Skip to main content
Topic: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9 (Read 20548 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #75
nah we won't go the Italian.  He's the good type of wog.
Aaah the old it's racism defence, I don't think it will help, if he's guilty he's gone!

Is this a Greek vs Italian thing, given Kyrgios has been asserting Sinner's guilt for almost 12 months?

Kyrgios had a fair crack at Iga Swiatek too!

I think that he is genuinely anti-drugs in tennis and couldn't give a fat rat's clacker about where drug cheats were born.
It's still the Gulf of Mexico, Don Old!

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #76
nah we won't go the Italian.  He's the good type of wog.
Aaah the old it's racism defence, I don't think it will help, if he's guilty he's gone!

Is this a Greek vs Italian thing, given Kyrgios has been asserting Sinner's guilt for almost 12 months?

As someone of greek heritage, I can definitely tell you that those which sit on the pope's side of Christianity are derided much less than those who sit on the Byzantine side of Christianity.

The further west you go, the more accepted you become.

This is particularly if you are more culturally aligned to your heritage and hail from the Balkans.

Did I tell you about what I heard from an aussie in the crowd at kokkinakis match this year?

"If he loses he's greek, if he wins he's aussie".

Had a good laugh with his mates.

When kokkinakis saluted and won whilst we were clapping i turned to him and said, and he's greek Australian whether he wins or loses and deserves our support. 

It's not everyone but it exists.  You can disregard it all you like.  It exists. 
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #77
"If he loses he's greek, if he wins he's aussie".
As offensive and shallow as it may be, but is it racism?

Those lowly few are minority, but the inclusive "nah we" assertion is global, isn't that also equally racist?

Also that other assertion, "an aussie", appearance based, holding a flag maybe, perhaps had an accent?

"Extremists on either side will always meet in the Middle!"

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #78
As someone of greek heritage, I can definitely tell you that those which sit on the pope's side of Christianity are derided much less than those who sit on the Byzantine side of Christianity.

The further west you go, the more accepted you become.

This is particularly if you are more culturally aligned to your heritage and hail from the Balkans.

Did I tell you about what I heard from an aussie in the crowd at kokkinakis match this year?

"If he loses he's greek, if he wins he's aussie".

Had a good laugh with his mates.

When kokkinakis saluted and won whilst we were clapping i turned to him and said, and he's greek Australian whether he wins or loses and deserves our support. 

It's not everyone but it exists.  You can disregard it all you like.  It exists.

Going over old ground here but "if he/she wins, he/she is an Aussie" is a fairly common if inappropriate comment among Aussie supporters, regardless of their heritage.

It's still the Gulf of Mexico, Don Old!

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #79
As someone of greek heritage, I can definitely tell you that those which sit on the pope's side of Christianity are derided much less than those who sit on the Byzantine side of Christianity.

The further west you go, the more accepted you become.

This is particularly if you are more culturally aligned to your heritage and hail from the Balkans.

Did I tell you about what I heard from an aussie in the crowd at kokkinakis match this year?

"If he loses he's greek, if he wins he's aussie".

Had a good laugh with his mates.

When kokkinakis saluted and won whilst we were clapping i turned to him and said, and he's greek Australian whether he wins or loses and deserves our support. 

It's not everyone but it exists.  You can disregard it all you like.  It exists.

Going over old ground here but "if he/she wins, he/she is an Aussie" is a fairly common if inappropriate comment among Aussie supporters, regardless of their heritage.


you didn't hear the manner in which it was said and the preceding conversation deriding people being there with greek flags.

Like I said it's not everyone, and it does exist.
"If he loses he's greek, if he wins he's aussie".
As offensive and shallow as it may be, but is it racism?

Those lowly few are minority, but the inclusive "nah we" assertion is global, isn't that also equally racist?

Also that other assertion, "an aussie", appearance based, holding a flag maybe, perhaps had an accent?


prejudice is prejudice.  See above.

"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #80
you didn't hear the manner in which it was said and the preceding conversation deriding people being there with greek flags.

I don't think that the manner in which it was said is particularly relevant.  It's a poor attempt at humour regardless, and it's not woke.

Like I said it's not everyone, and it does exist. prejudice is prejudice.  See above.

Yes, and bigotry is bigotry, but neither are necessarily racist.
It's still the Gulf of Mexico, Don Old!

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #81
you didn't hear the manner in which it was said and the preceding conversation deriding people being there with greek flags.

I don't think that the manner in which it was said is particularly relevant.  It's a poor attempt at humour regardless, and it's not woke.

Like I said it's not everyone, and it does exist. prejudice is prejudice.  See above.

Yes, and bigotry is bigotry, but neither are necessarily racist.
right.

Guess I'm just being over sensitive then and this under current is rubbish?

I'll remember to ask you whether or not I'm ok to feel aggrieved or not.

You might want to have a think about the points being argued and what your contention is.  Thus far it appears you're just being contrary but to what point I'm not quite clear of.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #82
Racism is a technical term, it's definition isn't in the eye of the beholder and certainly not in the opinion of the offended. Much of what is represented in media and social media as racism is not, much like the events and reactions that started this thread!
"Extremists on either side will always meet in the Middle!"

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #83
right.

Guess I'm just being over sensitive then and this under current is rubbish?

I'll remember to ask you whether or not I'm ok to feel aggrieved or not.

You might want to have a think about the points being argued and what your contention is.  Thus far it appears you're just being contrary but to what point I'm not quite clear of.

I'm not really sure what you're on about here Thry.

Yes, the comment was inappropriate and you have every right to feel aggrieved. 

The "woke" that some folk dislike simply means awareness of social and political issues and the bozo who made the comment is certainly not woke.

However, as LP pointed out, it was not a racist comment.  The Australian Human Rights Commission defines racism as "... the process by which systems and policies, actions and attitudes create inequitable opportunities and outcomes for people based on race. Racism is more than just prejudice in thought or action. It occurs when this prejudice – whether individual or institutional – is accompanied by the power to discriminate against, oppress or limit the rights of others."

In other words, the comments that quite rightly caused you offence were ignorant, unthinking, prejudiced, and not woke, but not racist.
It's still the Gulf of Mexico, Don Old!

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #84
right.

Guess I'm just being over sensitive then and this under current is rubbish?

I'll remember to ask you whether or not I'm ok to feel aggrieved or not.

You might want to have a think about the points being argued and what your contention is.  Thus far it appears you're just being contrary but to what point I'm not quite clear of.

I'm not really sure what you're on about here Thry.

Yes, the comment was inappropriate and you have every right to feel aggrieved. 

The "woke" that some folk dislike simply means awareness of social and political issues and the bozo who made the comment is certainly not woke.

However, as LP pointed out, it was not a racist comment.  The Australian Human Rights Commission defines racism as "... the process by which systems and policies, actions and attitudes create inequitable opportunities and outcomes for people based on race. Racism is more than just prejudice in thought or action. It occurs when this prejudice – whether individual or institutional – is accompanied by the power to discriminate against, oppress or limit the rights of others."

In other words, the comments that quite rightly caused you offence were ignorant, unthinking, prejudiced, and not woke, but not racist.
Maybe have a read of the original comments.  I thought I was confused but I dont think woke is part of this conversation
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #85
Maybe have a read of the original comments.  I thought I was confused but I dont think woke is part of this conversation

Woke is definitely part of the conversation Thry.  A "woke" person is aware of social and political issues and would not have made the comments that quite rightly offended you at the tennis.  Woke is good, despite Dutton claiming that "wokeness" is an affront to masculinity  ::)
It's still the Gulf of Mexico, Don Old!

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #86
Most stuff is OK in moderation, in a state of balance.
"Extremists on either side will always meet in the Middle!"

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #87
Talking about the blurred lines between racism-bigotry-sexism-predjudice and privilege etc the Kerr trial is an interesting follow
DrE is no more... you ok with that harmonica man?

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #88
Talking about the blurred lines between racism-bigotry-sexism-predjudice and privilege etc the Kerr trial is an interesting follow

Indeed!

The legal situation in the UK is a bit different to here and several Acts refer to "less favourable treatment on grounds of colour, race, or ethnic or national origins". If a black person treats a white person less favourably, it is racism.  We'll have to see how that plays out in the Sam Kerr case ...
It's still the Gulf of Mexico, Don Old!

Re: Djokovic v TJ / Ch9

Reply #89
Yes, on one hand you've got the sexism thing/prejudice (female claiming male indifference, prejudice against LGTBI people, coloured person v police issues, uncomfortable scenario- potential deprivation of liberty locked in cab) vs. criminal damage, spewing in a cab, threats and abusive language towards a police officer.  It's not a good look being boozed and up and abusive and it will be interesting to see how the Crown adjudicates this.  I wouldn't be surprised if she gets a suspended sentence or a very hefty fine.
DrE is no more... you ok with that harmonica man?