Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #15 – March 23, 2026, 01:59:52 pm Quote from: kruddler – on March 23, 2026, 01:42:58 pmQuote from: crashlander – on March 23, 2026, 10:42:54 am Pitto in 3rd says something.I wonder if TDK is 3rd in the saints count at this stage?Or even in the top 10! Probably not, although he was decent enough against GWS.This will be the test for Pitto: if he can keep Gawn from dominating, we should be OK. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #16 – March 23, 2026, 02:54:26 pm Quote from: kruddler – on March 23, 2026, 01:42:58 pmQuote from: crashlander – on March 23, 2026, 10:42:54 am Pitto in 3rd says something.I wonder if TDK is 3rd in the saints count at this stage?Or even in the top 10! He probably will be, will get a pass because the rest of the team is more why they lost than him. Gawn did play better than him, but he put in a shift at least, just not one worth 1.8 million worth. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #17 – March 23, 2026, 04:08:02 pm I had a look at the Saintsational voting for the games so far.Tom had the second most votes in the Collingwood game-45 under their systemNothing against Melbourneand only a handful against GWS to this stage, but they haven't finished voting yet.But that first game gained him enough that he's probably in the top 4-5 at the moment on their voting.Hall, Sinclair and Wilkie are ahead of him, Windhager and NWM around the same Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #18 – March 23, 2026, 04:27:13 pm Quote from: Lods – on March 23, 2026, 04:08:02 pmI had a look at the Saintsational voting for the games so far.Tom had the second most votes in the Collingwood game-45 under their systemNothing against Melbourneand only a handful against GWS to this stage, but they haven't finished voting yet.But that first game gained him enough that he's probably in the top 4-5 at the moment on their voting.Hall, Sinclair and Wilkie are ahead of him, Windhager and NWM around the sameSo, basically 1 game gets you top 4-5 after 3 games??Wow, they are worse than i thought. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #19 – March 23, 2026, 05:09:26 pm Quote from: kruddler – on March 23, 2026, 04:27:13 pmQuote from: Lods – on March 23, 2026, 04:08:02 pmI had a look at the Saintsational voting for the games so far.Tom had the second most votes in the Collingwood game-45 under their systemNothing against Melbourneand only a handful against GWS to this stage, but they haven't finished voting yet.But that first game gained him enough that he's probably in the top 4-5 at the moment on their voting.Hall, Sinclair and Wilkie are ahead of him, Windhager and NWM around the sameSo, basically 1 game gets you top 4-5 after 3 games??Wow, they are worse than i thought.It's a bit like percentageA big win in the first three rounds and a couple of close results, gives you an unrealistic percentage.As the year goes on and more games are played it evens itself out and it's the consistent performers who end up at the top. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #20 – April 02, 2026, 10:14:46 pm AFL 2026 Rd 2: Carlton vs MelbourneI've left the voting thread open, as this is a short week. I'd rather not have to change things, but I will if necessary. I want more people voting, even in disasters like this one.Trends:[1] There were 10 voters this round, which isn't too bad considering how poor we were after half time. Please do voteplease do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate and it makes our statistics a lot more reliable. And our statistics hold up pretty well when it comes to John Nicholls Medal night![2] The rating was a 6.13, which represents a E+, shows juts how frustrated our voters are this week.[3] 15 players managed a mention this week, which is better than last week. But the size of the vote shows how few played 4 quarters.[4] The average vote this week was 20, which again shows significant dissatisfaction with the result and the effort after half time. [5] 4 players managed 100 votes or more this week. This is the best for the year, but the size shows that our players weren't dominant for 4 quarters.[6] Sam Walsh and Jacob Weitering were both BOG's this round with 175 votes. They were followed by Mitch McGovern with 163 and Elijah Hollands with 113. [7] Three player managed votes from everyone this week, Walsh, McGovern and Weitering. Elijah Hollands missed from 1.[8] The distribution of votes this week suggested that we had a rounded performance across the board; everyone fell off after half time.[9] If there was a positive from this disaster, it was the significant contribution from our youngsters. Smith, Dean, Byrne and the Hollands brothers made contributions.Votes:Walsh, Sam 175Weitering, Jacob 175McGovern, Mitchell 163Hollands, Elijah 113Young, Lewis 52Hollands, Oliver 40Cripps, Patrick 37Smith, Jagga 34Byrne, Talor 34Ainsworth, Ben 31Carroll, Matthew 28Dean, Harry 12Pittonet, Marc 9William, Zac 9McKay, Harrison 9Progressive Voting:Walsh, Sam 700Smith, Jagga 394Pittonet, Marc 316Weitering, Jacob 308Patrick Cripps 228Mitch McGovern 199Lord, Cooper 144 Hollands, Elijah 124William, Zac 118Matthew Carroll 97Ainsworth, Ben 65Hollands. Ollie 62Young, Lewis 55Florent, Oliver 53Hewett, George 52Dean, Harry 51Byrne, Talor 34Harry McKay 23Kemp, Brodie 10Will Hayward 8Sam Walsh is the early leader, ahead of Jagga Smith. Pitto in 3rd says something. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #21 – Today at 12:00:00 pm AFL 2026 Rd 4: Carlton vs North MelbourneI've left the voting thread open for longer, because of the short week. But, losing turns voters off.Trends:[1] There were 9 voters this round, which is not good. But then, it is hard to vote when we do so poorly and when the program is so disjointed and unsatisfactory. Please do voteplease do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate and it makes our statistics a lot more reliable. And our statistics hold up pretty well when it comes to John Nicholls Medal night![2] The rating was a 6.93, which represents a D, shows just how frustrated our voters are this week.[3] 17 players managed a mention this week, which is better than last week. But the size of the vote shows how few played 4 quarters. Hard, I guess, when the whole team doesn't play 4 quarters![4] The average vote this week was 23, which again shows significant dissatisfaction with the result and the effort after half time. Scores are around 30 when we win.[5] 4 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which equals last week's effort. [6] Elijah Hollands was both BOG this round with 258 votes. He was followed by Pittonet, McGovern and Ollie Hollands.[7] One player managed votes from everyone this week, Elijah Hollands. None of the others got close.[8] The distribution of votes this week suggested that we had a rounded performance across the board; everyone fell off after half time.[9] The Hollands brothers dominated. But most of our youngsters didn't make the contribution they've done in earlier games.Votes:Hollands, Elijah 258Pittonet, Marc 162McGovern, Mitchell 142Hollands, Oliver 104Kemp, Brodie 69Newman, Nicholas 58Ainsworth, Ben 50Walsh, Sam 31Weitering, Jacob 31Cripps, Patrick 31Boyd, Jordan 27Hewett, George 23Cowan, Lachlan 23Cerra, Adam 12Florent, Oliver 8Evans, Francis 8Smith, Jagga 4Progressive Voting:Walsh, Sam 731Pittonet, Marc 477Smith, Jagga 398Hollands, Elijah 382Mitch McGovern 341Weitering, Jacob 339Patrick Cripps 259Hollands. Ollie 166Lord, Cooper 144 William, Zac 118Ainsworth, Ben 115Matthew Carroll 97Kemp, Brodie 90Hewett, George 75Florent, Oliver 61Young, Lewis 55Newman, Nic 58Dean, Harry 51Byrne, Talor 34Boyd, Jordan 27Harry McKay 23Cowan, Lachie 24Cerra, Adam 12Will Hayward 8Evans, Francis 8Sam Walsh is the early leader, ahead of Marc Pottonet! Considering that we haven't really won the ruck much, that says a lot. Jagga Smith is 3rd. Quote Selected
Topic: Jim Park Award 2026 (Read 14645 times)
previous topic - next topic
Topic: Jim Park Award 2026 (Read 14645 times)
previous topic - next topic