Jim Park Analysis 2025 March 14, 2025, 12:52:58 am Getting ready for this week. I'm assuming people still want this. Voting will be as usual. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2025 Reply #1 – March 21, 2025, 01:25:07 pm AFL 2025 Rd 1: Carlton vs RichmondProbably our poorest game in a long time, we capitulated against Richmond after leading by 41 points. We played stupid football and got run over by a side many predicted not to win a game. There wasn't much positive to get out of it.Trends:[1] There were 12 voters this round, which is not great for Rd 1. Granted that we lost, but a few more people putting in their opinions would be appreciated. Please do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate.[2] The rating was a 5.58, which is almost an E-, one of the worst performances under Michael Voss. Some us could see some positives from our first quarter and a bit, other just saw the train wreck.[3] 11 players managed a mention this week. When we win, we often get 15 or more. And then, a couple of these guys were actually beaten. [4] The average vote this week was 19!. That is the worst I can remember.[5] 3 players managed 100 votes or more this week.[6] Jacob Weitering was an easy winner this week. He slaughtered his opponent. Tome de Koning and Patrick Cripps shared equal second.[7] Two player managed votes from everyone this week; Patrick Cripps and Tom de Koning. Our BOG, Weitering, missed one.[8] Of our youngsters, Lucas Camporeale made an impression with 21 disposals. Pity not many of them hit targets, but he wasn't alone there. [9] This was a game where our forwards struggled. Mids and defenders got the votes.Votes:Weitering, Jacob 251Cripps, Patrick 177de Koning, Tom 177Silvagni, Jack 58Cerra, Adam 49Hewett, George 47Hollands, Oliver 37Camporeale, Lucas 21Acres, Blake 16Cowan, Lachlan 2Saad, Adam 2 Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2025 Reply #2 – April 02, 2025, 11:25:17 am AFL 2025 Rd 2: Carlton vs HawthornLots of things didn't go our way, but it was our inability to finish that killed us. Much better than last week, but still not what we need to win.Trends:[1] There were 11 voters this round, which is heading in the wrong direction. Alas, that often happens when we lose, and our 1st two games have been considerably worse than we had hoped. Please do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate.[2] The rating was a 7.79, which is almost an C-. Not good enough, but compared to last week infinitely better. [3] 14 players managed a mention this week, which is also an improvement. When we win, we often get 15 or more. [4] The average vote this week was 27. The effort was there, but ...[5] 4 players managed 100 votes or more this week. That shows we had a much improved performance.[6] Tom de Koning was this week's winner, which is disappointing. Not that I dislike Tom, but his opponent was also a significant player (for the second week in a row). For that matter, Patrick Cripps was clearly 2nd, and he, too, lacked some of the penetration that really good Cripps games usually display.[7] Two player managed votes from everyone this week; Patrick Cripps and Tom de Koning. [8] Of our youngsters, Ollie Hollands had a good defensive game and Motlop showed a lot more than he has of late.[9] This week our forwards again struggled for impact. When you don't score much after half time, it is hard to get a vote.Votes:de Koning, Tom 294Cripps, Patrick 244Hewett, George 205Cerra, Adam 120Weitering, Jacob 96Motlop, Jesse 53Hollands, Oliver 46Silvagni, Jack 39Walsh, Sam 25Saad, Adam 18Cottrell, Matthew 11Fogarty, Lachlan 7William, Zac 7McGovern, Mitchell 4Progressive Voting:Tom de Koning 471Patrick Cripps 422Jacob Weitering 347George Hewett 252Adam Cerra 170Jack Silvagni 98Ollie Hollands 84Jesse Motlop 54Sam Walsh 25Lucas Camporeale 21Adam Saad 21Blake Acres 17Matthew Cottrell 11Lachie Fogarty 8Zac Williams 8Mitch McGovern 4Lachie Cowan 3 Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2025 Reply #3 – April 10, 2025, 04:13:24 pm AFL 2025 Rd 3: Carlton vs Western BulldogsShould have won this one; we were the better team for most of the day. But, being unable to execute when it mattered was enough for us to fail.Trends:[1] There were 13 voters this round, which is better than the previous round. ( Alas, that often happens when we lose, and our 1st three games have been considerably worse than we had hoped. Please do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate.[2] The rating was a 7.92, which is almost a C. Not good enough, but compared to last week infinitely better. [3] 14 players managed a mention again this week, which isn't bad. Just not good enough yet. [4] The average vote this week was 27 again. The effort was there, but ... Consistency? Maybe.[5] 5 players managed 100 votes or more this week. That is also an improvement, but we need more from more if we are going to win against a decent team.[6] Tom de Koning was this week's winner again, which is disappointing. Not that I dislike Tom, but his opponent was also a significant player (for the third week in a row). On the other hand, Brodie Kemp managed his first top 5 finish in probably his most effective game to date.[7] Two player managed votes from everyone this week; Kemp and Tom de Koning. Two missed from voter (Weitering and Hewett), while Jack Silvagni missed from two.[8] Of our youngsters, none really stood out but Kemp. That isn't good enough. One thing to note, was Lewis Young's game: he drifted out of the game, but it was his best in many ways.[9] While this week's effort was more even, with our forwards being more dangerous, there still wasn't the sort of consistency required to get us over the line.Votes:de Koning, Tom 317Kemp, Brodie 274Weitering, Jacob 189Hewett, George 140Silvagni, Jack 128Cerra, Adam 58Saad, Adam 15Fogarty, Lachlan 15Curnow, Charles 15Haynes, Nick 9Young, Lewis 9Cripps, Patrick 6Hollands, Oliver 6Walsh, Sam 6Progressive Voting:Tom de Koning 788 Tom deserves his lead after 3 strong performances, but he hasn't been a clear winner yet. Jacob Weitering 536Patrick Cripps 428 Again, Cripps deserves his 3rd spot, but not one of his games has been really good yet.George Hewett 393 A big effort from George. He really deserves his 4th spot as arguably our most effective mid this year.Brodie Kemp 275 Basically one brilliant game. Nothing in the others.Adam Cerra 228Jack Silvagni 226 Jack has been a big inclusion for us, in both defence and attack.Ollie Hollands 90Jesse Motlop 54 Like Kemp, one good game.Adam Saad 36Sam Walsh 31Lachie Fogarty 23Lucas Camporeale 21Blake Acres 17Charlie Curnow 16Matt Cottrell 11Nick Haynes 10Lewis Young 10Zac Williams 8Mitch McGovern 4Lachie Cowan 3The way the votes drop off after Silvagni really shows how poor we've been this year. Not enough being done by enough people to make it matter. Quote Selected 1 Likes
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2025 Reply #4 – April 15, 2025, 08:00:55 pm AFL 2025 Rd 4: Carlton vs CollingwoodOne poor quarter and some more awful forward football.Trends:[1] There were 8 voters this round, which is among the lowest in memory. ( Please do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate.[2] The rating was a 7.22, which is almost a D+. Not good enough.[3] 13 players managed a mention this week, which is one less than last week. Just not good enough yet. [4] The average vote this week was 23. Not good enough yet.[5] 4 players managed 100 votes or more this week. That is one less than last week, but still not too bad. Unfortunately, not all of those players won their position clearly.[6] George Hewett continues his excellent season by collecting 282 votes. This is his 3rd week in the top 4 vote getters. Saad, Ollie Hollands and Walsh were equal 2nd with 128 votes. [7] One player managed votes from everyone this week; Hewett. Saad missed from one voter, while Jack Silvagni missed from two.[8] Of our youngsters, none really stood out but Ollie Hollands. That isn't good enough. Will White was noticed; had he kicked 3 goals instead of 3 points, it would have been more than noticed.[9] Our defenders and mid continue to get votes, but our forwards aren't.Votes:Hewett, George 282Saad, Adam 128Hollands, Oliver 128Walsh, Sam 128Silvagni, Jack 94Weitering, Jacob 68Cerra, Adam 47William, Zac 38Acres, Blake 34de Koning, Tom 30Docherty, Sam 26Lord, Cooper 13White, Will 9Progressive Voting:Tom de Koning 818George Hewett 674Jacob Weitering 608Patrick Cripps 428Jack Silvagni 320Adam Cerra 275Brodie Kemp 275Ollie Hollands 218Adam Saad 164Sam Walsh 128Jesse Motlop 54Blake Acres 51Zac Williams 46Sam Docherty 26Lachie Fogarty 23Lucas Camporeale 21Charlie Curnow 16Cooper Lord 13Matthew Cottrell 11Nick Haynes 10Lewis Young 10Will White 9Mitch McGovern 4Lachie Cowan 3George Hewett moved up 2 spots to 2nd. Quote Selected 1 Likes
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2025 Reply #5 – April 25, 2025, 10:37:50 am AFL 2025 Rd 5: Carlton vs West Coast in AdelaideWhat a difference a week makes. Granted that we were playing an ordinary side, but we've been ordinary until this game.Trends:[1] There were 13 voters this round, which isn't high for a 71 point win.Please do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate and it makes our statistics a lot more reliable.[2] The rating was a 8.74, which is a comfortable B- and the highest of the year so far. Still, there is room for improvement. [3] 15 players managed a mention this week, which is an improvement. Not only that, but their contributions were more significant. We had clear winners in a lot of places for a change.[4] The average vote this week was 30. Easily our best result for the year.[5] 3 players managed 100 votes or more this week. That is one less than last week, but still not too bad. However, unlike the previous weeks, these guys were serious winners, not just the best of an ordinary lot.[6] George Hewett continues his excellent season by collecting 353 votes in a Cripps-like performance. This is his 4rd week in the top 4 vote getters. Sam Walsh was 2nd with 346 votes, his best game in a long time. [7] Two player managed votes from everyone this week; Hewett and Walsh. Nobody else got close.[8] Of our youngsters, Corey Durdin made the most impact in easily his best game for us to date.[9] This was a round where all of our lines got some recognition, but our mids were dominant. Nice to see!Votes:Hewett, George 353Walsh, Sam 346Durdin, Corey 108Cerra, Adam 81Cripps, Patrick 81McGovern, Mitchell 67Saad, Adam 61Weitering, Jacob 61Oliver Hollands 57Silvagni, Jack 44Cottrell, Matthew 37Curnow, Charles 7Docherty, Sam 3Haynes, Nick 3Motlop, Jesse 3Progressive Voting:George Hewett 1028Tom de Koning 818Jacob Weitering 665Patrick Cripps 508Sam Walsh 506Jack Silvagni 363Adam Cerra 355Brodie Kemp 275Ollie Hollands 275Adam Saad 224Corey Durdin 108Mitch McGovern 71Jesse Motlop 57Blake Acres 51Matthew Cottrell 48Zac Williams 46Sam Docherty 29Lachie Fogarty 23Charlie Curnow 22Lucas Camporeale 21Nick Haynes 13Cooper Lord 13Lewis Young 10Will White 9Lachie Cowan 3 Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2025 Reply #6 – Today at 09:19:48 pm AFL 2025 Rd 6: Carlton vs North Melbourne at MarvelA really strong game this round, pounding a team that bothered us in recent times.Trends:[1] There were 14 voters this round, which isn't that high for a game where we've thrashed a team. Please do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate and it makes our statistics a lot more reliable.[2] The rating was a 9.74, which is a comfortable A- and the highest of the year so far. Still, there is room for improvement. [3] 20 players managed a mention this week, which is nothing short of huge! Not only that, but their contributions were more significant. We had clear winners all over the ground.[4] The average vote this week was 33. Easily our best result for the year.[5] 4 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which is almost the norm when we win.[6] George Hewett continues his excellent season by collecting a Judd-like 417 votes in his BOG in a row. This is his 5th week in the top 4 vote getters. Adam Cerra was 2nd with 233 votes, his best game in a long time. [7] One! player managed votes from everyone this week; Hewett. Nobody else got close, as a lot of votes got shared around. [8] Most of our youngsters made a good contribution: Carroll got votes, Cottrell got votes, Durdin got votes, Fogarty got votes, Motlop had his best game for the year, Ollie Hollands got votes and Will White got votes.[9] This was a round where all of our lines got some recognition, but our mids were dominant. Nice to see!Votes:Hewett, George 419Cerra, Adam 233de Koning, Tom 150Motlop, Jesse 129Curnow, Charles 94William, Zac 83Durdin, Corey 77Weitering, Jacob 63Silvagni, Jack 35Cottrell, Matthew 31Walsh, Sam 28McGovern, Mitchell 21Hollands, Oliver 21Acres, Blake 21White, Will 17Young, Lewis 17Carroll, Matthew 10Cripps, Patrick 7Haynes, Nick 3Fogarty, Lachlan 3Progressive Voting:George Hewett 1445Tom de Koning 967Jacob Weitering 728Adam Cerra 588Sam Walsh 534Patrick Cripps 515Jack Silvagni 398Ollie Hollands 296Brodie Kemp 275Adam Saad 224Jesse Motlop 186Corey Durdin 185Zac Williams 129Charlie Curnow 116Mitch McGovern 92Matthew Cottrell 79Blake Acres 72Sam Docherty 29Lewis Young 27Will White 26Lachie Fogarty 26Lucas Camporeale 21Nick Haynes 16Cooper Lord 13Matthew Carroll 11Lachie Cowan 3 Quote Selected
Topic: Jim Park Analysis 2025 (Read 2555 times)
previous topic - next topic
Topic: Jim Park Analysis 2025 (Read 2555 times)
previous topic - next topic