICC is the referee that adjudicates war crimes.
I'm not a fan of protests generally and I don't think the pro-Palestinian rallies will change anyone's mind, or government policies. However, as Judith Treanor, a Jewish small business owner, points out,
"Those advocating for restrictions on pro-Palestinian protests must acknowledge the diversity of Jewish perspectives. Many Jews, including members of anti-Zionist groups like Jews Against the Occupation '48, Tzedek Collective, and the Loud Jew Collective, actively participate in these weekly rallies, standing in solidarity with Palestinians suffering atrocities in Gaza and the West Bank.
Globally, anti-Zionist Jewish groups echo this support. In the U.S., Jewish Voice for Peace and lfNotNow have organised mass protests. Orthodox groups like Torah Jews for Justice have taken clear anti-Zionist stances. In London, the UJewish Bloc" within pro-Palestine rallies numbers in the hundreds, including Holocaust survivors. Na'amod, a contributing group, emphasises that uonly when Palestinians live in freedom and dignity will Israel have security.
These groups, like ours, reject the notion that Zionism represents all Jews. The atrocities committed by Israel are not done in ourtives. Many Jews, including members of anti-Zionist groups like Jews Against the Occupation '48, Tzedek Collective, and the Loud Jew Collective, actively participate in these weekly rallies, standing in solidarity with Palestinians suffering atrocities in Gaza and the West Bank.
Globally, anti-Zionist Jewish groups echo this support. In the U.S., Jewish Voice for Peace and lfNotNow have organised mass protests. Orthodox groups like Torah Jews for Justice have taken clear anti-Zionist stances. In London, the UJewish Bloc" within pro-Palestine rallies numbers in the hundreds, including Holocaust survivors. Na'amod, a contributing group, emphasises that uonly when Palestinians live in freedom and dignity will Israel have security.
These groups, like ours, reject the notion that Zionism represents all Jews. The atrocities committed by Israel are not done in our name."
You can read Judith's letter here: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/lcdocs/other/21804/Judith%20Treanor,%20Pearls%20and%20Irritations,%2029%20January%202025.pdf
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 21, 2025, 08:05:12 pm
An exercise in hypocrisy!
Josh Frydenberg, ever the opportunist, is criticising the Government's position on hate speech but he strongly advocated weakening existing hate speech legislation when he was an MP.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on December 21, 2025, 08:17:01 pm
Not saying it isnt, and whilst we like to place rules on this, where were these rules when Islamic militants abducted innocent party goers at a music festival?
This isnt sports. With a referee that can adjudicate, and when the Palestinians hide their militants in the gen pop and under hospitals then what is expected?
I know there are rules of conduct and what not, but whos rules are they? History is always written by the victor.
That's the thing though Thry, the terrorists who attacked innocent Israelis aren't professional soldiers, don't wear a uniform, don't answer to a government and aren't bound by the rules that govern conflicts between nations. If they are apprehended, they are charged with terrorism offences (although the ICC did charge the now dead head of Hamas with war crimes). When I was a member of the ADF, I was taught the provisions of the Geneva and Hague Conventions and regularly reminded to comply with them at all times. Of course, professional soldiers may find it hard to adhere to the rules when the enemy doesn't, as we saw in Afghanistan.
Israel is a party to all four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and is legally bound by their rules ... and they're the first to bleat if any IDF personnel are not treated in accordance with the conventions.
Again, you're falling into the trap of assuming that the militants represent all Palestinians and all Palestinians are militants. The vast majority of Palestinians just want the Israelis and Hamas to leave them alone and they are not hiding "their militants" anywhere.
The 7 October attacks killed 1,195 people, 815 of whom were Israeli civilians. In addition, around 250 people were taken hostage and many of them haven't survived. The Israeli offensive that followed has killed 70,925 Palestinians, foreign aid workers and reporters and another 171,185 have been wounded. Around 1,200 IDF personnel have been killed since 7 October, on all fronts. Since the "ceasefire", 379 Palestinians, including 70 children, have been killed and three IDF soldiers have died. Those figures aren't surprising when you have one of the largest, most ruthless and well-equipped military forces waging war on unarmed civilians and defenceless children.
Hamas was estimated to have between 20-40,000 fighters of varying capacity and access to weapons in October 2023. The IDF claims to have killed around 17,000 to 23,000 militants (that's around one third of Palestinian casualties) since then. Of course, the ongoing persecution of Palestinians is likely to radicalise more fighters but there's a finite number.
The ICC is the referee that adjudicates war crimes.
I'm not a fan of protests generally and I don't think the pro-Palestinian rallies will change anyone's mind, or government policies. However, as Judith Treanor, a Jewish small business owner, points out,
"Those advocating for restrictions on pro-Palestinian protests must acknowledge the diversity of Jewish perspectives. Many Jews, including members of anti-Zionist groups like Jews Against the Occupation '48, Tzedek Collective, and the Loud Jew Collective, actively participate in these weekly rallies, standing in solidarity with Palestinians suffering atrocities in Gaza and the West Bank.
Globally, anti-Zionist Jewish groups echo this support. In the U.S., Jewish Voice for Peace and lfNotNow have organised mass protests. Orthodox groups like Torah Jews for Justice have taken clear anti-Zionist stances. In London, the UJewish Bloc" within pro-Palestine rallies numbers in the hundreds, including Holocaust survivors. Na'amod, a contributing group, emphasises that uonly when Palestinians live in freedom and dignity will Israel have security.
These groups, like ours, reject the notion that Zionism represents all Jews. The atrocities committed by Israel are not done in ourtives. Many Jews, including members of anti-Zionist groups like Jews Against the Occupation '48, Tzedek Collective, and the Loud Jew Collective, actively participate in these weekly rallies, standing in solidarity with Palestinians suffering atrocities in Gaza and the West Bank.
Globally, anti-Zionist Jewish groups echo this support. In the U.S., Jewish Voice for Peace and lfNotNow have organised mass protests. Orthodox groups like Torah Jews for Justice have taken clear anti-Zionist stances. In London, the UJewish Bloc" within pro-Palestine rallies numbers in the hundreds, including Holocaust survivors. Na'amod, a contributing group, emphasises that uonly when Palestinians live in freedom and dignity will Israel have security.
These groups, like ours, reject the notion that Zionism represents all Jews. The atrocities committed by Israel are not done in our name."
You can read Judith's letter here: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/lcdocs/other/21804/Judith%20Treanor,%20Pearls%20and%20Irritations,%2029%20January%202025.pdf
ahh, but have you read the hadiths and manifestos laid out by Mohammed?
The extremists are activists who represent Islam. Not just Islamic state, not just palestine. Its not as simple as being made out.
I agree that the Bondi stuff is over simplified as being anti Semitic. Its activism in the worst way, but the actual scenario is that the Palestinian people won't rest until the Jews are expelled for Israel or what was former Britain mandate palestine.
Its a scenario without end djc. Just like Ukraine Russia.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on December 22, 2025, 06:17:44 am
Josh Frydenberg, ever the opportunist, is criticising the Government's position on hate speech but he strongly advocated weakening existing hate speech legislation when he was an MP.
Because he is guilty of it, he wants to throw rocks for political gain, that is part of his hypocrisy exposed.
He is no different to Pauline, same tactics from a more profitable perspective. One targets the welfare state, the other billionaires.
They are not leaders, they are antagonists.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 23, 2025, 01:18:05 pm
At least Malcolm Turnbull has the balls to push back against the war criminal Netanyahu.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on December 23, 2025, 01:34:49 pm
Sussan Ley is embarrassing with some of her appearances in recent days. ::)
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on December 23, 2025, 04:01:12 pm
Sussan Ley is embarrassing with some of her appearances in recent days. ::)
Not as embarrassing as Albanese, Wong and Burke. The only polly with any credibility has been Chris Minns from NSW imo. Minns has been prepared to break ALP ranks and call for a Royal Commission along with the Federal Opposition and has been able to negotiate support from NSW opposition leader Kellie Sloane for security and gun control reforms. Albanese and crew have been too busy avoiding responsibility and are more interested in deflecting criticism, accountability and trying to shore up votes by making token disingenuous appearances which have been met with the appropriate response from the Jewish community who can see through them like a sheet of ultra clear glass.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 23, 2025, 05:15:44 pm
Morrison was PM when an Australian nazi terrorist shot and killed 51 Muslim worshippers in New Zealand. Abbott was PM when a Muslim terrorist took hostages in the Lindt Cafe, two of whom subsequently died from gunshot wounds. Howard was PM when an Australian shot and killed 35 tourists at Port Arthur.
The common thread is that the Opposition adopted a bi-partisan approach and supported the Government's responses in each case.
You would expect the One Nation nutters to try to capitalise on any event but the politicisation of the Bondi tragedy by the Coalition is disgraceful.
The hysterical calls for a Royal Commission are probably understandable but should be ignored by good government. If there were flaws in the work of ASIO, AFP and/or NSW Police, they need to be identified and rectified immediately, not after a Royal Commission has spent 18 months or more examining the terrorist attack from a legal perspective.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 23, 2025, 05:36:52 pm
Sussan Ley is embarrassing with some of her appearances in recent days. ::)
Not as embarrassing as Albanese, Wong and Burke. The only polly with any credibility has been Chris Minns from NSW imo. Minns has been prepared to break ALP ranks and call for a Royal Commission along with the Federal Opposition and has been able to negotiate support from NSW opposition leader Kellie Sloane for security and gun control reforms. Albanese and crew have been too busy avoiding responsibility and are more interested in deflecting criticism, accountability and trying to shore up votes by making token disingenuous appearances which have been met with the appropriate response from the Jewish community who can see through them like a sheet of ultra clear glass.
Gotta laugh, Albo's reasoning for not calling for a royal commission is because Howard didnt after Port Arthur. What a farken moron, any wonder the country is farked.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on December 23, 2025, 05:38:14 pm
I think the thing I struggle with in trying to understand the motivation of those that carry out these acts of terror is that the result always invites a backlash, against not only the perpetrators but by extension the people they claim to represent. We’ve seen that play out the last week.
Not all Jewish people are supportive of the actions of the Israeli government and military. Not all Palestinians are supportive of Hamas.
There are a few other aspects that are probably true... If Hamas hadn’t committed the atrocities of October the 7th 2023 there would be 70,000 Palestinian men, woman and children still alive. Maybe not all living in the best of conditions but at least with the basics of housing, food and medical access. There would be 1200 Israelis killed on the day who would still be alive There are around 1000 IDF soldiers been killed in combat since October the 7th (around half of them in Gaza) who would still be alive
That the response to the attack has been overwhelmingly disproportionate is also true. Israeli leadership has acted reprehensibly to the point that war crimes have occurred, no doubt, and areas of Gaza left totally destroyed and uninhabitable. That those leaders will ever be held to full account is doubtful. Winners rarely get held to account.
Was the disproportionate response unpredictable? Hardly!
The Jewish people learned from the very, very best about ‘disproportionate’ responses. Whole villages would be exterminated as revenge for the loss of German lives during the 1940’s. The leaders of Israel are in many cases the children and or grandchildren of European Jews who survived (or didn’t) the horrors of the “Holocaust” There would have been a general feeling amongst Israelis since the founding of that country that “never again will we go meekly to the slaughter”.
So given the Israeli response would be disproportionate, and Hamas would know that, then the question would have to be “Why attack civilians in the manner in which they did?”
Did they believe the response would be disproportionate, but not in the extreme manner that’s occurred…that hostages would also give Hamas some protection and bargaining power and the Israelis some pause.
Did they believe that once the conflict started, other Arab nations and Iran would join the fight.
Or did they believe that the ‘world’ outrage and growing sympathy for their cause following such a disproportionate response was likely (as has happened)…If that’s what a ‘win’ looks like their fellow Palestinians have paid a terrible price to gain that sympathy and support.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on December 23, 2025, 05:45:37 pm
Morrison was PM when an Australian nazi terrorist shot and killed 51 Muslim worshippers in New Zealand. Abbott was PM when a Muslim terrorist took hostages in the Lindt Cafe, two of whom subsequently died from gunshot wounds. Howard was PM when an Australian shot and killed 35 tourists at Port Arthur.
The common thread is that the Opposition adopted a bi-partisan approach and supported the Government's responses in each case.
You would expect the One Nation nutters to try to capitalise on any event but the politicisation of the Bondi tragedy by the Coalition is disgraceful.
The hysterical calls for a Royal Commission are probably understandable but should be ignored by good government. If there were flaws in the work of ASIO, AFP and/or NSW Police, they need to be identified and rectified immediately, not after a Royal Commission has spent 18 months or more examining the terrorist attack from a legal perspective.
I would never in a million years blame Howard or Tony Rundle for Port Arthur. Seems like a flimsy logic and a poor argument.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 23, 2025, 05:48:31 pm
Once again, after a catastrophe in NSW, a good leader in Chris Minns comes to the fore (IMO). I say again because I remember the Premier there in Mike Baird during and after the Lindt Cafe siege. Its a shame quality like these guys dont step up to federal level pushing out the bunch of absolute buffoons there now. I also dont mind the cut of the SA Premiers jib for that matter.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on December 23, 2025, 06:25:54 pm
Morrison was PM when an Australian nazi terrorist shot and killed 51 Muslim worshippers in New Zealand. Abbott was PM when a Muslim terrorist took hostages in the Lindt Cafe, two of whom subsequently died from gunshot wounds. Howard was PM when an Australian shot and killed 35 tourists at Port Arthur.
The common thread is that the Opposition adopted a bi-partisan approach and supported the Government's responses in each case.
You would expect the One Nation nutters to try to capitalise on any event but the politicisation of the Bondi tragedy by the Coalition is disgraceful.
The hysterical calls for a Royal Commission are probably understandable but should be ignored by good government. If there were flaws in the work of ASIO, AFP and/or NSW Police, they need to be identified and rectified immediately, not after a Royal Commission has spent 18 months or more examining the terrorist attack from a legal perspective.
I would never in a million years blame Howard or Tony Rundle for Port Arthur. Seems like a flimsy logic and a poor argument.
It really has nothing to do with blame Paul. It is the actions of the Opposition that is under scrutiny here. Howard, Abbott and Morrison enjoyed bipartisan support for their responses, as they should.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: madbluboy on December 23, 2025, 06:33:21 pm
Kill the Jews was chanted every week for a couple of years. We just accepted it.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on December 23, 2025, 06:37:20 pm
It really has nothing to do with blame Paul. It is the actions of the Opposition that is under scrutiny here. Howard, Abbott and Morrison enjoyed bipartisan support for their responses, as they should.
Ley and McKenzie have gone all out finger pointing and blaming Wong and Albanese, and their outsourced hype crew and propaganda arm are more than happy to add fuel to the fire.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Baggers on December 23, 2025, 07:53:26 pm
Morrison was PM when an Australian nazi terrorist shot and killed 51 Muslim worshippers in New Zealand. Abbott was PM when a Muslim terrorist took hostages in the Lindt Cafe, two of whom subsequently died from gunshot wounds. Howard was PM when an Australian shot and killed 35 tourists at Port Arthur.
The common thread is that the Opposition adopted a bi-partisan approach and supported the Government's responses in each case.
You would expect the One Nation nutters to try to capitalise on any event but the politicisation of the Bondi tragedy by the Coalition is disgraceful.
The hysterical calls for a Royal Commission are probably understandable but should be ignored by good government. If there were flaws in the work of ASIO, AFP and/or NSW Police, they need to be identified and rectified immediately, not after a Royal Commission has spent 18 months or more examining the terrorist attack from a legal perspective.
I would never in a million years blame Howard or Tony Rundle for Port Arthur. Seems like a flimsy logic and a poor argument.
It is embarrassing that so-called leaders apportion blame to the incumbent PM.
Holy mackerel this is a problem that goes back decades and centuries, FFS. Need I say that the shallowness and opportunism of some is breathtaking... and vulgar. (and Baggers steps down from his soapbox).
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on December 23, 2025, 08:05:46 pm
It is embarrassing that so-called leaders apportion blame to the incumbent PM.
Holy mackerel this is a problem that goes back decades and centuries, FFS. Need I say that the shallowness and opportunism of some is breathtaking... and vulgar. (and Baggers steps down from his soapbox).
Yes, leaving aside the inflammatory nature of this stance, it also lacks intellectual and analytical rigor.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 23, 2025, 11:23:19 pm
I would never in a million years blame Howard or Tony Rundle for Port Arthur. Seems like a flimsy logic and a poor argument.
It is embarrassing that so-called leaders apportion blame to the incumbent PM.
Holy mackerel this is a problem that goes back decades and centuries, FFS. Need I say that the shallowness and opportunism of some is breathtaking... and vulgar. (and Baggers steps down from his soapbox).
Wny Baggers? Is it not the Government's and its Authorities/Agencies job to keep Australians safe? As you say, this isn't a new problem that came about last week and many jewish members of the public have been saying this would happen and it has (on the current PM's watch). If I was being sceptical, I'd suggest that the law enforcement and intelligence agencies appear to pick and choose went to use intel to foil crimes.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on December 24, 2025, 07:47:01 am
I'll come around and throw rocks at your house, which I won't talk about, but I'll keep telling people that you are prone to attack me! You'll prove me right, nothing is more certain.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Baggers on December 24, 2025, 07:56:21 am
It is embarrassing that so-called leaders apportion blame to the incumbent PM.
Holy mackerel this is a problem that goes back decades and centuries, FFS. Need I say that the shallowness and opportunism of some is breathtaking... and vulgar. (and Baggers steps down from his soapbox).
Wny Baggers? Is it not the Government's and its Authorities/Agencies job to keep Australians safe? As you say, this isn't a new problem that came about last week and many jewish members of the public have been saying this would happen and it has (on the current PM's watch). If I was being sceptical, I'd suggest that the law enforcement and intelligence agencies appear to pick and choose went to use intel to foil crimes.
I was referring to the political point scoring, GTC.
On the subject of leadership and dealing with terrorism, I reckon you're right... Aussies, regardless of religion, political persuasion, gender or hair colour! have a right to feel safe in their own country (as do Ukrainians, Jews and Palestinians!!). This Bondi horror happened on Albo's watch so he's copping in the neck but this is a failure of leadership over many years - addressing antisemitism and facing the reality that terrorists reside here and are planning horrors right now.
You can bet that ASIO and the AFP, in particular, will up their games now.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on December 24, 2025, 09:44:21 am
From Jillian Segal's Envoy report: 2.1 From October 2023 to September 2024, antisemitic incidents surged by 316%, with over 2,000 cases reported – threats, assaults, vandalism and intimidation. In October and November 2023 alone, episodes increased over 700% compared to the previous year, reflecting incitement by those with extremist views and misinformation in the media and online. These figures exclude much of the hate online, where antisemitism has exploded. Notable incidents include the firebombing of Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue, firebombing of a childcare centre adjacent to a Synagogue and school, firebombing of cars in residential areas and the repeated targeting with graffiti of Jewish schools and places of worship. In February 2025, ASIO Director General Mike Burgess declared antisemitism Australia’s leading threat to life.
Clearly the Government, ASIO, the AFP have had the information but Albanese has refused to act and protect Jewish citizens in this country.Think I read that 70% of Jews in Australia vote Liberal which isnt unexpected and thats probably going to spiral upwards after recent events. Its been clear that the ALP and the Greens are anti Israel and pro Palestinian, so Albanese has been in no hurry to act until now of course when under the media and world spotlight. 50% of Jews left Nazi Germany pre war so it will be interesting to see if we get a significant exit from Australia now its unsafe for them.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 24, 2025, 09:50:12 am
Wny Baggers? Is it not the Government's and its Authorities/Agencies job to keep Australians safe? As you say, this isn't a new problem that came about last week and many jewish members of the public have been saying this would happen and it has (on the current PM's watch). If I was being sceptical, I'd suggest that the law enforcement and intelligence agencies appear to pick and choose went to use intel to foil crimes.
I was referring to the political point scoring, GTC.
On the subject of leadership and dealing with terrorism, I reckon you're right... Aussies, regardless of religion, political persuasion, gender or hair colour! have a right to feel safe in their own country (as do Ukrainians, Jews and Palestinians!!). This Bondi horror happened on Albo's watch so he's copping in the neck but this is a failure of leadership over many years - addressing antisemitism and facing the reality that terrorists reside here and are planning horrors right now.
You can bet that ASIO and the AFP, in particular, will up their games now.
Spot on Baggers, my point exactly. Why now though? I feel like the antisemitism issue has been given a low priority. I can only speak for my local government, but they have actually promoted and fostered antisemitism which has been disgraceful. City of Darebin is in the news again in recent days, shameful.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 24, 2025, 01:57:50 pm
From Jillian Segal's Envoy report: 2.1 From October 2023 to September 2024, antisemitic incidents surged by 316%, with over 2,000 cases reported – threats, assaults, vandalism and intimidation. In October and November 2023 alone, episodes increased over 700% compared to the previous year, reflecting incitement by those with extremist views and misinformation in the media and online. These figures exclude much of the hate online, where antisemitism has exploded. Notable incidents include the firebombing of Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue, firebombing of a childcare centre adjacent to a Synagogue and school, firebombing of cars in residential areas and the repeated targeting with graffiti of Jewish schools and places of worship. In February 2025, ASIO Director General Mike Burgess declared antisemitism Australia’s leading threat to life.
Clearly the Government, ASIO, the AFP have had the information but Albanese has refused to act and protect Jewish citizens in this country.Think I read that 70% of Jews in Australia vote Liberal which isnt unexpected and thats probably going to spiral upwards after recent events. Its been clear that the ALP and the Greens are anti Israel and pro Palestinian, so Albanese has been in no hurry to act until now of course when under the media and world spotlight. 50% of Jews left Nazi Germany pre war so it will be interesting to see if we get a significant exit from Australia now its unsafe for them.
^^^^ Says it all really.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on December 24, 2025, 02:00:29 pm
From Jillian Segal's Envoy report: 2.1 From October 2023 to September 2024, antisemitic incidents surged by 316%, with over 2,000 cases reported – threats, assaults, vandalism and intimidation. In October and November 2023 alone, episodes increased over 700% compared to the previous year, reflecting incitement by those with extremist views and misinformation in the media and online. These figures exclude much of the hate online, where antisemitism has exploded. Notable incidents include the firebombing of Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue, firebombing of a childcare centre adjacent to a Synagogue and school, firebombing of cars in residential areas and the repeated targeting with graffiti of Jewish schools and places of worship. In February 2025, ASIO Director General Mike Burgess declared antisemitism Australia’s leading threat to life.
Clearly the Government, ASIO, the AFP have had the information but Albanese has refused to act and protect Jewish citizens in this country.Think I read that 70% of Jews in Australia vote Liberal which isnt unexpected and thats probably going to spiral upwards after recent events. Its been clear that the ALP and the Greens are anti Israel and pro Palestinian, so Albanese has been in no hurry to act until now of course when under the media and world spotlight. 50% of Jews left Nazi Germany pre war so it will be interesting to see if we get a significant exit from Australia now its unsafe for them.
My ex-neighbour who sold house and moved because of how bad it was in our area now believes he would feel safer in Israel and is considering uprooting his family and going there. Think about that for a second? Where are we at as a nation if even one person thinks living in the Middle East is safer than Melbourne/Australia?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on December 24, 2025, 02:13:39 pm
From Jillian Segal's Envoy report: 2.1 From October 2023 to September 2024, antisemitic incidents surged by 316%, with over 2,000 cases reported – threats, assaults, vandalism and intimidation. In October and November 2023 alone, episodes increased over 700% compared to the previous year, reflecting incitement by those with extremist views and misinformation in the media and online. These figures exclude much of the hate online, where antisemitism has exploded. Notable incidents include the firebombing of Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue, firebombing of a childcare centre adjacent to a Synagogue and school, firebombing of cars in residential areas and the repeated targeting with graffiti of Jewish schools and places of worship. In February 2025, ASIO Director General Mike Burgess declared antisemitism Australia’s leading threat to life.
Clearly the Government, ASIO, the AFP have had the information but Albanese has refused to act and protect Jewish citizens in this country.Think I read that 70% of Jews in Australia vote Liberal which isnt unexpected and thats probably going to spiral upwards after recent events. Its been clear that the ALP and the Greens are anti Israel and pro Palestinian, so Albanese has been in no hurry to act until now of course when under the media and world spotlight. 50% of Jews left Nazi Germany pre war so it will be interesting to see if we get a significant exit from Australia now its unsafe for them.
My ex-neighbour who sold house and moved because of how bad it was in our area now believes he would feel safer in Israel and is considering uprooting his family and going there. Think about that for a second? Where are we at as a nation if even one person thinks living in the Middle East is safer than Melbourne/Australia?
Woah there GI2C.
There are going to be people who feel safer somewhere else irrespective of where that is.
Those people are not an indication of anything to do with how safe Australia is.
HOWEVER, things are getting out of hand here.
Ultimately, Jews would always feel safer in Israel. They are a ethno religious nationality that will look after their own, and actively patrol their borders against threats on their doorsteps. Would they feel safer or less safe here? Thats relative. Id probably feel safer in the villages of Greece too, but thats comparing an apple with an orange using a big city as a comparison. Ditto for Israel vs Australia.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on January 01, 2026, 10:46:46 pm
Machette slashing on NYE in Lygon st had 2 young men in a critical condition with chest stabbings.
Just saw the footage and of you didnt know you would think this is in a 3rd world country. These thuds have no regard for the law laugh at our soft BS policies bail and sentencing and didnt obey labours brain fart idea to hand them into the machette bins. now who would have thought that wouldnt work 🤔
Again like the roads hospitals emergency services housing issues cost of living the crime situation just continues to get worse without any real changes to arrest it
But not all is lost Jacinta has confirmed the city is safe and the machette bins have done their job.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on January 22, 2026, 01:23:01 pm
You would think with Albo on the ropes with regards the economy, migration, anti semitism etc that the Libs would be soaring in the polls and climbing back into poll position for the next election but alas the nationals have bailed on them again and Party Leader David Littleproud has said they cant and wont be working with Susan Ley. Right Wing Fish and Chip purveyor Pauline Hanson's popularity on the other hand has gone through the parliamentary roof and its Susan Ley looking like she is yesterday's fish and chip paper and on the way out. Libs will do their usual next dud up mentality and pick Hastie or Taylor when they should looking at some of their younger better performers... Albo might get in again by doing a Bradbury and staying off the pace while the others trip themselves up..
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on January 22, 2026, 01:45:48 pm
You would think with Albo on the ropes with regards the economy, migration, anti semitism etc that the Libs would be soaring in the polls and climbing back into poll position for the next election but alas the nationals have bailed on them again and Party Leader David Littleproud has said they cant and wont be working with Susan Ley. Right Wing Fish and Chip purveyor Pauline Hanson's popularity on the other hand has gone through the parliamentary roof and its Susan Ley looking like she is yesterday's fish and chip paper and on the way out. Libs will do their usual next dud up mentality and pick Hastie or Taylor when they should looking at some of their younger better performers... Albo might get in again by doing a Bradbury and staying off the pace while the others trip themselves up..
Ley was the wrong choice, I said it at the time and it will come home to roost. The Libs should be renamed the No Opposition party, with leaders like Ley they provide zero alternative to a Government who must be pissing themselves laughing. Albo and Wong couldn't fark things up any worse if they tried and would get re-elected in a canter if an election was held tomorrow. Jacinta on the other hand has a real fight on her hands here in Vic.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on January 23, 2026, 08:33:18 am
The structure of politics has changed, being a State Politician use to be a full career, no less than being Prime Minister.
Now being in state politics is just a stepping stone to Federal politics, the gulf between the roles has grown too big as more and more government get's centralised, ironically while they spend their time telling people and industry to decentralise!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: dodge on January 23, 2026, 01:25:20 pm
Jacinta's fight won't be due to great opposition quality. If Jacinta gets up, it is because there is even less hope in the opposition - labour has 56 of 88 seats. LNP needs to work very hard still (although I think there are some pretty tight seats, which helps)
The now ex-coalition don't want to be in federal government - liberals hold 27 seats, nats 31 (out of 150). Going it alone won't get them anywhere. Nats/PHON is curious, as Hanson has no lower house seats (and never has). Surely it would be impossible to get to 76 seats for them.
LNP whinge no immediate action from Labor after Bondi, when it happens, whinge that it is too fast. Nats tell Libs that three shadow cabinet members are going to vote against the proposed consequences knowing that they will be kicked out from s/cabinet. Nats then threaten to have all other s/cabinet members resign if Libs do kick the 3 out - Libs call them out, Nats resign. Don't know if Utopia/Working Dog could have come up with this.
Hanson is gaining traction as she is seen as an opposition, because LNP have no idea how to be a coalition anymore. Read the One Nation policies, certainly not going to win global citizen of the year, a couple of pie in the sky thought bubbles, a couple of OK ideas and some rubbish (all parties would have a similar mix) - but really with no legislative experience, and if they got in a whole bunch of MPs with no idea as to how parliament works. May depend on preferences but have a stronger Senate presence.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on January 23, 2026, 01:36:01 pm
The LNP have got another problem across the whole country, kids are leaving family farms in droves, farms are being consumed by corporations and the workers are now employees not owners, when this change happens so do voting patterns.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: kruddler on January 24, 2026, 07:46:57 am
One nation voters seem to be multiplying at an eponential rate in some circles. Could be a somewhat genuine 3rd part alternative to libs and ALP and suprise a few.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on January 24, 2026, 08:47:07 am
The LNP only need to get half a clue and a more effective leadership and that One Nation vote will disappear. That's a challenge that appears beyond them at the moment.
The One Nation support is largely a reflection of the MAGA vote in the states. Hanson pushes that theme and connection. Around 20% is about the mark. We're trailing a bit behind in Australia and some still think those policies are a recipe for success. Not here. And around November, not there either.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Professer E on January 24, 2026, 08:57:54 am
They'll do better than you think, a lot of Australians are fed up with the useless nuffies in the two major parties and are looking for options. Whats the saying, a drowning man will cling to a serpent?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on January 24, 2026, 09:24:16 am
We're a bit of a way off any Federal election Although if you were Albanese you'd probably want to go while the opposition is in turmoil. It will be intersting to see how some of the elections and by-elections go in the meantime.
When it comes to a Federal election campaign, the actual quality of the One Nation candidates,especially their leadership will come under increased scrutiny and the current facade will fall apart. Their candidate selection process is limited and often throws up some real nut jobs.
I suspect many of the folks saying they'd vote 'One Nation'at the moment are doing it as a bit of an "Up Yours" to the major parties, especially the LNP, and a message to get their act together.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on January 24, 2026, 09:48:11 am
The LNP only need to get half a clue and a more effective leadership and that One Nation vote will disappear. That's a challenge that appears beyond them at the moment.
The One Nation support is largely a reflection of the MAGA vote in the states. Hanson pushes that theme and connection. Around 20% is about the mark. We're trailing a bit behind in Australia and some still think those policies are a recipe for success. Not here. And around November, not there either.
I think the One nation popularity is due to the appalling Labour Government and the lack of confidence in their attitude to community safety and woeful economic performance. It's a far swing to the right out of desperation and frustration with both major parties being seen as incompetent and not listening to mainstream voters. You add in the Greens who are devoid of any policies other than of the conservation variety and the simplistic policies of Hanson look appealing to voters doing it tough and Hanson's fish and chip shop owner battler image is serving her well vs the well heeled polly's with their property portfolios etc.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on January 24, 2026, 10:04:32 am
One nation voters seem to be multiplying at an eponential rate in some circles. Could be a somewhat genuine 3rd part alternative to libs and ALP and suprise a few.
Most of those LNP or One Nation surveys are being driven by surveys taken in the tropics, where rodeos or B&S balls dominate the landscape, it only becomes a problem when the major parties are hung. Which is another reason why at the moment they are self-destructing, because they've lost the power of influence, so they have become reactive.
They aren't really growing a base, they are just changing the split of what they already have.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on January 24, 2026, 10:22:23 am
I think the One nation popularity is due to the appalling Labour Government and the lack of confidence in their attitude to community safety and woeful economic performance.
I think the constant negativity from the opposition is wearing thin with the public, the criticisms are losing their impact in the absence of policy.
People may well vote the government out, but it's not a result of anything the opposition have said, it's because of stupid mistakes the government make.
Not much of an LNP base south of the border in Mexico(Vic), not much of a base down there with the Steak Press Lady and Bannanabe having pretty much zero influence.
FWIW, the same negativity thing is happening to RedTrump at the moment, his base is eroding because people are over the negativity in the absence of delivering real world benefits. Hollow promises fall dead, hollow threats mean nothing to smart people.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: dodge on January 24, 2026, 10:33:47 am
I think the One nation popularity is due to the appalling Labour Government and the lack of confidence in their attitude to community safety and woeful economic performance. It's a far swing to the right out of desperation and frustration with both major parties being seen as incompetent and not listening to mainstream voters. You add in the Greens who are devoid of any policies other than of the conservation variety and the simplistic policies of Hanson look appealing to voters doing it tough and Hanson's fish and chip shop owner battler image. [/quote]
It's not all about # votes it's where they are that matters. Greens are socialist, which doesn't work in a society that is asking 'what about me?'. Hanson speaks to many different prejudices, like MAGA does, so it is easy to find a platform that suits.
Hanson is probably worth well over 10 million - doing well to maintain battler image. Still yet to contribute anything positive or meaningful to Parliament.
As a curiosity, what is the woeful economic performance - I assume you are referring to Feds? (Vic is blindingly obvious to all!)
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Professer E on January 24, 2026, 10:56:12 am
Jacinta will lose Victoria for the feds
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on January 24, 2026, 03:57:57 pm
The LNP only need to get half a clue and a more effective leadership and that One Nation vote will disappear. That's a challenge that appears beyond them at the moment.
The One Nation support is largely a reflection of the MAGA vote in the states. Hanson pushes that theme and connection. Around 20% is about the mark. We're trailing a bit behind in Australia and some still think those policies are a recipe for success. Not here. And around November, not there either.
thats how Trump got in.
Don't underestimate an up yours vote.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on January 24, 2026, 04:20:10 pm
The LNP only need to get half a clue and a more effective leadership and that One Nation vote will disappear. That's a challenge that appears beyond them at the moment.
The One Nation support is largely a reflection of the MAGA vote in the states. Hanson pushes that theme and connection. Around 20% is about the mark. We're trailing a bit behind in Australia and some still think those policies are a recipe for success. Not here. And around November, not there either.
thats how Trump got in.
Don't underestimate an up yours vote.
Yep Trump got in because Americans doing it tough got desperate enough to try any alternative and again he promised simplistic solutions to difficult problems. I think it was John Lennon who said in reference to the TV band "The Monkees"people will buy anything if you market it well enough or words to that effect..
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on January 24, 2026, 04:48:17 pm
Yep Trump got in because Americans doing it tough got desperate enough to try any alternative and again he promised simplistic solutions to difficult problems. I think it was John Lennon who said in reference to the TV band "The Monkees"people will buy anything if you market it well enough or words to that effect..
What's wrong with the Monkees >:(
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on January 24, 2026, 05:34:48 pm
Yep Trump got in because Americans doing it tough got desperate enough to try any alternative and again he promised simplistic solutions to difficult problems. I think it was John Lennon who said in reference to the TV band "The Monkees"people will buy anything if you market it well enough or words to that effect..
What's wrong with the Monkees >:(
Lennon actually liked them as a comedy act and was a fan of their TV stuff but didnt see them as serious musicians...unlike somebody I know🤔😀
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on January 24, 2026, 06:10:23 pm
Lennon actually liked them as a comedy act and was a fan of their TV stuff but didnt see them as serious musicians...unlike somebody I know🤔😀
It's all relative isn't it. If you'd asked many people when they first heard the Beatles you probably would have got catchy, but it's not 'serious' music.
And it often comes down to personal choice. Lennon likened the Monkees to the Marx Brothers, and loved the TV show. It was a commercial exercise no doubt, and the music was aimed for a wide range of fans
But commercial isn't really a bad thing. 18,000,000 albums sold tells me I'm probably not Robinson Crusoe. I've only got three of those :D Funny thing is I was playing Monkee youtube clips yesterday.
While session musicians played on their early work they weren't Robinson Crusoe in that respect either. Session musicians played on a lot of the music of that era. Jimmy Page probably played on more hits as a session musician than he did with the Yardbirds and Led Zeppelin
Once they gained control of their music the Monkees then played on records and concert tours. Nesmith was a very good guitarist. Tork could play lead guitar, bass and keyboard. He actually played banjo on a George Harrison project. Dolenz was a guitarist who switched to drumming.
Google top seeling bands of the 60s and you'll probably find the Monkees there. ********************************************************************************
But we're getting off track so we'll find another thread for the music stuff and get back to the law and order.
I see the current surge in One Nation popularity as something akin to the "Joh for Canberra" push. It'll die in the backside after it comes under a bit of pressure and folks, look deeper and really have to make a choice on support. It also fills a void while the Libs and Nats are in such disarray.
One Nation may be seen to keep some undesirables out of the country...but will they bring your grocery prices down.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on January 24, 2026, 06:31:44 pm
One Nation may be seen to keep some undesirables out of the country...but will they bring your grocery prices down.
Don't you mean keep some undesirables in the country? ;)
Bit of both. :D (I meant to put 'undesirables' in inverted commas.)
The problem is they'd probably keep a whole lot of really desirables out of the country as well. Their Law and Order ideas seem to focus mostly on immigrant crime, especially assaults. That's where the problems solely lie to their way of thinking.
Their platforms and policies are far too limited and narrowly focussed for them to form a working Government. The may pick up the odd lower house seat. I suspect everyone will preference against them there though. Their real hope for success may be in the senate, but even there the number of states where they could get a position will be limited.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on January 24, 2026, 07:00:09 pm
I read something online and pissed myself laughing. The question (and poll I think) was asked if David Crisafulli would make a good PM. One of the responses was "Donald Duck would make a good PM right now". Thought it was both funny and accurate.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 09, 2026, 12:54:36 pm
Another stabbing in the SW on Sunday night with the victim dying.
The man charged with a NYE stabbing has been granted bail despite the police having concerns about potential gang links
Didn't Jacinta promise tougher bail laws?
They are all FOS.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on February 09, 2026, 02:46:12 pm
Another stabbing in the SW on Sunday night with the victim dying.
The man charged with a NYE stabbing has been granted bail despite the police having concerns about potential gang links
Didn't Jacinta promise tougher bail laws?
They are all FOS.
More machete bins should sort it out
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on February 09, 2026, 03:14:54 pm
Victoria now has its smallest full-time police force in close to seven years despite soaring crime and government promises to boost frontline officers...think I read in the HS we are 1700 officers down on where we need to be. A family member was a Detective but has gone back to being in Uniform for the massive overtime that is being offered...
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 09, 2026, 05:48:11 pm
Victoria now has its smallest full-time police force in close to seven years despite soaring crime and government promises to boost frontline officers...think I read in the HS we are 1700 officers down on where we need to be. A family member was a Detective but has gone back to being in Uniform for the massive overtime that is being offered...
Not just a recruiting issue, but I've heard that hundreds of Vicpol members are being poached by Qld and NSW offering better pay deals. However, from what I've heard a lot regret making that move, as much as we talk a lot about crime here in a Vic it turns out it's far worse in Brisbane or Sindney, who'd have thunk it, the grass isn't greener!
Really, from what I've read Vicpol aren't doing a bad job, the problem is the courts, crooks are out on bail before the report is even written!
I know of several who came back to Vic not re-entering the force but leaving it, one couple I know were both in Vicpol and went to Qld, then returned to Victoria to become Fireys. Talk about out of the frypan and into the fire!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: madbluboy on February 11, 2026, 01:27:35 pm
Peter Dean bashed and put in hospital by a couple of teenage car thieves.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 11, 2026, 06:39:16 pm
Trump cant fart without everyone going nuts on here yet own backyard is a shambles on so many fronts and hardly a word.
funny that.
Why do you insist on deflecting criticism of the senile narcissist in the White House with ill-considered complaints about Australian governments?
We have a thread devoted to the lunacy of the convicted felon and I started this thread to give you a platform to air what you believe are problems with our State and Commonwealth governments.
If you want to defend the indefensible, post in the Taco thread. If you want to bleat about Australian politicians, do it here.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: madbluboy on February 12, 2026, 08:19:48 am
Trump cant fart without everyone going nuts on here yet own backyard is a shambles on so many fronts and hardly a word.
funny that.
Why do you insist on deflecting criticism of the senile narcissist in the White House with ill-considered complaints about Australian governments?
We have a thread devoted to the lunacy of the convicted felon and I started this thread to give you a platform to air what you believe are problems with our State and Commonwealth governments.
If you want to defend the indefensible, post in the Taco thread. If you want to bleat about Australian politicians, do it here.
Nice try at deflecting.
How people accept this absolute bloody disgrace corrupt bunch of criminals that just happens to be in charge of running our state - running it into the ground astounds me.
And my comparsion to US politics and the obsession with everything that happens on the other side of the world is very relevant and if comparing that to the corrupt government we have here just happens to trigger you well so be it.
Im fking triggered at the corrupt spending of 15 BILLION dollars of OUR money.
15 billion in case you didnt know is 15 thousand MILLION and yet not one comment about your thoughts on this situation.
i wonder why that is ?😏
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: northernblue on February 12, 2026, 10:19:29 pm
Why do you insist on deflecting criticism of the senile narcissist in the White House with ill-considered complaints about Australian governments?
We have a thread devoted to the lunacy of the convicted felon and I started this thread to give you a platform to air what you believe are problems with our State and Commonwealth governments.
If you want to defend the indefensible, post in the Taco thread. If you want to bleat about Australian politicians, do it here.
Nice try at deflecting.
How people accept this absolute bloody disgrace corrupt bunch of criminals that just happens to be in charge of running our state - running it into the ground astounds me.
And my comparsion to US politics and the obsession with everything that happens on the other side of the world is very relevant and if comparing that to the corrupt government we have here just happens to trigger you well so be it.
Im fking triggered at the corrupt spending of 15 BILLION dollars of OUR money.
15 billion in case you didnt know is 15 thousand MILLION and yet not one comment about your thoughts on this situation.
i wonder why that is ?😏
It’s because DJC gets a trailing commission…
😎
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 13, 2026, 09:46:03 am
So Jacinta knew nothing about this. She was the infrastructure minister at the time yet 'claims' she knew nothing
Therefore one of the following is correct - she is a pathological liar like the man she proceeded or she is completely incompetent.
Not sure which one is better but this corrupt party cannot be re-elected - they just can't. The libs are the weakest they have ever been and don't provide much backbone or kickback against this which is so weak however what the current party has done to this state on practically every front is criminal and cannot be accepted anymore.
I understand there are millions of dyed on labour supporters (that never admit it of course) who's silence speaks volumes when issues in our own backyard are raised they refuse to comment refuse to dare go against their political beliefs BUT to wash down the drain 5000 MILLION dollars of our money to criminal entities and criminal activities all while the state is at debt levels that our great grand kids will be paying off is pure evil and madness we accept it. Victoria has no money to fix roads, has no money to fund hospitals or health care properly and understaffed emergency services - it just makes my blood boil and every tax paying Victorian should be feeling the same!
Their answer to our debt that they got us in is to introduce new taxes as well as increasing current already ridiculously high taxes - so the average hard working Victoria cops it both ways and they walk away from politics set up for life without missing a beat.
Disgusting governance and happening under our noses and we just take it. Jacinta and that Criminal before her (the new Skase) are a blight on politics and the only thing they are consistent on is corruption and pathological lying, right down to their very core.
Its 9.30 in the morning and my blood pressure is raising. Think i better stop.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 13, 2026, 09:54:15 am
How people accept this absolute bloody disgrace corrupt bunch of criminals that just happens to be in charge of running our state - running it into the ground astounds me.
And my comparsion to US politics and the obsession with everything that happens on the other side of the world is very relevant and if comparing that to the corrupt government we have here just happens to trigger you well so be it.
Im fking triggered at the corrupt spending of 15 BILLION dollars of OUR money.
15 billion in case you didnt know is 15 thousand MILLION and yet not one comment about your thoughts on this situation.
i wonder why that is ?😏
It’s because DJC gets a trailing commission…
😎
That was so funny - you should join the Labour party.
They pay clowns well
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: northernblue on February 13, 2026, 10:38:08 am
That was so funny - you should join the Labour party.
They pay clowns well
You really need a hug man xo
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: dodge on February 13, 2026, 12:56:45 pm
"How people accept this absolute bloody disgrace corrupt bunch of criminals that just happens to be in charge of running our state - running it into the ground astounds me"
Not accepting it, Shawny. This is an absolute disgrace and appropriate action needs to be taken against the appropriate people - with 'I know nothing' or 'I don't remember' not being acceptable.
There are two difficulties that I have. The first is that no one was really made (federally) accountable for Robodebt - one of many horrific actions of the gov of the day. There is a bit of shrug the shoulders - what can we do. The second is that the opposition have its scandals the other way with property development and Lobster with a mobster - once bitten twice shy? Unless we are able to be absolutely convinced that this is no longer going on.
The conflict of interest ($$, power, looking after mates) within parliament is nearly as big as in the AFL.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 13, 2026, 01:01:44 pm
@Shawny, you are very anti-labour, which is your right. However, do you think liberals are all squeeky clean with no skeletons in the closet?
Everyone is corrupt
I'm not sure 'everyone' is corrupt, Kruddler, but when any party remains in power without enough checks and balances, things appear to go backwards. And governments of different stripes tend to become 'corrupt' in different ways. It give me nightmares to think how disastrous an extended period of Green party government might be, as I don't agree with many of their policies about anything.
However, I do think the Labour government of Victoria is considerably past its use-by date. I am hoping that there can be a viable alternative com Election Day.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 13, 2026, 01:34:47 pm
@Shawny, you are very anti-labour, which is your right. However, do you think liberals are all squeeky clean with no skeletons in the closet?
Everyone is corrupt
Not at all.
i never once said the Libs will right every wrong and are honest true blah blah blah. i know very well they are generally all liars that dont follow through on promises and both sides blame one another whenever the sh1te hits the fan however regardless of which side of the fence you sit on we cant keep re electing a corrupt government simply because the alternative’may’ be just as bad. You cannot allow this sort of governance rewarded with re electing.
This very situation should be enough to remove a government imo.
if the same corrupt culture was found on a board of any private company would the board not be stood down immediately?
come on mate this can not be defended in any shape or form.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: kruddler on February 13, 2026, 01:39:10 pm
@Shawny, you are very anti-labour, which is your right. However, do you think liberals are all squeeky clean with no skeletons in the closet?
Everyone is corrupt
Not at all.
i never once said the Libs will right every wrong and are honest true blah blah blah. i know very well they are generally all liars that dont follow through on promises and both sides blame one another whenever the sh1te hits the fan however regardless of which side of the fence you sit on we cant keep re electing a corrupt government simply because the alternative’may’ be just as bad. You cannot allow this sort of governance rewarded with re electing.
This very situation should be enough to remove a government imo.
if the same corrupt culture was found on a board of any private company would the board not be stood down immediately?
come on mate this can not be defended in any shape or form.
I'm not defending anything.
Its just like asking someone which way they prefer to die, thrown off a big building or shot in the head. The method varies, but the end result is the same. The party varies, but the end result is the same.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on February 13, 2026, 01:56:56 pm
@Shawny, you are very anti-labour, which is your right. However, do you think liberals are all squeeky clean with no skeletons in the closet?
Everyone is corrupt
The Andrews Government which Jacinta Allan now leads is the most corrupt I have seen in my years, the Liberals are hopeless and incompetent but have a way to go to match what Labor have done to the State of Victoria. Federally Albanese isnt far off what Andrews achieved and the Liberals under Taylor wont be any different to what Ley or Dutton delivered which was a useless opposition. Its why Pauline and One Nation have gained traction which probably tells you how bad the country is travelling.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 13, 2026, 02:35:55 pm
Why do you insist on deflecting criticism of the senile narcissist in the White House with ill-considered complaints about Australian governments?
We have a thread devoted to the lunacy of the convicted felon and I started this thread to give you a platform to air what you believe are problems with our State and Commonwealth governments.
If you want to defend the indefensible, post in the Taco thread. If you want to bleat about Australian politicians, do it here.
Nice try at deflecting.
How people accept this absolute bloody disgrace corrupt bunch of criminals that just happens to be in charge of running our state - running it into the ground astounds me.
And my comparsion to US politics and the obsession with everything that happens on the other side of the world is very relevant and if comparing that to the corrupt government we have here just happens to trigger you well so be it.
Im fking triggered at the corrupt spending of 15 BILLION dollars of OUR money.
15 billion in case you didnt know is 15 thousand MILLION and yet not one comment about your thoughts on this situation.
i wonder why that is ?😏
I'm still waiting for you to have a crack at Chris Minns for the scumbag who kinghit Peter Dean being dealt with under the Young Offenders Act ::)
If you're triggered by headlines, you probably should delve a little deeper, and I don't mean listening to influencer podcasts.
First of all the Allan Government doesn't "just happen to be in charge", they were democratically elected and, when you consider the rabble that's supposed to be the opposition, it's easy to see why. The opposition at national level is worse, if anything, and Malcolm Turnbull's description of their incoming leader as the “best qualified idiot” is spot on. It's funny how politicians often make more sense after they retire.
Secondly, the allegations, and that's all they are at this stage, were set out in a draft report by barrister Geoffrey Watson SC. The draft report detailed the results of an investigation into CFMEU criminality and corruption commissioned by CFMEU administrator Mark Irving KC. As I'm sure you know, Irving was appointed by the Commonwealth Government to clean up the CFMEU. The report isn't a public document and is the property of the CFMEU. When Irving read the draft, he directed Watson to delete two sections alleging that the Allan government knew of the CFMEU aggression and corruption, that Watson estimated cost Victorian taxpayers $15 billion, because he (Irving) was “not satisfied that they were well-founded or properly tested”. That's the opinion of a King's Council and one of the most senior and respected industrial relations lawyers in the country, not a half-baked politician or shock jock.
Watson is p1ssed off that his allegations have been discarded but he recently said the government “would be mad to get rid of Mark Irving" and “I’ve worked for Irving for two years now, and I’ve never met a more honest or decent man … I can tell you, everything he did was opposed to corruption and was in favour of fixing the CFMEU.”
I think that scuttles any suggestion that Irving's rejection of the $15 billion corruption allegations was politically motivated or in any way intended to protect politicians or CFMEU operatives.
It's possible that the CFMEU did cost Victorian taxpayers $15 billion, or perhaps even $30 billion. Heads should roll if the CFMEU cost Victorian taxpayers any funds above and beyond legitimate construction costs, and I don't just mean Allan and the relevant Ministers. There's a raft of people - bureaucrats, police, regulators, auditors, union officials, opposition leader, shadow ministers, etc - who should be taking action at the slightest whiff of misuse of public funds and union corruption.
For the record, I don't think much of our democratically elected State Government; they're tired, short on talent, running out of ideas and money and desperately need a spell in opposition. Sadly for Victoria and Victorians, the alternative government is no better after such a promising start by John Pesutto. While I admire him for taking on the fascists, he wasn't very smart in the way that he went about it.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 13, 2026, 03:43:21 pm
They don't need youth crime in the USA, they have ICE.
For what it's worth regarding Victoria, things aren't so rosy in other Australian states either, claiming one is better is more an issue of cherry-picking than identifying better ways.
Crime is rife in WA, but just like the NT no media entity on the east coast gives a stuff to report it, and they don't have Bec Judd on social media as the town crier.
Sindney's organised crime makes the CFMEU in Vic look like amateurs, and it extends into parliament house and the police force.
Most in Qld are too drug f@3k3d to know what the f@ck is going on!
SA thinks Elon Musk is a good solid business partner, and that carbon emissions don't apply to all the green tech they import.
Tassie is the fraud capital of the country, half the multi-million dollar well to do homes overlooking Salamanca are occupied by NDIS welfare recipients!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Baggers on February 13, 2026, 04:06:56 pm
How people accept this absolute bloody disgrace corrupt bunch of criminals that just happens to be in charge of running our state - running it into the ground astounds me.
And my comparsion to US politics and the obsession with everything that happens on the other side of the world is very relevant and if comparing that to the corrupt government we have here just happens to trigger you well so be it.
Im fking triggered at the corrupt spending of 15 BILLION dollars of OUR money.
15 billion in case you didnt know is 15 thousand MILLION and yet not one comment about your thoughts on this situation.
i wonder why that is ?😏
I'm still waiting for you to have a crack at Chris Minns for the scumbag who kinghit Peter Dean being dealt with under the Young Offenders Act ::)
If you're triggered by headlines, you probably should delve a little deeper, and I don't mean listening to influencer podcasts.
First of all the Allan Government doesn't "just happen to be in charge", they were democratically elected and, when you consider the rabble that's supposed to be the opposition, it's easy to see why. The opposition at national level is worse, if anything, and Malcolm Turnbull's description of their incoming leader as the “best qualified idiot” is spot on. It's funny how politicians often make more sense after they retire.
Secondly, the allegations, and that's all they are at this stage, were set out in a draft report by barrister Geoffrey Watson SC. The draft report detailed the results of an investigation into CFMEU criminality and corruption commissioned by CFMEU administrator Mark Irving KC. As I'm sure you know, Irving was appointed by the Commonwealth Government to clean up the CFMEU. The report isn't a public document and is the property of the CFMEU. When Irving read the draft, he directed Watson to delete two sections alleging that the Allan government knew of the CFMEU aggression and corruption, that Watson estimated cost Victorian taxpayers $15 billion, because he (Irving) was “not satisfied that they were well-founded or properly tested”. That's the opinion of a King's Council and one of the most senior and respected industrial relations lawyers in the country, not a half-baked politician or shock jock.
Watson is p1ssed off that his allegations have been discarded but he recently said the government “would be mad to get rid of Mark Irving" and “I’ve worked for Irving for two years now, and I’ve never met a more honest or decent man … I can tell you, everything he did was opposed to corruption and was in favour of fixing the CFMEU.”
I think that scuttles any suggestion that Irving's rejection of the $15 billion corruption allegations was politically motivated or in any way intended to protect politicians or CFMEU operatives.
It's possible that the CFMEU did cost Victorian taxpayers $15 billion, or perhaps even $30 billion. Heads should roll if the CFMEU cost Victorian taxpayers any funds above and beyond legitimate construction costs, and I don't just mean Allan and the relevant Ministers. There's a raft of people - bureaucrats, police, regulators, auditors, union officials, opposition leader, shadow ministers, etc - who should be taking action at the slightest whiff of misuse of public funds and union corruption.
For the record, I don't think much of our democratically elected State Government; they're tired, short on talent, running out of ideas and money and desperately need a spell in opposition. Sadly for Victoria and Victorians, the alternative government is no better after such a promising start by John Pesutto. While I admire him for taking on the fascists, he wasn't very smart in the way that he went about it.
Without wanting to blow sunshine up your dot, David...
Your post is an astute and exemplary example of critical thinking, objectivity and cold hard facts with an intelligent conclusion. Great read old son. A lot better than any mainstream journalistic offering I've read.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 13, 2026, 04:41:29 pm
Without wanting to blow sunshine up your dot, David...
Your post is an astute and exemplary example of critical thinking, objectivity and cold hard facts with an intelligent conclusion. Great read old son. A lot better than any mainstream journalistic offering I've read.
Thanks Shane but you're a much easier marker than my year 12 politics teacher!
I worked in the system for a long time and with Labor, Liberal and Nationals Ministers. Regardless of party or ideological leanings, some were good, some were ordinary and some were awful, but only one ever had a whiff of corruption about him. He's still in Parliament and is a shadow minister.
Thinking back about those days reminded me of a story Hugh Delahunty told me. Hugh was the National Party MP for Wimmera and Lowan for about 15 years from the turn of last century and he was a good bloke ... for an Essendon footballer. Hugh's sister is Mary Delahunty aka "Scary Mary", former ALP Minister for the Arts, Planning, Education and Women's Affairs. She was elected at the same time as Hugh but only lasted until 2006. I dealt with her in her capacity as Minister for the Arts and she was very scary ... and borderline incompetent. Hugh and Mary's father was a farmer at Murtoa, a staunch National Party member, and not all that impressed with his daughter's political views. Mary was back in Murtoa for a visit and went to the pub for dinner. Hugh thought he'd stir their father and told him that the boys in the pub were giving Mary a hard time over her politics. Their father said, "Right Hugh, were going down to the pub to sort these bastards out!" Hugh had to fess up but I think that the story is a good example of how most Australians are able to compartmentalise politics and put it to one side, particularly for family.
Another example is Albo and Dutton who remain great mates despite the barbs they cast at each other in political life.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on February 13, 2026, 04:42:14 pm
Once you have wealth and power and access to resources concentrated in the hands of a few, the possibility of corrupt behavior by both giver and taker increases significantly.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: crashlander on February 13, 2026, 07:59:12 pm
My father used to know a number of politicians back in the day, some from his school (he went to Richmond Tech until his father died), some from his business dealings. It did colour the way he voted. He found Labour almost impossible to vote for after that. My Uncle was the dux at Camberwell Grammar, and knew some people on the other side of politics. His tales were interesting, but ultimately didn't effect the way he voted. Some of my voting behaviour comes from my time teaching. At some schools I was told not to attend when a strike was going on, or "I would know about it". That made sure I didn't go on strike. Similarly, I was extremely unimpressed by the changes in education that eventually became the VCE. (Thankfully, many of my issues were eventually addressed, but it took a long time for sense to prevail.) I wanted us to strike over the idiocy, but we were told we were not allowed to strike, because a Labour government was in power. Similarly, when the schools were being closed back in the day, we were told to strike when Kennett was in power. When we were not happy when the next Labour government continued the policy (just not making it public), we were informed that we couldn't strike.
I have never appreciated hypocrisy and have never liked it being thrust in my face.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 14, 2026, 12:01:58 pm
How people accept this absolute bloody disgrace corrupt bunch of criminals that just happens to be in charge of running our state - running it into the ground astounds me.
And my comparsion to US politics and the obsession with everything that happens on the other side of the world is very relevant and if comparing that to the corrupt government we have here just happens to trigger you well so be it.
Im fking triggered at the corrupt spending of 15 BILLION dollars of OUR money.
15 billion in case you didnt know is 15 thousand MILLION and yet not one comment about your thoughts on this situation.
i wonder why that is ?😏
I'm still waiting for you to have a crack at Chris Minns for the scumbag who kinghit Peter Dean being dealt with under the Young Offenders Act ::)
If you're triggered by headlines, you probably should delve a little deeper, and I don't mean listening to influencer podcasts.
First of all the Allan Government doesn't "just happen to be in charge", they were democratically elected and, when you consider the rabble that's supposed to be the opposition, it's easy to see why. The opposition at national level is worse, if anything, and Malcolm Turnbull's description of their incoming leader as the “best qualified idiot” is spot on. It's funny how politicians often make more sense after they retire.
Secondly, the allegations, and that's all they are at this stage, were set out in a draft report by barrister Geoffrey Watson SC. The draft report detailed the results of an investigation into CFMEU criminality and corruption commissioned by CFMEU administrator Mark Irving KC. As I'm sure you know, Irving was appointed by the Commonwealth Government to clean up the CFMEU. The report isn't a public document and is the property of the CFMEU. When Irving read the draft, he directed Watson to delete two sections alleging that the Allan government knew of the CFMEU aggression and corruption, that Watson estimated cost Victorian taxpayers $15 billion, because he (Irving) was “not satisfied that they were well-founded or properly tested”. That's the opinion of a King's Council and one of the most senior and respected industrial relations lawyers in the country, not a half-baked politician or shock jock.
Watson is p1ssed off that his allegations have been discarded but he recently said the government “would be mad to get rid of Mark Irving" and “I’ve worked for Irving for two years now, and I’ve never met a more honest or decent man … I can tell you, everything he did was opposed to corruption and was in favour of fixing the CFMEU.”
I think that scuttles any suggestion that Irving's rejection of the $15 billion corruption allegations was politically motivated or in any way intended to protect politicians or CFMEU operatives.
It's possible that the CFMEU did cost Victorian taxpayers $15 billion, or perhaps even $30 billion. Heads should roll if the CFMEU cost Victorian taxpayers any funds above and beyond legitimate construction costs, and I don't just mean Allan and the relevant Ministers. There's a raft of people - bureaucrats, police, regulators, auditors, union officials, opposition leader, shadow ministers, etc - who should be taking action at the slightest whiff of misuse of public funds and union corruption.
For the record, I don't think much of our democratically elected State Government; they're tired, short on talent, running out of ideas and money and desperately need a spell in opposition. Sadly for Victoria and Victorians, the alternative government is no better after such a promising start by John Pesutto. While I admire him for taking on the fascists, he wasn't very smart in the way that he went about it.
The Allan government were not democratically elected, Allan was handed the position by her party after the criminal behind her up and resigned which was after yet another lie after promising 6 months prior to the election he would be seeing out his term. This was not a leader that was elected democratically by the voters let's get that straight.
Back to the point at hand, we can all find reports pointing to slightly different reasoning behind why and how the money wasted occurred and you may even choose to accept Allan saying she knew nothing about it but lets be honest that is all semantics and you can draw whatever conclusions you want from that - the bottom line is it happened and the governing party at the time is responsible. Surely you agree with that.
I'm in agreeance with you in not being overly confident in the Libs but we as a state cannot allow the current party to govern any longer and anyone that cast's their vote for them again in November won't be able to keep a straight face saying they are voting with their head, as they aren't.
Long overdue for a change
Ok that's it for me - off to do some weeding.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 14, 2026, 01:49:19 pm
The Allan government were not democratically elected, Allan was handed the position by her party after the criminal behind her up and resigned which was after yet another lie after promising 6 months prior to the election he would be seeing out his term. This was not a leader that was elected democratically by the voters let's get that straight.
Back to the point at hand, we can all find reports pointing to slightly different reasoning behind why and how the money wasted occurred and you may even choose to accept Allan saying she knew nothing about it but lets be honest that is all semantics and you can draw whatever conclusions you want from that - the bottom line is it happened and the governing party at the time is responsible. Surely you agree with that.
I'm in agreeance with you in not being overly confident in the Libs but we as a state cannot allow the current party to govern any longer and anyone that cast's their vote for them again in November won't be able to keep a straight face saying they are voting with their head, as they aren't.
Long overdue for a change
Ok that's it for me - off to do some weeding.
You need to brush upon our system of government Shawny. Voters elect their local member and five MLCs for each of eight regions. The party that controls the Legislative Assembly forms government and their party room elects/appoints the Premier, Ministers, etc. The ALP was democratically elected in 2022 and they chose Jacinta Allan to be Premier. That's our democratic process for better or for worse.
As I said previously, there were unsubstantiated allegations contained in a draft CFMEU commissioned report. Those allegations may be true or they may not. Again, if the allegations can be substantiated, heads should roll.
I agree that we need a change of government but the Coalition isn't a viable alternative and even hard line conservatives like Steve Price are on record stating that they can't win the next election. Time will tell I guess.
Our local member works extremely hard for our community and a Liberal candidate would need a 17% swing to unseat her. That's not going to happen ... and I'm in a rural electorate.
If you run out of weeds I've got plenty at my place :)
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 14, 2026, 06:26:51 pm
DJC, I understand how it works. I'm not as ignorant as I think you like to believe I am.
Allan was not elected 'by the people' to govern the state. Andrews was. She was then 'elected' by the party which was my point.
Anyhow weeding completed as also is the discussion for me on this one mate.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 14, 2026, 06:30:20 pm
You need to brush upon our system of government Shawny. Voters elect their local member and five MLCs for each of eight regions.
On the MLC, since 2006 a party can nominate a existing member as a replacment to a casual vacany without election, it's the one and only method people have of getting into parliament without being elected. They do have to be aproved by a joint sitting.
Prior to 2006 a by-election was required, but the change was made because it was seen as a way of getting more people involved in politics, to ensure all regions have representation.
In recent years it's become controversial because federal parties have issued directives to state parties regarding who to nominate / elect.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 14, 2026, 06:33:05 pm
Allan was not elected 'by the people' to govern the state. Andrews was. She was then 'elected' by the party which was my point.
Nobody elects a poltician to be a Premier, Treasurer or any other position, those positions are the result of an internal party vote as are casual vacanies in the Legilstative Council. We do not have a Republic or President.
In the Legislative Council(Upper House) you might well think you are voting for a person, but you are really voting for a party.
For the Legislative Assembly(Lower House), you vote locally for your local member, those who first win locally become candidates for the party to elect to senior positions.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 14, 2026, 06:58:21 pm
DJC, I understand how it works. I'm not as ignorant as I think you like to believe I am.
Allan was not elected 'by the people' to govern the state. Andrews was. She was then 'elected' by the party which was my point.
Anyhow weeding completed as also is the discussion for me on this one mate.
No Premiers, or Prime Ministers for that matter, are elected by the people to govern.
Good job with the weeding!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 14, 2026, 07:59:59 pm
Fun facts:
The Australian Constitution does not mention "Prime Minister". "Ministers of State" are appointed by the Governor-General. They don't have to be elected but may only hold office for three months unless they do become a senator or MP. In practice, the Governor-General only appoints Ministers as directed by the Prime Minister - who doesn't exist constitutionally ::)
The office of Premier is not defined in the Victorian Constitution but "Premier" is mentioned several times. For example Clause 8A states, "The [Legislative] Assembly may be dissolved if a motion of no confidence in the Premier and the other Ministers of State for the State of Victoria is passed by the Assembly ..." There's no mention of how someone can become the Premier or be removed as Premier, apart from through a no confidence motion as in Clause 8A.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 14, 2026, 08:31:53 pm
Allan was not elected 'by the people' to govern the state. Andrews was. She was then 'elected' by the party which was my point.
Nobody elects a poltician to be a Premier, Treasurer or any other position, those positions are the result of an internal party vote as are casual vacanies in the Legilstative Council. We do not have a Republic or President.
In the Legislative Council(Upper House) you might well think you are voting for a person, but you are really voting for a party.
For the Legislative Assembly(Lower House), you vote locally for your local member, those who first win locally become candidates for the party to elect to senior positions.
Why is their name on the ballot form if your not electing the leader?
every election campaign the leaders are debating against each other in full campaigning mode. spin it any way you want while we all know we vote for the party the leaders qualities polices etc are very much tied to him/her and who we all see when voting.
look at the last election all the hype talk was on kicking Dan out. it failed but all talk was on him.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 14, 2026, 09:18:03 pm
anyhow as usual we have gotten off the subject so thats it from me.
So in a political thread discussing state politics elections are off topic, while in a thread about a past player being bashed in a car jacking in NSW we have to talk state politics!
Sure, we understand! ::)
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 14, 2026, 10:17:38 pm
I think you know what i meant. every bit of advertising leafouts hand outs shows the leaders face.
blind freddie knows who the leaders are.
anyhow as usual we have gotten off the subject so thats it from me.
But you said that the current State government wasn’t democratically elected. Despite their many faults, the ALP was democratically elected with a thumping majority - and a weak opposition of any flavour means that we have to rely on the media to keep the government on track, and that’s not good.
And the party leaders’ names are only on the ballot papers for their own electorates. In fact it wasn’t so long ago that party affiliations weren’t permitted on ballot papers - and that’s why how to vote cards came into being.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 15, 2026, 12:29:55 am
anyhow as usual we have gotten off the subject so thats it from me.
So in a political thread discussing state politics elections are off topic, while in a thread about a past player being bashed in a car jacking in NSW we have to talk state politics!
Sure, we understand! ::)
Thread about a past player?
The post you replied to was originally relating to the 15Billion debarkle and then shifted to whos names appear on voting papers, hence the reference to off topic.
i get its a specialty of those who cant keep on the topic of local matters when it doesnt suit their political views.
Its there for all to see 🤓
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 15, 2026, 12:35:25 am
But you said that the current State government wasn’t democratically elected.
thats not what i said at all!!
my comment was relating to allan not being elected democratically.
she was elected by her party and i stand by that.
I understand what your saying but dont agree with it.
anyhow we are going in circles now
As stated, you don’t vote for a leader. You vote for a person in a group and the biggest group votes for one of their mates to be the boss. You might think that the boss of one group has nice hair and white teeth but you don’t get to vote for them usually. The best you can hope for is that that guys group is the biggest and that they subsequently make him boss but again, you usually don’t get to vote for him.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 15, 2026, 01:34:21 am
But you said that the current State government wasn’t democratically elected.
thats not what i said at all!!
my comment was relating to allan not being elected democratically.
she was elected by her party and i stand by that.
I understand what your saying but dont agree with it.
anyhow we are going in circles
The leader of every government and opposition in Australia is elected by their Party; Sussan Ley was elected by the Liberals in Canberra, now it's Angus Taylor. We had Rudd-Gillard-Rudd, then Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison, all PMs elected by their parties. The Victorian opposition has had Guy-O'Brien-Guy-Pesutto-Battin-Wilson, all elected by the Liberal party room. And we've had Baillieu-Napthine and then Andrews-Allan as Premier. The voters don't have a say in it.
I get that you don't like Allan, or Andrews, but Allan was democratically elected, as was her government, and she is Premier in accordance with the Westminster principles of government that have been in place in Victoria since 1855.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 15, 2026, 08:28:07 am
The post you replied to was originally relating to the 15Billion debarkle and then shifted to whos names appear on voting papers, hence the reference to off topic.
i get its a specialty of those who cant keep on the topic of local matters when it doesnt suit their political views.
Its there for all to see 🤓
You're disingenuous, basically projecting your own behaviour, except as a tactic you are rubbish at it.
Everyone engaged in the Peter Dean bashing thread and this thread knows you're making a goose of yourself. What we don't know if it's you being deliberate to cross post and wind people up, or if you are just genuinely naive, chaotic and erratic.
But the more you post it becomes clearer and clearer you have little to say that is worth reading, you're painting yourself as either a rock thrower, sufferer of Dunning Kruger syndrome or genuinely detached from reality.
Don't go postal, get help, you genuinely need help I'm not joking.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 15, 2026, 09:03:21 am
The post you replied to was originally relating to the 15Billion debarkle and then shifted to whos names appear on voting papers, hence the reference to off topic.
i get its a specialty of those who cant keep on the topic of local matters when it doesnt suit their political views.
Its there for all to see 🤓
You're disingenuous, basically projecting your own behaviour, except as a tactic you are rubbish at it.
Everyone engaged in the Peter Dean bashing thread and this thread knows you're making a goose of yourself. What we don't know if it's you being deliberate to cross post and wind people up, or if you are just genuinely naive, chaotic and erratic.
But the more you post it becomes clearer and clearer you have little to say that is worth reading, you're painting yourself as either a rock thrower, sufferer of Dunning Kruger syndrome or genuinely detached from reality.
Don't go postal, get help, you genuinely need help I'm not joking.
You again refused to read my replay and answer it and went with a personal dig all in an attempt to avoid admitting the dean assault posts had absolutely nothing to do with when you chimed in.
By the way im so curious why did you choose to pipe up when you did yet crickets from you when all the original posts were made about the wasting of 15billion dollars - now why would that be the case i wonder 😏?
Note- dont forget to include the dean assault again🥴
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 15, 2026, 04:00:20 pm
@Shawny My concerns are genuine, you are on a self-destructive course fueled by social media fantasies, false claims and errors in fact. What if any valid points you make are lost in a blanket of subterfuge. Fantasies which you defend vigorously. It's a sign you're heading towards becoming the next Desi or Richard, and that is why my concerns are genuine. I've seen others go down this path, it never ends well.
People won't debate fantasy because those who profligate fantasy just grow the fantasy and bend it to suit perceptions and ignore or abuse those who often have done nothing more than offer reality as a measure of fact or fantasy. Even as the fantasies become more fantastical, the facts remain the same.
I can't or won't debate fantasies, but I'm free to never hesitate in pointing out errors, false claims or outright lies, which can be done with simple rudimentary facts.
Australian Government, Federal and State, is elected under the Westminster System. A system built on transparency, accountability and legality, even those matters held in camera area available to the review and debate of their peers, As such our political leaders are not autocrats, and they have no means of becoming autocratic. They answer to the public, they are elected by the public, and their political parties live and die by their performance. These are hard facts, not fantasy.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 15, 2026, 05:50:52 pm
@Shawny My concerns are genuine, you are on a self-destructive course fueled by social media fantasies, false claims and errors in fact. What if any valid points you make are lost in a blanket of subterfuge. Fantasies which you defend vigorously. It's a sign you're heading towards becoming the next Desi or Richard, and that is why my concerns are genuine. I've seen others go down this path, it never ends well.
People won't debate fantasy because those who profligate fantasy just grow the fantasy and bend it to suit perceptions and ignore or abuse those who often have done nothing more than offer reality as a measure of fact or fantasy. Even as the fantasies become more fantastical, the facts remain the same.
I can't or won't debate fantasies, but I'm free to never hesitate in pointing out errors, false claims or outright lies, which can be done with simple rudimentary facts.
Australian Government, Federal and State, is elected under the Westminster System. A system built on transparency, accountability and legality, even those matters held in camera area available to the review and debate of their peers, As such our political leaders are not autocrats, and they have no means of becoming autocratic. They answer to the public, they are elected by the public, and their political parties live and die by their performance. These are hard facts, not fantasy.
As kruddler has pointed out several times you don't read posts you just reply with any angle you can point score on, this time going on a tangent about a single point which has no relevance to the original post.
The original post was on our current Governments blowing of 15B of taxpayers money on hookers, bikies, drugs to name a few. Blind Freddie knows why you keep avoiding the original post so not going to spell it out.
Also as you only deal in facts, this means we have all seen the last of your posts on how the AFL, Tribunal, Media all conspire against Carlton.... Remember you don't debate fantasy conspiracies, only facts mate :))
And by the way its Dezi not Desi..... If you're going to insult me get the spelling right ::)
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 15, 2026, 11:26:28 pm
I clearly state when I am discussing perceptions and appearances versus reality, matters of subjectivity versus objectivity. We can laugh and joke about matters of footy, it's conspiracies, agency and perceptions of bias, but they are meaningless like the dribble on a footy panel show.
However, a town crier like approach to spreading lies and misdirection about real world politics and society is destructive and not a valid basis for argument, it is anarchistic in this thread and any other perspective.
Some might be offended by my call for those afflicted by distortions of reality to seek assistance, but it's a genuine call, we can't tell from the words who is taking the piss, who is a troll or who is genuine.
Those on this destructive type of path as a minimum hurt themself, but often also hurt others along the way, especially those impressionable. The same mechanism that leads youth to idolise nutters and radicals, words are as contributive to the youth crime epidemic as any drug dealer, words led to Desi, et al.. Hanson's version of democracy comes at a very high price to society, as the USA is finding out about RedTrump, and it starts with a loud false claim of systematic fraud or misrepresentation.
This is an open tolerant forum, far more tolerant to open debate than most, and one of the reasons we prefer it over so many others, people can spread conspiracies and fantasies within reason and shouldn't be offended when others may call them out for doing so.
Australia is not an autocracy, unlike some high profile regions, we actually do have freedom of speech.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 15, 2026, 11:54:05 pm
It's interesting to read about Jeff Kennett calling for an alliance between the Liberals and One Nation, I'd assert the polls are a tad selective to say the least. Kennett is happy to sell the soul of his former party for a dying shot at power. It's an interesting debate of means and ends.
For what it is worth, in Victoria at least, One Nation has become a trove for hard right fundamentalist Christian lobbyists. People who at times can be even scarier than the Neo Nazis that hide among them, perhaps not in violent extremism but at least in oppression, intolerance and persecution. Lobbyists who think racism, homophobia and bigotry are justified by God. They are the other side of the extremist coin to radical Muslim, and my signature line says it all.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on February 16, 2026, 12:46:24 am
It's interesting to read about Jeff Kennett calling for an alliance between the Liberals and One Nation, I'd assert the polls are a tad selective to say the least. Kennett is happy to sell the soul of his former party for a dying shot at power. It's an interesting debate of means and ends.
For what it is worth, in Victoria at least, One Nation has become a trove for hard right fundamentalist Christian lobbyists. People who at times can be even scarier than the Neo Nazis that hide among them, perhaps not in violent extremism but at least in oppression, intolerance and persecution. Lobbyists who think racism, homophobia and bigotry are justified by God. They are the other side of the extremist coin to radical Muslim, and my signature line says it all.
Jess Allan well ahead in the preferred Premier polls according to the Herald Sun and I can see the Libs being tempted to do that preference deal with One Nation. Won't matter much with debt soaring and the future bleak for Victorian's it's a Poison Chalice for who ever wins.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 16, 2026, 07:53:34 am
Jess Allan well ahead in the preferred Premier polls according to the Herald Sun and I can see the Libs being tempted to do that preference deal with One Nation.
Won't matter much with debt soaring and the future bleak for Victorian's it's a Poison Chalice for who ever wins.
Yes, it will be intersting to see if Allan can make the glitter stick, at the moment she is travelling on a promise of potential.
Regarding infrastructure and budget, those of us old enough might recall hearing so much of the same rhetoric when the West Gate Bridge was built, and when it was rebuilt, but decades on now many of the same claim it is now indispensible critical infrastructure and makes the tunnel redundant. The problem here is that critics live in the now and the past, and have no genuine regard for the real future as Melbourne grows, despite all the mainstream media argy bargy Vic is continuing to grow faster than any other state, that infrastructure duplication will be needed, as will the train loop, and maybe more as well. Many local councils are projecting population growth of 50% by 2050, none are projecting contraction, ignore what News Ltd and Faceplant tell you as they speak bullsh1zen. If things are as they seem, the next big infrastructure spend must be water and water recycling, they have no choice but to start very very soon, it'll make the desalination plant look cheap. For reference, I've heard it stated for a 100% growth in population, you need a 500% growth in water, assuming all other things like weather, water quality and food are to remain equal.
Does anyone really think that for example cities like Paris or London paid for the train loops in advance, and that they aren't still paying?
But what's the real issue here, the personal issue, the thing that affects those doing the complaining? Do they genuinely think no tunnel, train loops or other infrastructure will make houses, rents and food cheaper? What's the connection?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: madbluboy on February 16, 2026, 10:13:31 am
This is an open tolerant forum, far more tolerant to open debate than most, and one of the reasons we prefer it over so many others, people can spread conspiracies and fantasies within reason and shouldn't be offended when others may call them out for doing so.
Are you taking the piss? Seriously?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 16, 2026, 11:42:46 am
@madbluboy So you think there are other football forums that are more open and tolerant, can you offer some examples?
How are you and others being tolerant of Shawny's views? This thread was created to mock him.
It would seem to have been created for him to voice his thoughts and project some possible solutions but respectfully to Shawny, it reads more as I’m not happy raging/venting. His articulation of his understanding of our voting system for eg.
And as for tolerance, you, me and everyone else, maybe not Lods… but the rest of us have all been intolerant boofheads at least once… some are BoG in that space. Overall this place is very tolerant and respectful to thoughts and opinions *backed up with data* as opposed to trumpian fact devoid outrage. Thats why I like this place.
Speaking of facts and data based thought and analysis, has anyone here tripped over Carrick Ryan and Mr Cucumber ? They’re accessible through the fb platform, intelligent, thoughtful analysis of world and Australian politics and debunking social media ragebait.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 16, 2026, 12:35:32 pm
How are you and others being tolerant of Shawny's views? This thread was created to mock him.
I understand this thread was created to enable @shawny to post his political views here without cross posting on pretty much every thread. No different to the RedTrump thread, or the EV thread, they are nothing more than a filing cabinet? But even so, that doesn't give license to anyone to post fake news or false claims without opportunity for others to redress.
So how are we being intolerant?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: dodge on February 16, 2026, 01:12:36 pm
Shawny raised a perfectly legitimate about the kwality (sic) of the current Vic Labor government. This has actually prompted some interesting commentary and discussion, however, it is a turn off when personal accusations fly.
It is interesting I don't really see a hammering of the Vic government - there should be a greater scrutiny, but everything seems to get shut down pretty quickly, or just run out of steam. It is there, but not as loud as it could be considering there is an election this year.
The major thing that I would disagree with Shawny about is that the current government wasn't legitimately elected as Jacinta wasn't the leader at election time. We all have a dilemma at times about whether to vote for a good local member, or a party that you may be more aligned with. Yes, the 'known' leader at the time may attract/deflect votes, but everyone knows that outside of the leaders' electorate we're not voting directly for them.
It is going to be hard for a lot of people this election - it is hard to argue that the current gov is good, but the LNP or PHON? Yes, we typically throw out a government rather than vote the opposition in - could be anyone's game.
Saw an interesting article that it could be hard for VEC to determine who the 2 party's are - Labor & LNP or PHON, which could then delay the results.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on February 16, 2026, 01:47:31 pm
How are you and others being tolerant of Shawny's views? This thread was created to mock him.
I understand this thread was created to enable @shawny to post his political views here without cross posting on pretty much every thread. No different to the RedTrump thread, of the EV thread, they are nothing more than a filing cabinet? But even so, that doesn't give license to anyone to post fake news or false claims without opportunity for others to redress.
So how are we being intolerant?
Its a football forum where fake news, rumours and innuendo reside comfortably and multiply in number because its all part of the landscape of public forums. It seems we can all agree and disagree on football matters and none of it is taken too seriously and posters move on but Politics seems to be a sensitive topic that is extra divisive. FWIW I enjoy Shawny postings and see nothing fake about what he draws attention too and Political Parties do get elected in many cases imo based on the personalities/leadership/selling of rather than the policies. eg How many people could tell you what One Nations major Policies were? but I bet they could tell you who is their leader and what was his/her previous employment... Jacinta Allan was democratically elected to Parliament as the member for Bendigo East but became Premier as she was chosen unopposed as Leader of the Labor Party after Andrews stepped down. She wasnt elected as Premier Elect initially which I think is the point Shawny was trying to make.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on February 16, 2026, 01:53:36 pm
And as for tolerance, you, me and everyone else, maybe not Lods… but the rest of us have all been intolerant boofheads at least once… some are BoG in that space.
Nah...Me too!
I was listening to Parliament last week and Albanese was asked a question by a Greens member regarding the Israeli PM's visit and the Police response to the protests. It generated a heated exchange between two other members. "Rip her apart" was the term used.
Now you might not like Albanese or agree with much of what he stands for in terms of policy. But what he said has relevance to what we've seen here over the off-season. We've had a number of heated debates over everything from 'list mangement' to this, and other political threads.
What Albanese said was..."We need to turn the temperature down"....and I've been guilty of that as well.
He also used a football analogy that applies to politics...stating that folks see political situations much like supporting a football team. We become a little one eyed and wear our Blue, Red, Green, and now more often Orange glasses.
We've had a tough year in 2025. People have been angry about a range of issues and lack of success on field has fuelled that. That's flowed over into many of our non-football threads. People's intelligence and beliefs are being questioned basically because we see the club or the world a little (quite) differently.
I visit quite few other Carlton and other clubs sites and facebook pages. I have a fair bit of time in retirement. I still reckon we stack up pretty well in terms of tolerance and debate. (You should read the social/ political threads on other football sites that run them).
Difference of opinion and debate is the core business of sites like ours. Without that difference, the site would be a pretty, boring empty place. It's also tied to a large extent to 'down' times, whether that be in football terms or social and political times. Losing is good for site business, as are troubled social times. When we're truly successful again as a football club we won't have a lot to talk about after the euphoria dies down.
Posts are a bit like a football. Make that the objective, and argue against things you don't believe in with all your effort. But let's try and keep the personal stuff (of which I've also been guilty at times) out of the debates. It's an old footy saying. Play the post (ball), not the poster (man, woman ;)
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on February 16, 2026, 02:17:40 pm
So turn the heat down we can do what vicpol did and buy some machete bins? :P
Shawny and I have gone head to head on a few football related matters, but none of it is personal. Political tends to be a bit more personal, because frankly, government action (or inaction) impacts everyone a little differently depending on what walk of life you and your loved ones are in.
Personally, a major government failing, is spending a lot of money, and effort to give the appearance of doing something, without actually achieving anything. Lots of it motivated by optics, and less about outcomes. The machete bins are a fan favourite of mine, because they represent my previous argument better than I can make it. A lot of money pilfered away reactively to a couple of incidents, and an exercise in tokenism at best.
Not to enforce change, not to enforce any sort of law enforcement. Whats the difference between a machete, an axe and a meat cleaver? Hell, it could be a golf club or a cricket bat too. Degrees of injury for each item, and also deadliness, but ultimatley the person wielding it is the issue (yes that applies to guns, but guns are a little more regulated than any other item ive mentioned here).
This is government agnostic too and event agnostic. There were degrees of stupidity regarding all things government, but lately things have gotten a bit ridiculous.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 16, 2026, 03:37:02 pm
I understand this thread was created to enable @shawny to post his political views here without cross posting on pretty much every thread. No different to the RedTrump thread, of the EV thread, they are nothing more than a filing cabinet? But even so, that doesn't give license to anyone to post fake news or false claims without opportunity for others to redress.
So how are we being intolerant?
Its a football forum where fake news, rumours and innuendo reside comfortably and multiply in number because its all part of the landscape of public forums. It seems we can all agree and disagree on football matters and none of it is taken too seriously and posters move on but Politics seems to be a sensitive topic that is extra divisive. FWIW I enjoy Shawny postings and see nothing fake about what he draws attention too and Political Parties do get elected in many cases imo based on the personalities/leadership/selling of rather than the policies. eg How many people could tell you what One Nations major Policies were? but I bet they could tell you who is their leader and what was his/her previous employment... Jacinta Allan was democratically elected to Parliament as the member for Bendigo East but became Premier as she was chosen unopposed as Leader of the Labor Party after Andrews stepped down. She wasnt elected as Premier Elect initially which I think is the point Shawny was trying to make.
EB....... halleluiah
Thank you very much for articulating that so nicely.
The Allan position was a very minor point in a much deeper discussion that as usual got hijacked to avoid the question at hand. Only DJC had the balls to reply to the original post on the $15B dollars of our states tax paying money being washed away. However i did receive replies about how I'm into conspiracy theories, social media fantasies, fake news and finally that i could become the next Dezi Freeman. LP latest reply or should i say word salad of dribble that only he knows WTF hes talking about is a perfect example of how to divert, sidetrack and say anything to avoid the topic raised.
How many pages are we up to for the 'Red Trump' who runs a country on the other side of the world? :-X Sorry DJC i know you get quite annoyed at any reference of the man but the irony is too much to ignore.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 16, 2026, 03:44:04 pm
So turn the heat down we can do what vicpol did and buy some machete bins? :P
Shawny and I have gone head to head on a few football related matters, but none of it is personal. Political tends to be a bit more personal, because frankly, government action (or inaction) impacts everyone a little differently depending on what walk of life you and your loved ones are in.
Personally, a major government failing, is spending a lot of money, and effort to give the appearance of doing something, without actually achieving anything. Lots of it motivated by optics, and less about outcomes. The machete bins are a fan favourite of mine, because they represent my previous argument better than I can make it. A lot of money pilfered away reactively to a couple of incidents, and an exercise in tokenism at best.
Not to enforce change, not to enforce any sort of law enforcement. Whats the difference between a machete, an axe and a meat cleaver? Hell, it could be a golf club or a cricket bat too. Degrees of injury for each item, and also deadliness, but ultimatley the person wielding it is the issue (yes that applies to guns, but guns are a little more regulated than any other item ive mentioned here).
This is government agnostic too and event agnostic. There were degrees of stupidity regarding all things government, but lately things have gotten a bit ridiculous.
Agree Thryleon. Once you get personal it's the final sign you have lost the discussion.
On the machete bins there are some on here that will still argue they were a smart move. :-[
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 16, 2026, 04:07:24 pm
Jacinta Allan was democratically elected to Parliament as the member for Bendigo East but became Premier as she was chosen unopposed as Leader of the Labor Party after Andrews stepped down. She wasnt elected as Premier Elect initially which I think is the point Shawny was trying to make.
Once again, all State or Commonwealth leader are elected/appointed by their parties. That's the Westminster democratic process in accordance with all Australian constitutions and conventions. Jess Wilson was elected Leader of the Opposition by the Parliamentary Liberal Party, not the Victorian electorate. That doesn't mean that she's not the democratically elected Leader of the Opposition.
Of course, the Greens take their leadership one step further and all party members get to vote for the leader.
There's plenty to criticise about Jacinta Allan without falsely claiming that she's not the democratically elected premier.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 16, 2026, 04:11:06 pm
How many pages are we up to for the 'Red Trump' who runs a country on the other side of the world? :-X Sorry DJC i know you get quite annoyed at any reference of the man but the irony is too much to ignore.
Off topic posts are the bane of a moderator's existence Shawny, but I'll let that one slide :)
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: kruddler on February 16, 2026, 04:16:04 pm
How many pages are we up to for the 'Red Trump' who runs a country on the other side of the world? :-X Sorry DJC i know you get quite annoyed at any reference of the man but the irony is too much to ignore.
Off topic posts are the bane of a moderator's existence Shawny, but I'll let that one slide :)
Isn't that an off topic post!
.....and this one. :P
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 16, 2026, 04:23:20 pm
Off topic posts are the bane of a moderator's existence Shawny, but I'll let that one slide :)
Isn't that an off topic post!
.....and this one. :P
This one is too!
As you know Kruddler, the odd off topic post or two are fine, and can often help make a point or enliven a discussion. It becomes a problem when the off topic posts take over the thread :)
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on February 16, 2026, 04:55:01 pm
Jacinta Allan was democratically elected to Parliament as the member for Bendigo East but became Premier as she was chosen unopposed as Leader of the Labor Party after Andrews stepped down. She wasnt elected as Premier Elect initially which I think is the point Shawny was trying to make.
Once again, all State or Commonwealth leader are elected/appointed by their parties. That's the Westminster democratic process in accordance with all Australian constitutions and conventions. Jess Wilson was elected Leader of the Opposition by the Parliamentary Liberal Party, not the Victorian electorate. That doesn't mean that she's not the democratically elected Leader of the Opposition.
Of course, the Greens take their leadership one step further and all party members get to vote for the leader.
There's plenty to criticise about Jacinta Allan without falsely claiming that she's not the democratically elected premier.
Thats part of what I said, yep its all Democratic but thats not what Shawny was arguing imho, Allan didnt enter the election as Premier and as I suggested a lot of voters often vote for the personalities/leaders rather than knowing too much about the policies. For all Andrews failings as Premier of which there were many, varied and sordid he was an excellent political tactician and salesman and while Labor still would have bolted in to win the election, Labor voters got something different than what they voted for with Allan steering the ship after Andrews did his job and made sure they were re-elected.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 16, 2026, 08:05:48 pm
Thats part of what I said, yep its all Democratic but thats not what Shawny was arguing imho, Allan didnt enter the election as Premier and as I suggested a lot of voters often vote for the personalities/leaders rather than knowing too much about the policies. For all Andrews failings as Premier of which there were many, varied and sordid he was an excellent political tactician and salesman and while Labor still would have bolted in to win the election, Labor voters got something different than what they voted for with Allan steering the ship after Andrews did his job and made sure they were re-elected.
Five out of the last ten Victorian Premiers became Premier without leading their party to an election. It's a common, routine practice that was even more common before Henry Bolte took a stranglehold on the job. It's fairly regular at Commonwealth level too with at least a dozen PMs taking on the office of PM without leading their party to an election. The most recent are Fraser, Keating, Gillard, Rudd, Turnbull and Morrison.
Shawny can take heart from the fact the previous four Victorian Premiers who became Premier without leading their party to an election lost the next election.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 17, 2026, 12:45:58 pm
Thats part of what I said, yep its all Democratic but thats not what Shawny was arguing imho, Allan didnt enter the election as Premier and as I suggested a lot of voters often vote for the personalities/leaders rather than knowing too much about the policies.
If Andrews had lost his seat, we'd have a Premier nobody voted for because nobody votes for the Premier, regardless of which party forms power.
An interpretation of the wider meaning of a debate is fine, but it doesn't mean those getting involved can't be free to highlight factual errors. Taking offense isn't a defence for being called out for posting stuff that is blatantly incorrect, and the poster is not a victim of bullying or under a personal attack, such claims are just diversionary, an attempt to avoid debate.
If people do not debate stuff, it usually means they have no opinion, or no basis for an informed opinion, not that the point being ignored is right or wrong, non-debate is a neutral stance. It's completely counterfactual for some to claim that a point ignored is proof of validity.
Further, on the issue of the state politics, it's fine to talk about the mistakes, mismanagement and morality, but stick to the facts which are more than enough to debate without slathering it in a veneer of bullsh1t! As Paul Keating would say, there is no need to paint the turd, it's clearly already an obvious turd!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: dodge on February 17, 2026, 04:07:05 pm
How many pages are we up to for the 'Red Trump' who runs a country on the other side of the world?
For me, living in Victoria, I see the consequences of what our government (s) do everyday and have an understanding of the effect that it has on people - and I agree that it's bad and I'm looking hopefully for a viable alternative.
In the US, I see the dismantling of government, disregard of the constitution, blatant corruption (including from the Pre$ident) democracy falling by the wayside, not treating people decently and no respect for society. The cover ups on the Epstein files are an absolute disgrace - it is surely beyond politics that people (loose use of the word) need to be accountable for their actions, not matter who they are. Lack of justice for migrants. The lack of compassion and kindness that is increasing (this is not unique to the US). I struggle to see how the US is going recover from the destruction from 2020 (we won the election), the insurrection, pardons and denials of the seriousness of what happened on Jan6. (Democrats are no angels with pardons!). The US has a butterfly effect in many countries.
The global political situation is pretty stark.
I see hope in countries starting to work together without the US - we'll see how it all goes!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: kruddler on February 17, 2026, 04:21:21 pm
I see hope in countries starting to work together without the US - we'll see how it all goes!
This is the key right now.
You have those who are 'under the wing' of the US (australia included) but are more frequently finding themselves disagreeing with their views. But they are the big brother, so better to be on their right side.
Problem is their right side changes with the breeze as denmark (greenland) are finding out. So what is the benefit of staying aligned with them?
They bully the rest of the world into doing what they want....and we just go along with it.
I was listening to a podcast on 'appeasing Hitler' and giving into his demands (pre-war) and how the rest of the world essentially said, "Ok, lets just give him that and THEN he'll go away". But he would ask for something else.....and something else...Countries found it easier to go along with it rather than stand up to it....and eventually it was too late, and he got too powerful and then it was on.
Right now there is a lot of that going on with the US, but less obvious. Countries continue to turn a blind eye to their 'tactics' as its easier to not rock the boat. Eventually it may be too late to stand up to them. As bad as Trump is, there could always be someone worse.
The more we band against the US now, the better off the rest of the world may be later.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 17, 2026, 04:43:08 pm
We’re veering away from Victorian and Australian governments 😢
What happens in the US affects us, and the rest of the world - and that’s why the Taco thread is generally buzzing.
Our governments’ actions may have negative outcomes but they won’t create another GFC or world war. Those negative outcomes, or positive outcomes, aren’t globally significant but they’re important to us. So let’s keep this thread for them and discuss Taco and global issues elsewhere.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on February 17, 2026, 07:31:41 pm
The Victorian and Federal Governments appear untouchable despite fark up after fark up. Locally I'd like to think Wilson will give it a good shake leading up to November but once Labour start with the playing the man (or woman) muck raking tactics, the Victoria public seem just lap it up.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 17, 2026, 07:41:19 pm
The Victorian and Federal Governments appear untouchable despite fark up after fark up. Locally I'd like to think Wilson will give it a good shake leading up to November but once Labour start with the playing the man (or woman) muck raking tactics, the Victoria public seem just lap it up.
I know that senior Liberals don't give Wilson much chance, but is that more about the boys' club than reality?
History is on Wilson's side, no Premier that assumed the role after an election has won the next election.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 22, 2026, 12:34:23 pm
A 15 year old and a 17 year old had a fight in a Geelong shopping centre last week. The 15 year old stabbed the 17 year old and he’s in hospital with critical injuries.
The police tracked the 15 year old down and he appeared in court charged with the stabbing and committing an offence while on bail.
The magistrate released him on bail 🙄
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 25, 2026, 11:18:53 am
A 15 year old and a 17 year old had a fight in a Geelong shopping centre last week. The 15 year old stabbed the 17 year old and he’s in hospital with critical injuries.
The police tracked the 15 year old down and he appeared in court charged with the stabbing and committing an offence while on bail.
The magistrate released him on bail 🙄
The 15 year old was back in court and was remanded in custody, as he should have been in the first place!
I'm not generally in favour of mandatory sentencing or bail laws as I believe that magistrates and judges require discretion to administer justice fairly to all. However, if someone commits a violent crime or offends while on bail, there would have to be a very persuasive argument put forward before bail became a consideration.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 25, 2026, 11:33:07 am
The $15bn allegedly ripped off by the CFMEU has become a major issue for the Victorian Government but how exactly was that figure arrived at?
Quote
Where did that $15bn figure come from?
Watson described the figure as a “very rough” estimate based on the opinions of “highly qualified stakeholders”.
Given the Big Build was worth roughly $100bn and industry sources told Watson that cost blowouts linked to CFMEU conduct ranged between 10% and 30%, he settled on an estimate of 15%, describing it as “not unreasonable” and “probably conservative”.
“From there the maths is simple – the leadership of the CFMEU has cost the Victorian taxpayer something like $15bn,” the redacted chapter reads. “There is another point to this – as will be seen, much of that $15bn has been poured directly into the hands of criminals and organised crime gangs.”
The Fair Work Commission’s general manager, Murray Furlong, later told Senate estimates the $15bn figure was “consistent with what I’ve heard from officials from the Victorian government”.
However, David Hayward, an emeritus professor of public policy and the social economy at RMIT University, said there “doesn’t seem any reason to believe criminality was as financially significant” as the redacted Watson chapters suggest.
He said overruns were largely due to increased materials and equipment costs, and issues at particular projects.
“What I don’t understand is why [Watson] went down the exaggeration path when he already established a strong case around corruption and criminality, and he really didn’t have to put an estimate in,” Hayward said.
The economist Saul Eslake said the engineering construction implicit price deflator – a measure of price growth used by Australian Bureau of Statistics – showed costs in Victoria went up by 36.8% between December 2014 and September 2025.
But this was lower than New South Wales at 37.4% and national figure of 41.7%.
“All the talk is that Victoria has become a much more expensive place to build and yet the data tells me a different story,” he said.
So Watson's guestimate has got people outraged when the facts of the matter, according to independent, conservative and highly respected economist, Saul Eslake, present a very different story.
Of course, this isn't a defence of the CFMEU; an organisation that should have been stamped on well before Albo took action.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on February 25, 2026, 12:48:48 pm
A 15 year old and a 17 year old had a fight in a Geelong shopping centre last week. The 15 year old stabbed the 17 year old and he’s in hospital with critical injuries.
The police tracked the 15 year old down and he appeared in court charged with the stabbing and committing an offence while on bail.
The magistrate released him on bail 🙄
The 15 year old was back in court and was remanded in custody, as he should have been in the first place!
I'm not generally in favour of mandatory sentencing or bail laws as I believe that magistrates and judges require discretion to administer justice fairly to all. However, if someone commits a violent crime or offends while on bail, there would have to be a very persuasive argument put forward before bail became a consideration.
Back in the day they used to change the bail laws like winding a clock. It usually happened with a change of Government or a change of Minister, or in response to public pressure after some significant offence. I'd go from an empty classroom to a full one in a couple of days. I'm out of the loop now so I don't really know what the current system is thowing up but I suspect it's not too different.
There will always be inconsistencies, but it has to be considered that we're not there in the court room with the current legislation, the limits on magistrates (who no doubt do make mistakes at times), and all the facts of the offender and the offence.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on February 25, 2026, 03:25:21 pm
8 million dollar Medicare fraud committed by detainees at the Melbourne immigration centre and they were given Visa's and bail plus allowed out into the community. Detainee tip...So if you are being detained at an Immigration centre the easy way out is to commit a crime and thus win your freedom.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: northernblue on February 27, 2026, 11:47:08 pm
The $15bn allegedly ripped off by the CFMEU has become a major issue for the Victorian Government but how exactly was that figure arrived at?
Quote
Where did that $15bn figure come from?
Watson described the figure as a “very rough” estimate based on the opinions of “highly qualified stakeholders”.
Given the Big Build was worth roughly $100bn and industry sources told Watson that cost blowouts linked to CFMEU conduct ranged between 10% and 30%, he settled on an estimate of 15%, describing it as “not unreasonable” and “probably conservative”.
“From there the maths is simple – the leadership of the CFMEU has cost the Victorian taxpayer something like $15bn,” the redacted chapter reads. “There is another point to this – as will be seen, much of that $15bn has been poured directly into the hands of criminals and organised crime gangs.”
The Fair Work Commission’s general manager, Murray Furlong, later told Senate estimates the $15bn figure was “consistent with what I’ve heard from officials from the Victorian government”.
However, David Hayward, an emeritus professor of public policy and the social economy at RMIT University, said there “doesn’t seem any reason to believe criminality was as financially significant” as the redacted Watson chapters suggest.
He said overruns were largely due to increased materials and equipment costs, and issues at particular projects.
“What I don’t understand is why [Watson] went down the exaggeration path when he already established a strong case around corruption and criminality, and he really didn’t have to put an estimate in,” Hayward said.
The economist Saul Eslake said the engineering construction implicit price deflator – a measure of price growth used by Australian Bureau of Statistics – showed costs in Victoria went up by 36.8% between December 2014 and September 2025.
But this was lower than New South Wales at 37.4% and national figure of 41.7%.
“All the talk is that Victoria has become a much more expensive place to build and yet the data tells me a different story,” he said.
So Watson's guestimate has got people outraged when the facts of the matter, according to independent, conservative and highly respected economist, Saul Eslake, present a very different story.
Of course, this isn't a defence of the CFMEU; an organisation that should have been stamped on well before Albo took action.
If you’re on stalkbook, look up “Mr Cucumber” he ran this on Monday. Investigation… absolutely required, crimes committed… possibly… A headline screamed from the rooftops, totally !
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 28, 2026, 05:50:38 am
If you’re on stalkbook, look up “Mr Cucumber” he ran this on Monday. Investigation… absolutely required, crimes committed… possibly… A headline screamed from the rooftops, totally !
But regardless the source is a problem, because it has zero accountability and therefore plastic legitimacy. The lack of accountability across all media destroys the concept of news, which is exactly what some want. If the public question hard evidence supported facts, they can say pretty much whatever they like, and that leads to doing anything they like.
Obama's playing this game at the moment, giving RedTrump some of his own medicine.Much of MAGA is disappearing up it's own alien rectum, which is amusing but concerning also.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 28, 2026, 11:09:44 am
Two quite significant changes to Victorian criminal law:
An amendment will be introduced to prevent criminals convicted of violent offences using character references to mitigate sentences. Probably more for "look and feel" than sentencing outcomes, although I once wrote a character reference that saved a mate from a custodial sentence for firearms offences.
The "adult crime, adult time" law came into force meaning that the maximum jail sentence faced by a 14 to 17 year old person will go from three years to 25 years.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on February 28, 2026, 11:14:10 am
8 million dollar Medicare fraud committed by detainees at the Melbourne immigration centre and they were given Visa's and bail plus allowed out into the community. Detainee tip...So if you are being detained at an Immigration centre the easy way out is to commit a crime and thus win your freedom.
I would take anything Senator James Paterson says with a grain of salt.
The former immigration detainees were granted Criminal Justice Visas; a standard procedure when immigration detainees are charged with criminal offences or required to give evidence in a trial. Depending on the outcome of the court cases, the former detainees will be imprisoned and then deported or returned to immigration detention, then deported.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on February 28, 2026, 12:59:17 pm
8 million dollar Medicare fraud committed by detainees at the Melbourne immigration centre and they were given Visa's and bail plus allowed out into the community. Detainee tip...So if you are being detained at an Immigration centre the easy way out is to commit a crime and thus win your freedom.
I would take anything Senator James Paterson says with a grain of salt.
The former immigration detainees were granted Criminal Justice Visas; a standard procedure when immigration detainees are charged with criminal offences or required to give evidence in a trial. Depending on the outcome of the court cases, the former detainees will be imprisoned and then deported or returned to immigration detention, then deported.
James Paterson and Andrew Bragg are two of the better performed Liberal Senators imo and yep I know their job as the Libs attack dogs is to drag up dirt on anything Labor do/dont do but the reality is this present Government are great at serving up themselves up on a plate,making mistake after mistake and then trying to cover it up. Letting detainees back into the public who have been charged with serious crimes is horrendous imo and lacking common sense much like giving ISIS brides Passports to come back to Australia and then trying to cover it up and deny giving assistance... Paterson usually gets it right imo and while he can be over the top wanting detail and pedantic about scoring political points Id rather that than letting these incidents be covered up and buried by the Government..
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 28, 2026, 01:50:18 pm
Compelling. Thought this belonged here more than anywhere else. Remember this when people start bashing numbers at you.
It's the tool that the media and politicians have used for years, cherry-picking the frame of reference to make the numbers look good or bad.
Media will do it deliberately 100% of the time, if not the reporter the editor, and they have no intention of substantiating the report with unfiltered hard numbers, they only ever provide a subset. Yet the same media happily accuse scientists and scientific publications of distorting the figures, sound familiar?
btw., In R&D or fundamental science they have a term that relates to this, it's called P-Hacking, and if you are a career scientist or engineer who gets caught doing it your career is over! If the media or a politician does it they just do it again, some even become more extreme!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 28, 2026, 01:53:22 pm
I would take anything Senator James Paterson says with a grain of salt.
The former immigration detainees were granted Criminal Justice Visas; a standard procedure when immigration detainees are charged with criminal offences or required to give evidence in a trial. Depending on the outcome of the court cases, the former detainees will be imprisoned and then deported or returned to immigration detention, then deported.
Yes, and in the context of @Thryleon referencing statistical fraud, the media and politicians like Hanson try to paint it as a tidal wave of criminals using legal loopholes, when in reality it might be a fraction of 1% in many tens of thousands.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 28, 2026, 03:22:11 pm
James Paterson and Andrew Bragg are two of the better performed Liberal Senators imo and yep I know their job as the Libs attack dogs is to drag up dirt on anything Labor do/dont do but the reality is this present Government are great at serving up themselves up on a plate,making mistake after mistake and then trying to cover it up. Letting detainees back into the public who have been charged with serious crimes is horrendous imo and lacking common sense much like giving ISIS brides Passports to come back to Australia and then trying to cover it up and deny giving assistance... Paterson usually gets it right imo and while he can be over the top wanting detail and pedantic about scoring political points Id rather that than letting these incidents be covered up and buried by the Government..
That's why the Libs are in the doldrums!
A Criminal Justice Visa is granted by the Department of Home Affairs so that an immigration detainee can be kept in the country to face charges. It's routine and there's nothing unusual or untoward about this. They were granted bail by the court, as is usually the case for non-violent offenders who aren't flight risks. The Government doesn't determine who gets bail.
The ISIS brides are Australian citizens and the Australian Government has no choice but to issue them with replacement passports. It's the law.
Paterson doesn't get things right. He fakes outrage over part of the story and ignores the facts.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on February 28, 2026, 03:57:41 pm
James Paterson and Andrew Bragg are two of the better performed Liberal Senators imo and yep I know their job as the Libs attack dogs is to drag up dirt on anything Labor do/dont do but the reality is this present Government are great at serving up themselves up on a plate,making mistake after mistake and then trying to cover it up. Letting detainees back into the public who have been charged with serious crimes is horrendous imo and lacking common sense much like giving ISIS brides Passports to come back to Australia and then trying to cover it up and deny giving assistance... Paterson usually gets it right imo and while he can be over the top wanting detail and pedantic about scoring political points Id rather that than letting these incidents be covered up and buried by the Government..
That's why the Libs are in the doldrums!
A Criminal Justice Visa is granted by the Department of Home Affairs so that an immigration detainee can be kept in the country to face charges. It's routine and there's nothing unusual or untoward about this. They were granted bail by the court, as is usually the case for non-violent offenders who aren't flight risks. The Government doesn't determine who gets bail.
The ISIS brides are Australian citizens and the Australian Government has no choice but to issue them with replacement passports. It's the law.
Paterson doesn't get things right. He fakes outrage over part of the story and ignores the facts.
Non Violent Offenders/Flight risk?....one from a neighbouring country has connections to a criminal bikie gang and the other main offender is an Indian National, Id view both as risks to leave the country... The ISIS brides are extremists and a threat to the community imo and the Minister has the power to issue exclusion orders.. Under section 17 return permits can be revoked "on the Minister's own initiative". What this means practically is that Australian citizens could, technically, be banned from returning indefinitely which Is what should happen but Tony Burke has promised his Dr mate he will let them back in and wont act in the interests of the country Paterson was on the money exposing the whole mess but unfortunately it seems NSW and Victoria will be having to re-house and pay for these Terrorist Brides to live amongst us...
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 28, 2026, 08:22:22 pm
Non Violent Offenders/Flight risk?....one from a neighbouring country has connections to a criminal bikie gang and the other main offender is an Indian National, Id view both as risks to leave the country... The ISIS brides are extremists and a threat to the community imo and the Minister has the power to issue exclusion orders.. Under section 17 return permits can be revoked "on the Minister's own initiative". What this means practically is that Australian citizens could, technically, be banned from returning indefinitely which Is what should happen but Tony Burke has promised his Dr mate he will let them back in and wont act in the interests of the country Paterson was on the money exposing the whole mess but unfortunately it seems NSW and Victoria will be having to re-house and pay for these Terrorist Brides to live amongst us...
So how do you get them to court without a Criminal Justice Visa?
These procedures have been in operation for many years under governments of both persuasions. Do you expect the current government to ignore the law?
As for Ene, I’m pretty sure that a judge can’t refuse bail on the grounds that the accused’s brother is a bikie. I’m also pretty sure that (a) Singh isn’t keen on returning to India and (b) the bail conditions will prevent him trying.
I don’t think there’s a one size fits all solution to the ISIS brides and their children. A child married at 14 probably deserves different treatment to an adult who still supports ISIS. But that doesn’t change the Australian government’s obligation to provide citizens with replacement passports.
Furthermore, ASIO would be all over whether any of these women and children present a security threat. I’m inclined to go with their assessment over Peta Credlin’s.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on February 28, 2026, 09:36:47 pm
Non Violent Offenders/Flight risk?....one from a neighbouring country has connections to a criminal bikie gang and the other main offender is an Indian National, Id view both as risks to leave the country... The ISIS brides are extremists and a threat to the community imo and the Minister has the power to issue exclusion orders.. Under section 17 return permits can be revoked "on the Minister's own initiative". What this means practically is that Australian citizens could, technically, be banned from returning indefinitely which Is what should happen but Tony Burke has promised his Dr mate he will let them back in and wont act in the interests of the country Paterson was on the money exposing the whole mess but unfortunately it seems NSW and Victoria will be having to re-house and pay for these Terrorist Brides to live amongst us...
So how do you get them to court without a Criminal Justice Visa?
These procedures have been in operation for many years under governments of both persuasions. Do you expect the current government to ignore the law?
As for Ene, I’m pretty sure that a judge can’t refuse bail on the grounds that the accused’s brother is a bikie. I’m also pretty sure that (a) Singh isn’t keen on returning to India and (b) the bail conditions will prevent him trying.
I don’t think there’s a one size fits all solution to the ISIS brides and their children. A child married at 14 probably deserves different treatment to an adult who still supports ISIS. But that doesn’t change the Australian government’s obligation to provide citizens with replacement passports.
Furthermore, ASIO would be all over whether any of these women and children present a security threat. I’m inclined to go with their assessment over Peta Credlin’s.
I don't follow Peta Credlin so I'll have to take your word on that, ASIO investigated Bondi shooter Naveed Akram but concluded he wasn't a threat so I think we can disregard their assessments as gospel on terrorist threats, that's why they are having an internal review. Minister Burke of course owes his Sydney GP buddy some payback after his electoral support ..but you knew that... Sure you need a CJV to get detainees to court but you can still detain them in custody not release them into the community when they were already detainees...
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on February 28, 2026, 10:13:19 pm
The goverment prevented a professional tennis player entering the country because he wouldnt take a vaccine but cant find a way to prevent ISIS sympathises who left on their own accord back onto our shores as its un lawfull. really?
Our PM provided his usual lip service after the Bondi terror attack saying he would make any changes needed to keep us safe yet as usual when it comes to the crunch he lies diverts and fails to act.
Yet people are still surprised with one nations rapid support.
The public have had a gutful of the current party.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 28, 2026, 10:42:11 pm
Much of the public commentary is bluster, we aren't an autocracy, we must follow international law despite what nutters demand.
Then there is the old wisdom, you keep your friends close and your enemy closer. The UK won the war by not spilling the beans about cracking enigma!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on February 28, 2026, 10:44:25 pm
The goverment prevented a professional tennis player entering the country because he wouldnt take a vaccine but cant find a way to prevent ISIS sympathises who left on their own accord back onto our shores as its un lawfull. really?
Our PM provided his usual lip service after the Bondi terror attack saying he would make any changes needed to keep us safe yet as usual when it comes to the crunch he lies diverts and fails to act.
Yet people are still surprised with one nations rapid support.
The public have had a gutful of the current party.
Sorry Shawny but you’re not the public and I think you’ll find that the sensible centre has had a gutful of extremist claims, be they right or left.
As with the CFMEU $15-30Bn beat up, none of this stands up to scrutiny. The Government, regardless of its persuasion, has to comply with the law.
But let’s celebrate yet another right wing terrorist being arrested by the WA Joint Counter Terrorism Team before he could implement his deadly plan. I suspect that these wannabe Nazis present a much greater threat than the ISIS brides and their children. Where’s the outrage at these terrorists?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 28, 2026, 10:51:03 pm
Sorry Shawny but you’re not the public and I think you’ll find that the sensible centre has had a gutful of extremist claims, be they right or left.
As with the CFMEU $15-30Bn beat up, none of this stands up to scrutiny. The Government, regardless of its persuasion, has to comply with the law.
But let’s celebrate yet another right wing terrorist being arrested by the WA Joint Counter Terrorism Team before he could implement his deadly plan. I suspect that these wannabe Nazis present a much greater threat than the ISIS brides and their children. Where’s the outrage at these terrorists?
Never a truer word was spoken, kick the Nazis and the Sovcits out and Australia will probably be a better place, but keep them here under surveillance and they will go extinct!
They are the minority, they only have impact when the majority stays silent. Germany and Japan both learned that, now it's their national shame. The strongest opponents of the radicals come from within.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on February 28, 2026, 10:58:05 pm
Democracy allows Shawny a voice, how would his dissent fair under the war version of the Swastika or Rising Sun?
Some prone to complain need to be careful of what they are asking for!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on March 01, 2026, 09:37:28 am
The goverment prevented a professional tennis player entering the country because he wouldnt take a vaccine but cant find a way to prevent ISIS sympathises who left on their own accord back onto our shores as its un lawfull. really?
Our PM provided his usual lip service after the Bondi terror attack saying he would make any changes needed to keep us safe yet as usual when it comes to the crunch he lies diverts and fails to act.
Yet people are still surprised with one nations rapid support.
The public have had a gutful of the current party.
Sorry Shawny but you’re not the public and I think you’ll find that the sensible centre has had a gutful of extremist claims, be they right or left.
As with the CFMEU $15-30Bn beat up, none of this stands up to scrutiny. The Government, regardless of its persuasion, has to comply with the law.
How do you explain one nation which is about as far right wing as you can get rapidly rising in popularity
Or is it another beat up BS story like the 15-30B of our tax payers money going to illegal activities, which as it cant be verified to your liking is now dismissed ?
DJC these are the times when you keep defending and refuse to admit any wrong doing that you lose credibility to me as its obvious your comments are not coming from a balanced view of the situation. Majority of us have a political side we support but most can also call a spade a spade too.
Oh well we shall all see in the upcoming elections what the people think.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on March 01, 2026, 10:15:05 am
One Nation enjoys a measure of support at the moment because of the turmoil in both the Coalition parties. That will drift away pretty quickly. It's probably already started...watch the polls. You'll probably find a lot of those people who are saying they're voting 'One Nation' are doing it as a bit of a protest at the state of coalition parties One Nation might have some minor impact in the State election in SA I suspect it will be mostly gone by the time the Victorian election comes around
Hanson has had some strange bedfellows along the way but they never last. The latest with Barnaby will go the same way. They lack the political nous and organisation and are too different to successfully mount a co-ordinated challenge in lower houses. Their upper house seats often turn independent as disagreements arise with party leadership and direction.
I also see it in some respects as a bit of a leaning to the politics in America. "Make Australia Great Again". It was successful there...why not here?
The problem is, that 'bus' in the USA is gradually, but surely, losing its wheels and some just haven't caught up with the fact that it's a 'slippery slide' route to chaos that we really don't want to take.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: northernblue on March 01, 2026, 10:47:09 am
People I meet who claim to want to vote one nation often say things like “We need change because they can’t be any worse than this current lot…” That right there is shallow, dangerous thinking.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on March 01, 2026, 10:57:40 am
One Nation enjoys a measure of support at the moment because of the turmoil in both the Coalition parties. That will drift away pretty quickly. It's probably already started...watch the polls. You'll probably find a lot of those people who are saying they're voting 'One Nation' are doing it as a bit of a protest at the state of coalition parties One Nation might have some minor impact in the State election in SA I suspect it will be mostly gone by the time the Victorian election comes around
Hanson has had some strange bedfellows along the way but they never last. The latest with Barnaby will go the same way. They lack the political nous and organisation and are too different to successfully mount a co-ordinated challenge in lower houses. Their upper house seats often turn independent as disagreements arise with party leadership and direction.
I also see it in some respects as a bit of a leaning to the politics in America. "Make Australia Great Again". It was successful there...why not here?
The problem is, that 'bus' in the USA is gradually, but surely, losing its wheels and some just haven't caught up with the fact that it's a 'slippery slide' route to chaos that we really don't want to take.
Agree on the chaos and lack of alternatives in the Coalition but its also the failure of the Albanese Government in most areas and the lies ,corruption and lack of transparency in everything they do. This is how the Nazi party achieved power in Germany after the Weimar Republic years brought recession, and desperation with no alternatives. People will vote for or try anything when they are desperate and have run out of patience and ideas and then they turn to the nutters ie One Nation.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on March 01, 2026, 11:06:23 am
Where is most of the One Nation 'vote' coming from? I suspect it's mostly a drift from the Coalition.
The LNP have a bit of a task because they have to pull that vote back, but they can't afford a drift too far to the right because they then lose that moderate vote in the middle where the next election will actually be decided.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on March 01, 2026, 11:12:28 am
The idea that people would vote for a policy-less, clueless, pig ignorant racist as an expression of dissatisfaction with the major parties is laughable. If you don't think any of them are worth a vote, then you should stand on principle, wear a very modest financial penalty and not vote at all. Why would you replace one pile of trash with an even bigger pile, just to send a message, or stick to individuals or groups you don't like ?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on March 01, 2026, 11:30:27 am
The idea that people would vote for a policy-less, clueless, pig ignorant racist as an expression of dissatisfaction with the major parties is laughable. If you don't think any of them are worth a vote, then you should stand on principle, wear a very modest financial penalty and not vote at all. Why would you replace one pile of trash with an even bigger pile, just to send a message, or stick to individuals or groups you don't like ?
Can't be less clueless than the current government and impossible to be as corrupt!
Your racist ignorant pig comment, based on current polls is unlikely to be a view shared by the majority unless of course the majority are all racists ignorant pigs..
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on March 01, 2026, 11:31:27 am
Where is most of the One Nation 'vote' coming from? I suspect it's mostly a drift from the Coalition.
The LNP have a bit of a task because they have to pull that vote back, but they can't afford a drift too far to the right because they then lose that moderate vote in the middle where the next election will actually be decided.
Its too big a swing to be only from coalition supporters Lods.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on March 01, 2026, 11:31:30 am
The idea that people would vote for a policy-less, clueless, pig ignorant racist as an expression of dissatisfaction with the major parties is laughable. If you don't think any of them are worth a vote, then you should stand on principle, wear a very modest financial penalty and not vote at all. Why would you replace one pile of trash with an even bigger pile, just to send a message, or stick to individuals or groups you don't like ?
It's a spectrum Paul, and One Nation are drawing from the right of the Coalition where the differences aren't as great as someone from the left would see them. Barnaby Joyce is an example of someone where the lines are not so dramatic.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on March 01, 2026, 11:34:03 am
Where is most of the One Nation 'vote' coming from? I suspect it's mostly a drift from the Coalition.
The LNP have a bit of a task because they have to pull that vote back, but they can't afford a drift too far to the right because they then lose that moderate vote in the middle where the next election will actually be decided.
Its too big a swing to be only from coalition supporters Lods.
No doubt a bit is coming from elsewhere but it's probably a single issue like immigration, cost of living that is drawing them. I'm not sure One Nation has the answers they are looking for, especially in relation to something like the economy.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on March 01, 2026, 12:14:23 pm
How do you explain one nation which is about as far right wing as you can get rapidly rising in popularity
Or is it another beat up BS story like the 15-30B of our tax payers money going to illegal activities, which as it cant be verified to your liking is now dismissed ?
DJC these are the times when you keep defending and refuse to admit any wrong doing that you lose credibility to me as its obvious your comments are not coming from a balanced view of the situation. Majority of us have a political side we support but most can also call a spade a spade too.
Oh well we shall all see in the upcoming elections what the people think.
Have you tried Vote Compass?
If not it's at https://votecompass.com/
It's based on the last election but still shows how your views/opinions fit in with those of the five major parties. It also shows how much the policies of the parties overlap.
For the record, my results are slightly to the left of dead centre.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on March 01, 2026, 01:12:44 pm
I like to think I'm pretty much dead centre...but maybe slightly to the right. I was a local union branch vice president for many years so workers conditions were a big part of my working career. My family were fairly conservative. Military on Dads side ..farmer's on Mum's so my parents were mostly LNP voters. We're all shaped by life experiences.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on March 01, 2026, 02:54:43 pm
Im a fascist these days.
Ive been a Labor voter my whole life until covid.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on March 01, 2026, 03:39:21 pm
The swings currently being reported in the polls depend greatly on who you ask and what is the question. As I've mentioned before, Victorian's voting for Hansen's One Nation party which is almost devoid of local representation, is like Australian's voting to be remote managed by Bejing.
Her party is built on a primary industry foundation, primary industry that is almost 100% subservient to China's buying power.
Beef, lamb, coal, iron, aluminium, soy, wheat, corn, etc., etc., etc.. you name it, China's market dominance controls it and indirectly funds One Nation, despite her racist rhetoric she is completely beholding to them.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on March 01, 2026, 04:55:55 pm
The swings currently being reported in the polls depend greatly on who you ask and what is the question. As I've mentioned before, Victorian's voting for Hansen's One Nation party which is almost devoid of local representation, is like Australian's voting to be remote managed by Bejing.
Her party is built on a primary industry foundation, primary industry that is almost 100% subservient to China's buying power.
Beef, lamb, coal, iron, aluminium, soy, wheat, corn, etc., etc., etc.. you name it, China's market dominance controls it and indirectly funds One Nation, despite her racist rhetoric she is completely beholding to them.
Remote managing from Beijing was something Dan Andrews was trying to facilitate long before One Nations rise to prominence, comrade Andrews Belt and Road initiative would have left us in more debt to Chinese infrastructure companies. China essentially build infrastructure around the world and target countries who cant really afford to pay then play Bailiff and call in the debt or take control of the assets.....not sure Pauline would understand the concept but Dan was happy to play along and use the creation of jobs etc as an excuse, a real fine mess that would have ended up given our level of debt now. Pauline might obtain some level of numbers in the Senate and be able to influence policy but I cant see her and Barnaby ever being able to form a Government even in partnership with other minority parties and the level of fear over One Nation ever being a strong force in Australian Politics is exaggerated greatly imho. The late Don Chipp was meant to keep the "bastards honest" with the Australian Democrats formation but the bastards kept and keep getting elected while the AD's were deregistered and only recently resurfaced with zero success and Id be tipping Pauline and crew will meet the same fate.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Gointocarlton on March 01, 2026, 05:22:13 pm
How do you explain one nation which is about as far right wing as you can get rapidly rising in popularity
Or is it another beat up BS story like the 15-30B of our tax payers money going to illegal activities, which as it cant be verified to your liking is now dismissed ?
DJC these are the times when you keep defending and refuse to admit any wrong doing that you lose credibility to me as its obvious your comments are not coming from a balanced view of the situation. Majority of us have a political side we support but most can also call a spade a spade too.
Oh well we shall all see in the upcoming elections what the people think.
Have you tried Vote Compass?
If not it's at https://votecompass.com/
It's based on the last election but still shows how your views/opinions fit in with those of the five major parties. It also shows how much the policies of the parties overlap.
For the record, my results are slightly to the left of dead centre.
Same, suprisingly
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: kruddler on March 01, 2026, 07:23:59 pm
Im touching centre, but just right and abiut one bubble with higher than middle.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Thryleon on March 01, 2026, 08:46:18 pm
We'll see how all this Iran business changes things.
America doing American things.
Good old regime change and freedom. Without worrying about whos right and wrong how would we all like it if Xi xing ping decided to give us a regime change and some good old Chinese branded structure?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on March 01, 2026, 09:43:30 pm
We'll see how all this Iran business changes things.
America doing American things.
Good old regime change and freedom. Without worrying about whos right and wrong how would we all like it if Xi xing ping decided to give us a regime change and some good old Chinese branded structure?
Xi might try his luck soon with Taiwan given Putin and Trump are busy waging wars elsewhere.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: northernblue on March 01, 2026, 09:58:07 pm
We'll see how all this Iran business changes things.
America doing American things.
Good old regime change and freedom. Without worrying about whos right and wrong how would we all like it if Xi xing ping decided to give us a regime change and some good old Chinese branded structure?
Not sure if murica have a direction other than “a change”… structure ? Pffft
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on March 04, 2026, 09:34:32 am
Labor just voted against giving Victorias anti corruption watchdog the powers it needs to investigate the 15B corruption on Vics big build projects.
All while Jacinta defends adamantly with 'they have nothing to hide.' :o
The balanced public already know how corrupt this government is yet for those on the fence this again doesn't pass the pub test.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on March 04, 2026, 03:29:02 pm
The hard reality here is that Wilson has kyboshed the possibility of a One Nation deal, it's not surprising.
It's really the hard right demanding anarchy as a solution to opacity, which as I have already stated is ironic given where the money indirectly comes from for One Nation, which seems to be conveniently ignored by many that shout the loudest.
For example, how do they rationalise rallying against the sale of the Victorian port to China state owned enterprise, while still being One Nation boosters? One Nation a party that is largely funded by primary industry which earns it's cash from the sale of resources to China.
One Nation is completely foreign to the Liberal cause, the antithesis of Liberal politics. Hansen sprouts Socialist policies, closer to Communism than Liberal. Socialism and Fascism can be two sides of the same coin.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on March 04, 2026, 04:14:22 pm
One Nation is completely foreign to the Liberal cause, the antithesis of Liberal politics. Hansen sprouts Socialist policies, closer to Communism than Liberal. Socialism and Fascism can be two sides of the same coin.
That certainly got my attention.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on March 04, 2026, 04:42:44 pm
Good old-fashioned fascism is creeping into social and political perspectives everywhere.
Maybe we can label it the Global Amnesia Pandemic, or GAP for short! Obviously there has been too long of a gap between the consequences of real global conflict, oppression and hatred as distinct from modern life.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on March 04, 2026, 05:36:18 pm
The hard reality here is that Wilson has kyboshed the possibility of a One Nation deal, it's not surprising.
It's really the hard right demanding anarchy as a solution to opacity, which as I have already stated is ironic given where the money indirectly comes from for One Nation, which seems to be conveniently ignored by many that shout the loudest.
For example, how do they rationalise rallying against the sale of the Victorian port to China state owned enterprise, while still being One Nation boosters? One Nation a party that is largely funded by primary industry which earns it's cash from the sale of resources to China.
One Nation is completely foreign to the Liberal cause, the antithesis of Liberal politics. Hansen sprouts Socialist policies, closer to Communism than Liberal. Socialism and Fascism can be two sides of the same coin.
Id be looking more at One Nation and the Libs tying the knot federally or at least jumping into bed together for preferences...latest polls have One Nation polling better than the Libs and Pauline being in essence the Opposition leader based on Polling Popularity. Albanese has dropped a couple of percent to Taylor but that has more to do with Albo being on the nose than Taylor providing anything useful or different to Dutton or Ley. If The Libs/Nats and One Nation did do a deal to expand the axis of evil then they would probably make it a close election next time around all be it they have a tough job to cut back Labor's large lead in the house of reps.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on March 04, 2026, 05:57:11 pm
Good old-fashioned fascism is creeping into social and political perspectives everywhere.
Maybe we can label it the Global Amnesia Pandemic, or GAP for short! Obviously there has been too long of a gap between the consequences of real global conflict, oppression and hatred as distinct from modern life.
Leaving aside the fact that too many people in lay discourse confuse and conflate fascism and authoritarianism, to say nothing of the blurring of lines and lumping together socialism, communism, Marxism, "the left" etc, I'll leave you with this : neither Hanson herself, nor any member of her party, nor any of her supporters, nor any scholar of the left, nor any students of the left, would consider One Nation to be socialist or communist, not in part, and not in whole.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on March 04, 2026, 06:42:36 pm
Labor just voted against giving Victorias anti corruption watchdog the powers it needs to investigate the 15B corruption on Vics big build projects.
All while Jacinta defends adamantly with 'they have nothing to hide.' :o
The balanced public already know how corrupt this government is yet for those on the fence this again doesn't pass the pub test.
That's not correct!
The Victorian Government introduced an omnibus justice bill in response to the Bondi massacre. The opposition and cross benches tried to add a half-baked amendment that was intended to increase IBAC's powers. The Government, as is their right, refused to allow that amendment to be passed. No Australian government would have allowed that to happen. It's the elected Government that sets the legislative agenda, not the opposition and cross benches.
A bipartisan parliamentary committee has made recommendations regarding IBAC's power to conduct "follow the money" investigations and the Government must table its response to those recommendations within six months. That is the appropriate and considered approach to developing legislation.
Meanwhile, VicPol's Taskforce Hawk has laid more than 70 charges against 15 individuals involved in construction industry criminality and the Big Build.
You can certainly question the competence of the Victorian Government but that's not corruption.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on March 04, 2026, 07:20:57 pm
Labor just voted against giving Victorias anti corruption watchdog the powers it needs to investigate the 15B corruption on Vics big build projects.
All while Jacinta defends adamantly with 'they have nothing to hide.' :o
The balanced public already know how corrupt this government is yet for those on the fence this again doesn't pass the pub test.
That's not correct!
The Victorian Government introduced an omnibus justice bill in response to the Bondi massacre. The opposition and cross benches tried to add a half-baked amendment that was intended to increase IBAC's powers. The Government, as is their right, refused to allow that amendment to be passed. No Australian government would have allowed that to happen. It's the elected Government that sets the legislative agenda, not the opposition and cross benches.
A bipartisan parliamentary committee has made recommendations regarding IBAC's power to conduct "follow the money" investigations and the Government must table its response to those recommendations within six months. That is the appropriate and considered approach to developing legislation.
Meanwhile, VicPol's Taskforce Hawk has laid more than 70 charges against 15 individuals involved in construction industry criminality and the Big Build.
You can certainly question the competence of the Victorian Government but that's not corruption.
More spin more spin
They blocked it cause they are protecting themself. Corrupt to the core.
Leaving aside the fact that too many people in lay discourse confuse and conflate fascism and authoritarianism, to say nothing of the blurring of lines and lumping together socialism, communism, Marxism, "the left" etc, I'll leave you with this : neither Hanson herself, nor any member of her party, nor any of her supporters, nor any scholar of the left, nor any students of the left, would consider One Nation to be socialist or communist, not in part, and not in whole.
There is a reason One Nation seems to attract support from what we would label as hard right fundamentalists, perhaps some are too willing to ignore the public face is nothing more than a veneer. As for Hanson herself I doubt she even knows what she is becoming.
Public commentary is rife with generalisations, but that doesn't mean the commentary is wrong, for example conflating Judaism and Zionists when one is really a hijacking. But .,........
The academic error seems to be driven by a need to categorize, but reality is not so convenient.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on March 05, 2026, 07:00:53 am
Pat, just take the L and move on. Hanson and One Nation are not Communist or Socialist.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on March 05, 2026, 08:16:19 am
Pat, just take the L and move on. Hanson and One Nation are not Communist or Socialist.
Talk to me about actions not words, the labels self-applied are meaningless, the words are a script, rehearsed and delivered with professional aplomb. There is a reason in law the participants are described as actors.
Who does Hanson target, what or who is the focus of her political ire, somebody different?
How do her actions compare to her words? Do as I tell you and you'll be OK!
More directly for yourself, as a long supporter of the rights and freedoms of the individual, the freedom to identify, how would Hanson label you? How would those you care for fair in Hanson's world compared to RedTrump?
As I study Hanson's politics, I realise she is comfortable telling you how to vote, without really arguing a case.
We debate alternatives to governments but they have to be genuine alternatives. In the meantime, the press lecture us about labelling the MAGA like Sovcits as dumb, like winning the US election that lead to current events somehow proves us wrong, I'd call it a confirmation of truth! When RedTrump puts boots on the ground, will he be on the front line, would Hanson, who are the pawns?
Ignoring the underlying laws, how is local politics different?
Is this the uncomfortable debate Hanson's supporters do not want to have?
If there is a weakness in the current Labor or Liberal parties, it's the weakness is calling out the extreme minority views, they are beholding to the minority and it's a consequence of their own doing!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Baggers on March 05, 2026, 08:44:11 am
Pat, just take the L and move on. Hanson and One Nation are not Communist or Socialist.
Talk to me about actions not words, the labels self-applied are meaningless, the words are a script, rehearsed and delivered with professional aplomb. There is a reason in law the participants are described as actors.
Who does Hanson target, what or who is the focus of her political ire, somebody different?
How do her actions compare to her words? Do as I tell you and you'll be OK!
More directly for yourself, as a long supporter of the rights and freedoms of the individual, the freedom to identify, how would Hanson label you? How would those you care for fair in Hanson's world compared to RedTrump?
As I study Hanson's politics, I realise she is comfortable telling you how to vote, without really arguing a case.
We debate alternatives to governments but they have to be genuine alternatives. In the meantime, the press lecture us about labelling the MAGA like Sovcits as dumb, like winning the US election that lead to current events somehow proves us wrong, I'd call it a confirmation of truth! When RedTrump puts boots on the ground, will he be on the front line, would Hanson, who are the pawns?
Ignoring the underlying laws, how is local politics different?
Is this the uncomfortable debate Hanson's supporters do not want to have?
If there is a weakness in the current Labor or Liberal parties, it's the weakness is calling out the extreme minority views, they are beholding to the minority and it's a consequence of their own doing!
With Pauline and One Nation all I see is a group of malcontents who can't get through the day without complaining about someone or something. A group of emotionally, psychologically and spiritually stunted individuals wondering about bitterly condemning others who are different to them. Totally devoid of humanitarianism... unless you're angry and fearful like them, which puts them closer to the Far Right than anything.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: Lods on March 05, 2026, 09:20:18 am
Its strange but 'narrow' issue parties like One Nation and the Greens have a political advantage in that they can target specific areas and can go 'all in'. They know that there is a group of society where those issues have a home...and that's where their key support lies. What they don't have to deal with are the consequences and costs of implementing them, and the political risks of advocating certain policies. That's because they can never gain enough seats to form a government and have to deal with the consequences and costs. They may hold a balance of power that can influence government policy but that still has them in a 'nothing to lose' position...and they can be outspoken.
Labor and the LNP don't have that luxury. They 'can' form government, and it depends not on extreme right or left voters but a 10-20% group slap back in the middle. That's where elections are decided. It actually puts the LNP in a difficult position at the moment. The leadership is mostly to the right of the party, with Taylor and his minions. That may bring back some of the One Nation vote but it risks moving further from that 'middle ground' where the vote they really need lies.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on March 05, 2026, 09:32:58 am
With Pauline and One Nation all I see is a group of malcontents who can't get through the day without complaining about someone or something. A group of emotionally, psychologically and spiritually stunted individuals wondering about bitterly condemning others who are different to them. Totally devoid of humanitarianism... unless you're angry and fearful like them, which puts them closer to the Far Right than anything.
It's grievance politics all the way down.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on March 05, 2026, 11:57:29 am
When you look at the grievances in detail, they are as diverse as the rainbow, the only commonality is that everybody has one!
Look at the commentary in today's right wing media and political coverage, the Hanson boosters are conflating the funding of Islamic infrastructure with those mourning the fall of Tehran's tyrant. The media and some political commentary paints the usual "They are all the same" picture. Of course if questioned they deny deny deny, but they are happy to make the inference, as is Hanson.
That is not democracy, never was, and never will be!
The end does not justify any means, and the end may not be what is implied by the speaker or inferred by the audience, they are frequently weasel words that get exposed by actions.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on March 05, 2026, 12:28:55 pm
As an aside.
Do we think it's a coincidence political and social debate ramps up in the lead up to or fallout from our games?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on March 05, 2026, 12:40:40 pm
When you look at the grievances in detail, they are as diverse as the rainbow, the only commonality is that everybody has one!..................
There's nothing diverse about the grievances from Hanson / One Nation. Look through 30 years of her and the party's public and political life. Not only are those grievances historically and internally consistent, they map very closely to far right / populist parties and individuals all over the globe.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on March 05, 2026, 12:46:24 pm
There's nothing diverse about the grievances from Hanson / One Nation. Look through 30 years of her and the party's public and political life. Not only are those grievances historically and internally consistent, they map very closely to far right / populist parties and individuals all over the globe.
I was primarily referring to the voters not the politicians, in the voter demographic the grievances are non-aligned, but they all have one!
That is the politics of grievance Hanson plays up to, it's that same inclusive media rhetoric I described, the they and them versus us language. Her own declarations and policies are nothing more than a net casting as broadly as possible.
It's right not to underestimate her, but it's naive to think she could ever bring something better or greater than more pain.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on March 05, 2026, 01:43:03 pm
I was primarily referring to the voters not the politicians, in the voter demographic the grievances are non-aligned, but they all have one!........................................................
The grievances are consistent from party to party, by and large. One Nation voters would either be rusted on, or be dissatisfied with the major parties, or subscribe to one of the many flavors of anti immigration rhetoric, or whining about restrictions on their " freedom.", be "Australia First", (whatever that means) etc. You may quibble about how each of those reasons is different from the other, but as a group, they present very consistently across the globe for these far right populist types.
People having different reasons for voting for this or that party is nothing new or unique, nor is the idea that politicians would cast as a wide a net as possible to attract votes.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on March 05, 2026, 02:13:18 pm
People having different reasons for voting for this or that party is nothing new or unique, nor is the idea that politicians would cast as a wide a net as possible to attract votes.
Correct, this isn't new, you've read about it all before in history! It wasn't a valid reason for the voter swing back then and it isn't now, those who vote will still be dullards today as they were throughout the early 1900s, and the 2020s!
We should be more resistant given voting is compulsory, I suppose someone will assert the election was stolen if they fail to win, because their own view is also everybody's!
How do Sovcits even vote given they are required to give a name and address?
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: shawny on March 07, 2026, 10:12:01 am
Machettes were involved again. Word is the 22 YO deceased man was not part of the initial fight between the teenagers but stepped in to try to deescalate things. Terrible and reality is 3 out 4 are under 18 so very likely will be out on bail walking the streets in coming days.
Police station is literally 300m from where this occurred but due to cuts is no longer manned 24hr.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: kruddler on March 07, 2026, 10:19:44 am
Machettes were involved again. Word is the 22 YO deceased man was not part of the initial fight between the teenagers but stepped in to try to deescalate things. Terrible and reality is 3 out 4 are under 18 so very likely will be out on bail walking the streets in coming days.
Police station is literally 300m from where this occurred but due to cuts is no longer manned 24hr.
I was coming home from the f1 on that very train line an hour after that happened and got off a couple stops before then. Had my 10yo with me.
Word i had was the 22yo was a security guard, but not sure.
They have arrested 4 people 16-18yos for the murder.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on March 07, 2026, 11:12:17 am
Machettes were involved again. Word is the 22 YO deceased man was not part of the initial fight between the teenagers but stepped in to try to deescalate things. Terrible and reality is 3 out 4 are under 18 so very likely will be out on bail walking the streets in coming days.
Police station is literally 300m from where this occurred but due to cuts is no longer manned 24hr.
Victorias debt is now 160 billion and goes up every hour by 1 million dollars plus. There is a shortfall of police numbers of about 1500 forcing the closing of Police Stations. Recruitment can't keep pace with demand, the crims are winning. Only way out for Victoria is if the Federal Government bail out the Allan Government but Albo doesn't want to know and said he is responsible for his budget so no help there.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: DJC on March 15, 2026, 12:44:38 pm
According to Time Out, Shanghai, Edinburgh, London and New York are in the top five for the world's best cites, but the champion of the Best Cities list for 2026 is Melbourne.
Who'da thunk it!
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: PaulP on March 15, 2026, 01:02:01 pm
According to Time Out, Shanghai, Edinburgh, London and New York are in the top five for the world's best cites, but the champion of the Best Cities list for 2026 is Melbourne.
Who'da thunk it!
I saw that a couple of days ago.
It seems as though the methodology of that survey is not, shall we say, particularly robust. Possible more for sh1ts and giggles than anything else. What is important IMO, is that across a range of different surveys / analyses from different institutions, Melbourne is constantly ranked near the top, as the 2nd half of this article shows.
According to Time Out, Shanghai, Edinburgh, London and New York are in the top five for the world's best cites, but the champion of the Best Cities list for 2026 is Melbourne.
Who'da thunk it!
I saw that a couple of days ago.
It seems as though the methodology of that survey is not, shall we say, particularly robust. Possible more for sh1ts and giggles than anything else. What is important IMO, is that across a range of different surveys / analyses from different institutions, Melbourne is constantly ranked near the top, as the 2nd half of this article shows.
It seems as though the methodology of that survey is not, shall we say, particularly robust. Possible more for sh1ts and giggles than anything else. What is important IMO, is that across a range of different surveys / analyses from different institutions, Melbourne is constantly ranked near the top, as the 2nd half of this article shows.
Perhaps these lists arent what they're cracked up to be.
Yep....hard to get up to the minute information on every city around the world and collate it in a meaningful way. A lot of the data is reused from days past.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on March 15, 2026, 05:15:08 pm
In reality if we focus on crime it is as high or even higher in most other locations, crime is a focus of some / many locals but it would be only a part of the assessment, and compared to most competing international locations we have almost no crime. And we certainly have next to nothing compared to New York, London, Edinburgh and Shanghai.
I've spent a lot of time in Shanghai, and the only people killing more individuals than the crooks would have been the authorities, it a demonstrative case that arbitrary capital punishment fixes nothing. If anything, it just makes the crooks more reactive.
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: ElwoodBlues1 on March 15, 2026, 06:18:57 pm
I guess if you surveyed the wealthy inner trendy Melbourne suburbs about the nightlife, arts , food, culture etc they would give it a big tick. I reckon if it was Melton, Caroline Springs, Dandenong, Franga etc you might get a different set of results. Bit like surveying Queensland in places like Maryborough, Lockyer, Ipswich West, Tablelands, for the preferred Prime Minister of Australia and Pauline being the clear winner....
Title: Re: Shawny’s concerns about Victorian and Australian Governments
Post by: LP on March 15, 2026, 10:01:31 pm
Not sure how these surveys work, some poll tourists, others residents.