Re: Rd 21: Jim Park medal Voting: Carlton vs Geelong Reply #15 – August 18, 2014, 10:32:22 am Team B5 Gibbs3 Carrazzo3 Murphy2 Yarran1 Rowe1 Docherty Quote Selected
Re: Rd 21: Jim Park medal Voting: Carlton vs Geelong Reply #16 – August 18, 2014, 11:55:11 am team . BCarrazzo . 4Rowe . 3Murphy . 3Gibbs . 2Menzel . 2Judd . 1 Quote Selected
Re: Rd 21: Jim Park medal Voting: Carlton vs Geelong Reply #17 – August 18, 2014, 01:21:55 pm Team = C+5 - Gibbs4 - Carrazzo3 - Judd2 - Rowe1 - Murphy Quote Selected
Re: Rd 21: Jim Park medal Voting: Carlton vs Geelong Reply #18 – August 18, 2014, 02:26:36 pm A5 Carrazzo4 Yarran2 Judd2 Gibbs1 Waite1 Murphy Quote Selected
Re: Rd 21: Jim Park medal Voting: Carlton vs Geelong Reply #19 – August 18, 2014, 09:47:56 pm Team: BWe were really brave, but we still lost. Can’t get better than a B.Votes:[3] Carrazzo[2.5] Gibbs[2] Judd[1.5] Waite[1.5] Bell[1] Murphy[1] Tuohy[1] Yarran[0.5] Curnow[0.5] Rowe[0.5] SheehanExplanations:[3] Carrazzo: After being obliterated in the 1st quarter, Carrots came back to be the most influential player on the ground, keeping Selwood to 4 possessions in half a game of football, while doing a great job himself.[2.5] Gibbs: Would have been worth more votes had he controlled his direct opponent, Caddy. However, he was instrumental in getting the ball out from stoppages.[2] Judd: Judd will not be at his best until next year, but he was damn good for a guy still not close to 100%.[1.5] Waite: Another good effort from Jarrod[1.5] Bell: For a guy as fit and able to run for so long, Tom Bell never sees out a game. He always runs out of juice in the last quarter. Pity, as he was a fine performer.[1] Murphy: A very different role for Murphy, but one that involved 10 tackles. But missing that goal was unforgiveable. [1] Tuohy: One of his best games for the season, he did well.[1] Yarran: This could have been a 3 vote game bit the mistakes were critical, especially by foot. I just don’t know why his kicking was so off, but it cost us 5 goals at least. His goal was special and he really controlled Motlop.[0.5] Curnow: Didn’t do as well as keeping his man quiet, but he did get a lot of ball himself.[0.5] Rowe: Good job in defence, not so good in attack.[0.5] Sheehan: A good game 2nd up. Looking promising.Honourable Mentions:Menzel: Pretty good until injured. But needed to kick more goals.Wood: Probably beaten on the day, but rucked his best. Armfield: Not on for long, but did a good job when he came on.Jamison: Probably beaten by the Fat Man, but worked hard and barely had a goal against him.Docherty: Too many errors, but he really shows he has a future. Quote Selected