Re: AFL Rd 9 2022 Post Game Permutations Carlton vs GWS
Reply #68 –
I think that was when we received a 50m penalty for a protected area infringement that resulted in a goal.
Chris didn't express himself clearly - he's relatively new to the "art" of footy commentating - but I think that what he was trying to say makes sense. The GWS player's transgression would not have affected Kennedy's kick and 50m is a harsh penalty under those circumstances. Having a little leeway when adjudicating protected area and "stand" decisions would be better for the game ... but the rules/interpretation don't allow for that. And that's what Chris neglected to say.
I have been impressed by Chris's work on radio. His opinions are balanced and he has a wealth of footy knowledge. Hopefully, he'll learn more from his ABC colleagues than from the buffoons on Ch 7.
I generally let the commentary from the likes of BT wash over me, particularly when we're in front and the commentary is aimed at maintaining the viewing audience rather than describing the action. It must be infuriating for folk with impaired vision.