Skip to main content
Topic: Jim Park Award 2026 (Read 3400 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Jim Park Award 2026

Reply #15
Pitto in 3rd says something.

I wonder if TDK is 3rd in the saints count at this stage?
Or even in the top 10!

 :-[  :D
Probably not, although he was decent enough against GWS.

This will be the test for Pitto: if he can keep Gawn from dominating, we should be OK.
Live Long and Prosper!

 

Re: Jim Park Award 2026

Reply #16
Pitto in 3rd says something.

I wonder if TDK is 3rd in the saints count at this stage?
Or even in the top 10!

 :-[  :D
He probably will be, will get a pass because the rest of the team is more why they lost than him.   Gawn did play better than him, but he put in a shift at least, just not one worth 1.8 million worth. 

"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: Jim Park Award 2026

Reply #17
I had a look at the Saintsational voting for the games so far.
Tom had the second most votes in the Collingwood game-45 under their system
Nothing against Melbourne
and only a handful against GWS to this stage, but they haven't finished voting yet.

But that first game gained him enough that he's probably in the top 4-5 at the moment on their voting.
Hall, Sinclair and Wilkie are ahead of him, Windhager and NWM around the same

Re: Jim Park Award 2026

Reply #18
I had a look at the Saintsational voting for the games so far.
Tom had the second most votes in the Collingwood game-45 under their system
Nothing against Melbourne
and only a handful against GWS to this stage, but they haven't finished voting yet.

But that first game gained him enough that he's probably in the top 4-5 at the moment on their voting.
Hall, Sinclair and Wilkie are ahead of him, Windhager and NWM around the same

So, basically 1 game gets you top 4-5 after 3 games??
Wow, they are worse than i thought.

Re: Jim Park Award 2026

Reply #19
I had a look at the Saintsational voting for the games so far.
Tom had the second most votes in the Collingwood game-45 under their system
Nothing against Melbourne
and only a handful against GWS to this stage, but they haven't finished voting yet.

But that first game gained him enough that he's probably in the top 4-5 at the moment on their voting.
Hall, Sinclair and Wilkie are ahead of him, Windhager and NWM around the same

So, basically 1 game gets you top 4-5 after 3 games??
Wow, they are worse than i thought.

It's a bit like percentage
A big win in the first three rounds and a couple of close results, gives you an unrealistic percentage.
As the year goes on and more games are played it evens itself out and it's the consistent performers who end up at the top.